Spencer

3.9K posts

Spencer banner
Spencer

Spencer

@ecomrat

Building brands

Katılım Ekim 2010
931 Takip Edilen5K Takipçiler
Kamal Razzak
Kamal Razzak@kamal_razzak·
We made a LP creator which connects to our slack (its called isilclaw) just message and get your LP And its creating great LPs Who else has done similar? Would anyone like a guide on how to do it?
Kamal Razzak tweet media
English
14
1
27
3.2K
Zoomer 🧢
Zoomer 🧢@Doomerzoomer·
The rise of the $1 billion one-person startup
Zoomer 🧢 tweet media
English
63
100
973
77.6K
Spencer
Spencer@ecomrat·
even crazier you did this without being the offer owner @JasonKutasi. that's insane volume
English
1
0
3
321
Spencer
Spencer@ecomrat·
Had to check if we'd ever crossed this threshold In December we did a handful of 9k order days with our peak hitting 9,631 orders in a day... so close 🤏
Jason Kutasi@JasonKutasi

You know a big number? I'll tell you one. Three weeks ago, on a Sunday… We were pacing towards 10,000 initial sales in a single day from an ad that had launched three days prior on a Thursday. I've told the story a couple times because it would have been a PR The only guys I know that ran bigger numbers were Jump, hitting Gundry's probiotic. That was like a goal of mine forever I've been in the game a long time and I've thrown some big numbers but this was about to be a big number I've shared the story with a few people and they've all asked, "How did you do it?" And when I think about how we actually did it, there were some nuances about the video. We did this, we did that. There was some secret sauce to be clear but It was one base video, five hooks, three ad accounts Side note: the only reason we didn't hit 10,000 is because we had daily caps on the three ad accounts that I wasn't paying attention to so we were clipped by noon EST But then when they're like, "What's the cheat code? How did you actually do it?" Well some of its luck. Let's not be confused; however luck is not a strategy There are only two ways we got it done I spent more hours practicing the piano than you have You were at the nightclub in your 30s. I was on my computer I've taken more swings at the plate than you have You were at the bar in your 20s. I was at my computer More importantly our client has also spent more time playing the piano and taking swings than you have too If he wants to raise his hand, so be it but I won't call him out. He's a good dude. A good husband. A good father. He has more reps than I do. So does luck play into it? For sure 100%. My biggest day ever was on the heels of my two worst months ever, all things considered. But then I just think back to the guy who bought Bitcoin ten years ago and just made a bunch of money This one guy I know who made more money in Bitcoin than anybody else bought Bitcoin at $5 because he read the white paper on it and thought the technology seemed interesting He was a friend of mine in the college dorms. My point is very simple: take more cuts, take more swings, practice more piano Create your luck

English
3
1
19
3.4K
Fan Bi (buy/ advise $5-50M brands in special sits)
Allbirds sold for $39M. That's not the interesting number. $43M is. That's what their inventory was worth at last count. American Exchange paid $39M for the IP, brand, customer relationships, and all remaining inventory. The inventory alone was worth more than the purchase price. That's not a brand acquisition. That's a liquidation with a logo attached. The capital timeline: $200M+ private capital $348M IPO $4B+ peak valuation $550M+ consumed Exit: $39M Revenue peaked at $297M in 2022. By 2025: $152M. Burning $0.45 of every dollar of revenue. Here's what nobody is saying: When a consumer brand reaches this point, cash depleting, revenue declining, burn rate compounding, the buyer knows the inventory is the floor. The brand, the IP, the customer list? Optionality they're getting for free. Distressed consumer exits don't get priced on revenue. They get priced on what's left on the balance sheet. Inventory, in this case. $43M worth.
Fan Bi (buy/ advise $5-50M brands in special sits) tweet media
English
10
5
49
12.6K
Ben Corkery
Ben Corkery@ecom_cork·
Rambled for 17 minutes on making a million dollars.
Ben Corkery tweet media
English
1
1
20
1.7K
Nick Shackelford
Nick Shackelford@iamshackelford·
I'm seeing a lot of chatter about not connecting Claude or GPT or tools to your Meta or Google accounts because you're getting banned. Does anybody have any thoughts on this or ways that you're getting around it or do I just have to use manas?
English
27
1
48
17.5K
Ash
Ash@ashvinmelwani·
META Last 3-4 Days = ASS
English
54
2
230
63K
Spencer
Spencer@ecomrat·
@natelagos system user token vs. personal oauth token should avoid any issues here
English
0
0
3
765
Jacob
Jacob@jforjacob·
I am far more productive lying in bed with my laptop than I am at a desk At a desk I just seem to constantly fidget, adjust myself and change position etc In bed I can legit just lie there working for like 6 hours without moving
English
56
7
394
57.7K
Ryan Clogg
Ryan Clogg@RyanClogg·
Who has the best community on Claude/AI for work? Drop the link.
English
12
2
71
12.8K
Spencer
Spencer@ecomrat·
@oliverbrocato @Bustem George hooked me up too. Is he still on here?? I thought his account got suspended lol
English
0
0
0
371
Cody Plofker
Cody Plofker@codyplof·
Anyone set up claude code for influencer sourcing? Or open claw in combo with it?
English
30
1
71
20.5K
Cody Schneider
Cody Schneider@codyschneider·
I just had Claude Code build me a Facebook ad generator that can make 100+ on-brand ad variations in minutes for $0. And I made a full Notion document guide for you. It includes: 1. How to use Claude to find the pain points and desired outcomes of your ICP 2. How to use these pain points and outcomes to write ad copy variations 3. How to build a Facebook ad template entirely with code (just like the ones you see) 4. How focus Claude Code’s design so the ad feels “on-brand” 5. How to export the Facebook ads as PNGs in a zip file 6. How to bulk upload them to a Facebook ad set 7. How to use an AI data analyst to track the success of these ads Everything above is just API calls and Claude Code doing the work for you. You just come up with the ideas and polish the outputs. Like and comment "generator" and I'll send the Notion document to you
Cody Schneider tweet media
English
1.3K
49
1.6K
86K
navuud
navuud@navuud·
My wife can barely find the settings app on her phone. her @openclaw bot just built her a telegram app and she calls it "her headquarters" this is the future and it looks nothing like what tech twitter thinks it does @steipete 🙏
English
1
0
1
564
Edd Chalk
Edd Chalk@EddChalk·
My OpenClaw ships banger ad briefs while I sleep. Production-ready briefs. Scored. Validated through a QA skill tree. And I am going to show you how to set it up in return for a little bit of clout Here's what's actually running while I'm asleep. OpenClaw has a skill graph. Three AI agents connected in sequence — each one feeds the next, and nothing moves forward until it passes. The first agent is pure research. It's scraping the Meta Ad Library pulling 5–10 active competitor ads, extracting repeating hooks, mapping visual patterns, documenting copy structures, and analysing CTA approaches (offer vs urgency vs curiosity). At the same time it's running Golden Pain Extraction — pulling verbatim emotional language from Amazon 3-star reviews, Reddit threads, TikTok comments on competitor videos, and customer service logs. Not summaries. Exact words real customers used. Each pain gets tagged and mapped to one of the 8 Life Force drives. Then it runs an asset audit — lifestyle product shots, founder content, UGC, testimonials, before/afters. Everything gets catalogued. All of that gets compiled into a research document. Competitor analysis. Golden Pains mapped to LFE8. Dream outcomes. Available assets. Recommended angles. That document feeds the second agent — the brief writer. It builds static briefs: 3 copy variations per brief, each with Headline + Subline + CTA. Left side: 3 USPs. Right side: Feature → Benefit mapping x3. Visual direction, do's and don'ts, product URL, primary image, drive assets — all included. It builds video briefs: 3 hook variations per brief, each broken into Text Hook + Visual Hook + Audio Hook + Why It Works. Then 3 full timed body scripts — [0–3s] Hook → [3–8s] Setup → [8–15s] Product → [15–18s] Proof → [18–20s] CTA. The 3-Second Formula is embedded at the writing stage. Second 0–1: Triple Stack (visual hook, text hook, audio hook firing simultaneously). Second 1–3: The Promise. Second 3–5: The Rehook. If the structure doesn't hit those timings, it doesn't get written. Every brief then hits the QA agent. This is where most of them die. Validation checklist: 10 Golden Rules scored out of 10. Minimum 7 to pass. Score below 7? It doesn't get sent to me. It gets rejected back to the brief writer with specific fix notes. Not a soft pass. A directed rewrite. The loop runs until it passes. Only when a brief clears every node does it hit my Telegram. 6 production-ready briefs. 3 static. 3 video. Validated hooks. Fresh angles built from real market intelligence. Ready for designer handoff → testing → iteration → scale. No docs opened. No prompts written. No hours wasted. I've scaled 50+ brands to 7 and 8 figures at MHI Media. I mapped the full skill tree — every agent, every node, every framework, every validation gate. Like + Repost + Comment "CLOUT" and I'll send it over. (Follow me so I can DM you) Screenshot not revelant but the last 30 days aint too bad.
Edd Chalk tweet media
English
492
238
505
45.2K
Shaun Eng
Shaun Eng@shauneng·
A lot of Ecom brands scaling super fast (8-9 fig/yr run rate) rely on aggressive Direct Response marketing Most can't exit for huge multipliers. Even brands crushing TikTok Shop are too uncompliant. And no - adding MRR doesn't instantly mean a big exit. Unless you're approaching your brand product-first and adding killer marketing on top, a 9-figure+ exit is unlikely from what I've seen (could be wrong) At that scale, most investors want Level 2.5+ compliance. Most DR-heavy brands are nowhere near that - and changing it up means revenue tanks. Too risky. The CPG brands I know that exited for 9 figs+ are usually close to Level 3 compliant (if DTC heavy), or heavy into retail. Level 3 Compliance – Bulletproof / Enterprise-Grade - Clinical studies or third-party testing supporting claims - Legal review of all ad copy and landing pages - Proper substantiation files maintained - Full TCPA compliance for SMS - Documented compliance processes - Ready to withstand an FTC investigation or NAD challenge MAJORITY of brands aren't even close to Level 2. I would say Ryze is around Level 1.5+. PetLabCo around Level 2.5+ (and exited). At this compliance level, you can't make many claims. The only way to keep scaling online at Level 2.5+: - A f*cking good product with strong clinicals so you can make real claims - Enough distribution to market a "boring" product (celebrity brands - existing audience) Hailey Bieber's cosmetic brand Rhode exited for a $1B deal, for example And IM8 did $100M ARR their first year at level 2.5+. But it also took them 2 years and millions on product development to get it right from the start. I've seen DR-heavy brand owners doing 9 figs/year struggle to exit health gadget brands because of compliance risk. Even after adding MRR through aggressive greyhat tactics. To be clear, you can have a great "white hat" brand, but that doesn't mean it's fully compliant. And you don't have to maintain such strict compliance right at the get-go. Most brands gradually transition. Not everyone's goal is to exit. You can still have a great cashflow business, and you can still exit for a good 8 figures. But if a 9 fig exit is the goal: Product-first. Compliant. Then you're exit-ready.
Drew Fallon@drewfallon12

i have bad news DTC twitter isn’t gonna like this, but i reviewed the data In the last 4 years (extent of my data), not one founder/ceo who has achieved a publicly disclosed 9 figure exit in consumer was a digital marketer by trade / spent most of their time on ads Mostly product (think dermatologist, influencer) or straight business people you’re focused on the wrong thing

English
26
10
266
32.7K