Easef

349 posts

Easef banner
Easef

Easef

@easefdwalima

believe in the power of coffee

Malaysia Katılım Mayıs 2025
15 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@BlackEagleFund @balajis you think we care bitch? set them up in your country then. mfk acting like you know shit about our country. bunch of useless white bugs
English
0
0
2
69
Black Eagle Litigation Fund
Black Eagle Litigation Fund@BlackEagleFund·
@balajis So typical of Third World - that aspires to look like proper countries, sets up fancy investor-welcome regimes but always slips into disregard for rule of law and fair business practices. They are what they are, bro.
English
6
0
5
798
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
Should the global tech community continue investing in Malaysia? Given recent events, I raise this question respectfully for the consideration of Prime Minister Yang Amat Berhormat Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (@anwaribrahim), for the people of Malaysia, and for our friends in the Malaysian tech community. The answer will be of interest to anyone in global tech that’s considering building, investing, or expanding in Malaysia, including executives at Google, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft, founders of tech unicorns like Coinbase and Solana, and investors at the world’s largest venture capital funds like a16z and Polychain. As context, I am the former CTO of Coinbase and former General Partner at a16z. In October 2024, I opened a startup society called Network School in Malaysia, because I felt I’d been invited in by the government’s pro-tech policies. Specifically, the KL20 initiative set out Malaysia’s ambition of becoming a top 20 global tech hub. Their MDEC digital nomad visas and MM2H investor visas were created to facilitate an influx of global talent and capital. And the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone was announced to facilitate the flow of capital and talent between Malaysia and Singapore, where I live. When taken in combination with Malaysia’s datacenter buildout and its policy of welcoming visa-free visits for 98% of the world, it seemed like Malaysia might be a great place to build a global tech hub that was simultaneously inexpensive and easy to visit (especially for non-Westerners). And that’s what we did, by creating Network School. It’s an international tech community with its first node in Forest City, Malaysia. We picked Forest City because it had millions of square feet of empty space, because it was one hour from Singapore’s capital markets, and because it was within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. Then, within 18 months, without a single penny of government money, we built Network School into a global attraction that brought thousands of engineers, investors, and builders from 70+ countries to learn technology, burn calories, earn online, and have fun, integrating with the local Malaysian economy along the way. Indeed, in terms of quantifiable contribution to the Malaysian economy, we’ve already invested 100M+ MYR in our campus to make it startup-friendly. For perspective, that’s about 4% of the budget of Johor, the Malaysian state where Forest City is located. We employ dozens of Malaysians directly and indirectly at every level from executive to staff. We’ve backed Malaysian tech startups like Collektr, hosted events for local teams like Superteam Malaysia, and are major customers of many local businesses like barbers, laundromats, and restaurants. We’ve also revitalized the multibillion-dollar Forest City project, causing millions of MYR in real estate appreciation. And, as the video below describes, we were on the cusp of a 500M+ MYR expansion to grow our community, as well as a global merit scholarship with my friend Amjad Masad of Replit. However, that emerging multi-billion dollar success story — which should rightfully have been hailed as a huge victory for the pro-tech policies of the Malaysian government — is at risk of being derailed by a fake story spread by an anonymous account named MP4P. In short: on the day before the July 11 Johor elections, MP4P posted an Instagram post falsely accusing Network School of harboring illegal aliens. The sensational accusations caused a tizzy in Malaysia, until Malaysian authorities came to our campus on July 14 to investigate. (I should note that the officers were very polite and professional.) After checking hundreds of physical passports from 40 countries, including dual passport holders, the authorities confirmed to the press on July 15 that all travel documents were in order. During the process, we cooperated fully; in the thread below you can see a photo of the men, women, and children of Network School smiling and holding up their passports in the bright daylight. Our faces are shown and our names are known; we have nothing to hide. With that said, the process is the punishment. What MP4P did is very similar to the American crime of “swatting”, because MP4P created a hoax report of a serious threat, thereby forcing the Malaysian police to take time away from protecting the Malaysian people towards investigating a nonexistent issue. Moreover, this anonymous MP4P account has also called for Malaysia to boycott Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft…a move that would cost ordinary Malaysians thousands of jobs…even while MP4P’s own Instagram collaborators promote their Apple and Google apps! I mean, we aren’t talking about a credible accuser, but just someone screaming inconsistently at the top of their lungs on social media for traffic, an all-too-common phenomenon these days. Anyway, at this point, all further investment we were planning to make in Malaysia is on hold until we get sufficient assurance that such issues won’t recur. So are the investment plans of many of our friends, including the execs and investors at global tech firms that we brought to Forest City. Because to put it very plainly: we have invested 100M+ MYR in Malaysia, while creating jobs for dozens of Malaysians, and our faces and names are known. Our Malaysian executives and employees deserve the benefit of the doubt over anonymous internet trolls. There are two paths forward. In the first case, if Malaysia still wants continued global tech investment, if it wants to be a top 20 tech hub, if it wants us to revitalize Forest City, then we request an audience with the Prime Minister’s office to discuss the terms of a memorandum of understanding between Network School and the Malaysian government, similar to the document recently signed between the Solana Foundation and the Kazakhstan government. Specifics can of course be discussed, but we would publicly commit to abiding by all Malaysian laws (we already do) and respecting Malaysia’s sovereignty (never in question). In return, they’d get to know our friendly community, and realize that we actually chose Malaysia because we thought it was a great place to build a tech hub where engineers from the global South, investors from the West, and builders from Malaysia itself could meet new people, build cool things, and perhaps create millions of dollars in economic growth in the fullness of time. That vision of peace and trade, internationalism and entrepreneurialism, is still on the table. We aren’t asking for any money — just a meeting, to help restore confidence in Malaysia as an investable jurisdiction. Alternatively, if you don’t want our investment, or those of our colleagues at billion dollar funds and trillion dollar companies, we will of course respect your wishes, and reallocate our capital to other countries instead. Either way, we will remain friends and abide by your decision. Please let us know.
English
1.1K
467
3K
2.3M
Chrisanne Chin
Chrisanne Chin@ChrisanneChin·
This is going to hurt Malaysia's reputation as a tech investment hub in a very, very big way. I can't stress enough that politicians need to stop fanning extremist rhetoric and allow toxic fear mongering to spread without wisdom and discipline. You reap what you sow.
Balaji@balajis

As the video below shows, we have nothing to hide. Men, women, and children from 40 countries held up their passports in the bright daylight and were fully cooperative. Malaysian authorities confirmed to the press on July 15 that they checked 266 physical passports in our community, and "all those inspected possessed valid immigration documents."

English
124
14
98
92.4K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@NewsBFM Pos ni company GLC yang CEO mat salleh tu kan?
Indonesia
0
0
0
267
BFM News
BFM News@NewsBFM·
Pos Malaysia will shut down all Pos Shop convenience store outlets effective today as it refocuses on its delivery and logistics business. The company has not given a reason for the closure or said whether affected retail staff will be retrenched or reassigned.
BFM News tweet media
BFM News@NewsBFM

Pos Malaysia recorded its sixth consecutive year of losses, with its net loss widening to RM202.7 million in FY24 from RM157.9 million the previous year, due to higher losses in its retail and convenience store businesses. Revenue declined by 0.9% to RM1.85 billion. 🧵1

English
37
187
422
509K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@shevereshtus Maybe cause they're not committing genocide in Gaza like you 🧃
English
0
0
1
30
Ashton Phoenix
Ashton Phoenix@AshtonPhoeniXXX·
@tankings @aishahsofey Bitch, fly your ass over to Iran, Iraq, or any of them fucking Muslim countries and see how many ninjas are walking around. See how they beat the shit out of him just for showing a strand of hair.
English
3
0
0
254
Aishah Sofey
Aishah Sofey@aishahsofey·
Just because I don’t wear a hijab doesn’t mean I’m not Muslim btw
English
353
47
2.6K
508.4K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@drmicro911 @NancyMace i swear americans are stupid. english is the only language you know but you don't even understand what "expanding what counts as rape" means. how can one person be this stupid. you're sucking the stupidity of your future generations and concentrating them on yourself
English
0
0
2
83
Ron Gehring
Ron Gehring@drmicro911·
@NancyMace Muslims only consider it rape if the goat finishes first
English
4
0
0
1.7K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@kitoile @rajjjjjj69 no one is more obsessed with ai than you ai haters. entah part mana yang nampak macam ai. apa la perasaan kalau designer logo ni nampak orang tuduh guna ai.
Indonesia
0
0
0
117
edward
edward@kitoile·
@rajjjjjj69 semua benda nak guna ai. haram jadah betul
Indonesia
3
0
1
2.1K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@KirbOfThePirate ngl abudi acting soy like that is probably why no one invited him
English
0
0
0
923
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@ah_____sa Just don't get married if you don't want to. no one cares.
English
1
2
61
12.8K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@amdjfr @Same_Sarikei i've been to all 3 of those states you mentioned. studied and worked in semenanjung for over 13 years. have you ever been to sabah? kalau tak pernah takyah nak panggil orang terpaling sangat la bro
English
0
0
0
18
sein_mkh
sein_mkh@amdjfr·
@easefdwalima @Same_Sarikei Concentrated in Klang Valley* Sejak bila Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan maju? You lot talk as if terpaling victim of poor development planning.
Indonesia
1
0
0
84
Same_Sarikei
Same_Sarikei@Same_Sarikei·
Malaysia is too egotistical to learn, to change and to admit its bad policies. It will continue this path until it’s a failed state like South Africa, Venezuela, Sri Lanka etc….
Handre@Handre

In 1965 Malaysia kicked Singapore out of the Malaysian federation, and Tunku Abdul Rahman thought he had won. He had dumped a port city with no oil, no farmland, no fresh water, and two and a half million people crammed onto an island smaller than Lake Tahoe. Sixty years later Singapore's GDP per capita runs past $84,000 while Malaysia limps along under $12,000. The man who got expelled built the richest patch of dirt in Asia. The man who did the expelling built the New Economic Policy. Let's study what happened. Start with what Singapore lacked. No resources. No hinterland. No domestic market worth the name. By every theory that says a nation needs raw materials to prosper, Singapore should have starved. Instead Lee Kuan Yew made his country a place where capital felt safe. Low tariffs. Easy entry for foreign firms. Courts that enforced contracts instead of shaking down the parties. Corporate tax dropped to 17 percent, personal rates capped at 22, no tax on most capital gains. Money flowed in because money is not stupid. Malaysia chose the opposite. The New Economic Policy was racial central planning dressed up as fairness. Bumiputera quotas demanded that ethnic Malays hold 30 percent of corporate equity, that government contracts favor Malay-owned firms, that universities admit by race rather than ability. The state picked winners by bloodline. Predictably, the productive Chinese and Indian minorities took their capital and brains elsewhere, much of it to (where else) Singapore. You distort prices and incentives long enough, the talented people leave. They always leave. Lee Kuan Yew was not perfect. The man jailed opponents, sued journalists into poverty, and ran a soft authoritarian state with a fondness for caning. He banned chewing gum, which is the kind of thing a control freak does when he runs out of real problems. Singapore is no libertarian paradise. The government owns Temasek and GIC, sovereign wealth funds sitting on close to a trillion dollars combined, and public housing covers 80 percent of the population. Plenty there for a free market thinker to dislike. But here is the lesson Malaysia missed. Lee understood the difference between an interventionist government and a parasitic one. Singapore's state stayed mostly out of the price system. It kept inflation low, the currency credible, the bureaucracy clean, and trade open. Transparency International ranks it the fifth least corrupt country on earth. Malaysia sits at 57th, with a former prime minister, Najib Razak, currently serving time for looting 1MDB to the tune of billions. One country treated public office as a trust. The other treated it as a buffet. Capital responds to incentives, not slogans. When Singapore guaranteed property rights and kept the rules predictable, Exxon and Shell built refineries, banks set up regional headquarters, and the port became the busiest transshipment hub in the world. When Malaysia told investors that race would override merit and that the rules could change whenever a minister felt like it, the smart money discounted everything by a risk premium. Over fifty years that premium compounds into a $70,000 gap in living standards.

English
24
17
78
49.2K
ًِ
ًِ@bckupacc99·
😂
ًِ tweet media
QME
7
190
1.4K
95.4K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@Pendekar7935 @budn3kkid @jameschin110 lol i guess yes. sarawak la nampaknya. kunun darah pendekar. tapi mau tapuk location. i'm not even malay semenanjung. heck i'm not even malay. kamu sarawak ni maju oleh orang islam abg joe kamu tapi online semua temberang anti islam hahaha. nda pernah keluar kampung betul 🤣
Indonesia
1
0
0
39
PendekarRahmat
PendekarRahmat@Pendekar7935·
@easefdwalima @budn3kkid @jameschin110 Same semenanjing muslims who criticise christians for using "Allah" in the BM bibles ? who protest against building churches? who gets triggered by tanda salib? Same muslims whos triggered sarawak's tolerance on other religious practices? U expect srwkians to be non-hostiles?
English
1
0
0
49
James Chin
James Chin@jameschin110·
IN THE NEAR FUTURE, EVERTHING KENOT .... WHAT DO YOU THINK? CAN A PERSON ENJOY HIS DRINK IN PUBLIC IF HE IS WALKING ? #JustAsking ❓❓❓🤔🤔🤔 QUOTE. THE phrase “much ado about nothing” is used when someone is over-reacting and makes a big deal of fuss over something unimportant. This certainly seems to be the case regarding an elderly gentlemen’s decision to enjoy a leisurely stroll through an unidentified shopping mall in Melaka while gasp, horror, sipping on a can of beer. This uncle’s insouciance had been interpreted as a slap on the face to Muslim sensitivities as highlighted on several social media domains. First up is Malay-language current affairs site Oh My Media Facebook page which signalled its displeasure by asking since when did public consumption of alcohol was permitted. It was claimed that the uncle had been sounded out over his choice of beverage but chose to ignore it and continued his journey in a hurry. “Didn’t the security personnel notice this?” the poster huffed while demanding that the mall management take appropriate action. There were those who sought to inflame the situation by using this as yet another example of the “kafir harbi” (belligerent infidel) being disrespectful towards the majority yet no action is taken against them. Regardless of the amount consumed, it is the principle that matters as a mall is a public space frequented by people of differing ages and backgrounds. However, such sentiments were on the receiving end of a backlash from netizens who were non-plussed by this holier-than-thou attitude. One commenter highlighted that one singular can of beer wasn’t going to get anyone intoxicated. More than a few highlighted that the uncle was minding his own business and not causing any disturbances to anyone, not least to any Muslims. Was he inviting Muslims for a drink? The split in opinion was exemplified by a couple of comments. One concerned citizen was dismayed that the rights of non-Muslims was being curtailed. On the one hand, it was pointed out that the beer lover was walking – not driving – hence, he should be allowed the pleasure of enjoying his booze peacefully. On the other, it was argued that such behaviour was unacceptable in Malaysia (as opposed to mainland China) where majority of the populace was Muslim. That divide in opinion was further underlined by a slew of comments that reflected the growing schism in society. One commenter argued that alcohol consumption was to be limited to licensed premises and not public spaces. However, this view was seen by another netizen as non-Muslim rights being curtailed even though the uncle in question was not bothering anybody. One can of beer but opposing perspectives. On the one hand, it is entirely reasonable that members of the public demand that, like smoking, consumption of the demon alcohol be confined to appropriate places. On the other, it is very disconcerting that a middle-aged uncle quietly enjoying his singular can of beer in a mall is used as an example of non-Muslim arrogance and insensitivity towards their Muslim compatriots. – July 9, 2026 #Malaysia #PoliticalIslam #Beer focusmalaysia.my/uncle-sipping-…
James Chin tweet media
English
155
21
71
355.7K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@budn3kkid @jameschin110 sarawak is one weird state. a lot of you guys are openly hostile against muslim but you guys sure do love your abang joe jambul
English
1
0
5
511
skewSME
skewSME@budn3kkid·
@jameschin110 This would not be a thing in Sarawak. Only in the West where majority ne'er-do-wells find fault in everything we Nons do. Where non-muslim kids get slapped by a racist Malay old coot because he's offended that Nons don't fast during Ramadan and they make him doubt his religion.
English
9
1
10
5.5K
Ladeez Washarum
Ladeez Washarum@13Mr_Mayhem·
I'm usually not one to brag about skyscrapers because I personally think it's a waste of money and space But if you're planning on winning a "biggest dick competition" and all you have to show is Marina Bay Sands Then bitch you're in for a rude awakening
Ladeez Washarum tweet mediaLadeez Washarum tweet mediaLadeez Washarum tweet mediaLadeez Washarum tweet media
Handre@Handre

Two countries split from the same colonial body in 1965. One picked economic freedom. The other picked handouts and racial spoils. You already know how this ended. Singapore had no oil, no farmland, no hinterland. Just a swamp and a port. Lee Kuan Yew looked at that and trusted trade, low taxes, and hard money. Central planners hate what he did. Malaysia went the other way. In 1971 Kuala Lumpur launched the New Economic Policy, a state program handing quotas, contracts, and university seats to ethnic Malays. Politicians decided who got what. A commissar fantasy dressed in liberal language. Now let's look at the numbers. In 1965 both places sat around $500 per capita. Today Singapore clears $84,000. Malaysia sits near $13,000. Same climate, same starting line, one sixth the result. The Singapore dollar holds its value because the Monetary Authority of Singapore manages it against a currency basket and refuses to print its way out of trouble. The ringgit has lost roughly two thirds of its value against the Singapore dollar since 1981. You cannot subsidize your way to wealth. You cannot redistribute what you never let people produce. Every ringgit funneled through a quota is a ringgit some bureaucrat spent on his own vision instead of a customer's. Malaysia bet on planners deciding outcomes. Singapore bet on people deciding for themselves. The gap between $84,000 and $13,000 is your answer.

English
13
220
1.3K
179.4K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@luxentX menyesal buat pe? not like they have proven track record pun. kalau sebelum ni nak claim pun susah not like anything other than the bigger chunk they're taking away from us changed after lindung 24.
English
2
6
14
1.9K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@mchooyah sounds hella gay. why you tryna wake up another man at 2am?
English
0
0
0
4
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@ladymissazira and why would anyone want a 40 year old earning 3k a month with 5 fig debt leading them? orang banyak hutang ni bahaya sebab desperate. silap silap duit hilang entah ke mana 🤷‍♂️
English
0
0
0
184
Azira 🇲🇾 🌺
Azira 🇲🇾 🌺@ladymissazira·
Why is everyone in disbelief that a 40 year old earns only RM3k per month and has 5 figures in debt? 🤦 It's just below the national median earnings of those between 40-44 year old based on DOSM data of RM 3,664. storage.dosm.gov.my/labour/formal_…
Azira 🇲🇾 🌺 tweet media
English
9
62
133
7.5K
Easef
Easef@easefdwalima·
@chunli7 bukan ni sama macam aquaponic ke?????? what??
Indonesia
0
0
0
92