Igor Fonseca - PROJETO100TI

YouTube is now acting illegally in Europe, and I can prove it. You better read this, @TeamYouTube @YouTube @nealmohan. According to the Digital Services Act in Europe (Articles 14, 15, 17, and 20), YouTube must provide clear, written explanations when taking action against a channel. So here’s what happened. On January 7th, one of my channels was demonetized for “Inauthentic Content.” As usual, the justification was extremely vague, without pinpointing any specific issues across more than 150 videos. Shortly after, other channels were also demonetized for “Related Channel.” Still, I respected the decision. I thought, “Maybe I did something wrong.” So, over the course of 90 days, I deleted all the videos on that channel before reapplying. Two weeks ago, I uploaded three new videos and finished removing the old ones, making sure everything complied with the Inauthentic Content policies on the YouTube Partner Program page. I reapplied with just the 3 new videos on the channel. After two days, the application was still under review. Then something strange happened. It was neither approved nor rejected. Instead, the “Earn” tab reverted to showing that I didn’t meet the 3,000 or 4,000 watch-hour requirement—only my subscribers and 162 public watch hours from the past 12 months. At first, this made sense because I had deleted the previous videos. So I assumed I needed to keep posting compliant content before reapplying. It stayed like that for a week. Today, when I opened YouTube Studio, I saw a message saying my channel was not approved for monetization. But instead of citing “Inauthentic Content,” it now says “Violations of YouTube monetization policies” and links to a general policy page without specifying which policies were violated. So how can a channel reapply if it doesn’t have the required watch hours? How can it be rejected if it couldn’t even reapply in the first place? And all of this seems tied to a broken AI system. I tried contacting YouTube chat support, but the representative kept repeating the same responses. They even suggested I was wrong about being able to reapply without the required hours, claimed there was no manager or supervisor available, and ended the chat without providing any real explanation. As it stands, YouTube is not complying with the European DSA. They are taking actions without proper explanation, affecting not just this channel but others as well. At this point, in case you haven't noticed, you can’t even reapply on other channels after the 90-day period until the original channel issue is resolved. This raises serious concerns about transparency—especially since YouTube claims to refund advertisers, yet provides no proof. I’ve been an advertiser myself and have never received any refunds. Coincidentally, this has also been a period where YouTube has demonetized more creators than ever while launching a record number of new features. I will be taking legal action if @TeamYouTube does not get in touch and have a real person review and resolve my case.

@timdanilovhi Inauthentic snake.

“Hey YouTube, my channel was wrongfully demonetized, I make original videos…” Also videos:

@Dykros Thanks mate!

@ecomnetworkers walking

Get a VA to buy aged accounts Warm the account for 3-5 days, watching content Post a random video Wait 3-5 days and check impressions Keep the accounts with +200 impressions +1k would be ideal Start posting Double down on outliers once get traction Thank me later

Hey @HeyGen what scam is this? Some people are being charged for Avatar III while others aren't? When asked, your support says there are 2 DIFFERENT CREATOR PLANS where one charges credits and the other is unlimited? There's NOTHING like that in the website or any placing specifing 3 credits per minute. Not in faqs, website or user dashboard. And if there are 2 plans why some people were getting charged yesterday and there are not charged anymore today???? PS: Now the support said it was supposed to be free. PS2: Now another one from the support entered the chat and said it was going to send to the Support Team. WTF IS GOING ON?

@thomaas You said warming in April but first upload in May but you posted in April, Im confused lol. You mean warming by posting videos @thomaas ?

> april 20th: testing & warming up the channel > first upload start of may > already getting picked up by the algo now it takes some time, testing and knowledge to get the perfect setup but once you have it, a good portion of channels you try will actually get results the issue without knowing if you're experiencing a shadowban or not is that you never know if a channel is doing no view because 1) the concept (or packaging) is bad 2) it's just because of your setup -> impossible to grow like this on the long run👨‍🍳 you're just gonna get confused more and more and take bad decisions you must have the right setup, its the most important thing rn on youtube

we just started a brand new faceless ultra long form channel with Produce 📈 bought a premonetised channel put it into our CMS generated the first long video with produce .so now we’re testing the niche properly i’ll post updates as it starts getting data goal is simple: $30+ RPM $5k/month faceless ULF channel running on AI comment “ULF” and i’ll send you the playbook.

And who's paying for the "affordable" prices you just announced? The clients who were using Avatar 3 that now are being charged credits for it? Where is the annoucement saying all customers who bought Heygen for the unlimited Avatar 3 generations dont have it unlimited anymore unless they have unlimited money to fund it?

Our Self-Serve API pricing just got a major update Avatar IV video generation → up to 50% lower Video Translation → up to 66% lower Lipsync → up to 33% lower Building with AI video keeps getting cheaper

@HeyGen Barcelona was amazing, now lets break the contracts we have and start charging credits to current customers on Avatar 3 without any warning. Great strategy guys, get ready to lose thousands of customers.

Barcelona was a great night 54 creators joined us at Betahaus for our first Spain community event with HeyGen × Seedance Next stops: Nairobi, Paris, SF, Frankfurt, Milwaukee Sign-ups for the upcoming events open soon

I know why your channel got demonetized unfortunately. Inauthentic content doesn't mean you are not the one recording it. People are idiots, started a trend here on X justifying they are humans creating the content and everyone followed it instead of thinking and reading things right. I did the same. Inauthentic content is also repetitive content. It wasn't demonetized before because no one was checking, the AI moderation now is. How many videos do you have posted about the idea "fan destroying"? 100? That's the same idea milked over and over and over again. Before we used to double down on what worked. Apparently according to AI, we can't anymore. That's it, that's why you got demonetized. Good luck appealing it, hope you get it back somehow.

My Channel was incorrectly demonitized for "Inauthentic Content" I make all of my videos using my Sony cameras, I make very unique videos and copy no one. My videos are 100% original content. 99% of my videos are recorded in my own backyard. No one else makes videos like I do. I use professional camera gear along with using Davinci Resolve Studio to edit all of my videos I've spent almost every night the past 10 years editing my videos which I enjoy doing. I've built a great community of viewers who enjoy my content. My videos do not violate the YouTube Partner Program. I've included my appeal video along with a sped up of my editing workflow and security camera footage of me setting up for a previous video a few weeks ago. I'm a real person, I enjoy making content and the community I have created. Please @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators look into this and have it reviewed internally so I can get back to making my videos without all this stress. I want to stay with the YouTube community ❤️

@sacredstuf Your problem is not the scripts, easy

@BugOfInternet LMAOOOOO

@blakefakhoury CMS

If your channel is demonetized or you want to connect it to the best CMS on YouTube, comment ‘CMS’ and DM me Benefits: 👇 Protection from demonetization and claims Highest trust score possible Videos get pushed quickly Only working with a small number of clients, DM me your channel URL.

@wannercashcow Only AI stories or 1h+ documentaries too?

Anyone doing who is demonetized with AI stories that did 60+ min videos please contact me with your channel URL might have something for you. (Preferably if you can show audience + how much rev u did before) Will reply Monday going to try and get a tan lol

@BugOfInternet @marifaceless Lmaooo I dare you

@marifaceless I'm creating tons of channels about Neal Mohan's AI stories... Neal Tips +50 stories, Neal romance stories, Neal furry stories, etc. If they ban me, let it be like a hero

first youtube purposely delays watch hours to update, they hit you with re-used content / other BS you have to appeal, you finally get monetized they "forget" to enable midrolls then your RPM doesnt update/settle for another week, hits you with inauthentic & reverses pay

@howtopedro Nada a ver, os canais são desmonetizados na mesma. Aconteceu-me em vários emails com conta Premium ativa.

Me gustaría saber si alguien ha sido desmonetizado por contenido inauténtico, en un canal con una suscripción a YouTube Premium activa. ¿A alguno os ha pasado o conocéis a alguien?

@blazinhu @TeamYouTube @YouTube @nealmohan @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider Sim força

@ecomnetworkers @TeamYouTube @YouTube @nealmohan @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider posso chamar no privado? tbm to fazendo reapply

YouTube is now acting illegally in Europe, and I can prove it. You better read this, @TeamYouTube @YouTube @nealmohan. According to the Digital Services Act in Europe (Articles 14, 15, 17, and 20), YouTube must provide clear, written explanations when taking action against a channel. So here’s what happened. On January 7th, one of my channels was demonetized for “Inauthentic Content.” As usual, the justification was extremely vague, without pinpointing any specific issues across more than 150 videos. Shortly after, other channels were also demonetized for “Related Channel.” Still, I respected the decision. I thought, “Maybe I did something wrong.” So, over the course of 90 days, I deleted all the videos on that channel before reapplying. Two weeks ago, I uploaded three new videos and finished removing the old ones, making sure everything complied with the Inauthentic Content policies on the YouTube Partner Program page. I reapplied with just the 3 new videos on the channel. After two days, the application was still under review. Then something strange happened. It was neither approved nor rejected. Instead, the “Earn” tab reverted to showing that I didn’t meet the 3,000 or 4,000 watch-hour requirement—only my subscribers and 162 public watch hours from the past 12 months. At first, this made sense because I had deleted the previous videos. So I assumed I needed to keep posting compliant content before reapplying. It stayed like that for a week. Today, when I opened YouTube Studio, I saw a message saying my channel was not approved for monetization. But instead of citing “Inauthentic Content,” it now says “Violations of YouTube monetization policies” and links to a general policy page without specifying which policies were violated. So how can a channel reapply if it doesn’t have the required watch hours? How can it be rejected if it couldn’t even reapply in the first place? And all of this seems tied to a broken AI system. I tried contacting YouTube chat support, but the representative kept repeating the same responses. They even suggested I was wrong about being able to reapply without the required hours, claimed there was no manager or supervisor available, and ended the chat without providing any real explanation. As it stands, YouTube is not complying with the European DSA. They are taking actions without proper explanation, affecting not just this channel but others as well. At this point, in case you haven't noticed, you can’t even reapply on other channels after the 90-day period until the original channel issue is resolved. This raises serious concerns about transparency—especially since YouTube claims to refund advertisers, yet provides no proof. I’ve been an advertiser myself and have never received any refunds. Coincidentally, this has also been a period where YouTube has demonetized more creators than ever while launching a record number of new features. I will be taking legal action if @TeamYouTube does not get in touch and have a real person review and resolve my case.

@adaviadavis @romayrohyt @eddieeizner Ayo only cool people out there!

YouTube Automation Final Bosses

@PhedEU Lmao

A man was discovered with almost 90% of his brain mass missing, while leading an almost normal life as an inauthentic content policy manager at YouTube.

@TeamYouTube @TeamBeard_Id @TeamYouTube how can you reapply to YPP within 50 days if you need to wait 90?

Hi there! When a channel gets suspended from YPP before the revenue is sent to the linked AdSense acct, its earnings will be put on hold: goo.gle/3NtJlX3 Once monetization gets reinstated, any unpaid revenue will be calculated & credited on the next payment cycle. Make sure your account follows our monetization policies, reapply to YPP, & be accepted within 50 days from your suspension. If you're not accepted within 50 days, accrued revenue goes back to the advertiser

Hi @TeamYouTube, My channel was demonetized on January 12, and my AdSense balance was withdrawn. However, I’ve seen cases where channels demonetized in late December still had their balance credited and not withdrawn. Could you please explain why there is a difference? Thank you.