Devan Sabaratnam

12K posts

Devan Sabaratnam banner
Devan Sabaratnam

Devan Sabaratnam

@dsabar

Creator & co-founder of @HRPartner. Serial developer of a plethora of web & mobile apps. Vintage guitar player. Former commercial pilot. EiR at @Catalysr.

Darwin, Australia Katılım Nisan 2008
2.7K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
My talented wife painted this portrait of our son @jordanravimusic to celebrate him releasing his new single “February 14th”. Enjoy the time lapse and the song…
English
1
2
24
5.4K
synabun.ai
synabun.ai@SynabunAI·
@dsabar the bash script was always better. you just paid $3 to confirm it
English
1
0
1
3
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
Was getting frustrated spending 15 seconds running bash scripts for automating code diffing and deployment, so I wrote a Claude Code slash command to do the same. Now I wait 4 or 5 minutes for it to do the exact same thing, AND charge me $$$ for the privilege...
English
1
0
0
39
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@jasonfried Thank you, but the last few months, we have lost customers from our SaaS who are building their own, highly tailored leave request workflows instead of using our own. SaaS won't completely die, but it will bleed quite a bit IMO.
English
0
0
0
13
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
I built bespoke apps for customers for decades. A few that were used for 20+ years. Far from bloated or confusing, it usually did one thing well, *exactly* to fit the customer's use case. No one else, just that one customer. The exact opposite of a SaaS product, which I do now.
Jason Fried@jasonfried

A bespoke software revolution? I don't buy it. It'll exist. It already exists. Small consultants and big consulting firms have made custom software for years. It almost always sucks. It’s bloated, confusing, and because the client pays, it’s built wrong in all the ways. Who’s excited about bespoke software? Software makers! Of course they're excited about building bespoke software — that's what they do. X is full of them. Your feed is full of people who love making software talking about making software. Of course they’re excited about the revolution. Echo, echo, echo... Most people don’t like computers. Nobody in tech wants to say that out loud. People tolerate computers. They use them because they have to. Given the choice, most would rather not think about them at all. So when someone suggests that AI means everyone will build their own custom tools, ask who "everyone" is. The three-person accounting firm drowning in client paperwork? They want the paperwork gone, not a new system to maintain. The regional logistics company with 40 trucks? They want the routes optimized, not Joe spouting off about this new system he’s been messing around with. The law firm billing 70-hour weeks? They want leverage on their time, not a software project to design. They don’t hate technology. But building and maintaining their own critical systems isn’t their wheelhouse, regardless of how much faster and easier it’s become. It's another job on top of the job. Will these people use AI? Absolutely, for all sorts of things. Will some outliers go deep and build real custom systems? Sure, but they're almost always people who already had some pull toward software. The curiosity was already there. They were dabblers before. Giving everyone access to software building tools doesn't mean everyone becomes a builder. A powerful excavator doesn't turn a homeowner into a contractor. Most people just want the hole dug by someone else. They don’t want the responsibility either.

English
1
0
2
523
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
I had set up Marvin the OpenClaw agent recently, with one of his tasks being to watch our support queue for high priority tickets to bring to our attention, but he has turned into somewhat of a support coach with regular positive updates for our team! Unexpected AI side effect.
Devan Sabaratnam tweet media
English
0
0
1
71
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@GergelyOrosz Google started Google Hire 2 years after we launched our HR SaaS. Friends and colleagues told us we were dead in the water. They shut it down a couple of years later (and some of their customers signed up with us). Our (then) 8 person startup outlasted Google!
English
0
0
0
124
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
In 2010 people working at Google would have believed Google will kill most startups when they enter a category. Case in point: Google Flights. It launched in 2011. Should have killed most flight comparison websites + travel agents. Yet today they are doing better than ever…
Yuchen Jin@Yuchenj_UW

Some people at frontier AI labs told me they believe startups are over. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI will absorb every industry as AGI nears. Coding today, science, medicine, and finance next. Then everything else. If they’re right, that’s a pretty boring end of the world.

English
95
105
2.8K
476.5K
Josh Pigford
Josh Pigford@Shpigford·
ummm...do i know anyone at @github? i think my account just got suspended? all sessions logged out and when i try to login it forwards me to github.⁠com/suspended but won't let me do anything/see anything. i've had this (paying) account for nearly 20 years.
English
11
2
47
45.9K
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@theo Wrote my first program that I sold for $$$ using this.
Devan Sabaratnam tweet media
English
0
0
0
279
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
If you recognize this image, I hope you enjoy your upcoming retirement
Theo - t3.gg tweet media
English
551
101
4.5K
629.5K
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@theo Still use it to open massive log files which kills all my other editors.
English
0
0
0
64
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
2024: "Don't waste time adding dark mode to your app, it will suck up too much developer/designer time!!" 2026: "Claude Code just added dark mode to my app in 15 minutes after one prompt..."
English
0
0
0
70
DeveloperSteve
DeveloperSteve@DeveloperSteve·
TLDR; If you are still using Amazon hosting, you are in for a bad time. Move your shit now!
Tech Layoff Tracker@TechLayoffLover

Amazon just confirmed 16,000 layoffs but sources inside are telling me the real story is so much worse Word from three different VPs: the 16K number is just "Phase One" - internal docs show another 14,000 cuts planned for Q2 A director in AWS walked me through their new "efficiency matrix" - entire teams being replaced by 2-3 senior engineers running Claude Sonnet workflows The Alexa division got completely hollowed out. 847 engineers two months ago. 23 remaining after this week. All hardware development moved to a Bangalore team of 31 contractors with Cursor access Here's the sick part: they're making the outgoing engineers document their entire decision-making process into "knowledge transfer sessions" that are being recorded and fed directly into training datasets One L7 told me he spent his final two weeks creating detailed prompt libraries and workflow documentation. Thought he was being helpful for the transition Turns out he was literally training the AI agent that replaced his entire org The contractors offshore are using his exact prompts and shipping features 40% faster than his old team of 12 Americans ever did Internal Slack shows leadership celebrating "operational excellence" while badges get deactivated in real-time They're calling it "right-sizing for the AI era" in the all-hands But the P&L sheets I'm seeing show $280M in salary savings this quarter alone The knowledge extraction is complete If you're still at Amazon and haven't started job hunting, you're already dead

English
3
0
3
828
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@nathanclark_ It's an amazing feeling isn't it? For the past few years, I have had to force myself not to rush straight to my work desk when I wake up but instead stretch, exercise, drink water etc. before doing so.
English
0
0
1
24
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@yongfook For example, when we found out FreshTeam were sunsetting their product, we put out messaging to target their customers, and it resulted in this sort of thing happening with AI searches suggesting our product with links:
Devan Sabaratnam tweet media
English
0
0
2
33
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@yongfook Our marketing team is focusing on optimising our messaging for agents - mainly as "our product is a good alternative for 'x'" because I think most people's queries are asking AI to compare 'x' vs 'y' or "what is better than 'x'". We are getting fairly decent results with it.
English
1
0
2
341
Jon Yongfook
Jon Yongfook@yongfook·
As a B2B SaaS this terrifies me: I have basically stopped clicking on google results. The AI summary is good enough, and for other things I just ask ChatGPT. My business relies on SEO, so my own actions are filling me with existential dread. Currently we are not wildly changing our strategy. I am working under the assumption that as long as we make it good for people (SEO) that's also making it good for bots. I'm also experimenting with youtube content, as I have noticed that my consumption of video content has at least stayed the same or increased, LLMs have not affected that (yet).
English
105
1
207
19.6K
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
Prompt entropy: Your *first* prompt to Claude is a 30 line detailed spec. Your *25th* prompt is basically "fix the damn bug!!!". I don't think coding LLMs are getting worse in as much as coders are just arbitrarily yelling at it and expecting it to understand...
English
0
0
1
75
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@_elzubeir Had that exact same challenge. Also I reserved their firstname.lastname@gmail.com but they initially could not see the value in that. Now they relish it later in life!
English
1
0
1
25
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
Things that prove the world is OK: * I wrote some crappy code * Claude picks up in code review that my code is crappy and suggests a decent improvement * Another (human) coder in our company suggests a MUCH better refactor (which even impressed Claude on re-review) Humans win.
English
0
0
3
70
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
@kokjinsam Mainly just watching the Jenkins build for any issues at this stage, then creating tickets if there are failing tests etc. Thinking of using Kimi more on the development side (i.e. getting Opus to plan the feature, then Kimi to actually build the code).
English
0
0
1
23
Devan Sabaratnam
Devan Sabaratnam@dsabar·
Our small dev team has found a great balance by using multiple agents for coding. One to help write the code (Codex), another to review it right in our Phabricator project management system (Claude), and one to handle build/deploy (Kimi). Like having double our human team.
Devan Sabaratnam tweet media
English
1
0
1
126