Simba (Egide)

15.9K posts

Simba (Egide) banner
Simba (Egide)

Simba (Egide)

@egidesimba

Investor & Trader | Multi-Founder | Consultant | Advisor | Web3 Pioneer | DM for Inquiries

United States Katılım Aralık 2020
1.4K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
Satoshi said it himself in 2010 — Bitcoin would be far more powerful if you could prove without revealing He just couldn’t see a way around the double-spend problem back then Fast forward to 2025 Zero-knowledge proofs made that vision real Thanks to innovations like @zkPass , we can now verify without exposing anything The point of crypto was never transparency — it was verifiability and distributed trust And that no longer requires giving up privacy Proof > Disclosure Explore how @zkyctech , powered by zkPass, brings this to life — verifiable privacy for the new internet.
zKYC@zkyctech

“Just one more KYC” That’s what they all said. Don’t KYC. Prove with zKYC.

English
3
1
6
544
Barry
Barry@BarryOnHere·
The Harden vs Wade debate has always been complicated. Harden's regular season career is so far above Wade's that it would take Harden being an unfathomably horrible big game performer to cancel it out.......but as it happens, that's exactly what he is. If Harden had just ONE (1) title run to fall back on, the debate wouldn't even be close, but he choked away so many chances it's disgusting. For the record, Wade's playoff career after 2006 without LeBron isn't good, BUT his 2006 Finals is so much better than anything playoff Harden ever did it's impossible to ignore. It's the ultimate trump card. The best way I can sum it up is: Wade was better in big games, but Harden was better at getting his teams to big games, he just wasn't very good in the games themselves. I'll take Wade by a hair, but I think people overlook the value in Harden's floor raising ability as a 1 man offensive engine during his prime.
English
136
124
2K
163.8K
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
@WhozMEECH Imagine putting Shai in the same conversation as Wade smh 🤦
English
0
0
1
102
Whoz Meech
Whoz Meech@WhozMEECH·
Peak Wade is over Shai to me. SGA is a better shooter yes. But Wade is more dynamic and won a championship with less in 2006. SGA won with one of the better constructed teams in recent memory. Wade is a lot more explosive and better defensively. Wade didn’t foul bait nearly as much and was an elite scorer of the basketball in a much tougher league where there was no space. Outside of Jordan, Wade may be the best slashing guard in NBA history. That along with his intangibles and supreme athleticism at 6’4” is why he couldn’t be contained. He was too fast and too smart and an underrated passer and creator. If I had an option I’d easily go Wade. Even though SGA is a supreme player. But I saw Wade do what he does against good defense and not a league that totally caters to the offensive players. So with that it’s hard to compare eras so I totally understand the younger generation disagreeing with me.
English
95
181
1.3K
85.3K
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Drop what you're doing and read this post Anthropic is about to release the most powerful AI model ever created. Claude Mythos It's so powerful they consider it a danger to cybersecurity everywhere It will also be significantly more expensive than Opus I don't know your financial situation, but I do know this: we are entering the era of humanity where having money is going to give you signficantly more power than those without money Those without money will not be able to create nearly the same economic value as those that already have money because they won't have access to this kind of super intelligence, widening the gaps even further This is where the concept of a permanent underclass comes from If you want to keep up in this economic race you have to be willing to do 1 of 2 things: 1. Spend the money necessary to use this intelligence to create value 2. Procure the money you need to use this intelligence to create value The people who go out and immediately use this model to create business, products, and services will experience unmatched wealth Both the scariest and most exciting time ever
M1@M1Astra

Claude Mythos Blog Post Saved before it was taken down. m1astra-mythos.pages.dev

English
151
63
820
158.1K
Simba (Egide) retweetledi
SΛGΞWHΛLΞ.HL✦
SΛGΞWHΛLΞ.HL✦@SageWhale·
Hyperliquid just became the most profitable chain on the planet in the last 24 hours hyperliquid generated more fees than ethereum, solana, bitcoin and BNB chain combined With just 11 employees, no VCs or marketing
SΛGΞWHΛLΞ.HL✦ tweet media
English
154
192
1.8K
146.5K
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
The Crypto market has not looked this good for a while When ETH starts to move and lead the major caps, good things tend to happen
GIF
English
0
0
1
40
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
Okay, imagine you're a little kid with some candy money, and you really want a super cool drawing of a dragon that your friend knows how to make. But... you don't totally trust your friend yet. What if you give the money first and they never draw the dragon? Or what if they draw it, but you say "nah, that's not good" and keep the money? That would be mean and unfair. So grown-ups made a magic toy box (it's actually a special computer rule on Ethereum, called ERC-8183) that works like this: 1. You put your candy money inside the magic box and say: "This is for a dragon picture!" 2. Your friend sees it, says "okay!" and draws the awesome dragon. 3. They put the finished picture (or a secret code that proves it's done) into the box too. 4. Now a fair judge (could be a smart robot, another super-honest friend, or even a computer checker) looks at it and decides: "Yup, that's a great dragon!" → box opens and gives the money to your friend. "Nope, that's just a squiggle!" → box gives your money back to you. 5. If nobody checks in time, the box just gives your money back automatically. No one can steal it. Everyone follows the same toy-box rules, so no big boss or company controls it and it's fair for all the robot friends (AI agents) too, not just kids. Robots can hire other robots to do jobs (make pictures, count money, write stories) and pay each other safely without anyone cheating. It's like turning "trust me bro" into "the magic box promises it's fair" so lots of smart computer friends can buy and sell stuff from each other super fast, all over the world, without needing a grown-up in the middle. That's what this new rule (ERC-8183) is for. Helping AI robots have their own fair playground economy!
Virtuals Protocol@virtuals_io

x.com/i/article/2030…

English
1
0
3
46
zKYC
zKYC@zkyctech·
@The_Cyber_News “AI will replace humans" AI: global outage
English
1
0
4
189
Cyber Security News
Cyber Security News@The_Cyber_News·
Claude AI Suffers Global Outage Source: cybersecuritynews.com/claude-ai-suff… On March 2, 2026, Anthropic's artificial intelligence assistant, Claude, experienced a significant global outage that disrupted workflows for users and developers worldwide. Organizations relying on the AI model for daily threat intelligence reporting, code generation, and automated security analysis faced temporary operational downtime as the platform struggled with elevated error rates. The technical difficulties initiated around 11:49 UTC, prompting Anthropic engineers to launch an immediate investigation into widespread user reports of failing services. #claudeisdown
Cyber Security News tweet media
English
19
73
218
16.7K
Jimmy
Jimmy@Jim_buildr·
a very good morning to all the fellow survivors 💪 remember everyone called crypto dead in 2018 and 2022 bear is a reminder to stay true to yourself for me it's discovering new inspiring places in Saïgon like this beautiful lake in District 7 😎 or minding @PerceptronNTWK 🤣
Jimmy tweet media
English
19
0
31
506
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
@Jim_buildr Jimmy my bro!! Hope you are doing well fam Only thing I can think of is building an AI agent army and putting them to work🤣 At the same time contemplating on how society will function when machines reduce human labor to zero
English
1
0
1
10
Jimmy
Jimmy@Jim_buildr·
@egidesimba Simbaaaa is baaaaack ser how to profit from this
English
1
0
1
9
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
Excellent and thought proving post. Would agree with 90% of the predictions Artificial intelligence will flip our world upside down and the world is not ready for that tsunami that is coming
Citrini@citrini

JUNE 2028. The S&P is down 38% from its highs. Unemployment just printed 10.2%. Private credit is unraveling. Prime mortgages are cracking. AI didn’t disappoint. It exceeded every expectation. What happened?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ citriniresearch.com/p/2028gic

English
2
0
2
56
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
@Citrini7 Couple polymarket bets can come out of this article. Well done
English
0
0
1
78
Citrini
Citrini@citrini·
JUNE 2028. The S&P is down 38% from its highs. Unemployment just printed 10.2%. Private credit is unraveling. Prime mortgages are cracking. AI didn’t disappoint. It exceeded every expectation. What happened?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ citriniresearch.com/p/2028gic
English
1.9K
4.3K
27.9K
28.6M
Barack Obama
Barack Obama@BarackObama·
Today, the Trump administration repealed the endangerment finding: the ruling that served as the basis for limits on tailpipe emissions and power plant rules. Without it, we’ll be less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change — all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.
English
45.9K
47.5K
397.2K
72.8M
Simba (Egide)
Simba (Egide)@egidesimba·
@zkyctech Verification without exposure → scalable trust 🔥
English
0
0
1
14
zKYC
zKYC@zkyctech·
Great breakdown. “No KYC” crypto cards aren’t a product... they’re a marketing phrase. They skip compliance, not verification. Compliance isn’t optional, and it doesn’t go away just because a card claims it. If you want trust at scale, you need verifiable eligibility, not repeated data collection and leaks. That’s why proof-based models like zKYC matter: confirm compliance without storing more identity data. Verification without exposure → scalable trust.
zKYC tweet media
Pavel Matveev@matveevp

x.com/i/article/2020…

English
2
1
9
259
Lefteris Karapetsas
Lefteris Karapetsas@LefterisJP·
Fatality. Had no idea @sumsub was also hacked. By now they should just rename KYC, to KYV (Know Your Victim) and realize that all this "compliance" is just creating a gazillion different honeypots of data, weaponized against us by criminals.
ZachXBT@zachxbt

@sumsub A bit tone deaf to publish an article on other company incidents when Sumsub just disclosed a threat actor had access to sensitive data that went undetected for 1.5 yrs.

English
25
64
531
101.4K
Simba (Egide) retweetledi
zKYC
zKYC@zkyctech·
Biometric scans shouldn’t be the price of access. Discord requiring face scans or IDs for full access raises the real question: why are we still solving trust by collecting more permanent data? Age verification doesn’t require storing identities. With zero-knowledge verification, you can prove eligibility without exposing who you are. Less data. Less risk. Better compliance. That’s what zKYC is built for.
Disclose.tv@disclosetv

JUST IN - Discord to globally require a bio-metric face scan or ID verification for full access next month to protect "teen safety." — Verge

English
20
7
52
7.2K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
It's a good decision! ENS names and records are a form of state that is central to the Ethereum ecosystem, the state is limited in size and there is high value in it being as accessible as possible from anywhere. It's also a semi-financial application, in the sense that buying and holding ENS names has a cost, and ENS names can become very valuable objects. With the expanded scaling roadmap, Ethereum L1 is the ideal place for these applications. More generally, I expect that the optimal architecture for decentralized identity and social (the general space I see ENS being in) is to have this kind of per-user account and profile data on L1, and to have special-purpose L2s, likely much simpler than full EVMs, to handle user actions (eg. actions on social platforms).
Katherine Wu | katherine.eth@katherinewu

A quick update on ENSv2: we have made the decision to deploy ENSv2 exclusively on Ethereum L1 and to cease development of Namechain. To be clear, ENSv2 will still ship. The only thing that’s changed is that instead of deploying ENSv2 on our own L2 stack, it will be deployed on L1. It is important to note that ENSv2 is ultimately an upgrade to ENS as it exists today — it’s still ENS! Regardless of where it ultimately gets deployed, it does not fundamentally change ENS the protocol nor does it change any part of our mission and ultimate goal of building the identity layer on Ethereum. The design for ENSv2 was always intended to work fully as designed, whether deployed on L1 or L2. Our product roadmap does not change. We have detailed progress on the ENSv2 Hub to show what exactly v2 will mean for you, and what the team has been building: giving each name its own registry (making your .eth names more powerful and customizable to your own rules!), building two brand new apps from the ground up (both deployed to testnet this week), and much more. I am so excited for this release (soon!) and think it will completely change the way you interact with your own ENS names. The timing of this decision coincides with a broader discussion about the role of L2s in Ethereum. I continue to believe that L2s play a vital role in extending the value of the world computer that is Ethereum, and ENS will continue to support as many chains as possible. In fact, very soon anyone will be able to register a .eth name regardless of which EVM chain they are on — meaning that even if your assets live on Optimism or Arbitrum, it’s a one-click process (no bridge, no gas tokens). We also continue to believe in a multi-chain world beyond EVM chains (a reminder that ENS has and always will support your addresses across major chains like Solana, Bitcoin, and more). We have published the detailed rationale for the decision to stay on L1 on our blog, and I encourage you to read it (in the QT here!) The .eth stays on 🫡

English
483
329
2.2K
389.7K