David Thompson

23.2K posts

David Thompson banner
David Thompson

David Thompson

@dumbmemore

Think we have traveled far as we age but with true reflection - it is a misconception & we have learn't truly very little just stupidity & excess greed !

SlaveMaster's HQ Katılım Mart 2012
3.3K Takip Edilen528 Takipçiler
John Simpson
John Simpson@JohnSimpsonNews·
US secretary of state Marco Rubio has re-re-stated US war aims. But he’s left out everything we thought President Trump wanted: no opening the Strait of Hormuz, no stopping nuclear enrichment, and certainly no regime change. So what’s the war been for?
English
156
507
2K
73.7K
Reform UK GRASSROOTS 🇬🇧
WE ARE SO LUCKY TO HAVE ZIA AT REFORM UK. HE'S HEAD AND SHOULDERS ABOVE ANY CURRENT POLITICAL FIGURE IN THE UK. HIS MEDIA PERFORMANCES ARE CONSISTENTLY BRILLIANT.
English
553
651
3K
42K
1stclassclips
1stclassclips@1stclassclips·
"You can bet that something is going on with JD Vance. Why? Because JD Vance is being sidelined by the Israelis" Peter Thiel, David Sacks, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson and Joe Kent are all connected, and they are making moves to salvage Vance from a war he supported from the start
Nicholas J. Fuentes@NickJFuentes

There is a major op underway by Team Vance to rescue his 2028 campaign from being torpedoed by Trump’s Iran War. Tucker, Sacks, Kent are all in on it. Follow the money and network, that’s the crew. They want Vance to save the day by brokering the ceasefire and take credit.

English
80
549
3.6K
339K
Jim Ferguson
Jim Ferguson@JimFergusonUK·
🚨 BREAKING: DEFENCE SECRETARY MELTDOWN: HEALEY SHOULD RESIGN NOW This wasn’t an interview… it was a collapse in real time. Stumbling. Repeating himself. Unable to answer basic questions about the fleet he’s supposed to command. “How many ships do we have?” A simple question. And the man responsible for Britain’s defence… couldn’t even answer it cleanly. 17 vessels on paper — but where are they? One deployed. The rest? “Some being repaired.” That’s not reassurance. That’s admission of failure. At a time of rising global tensions, threats in the Middle East, and pressure on NATO… This is the man in charge? Britain is not being led. It is being exposed. This wasn’t just embarrassing — it was dangerous. For the safety of the country, John Healey should resign immediately. Watch the interview and judge for yourself
English
318
1.4K
4.2K
132.3K
The Free Press
The Free Press@TheFP·
Politicians condemn each attack on Jews but do little to fight the ideologies that create the hostility, writes former UK prime minister Tony Blair. Read the full story here: bit.ly/4uQZJC8
The Free Press tweet media
English
116
237
960
114.5K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@toadmeister Foreign money from Thailand is wrong .Your father would turn in his grave!
English
0
0
1
32
Toby Young
Toby Young@toadmeister·
Labour has announced a clampdown on foreign interference that conveniently catches a major Reform donor but swerves around all those who donate to Labour and the Left. Funny that, says Charlotte Gill. dailysceptic.org/2026/03/28/lab…
English
60
1.1K
2.9K
22K
Rhein Amacher
Rhein Amacher@RheinAmacher·
I definitely voted for this! 🫡🇺🇸
English
2.2K
2.6K
14.2K
228.5K
Jim Nauseum 2.0
Jim Nauseum 2.0@jim_nauseum2·
@bbcquestiontime There is a longstanding policy on Question Time to invite Unelected nobody Zia Yusuf on your show more than 4 times in a year (more than any other guest). It's also a longstanding policy on Question Time to invite Reform cheerleaders and not mention it in their bios 👍🏼
Jim Nauseum 2.0 tweet mediaJim Nauseum 2.0 tweet mediaJim Nauseum 2.0 tweet media
English
10
187
814
21.9K
BBC Question Time
BBC Question Time@bbcquestiontime·
There is a longstanding policy on Question Time not to invite MPs on in their local constituencies unless it’s for a single-issue special programme. This is why Mike Tapp MP appeared on the panel in his constituency for the immigration special in Dover.
Mike Tapp MP@MikeTappTweets

I seem to remember being on Question Time, a few months ago, in Dover…my constituency. You were too scared to even put a Reform MP up for tonight it seems. Weak.

English
756
518
3.1K
1.2M
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@ZiaYusufUK Dirty donations , funds , even an Ex GS Banker should be familiar with..
English
0
0
0
3
Zia Yusuf
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK·
🚨 This is a dark day for Britain. Reform receives a large, perfectly lawful donation from a British Citizen, and Labour responds by rushing through a new law to prohibit him from making such a donation again. Rycroft even refers to British citizens as “malign actors” in his report. This is how fast the machinery of government moves when it wants to protect itself. When it comes to securing our borders? Nothing can be done for years at all apparently. This Starmer regime is authoritarian. Cancelling elections, choking off legal funding for its main rival, surveilling speech. Make no mistake, if Reform do not win the next general election, this country is toast.
Zia Yusuf tweet media
English
1.1K
2.6K
9.7K
309.6K
Isabel Oakeshott
Isabel Oakeshott@IsabelOakeshott·
@DrBob_Drop I was a member of the parliamentary Press Gallery for ten years you moron. Look it up.
English
79
6
153
8.9K
Isabel Oakeshott
Isabel Oakeshott@IsabelOakeshott·
IF the Prime Minister cannot or will not answer serious questions, then there is no point in PMQs-it’s just bad theatre. He doesn’t deserve an audience
English
904
801
7K
100.5K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@IsabelOakeshott Stay in Dubai where it is ALL about what ToBuy.. Your record with Con party these past decades like men is a weird condition/ illness..
English
0
0
0
49
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@ZiaYusufUK Zia, The Express is orchestrated Trash for Cash.. Have you any seriousness regarding Politics? What story ?
English
0
0
0
3
Zia Yusuf
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK·
The French are laughing at us. Hopeless Tory and Labour governments have paid them £700 million of British taxpayer money to stop the boats, yet illegal boat crossings skyrocketed. Reform would not pay them another penny and demand a refund for the scam they have perpetrated on the British people.
Zia Yusuf tweet media
English
227
694
2.2K
31.4K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@nadhimzahawi Nadhim cares about what precisely wrkng in 2026 afyer 14 Con years! Those who jumped Conservative Party Ship, are traitors / pirates?
English
0
0
0
20
Nadhim Zahawi
Nadhim Zahawi@nadhimzahawi·
If the PM knew about this, and Morgan must have had to tell him. Then he must resign. This is a massive national security breach. 👇🏽
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

BREAKING Morgan McSweeney did not tell the Metropolitan Police who he was or where he worked when he called 999 after his phone was stolen The Metropolitan Police has released a transcript of the call and said that it was not aware 'of the victims employment or the particular security risks associated with his device or material on it The call took place on 20 October, 2025 at 22.30. McSweeney stated that it was a government phone Here is the verbatim transcript of the call in full: Call handler: Police, what's your emergency? Caller: Oh, hello, someone just robbed my phone. Call handler: Did they actually take it from you just now? Caller: Yeah Call handler: How did they get away? Caller: So he's on a bike. He's come onto the pavement to grab my phone and cycled off on a bike. Call handler: And where did this happen? Caller: It happened in Belgrave Street* in Westminster. *We now know that the incident took place in Belgrave Road, Westminster. The call handler inputs Belgrave Street and it provides a matching road name in Tower Hamlets, which is what is recorded in error. There are further references to locations near to Belgrave Street in Tower Hamlets later in the call, which compounds the issue. Call handler: And whose phone are you using now? Caller: I've got two phones. I'm using my personal one. That was my work one. Call handler: Can I take the phone number for this phone you're calling on? Caller: Yeah, 07XXXXXXXXX. Call handler: Thank you. And you said Belgrave Street, yeah? Caller: Yeah, just kind of going back to the location. Call handler: Don't put yourself at any risk. It's not worth it over a phone. I appreciate it’s frustrating. Call handler: And which way did they go towards, this suspect on a bike? Caller: He went. He travels north. I saw him for a few blocks. Call handler: So where were you when you last saw him? Have you got any idea? Caller: Yeah, so. Call handler: Did you get up to Stepney? Caller: Let me tell you where I got to. I'm just going back to where I can. Caller: So he turned right. Sorry, he turned left. There's a park on top of the road and he turned left there. Call handler: Stepney Green Park, ok. Caller: Yeah. He turned left there. Call handler: Can you remember anything about his appearance? Caller: Yeah, he was young. He was a black guy. He was on a bike. Call handler: About how young? Call handler: Just a guess. Caller: Teens. Late teens. Call handler: Was he skinny, tall, any idea? Caller: Yeah. He was slim. He was about average height. Call handler: Was it an e bike or pedal bike? Caller: Pedal bike. Call handler: Have you got a tracker on the phone at all? Caller: I do. It’s a government phone. Call handler: And it's your work phone. What kind of phone is it? Caller: It’s an iPhone. Call handler: Do you know what model? Caller: I don't. [PAUSE] Call handler: Right, just bear with me a second. Call handler: We would normally deploy to see you but at the moment, we are having extreme demand on police officers. So, I don't know if you would prefer to make your way home and make a crime report over the phone or online tomorrow. I mean, I can complete one with you now. I can pass this down, you can wait, but I honestly do not know how long you'll be waiting, Caller: If I could complete it now that would be good. Call handler: Ok. Call handler: What's your name, please? Caller: My name is XXXXXXXXXX. Call handler: XXXXXXXXXX? (repeats name back) Caller: Yeah. Call handler: And your date of birth, please? Caller: It's XXXXXX Call handler: Is XXXXXXXXX (surname) all one word? Caller: Yeah, (spells surname). Call handler: And what's your home address? Caller: (Provides non-London address) Call handler: So you live in XXXXXX? Caller: Yeah. Call handler: Are you staying anywhere while you're in London? Caller: Yeah. Call handler: Sorry, it just takes a little bit longer to deal with an address outside of the Met. I do apologise. Caller: It’s ok. Call handler: And may I take an email for you please (name)? Caller: Yeah, it's XXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXX.com (personal email address) Call handler: You'll get a copy of the preliminary crime report through to that email. Call handler: How would you like to be contacted by an investigating officer? By email or phone? Caller: Phone, please. Or either, I’m not fussed. Call handler: Have you got any finance apps on the phone? Caller: No. Call handler: You'll need to change any passwords for any logins you do have on the phone. Caller: Yeah, okay. Call handler: You're not vulnerable in any way. Are you? Caller: No I’m not. Call handler: Do you believe there was any CCTV near where the incident happened? Caller: Might be. [Inaudible] away from location. Call handler: Don't worry. Don't return. No, I'll just put at the moment unknown. And obviously, if we find out more, we find out more. Call handler: Are you willing to make a statement to support the investigation? Caller: Definitely. Call handler: So what time did he actually snatch the phone? Caller: About two minutes before I rung you and I chased, and then I rang my office to get the phone tracked and then I rang you. Call handler: Okay, cool. It would have been about 25 past that you were robbed. Caller: A little before, about 23 minutes past, I think. Call handler: 23? Little bit before? Okay. [PAUSE] Call handler: Just bear with me, I’m just trying to get this system to accept the address. Sorry about this. I won't keep you much longer. Call handler: If you do get any tracking updates, what you do is you give us call back if the phone is stationary. Caller: Yeah. Call handler: And we can review attending then. We can't guarantee attending a moving phone at all, but if it's been stationary for a few… Call handler: It’s not accepting your address. Caller: I can give you my London address? Call handler: It’s alright. I've nearly got this to work. Caller: Okay Call handler: How long you staying in London? Caller: So I come to London every week. I work in London. Call handler: Oh, I see. Okay, that makes sense. Caller: So I'll be here till Thursday. Call handler: Okay. [PAUSE] Call handler: As I was trying to say, I've got this sorted now, so I'll be texting you a crime reference number in the next few moments. Along with the crime reference number will be a CHS reference number. If you need to give us a call back, you can call back giving that reference number from any device, and then we'll be able to link it straight away to your crime report and review deploying. We will need to know a bit more details about the phone itself, so when you're contacted by the investigating officer, or if you do get tracking details, you can call us back with the IMEI number, and the type of phone that it is that would be super helpful. Caller: All right, thank you. Call handler: All right, I’m just about to text you through the crime reference number now. Caller: Thank you so much. You’ve been really helpful. Call handler: No worries. All right, (name). You take care now, okay? Bye. Caller: Bye bye.

English
107
262
1.1K
31.9K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@RobertBuckland Smoking Kills and your leader is a nasty fool , to apeal to old biggoted voters this way. Justice folly.
English
1
0
0
413
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
Private credit returns 11.5% on loans that yield 9.5%. Nobody asks how. I'll tell you how: Leverage. They take a portfolio of loans yielding 9.5%, lever it 2x, and the gross return doubles to 19%. Subtract financing costs and fees, hand the client 11.5%, and show them a chart with a line so smooth it would make Madoff jealous. That's the product Wall Street has been selling to pensions, endowments, insurance companies, and now your 401(k). They even gave it a nice name. "Private credit." There's a better name for it: volatility laundering. The returns aren't smooth because the risk is low. They're smooth because nobody is marking anything to market. The same people making the loans are the ones deciding what they're worth. When everything's going up, that's a feature. When it turns? It's a trapdoor. And we're watching the trapdoor open right now. Funds are gating redemptions across the industry. Loans are going from 100 cents on the dollar to zero in a single quarter. The biggest asset managers on earth are telling investors: "Sorry, you can't have your money back." And none of this should surprise anyone who's been paying attention. Every cycle produces the SAME SCHEME wearing a different outfit. Junk bonds in the 80s. Mortgage-backed securities in 2007. Both sold the identical promise - equity-like returns with bond-like stability. Both ended the same way. Private credit is the 2020s version. Bigger numbers. Fancier packaging. Same math. The leverage is the tell. Any time someone shows you returns that look too good for the underlying asset, there's leverage hiding somewhere in the structure. And leverage doesn't create returns... It amplifies outcomes - in both directions. What pisses me off is that the people running this know exactly what they're doing. The risk disclosures are 400 pages long. The gates are buried in footnotes. It's not technically illegal. But doing something because you can get away with it - not because it's right - is a special kind of rotten. After 2008, NOBODY went to jail. Banks paid fines that amounted to rounding errors on their balance sheets. The message was clear: heads you win, tails the taxpayer covers it. So of course they did it again. Why wouldn't they? And here's where the realist in me takes over from the idealist: They're not going to let this blow up cleanly. They NEVER do... The playbook is extend, pretend, and print. Special vehicles. Special accommodations. More liquidity injected into a system that's already drowning in it. Every time they paper over a crisis, they confirm the only trade that matters. Gold pulled back hard this week - from $5,000 to around $4,575. Every shakeout over the past two years has been a buying opportunity. The structural case (debasement, central bank accumulation, collapsing confidence in sovereign debt) hasn't weakened. It's accelerated. The worse private credit gets, the more they'll have to print. And the more they print, the HIGHER gold goes. It's not complicated. It's just math that most people don't want to accept.
English
120
470
2.4K
354.3K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@nadhimzahawi Covid fruad a huge cover up on your watch.. Billions. That is just the beginning to how much cover up 2010 2024... CS links with politicos before implosion..etc. Kurds wealth cleaned in Ealing & byond...
English
0
0
0
14
Nadhim Zahawi
Nadhim Zahawi@nadhimzahawi·
This is a huge cover up, there is no way in the world that the CoS to the PM would have his phone stolen (presumably with an ability to track location) and is treated in this way. Security & Intel Cttee needs to get involved and bring everyone involved as a witness. Where is the Cabinet Secretariat? This is a massive breach of NatSec. and somehow nonchalantly the Police do nothing! 👇🏽
Steven Swinford@Steven_Swinford

The police response to Morgan McSweeney having his phone stolen in October last year seems bizarre As phones go his was about as sensitive as it gets. The number of every cabinet minister and the prime minister. Messages with all of them. Emails, text messages. You name it If you were a hostile state looking for an insight into what was going on in government at that time/ kompromat it's probably about as good as it gets And yet they treated him in the same way as tens of thousands of people are treated every year when their phones are stolen They gave him a crime reference number. Officers didn't speak to him. They didn't conduct an investigation. They just closed the case Now that's not to say they could have tracked down the thief - he was on an e-bike and wearing a balaclava for one. It's just the lack of any further investigation seems odd, although I'm sure it will be familiar to many of the 70,000+ people who reported their mobiles stolen last year More on our podcast The State of It pod.fo/e/3bdacf

English
209
756
2.3K
81K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@ZiaYusufUK Open border polices , free movement ,is what to an ex GS banker? The weird hypocrisy feels like a disease is prevalent.
English
0
0
0
9
Zia Yusuf
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK·
Asking the Home Office for the real cost of Tory and Labour open border policies is *not* terrorism. It’s patriotism. The BBC has lost the plot, and spending license fee money on such propaganda only accelerates the end of a once great institution.
English
46
354
2.1K
18.5K
BBC Politics
BBC Politics@BBCPolitics·
“That wouldn’t be my personal take on it…” Sir James Cleverly MP, Shadow Communities Secretary, on whether Nick Timothy was right to describe a mass Muslim public prayer as an "act of domination". #BBCLauraK
English
48
5
47
54.5K
David Thompson
David Thompson@dumbmemore·
@ZiaYusufUK NadhimZadawhi achieved what with his front bench Con seat position , a kurd who was a traitor on numerous fronts ?
English
0
0
0
4
Zia Yusuf
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK·
The antisemitic attack on volunteer ambulances is a disgusting result of the two tier system we have seen in this country for years. Remember in May 2021, men marauded through North London with a Palestinian flag on their car, screaming: ""F*** the Jews, f*** their daughters, f*** their mothers" "Rape their daughters" 4 men were arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated public order offences. The result? All charges were dropped. Millions in this country saw that sick video, and the CPS simply said there was "no realistic prospect of conviction". This happened under a Tory government. A Tory government that imported millions of people against the wishes of the British people, allowed a two tier policing and justice system to take hold. Now they want praise for pointing to the terrors they inflicted on the British people. The faux outrage from Labour is obvious - many of their Cabinet members fear losing their seats to sectarian candidates). But make no mistake, it was the Tories who created this mess. That's why they belong in the dustbin of history. Reform will end two tier policing and justice. Have 0 tolerance for Islamist extremism. Ensure British jews are not subjected to anti-semitism.
English
198
689
3.7K
67.9K