2x Old Beef

149 posts

2x Old Beef banner
2x Old Beef

2x Old Beef

@elderbeef

Hot Garlic Beef

Canada Katılım Ekim 2024
33 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@TyrantOppressor I think people don’t respect and understand the struggle India has to deal with of managing a complex democratic society that is the largest on earth wirh deep complex ancient and modern issues. I think they see what they want to see and choose to see poverty and assume choice.
English
0
0
0
7
Oppressor
Oppressor@TyrantOppressor·
What exactly caused this, and who is responsible ?
Oppressor tweet media
English
369
131
759
27.1K
Nora
Nora@Heal_within96·
People always ask: "How did giant Africans like this man get enslaved?" It's simple (1) Advanced weapons and (2) traitors who sold them.
English
161
40
212
11.3K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@BrumeMofeDamijo @MarioNawfal Yeah. the gulf strategy is flood market with cheaper to produce better quality oil, and USA is to constrain oil and raise price of oil to make their lower quality expensive to produce and good quality expensive to frack oil profitable. USA prefer it to be in a sweet spot of 80$
English
0
0
0
45
Brume Mofe-Damijo
Brume Mofe-Damijo@BrumeMofeDamijo·
@MarioNawfal Numbers don’t lie… power follows production. The top three are not just producing oil, they’re shaping the game.
English
1
0
0
1.6K
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
Insane way of portraying how much oil each country produces. Numbers and "heights" are shocking. If you look at the top 3, you start to understand who benefits most from this war 🇺🇸U.S over 20M 🇸🇦Saudi over 11M (cannot 100% export atm) 🇷🇺Russia over 10M
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Jake Sullivan on Iran: “A broken Iran is less of a threat to Israel… [but to the U.S.] it means a broken global economy” Same situation, different priorities.

English
50
258
1.1K
413.6K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@0xMaximus_Kek @mymonkey0000 @MarioNawfal Only if they could supply the whole Planet, and for cheaper than the current methods, could they realistically subsidize gas prices at the pumps. The usa makes tons of money but it is more likely to fund the war machine, they tax the pump and sell oil highest bidder
English
0
0
0
44
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@mymonkey0000 @MarioNawfal They don’t need to get the oil, they just need to make the world not trust the gulf strait or irán oil as reliable and jack the price of oil up. That makes them more money per barrel and forces countries to buy USA crude oil. Gulf oil is only 5-15$ a barrel cost to produce.
English
0
0
0
60
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@mymonkey0000 @MarioNawfal USA produces the most oil but it focuses on the bottleneck of difficult ti refine heavy crude and difficult to pump shale light sweet crude. This means USA needs oil to be above 60$ a barrel to be truly profitable. Higher the price, the more they have advantage.
English
1
0
0
54
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@MbarkCherguia Who cares, many American foods are eating by hand. India has flavour. Imagine spending your life not experiencing flavour.
English
0
0
0
8
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺@MbarkCherguia·
Can someone please explain the whole eating with your hands thing? Why not use utensils? 🤔🍴
English
463
20
126
14.9K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@Azure_Myst @HellArn__ @Foreman1David @elbichobichejo @iAnonPatriot I know. Until the gold flowed in, then was released and even honoured in the courts as a hero. But Spanish were very different from the British and French and Portuguese. They were, in my opinion, the least destructive culturally to the populations and wanted integration the most
English
0
0
0
13
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@Azure_Myst @HellArn__ @Foreman1David @elbichobichejo @iAnonPatriot Never heard of these black or pink legends but sounds culty... What does English or USA have to do with anything? they were even worse. I’ve never read any “US” history on the Spanish. There are tons of people that have real oral and written histories living across the Americas.
English
0
0
0
15
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@Farshidi0m @StateDept … The states has over 500 million Civilian guns. They could do a gun drive and drone release guns all over the streets with hopeful messages attached. (Not actually serious) already enough death. Hopefully people can find a resolution that brings lasting peace.
English
0
0
0
24
Farshid
Farshid@Farshidi0m·
The people of Iran are fully ready to overthrow the Islamic Republic today. Repressive forces are threatening civilians with military-grade weapons in the streets and are prepared to kill protesters. If the US and Israeli forces eliminate these repressive units, the Iranian people will bravely take to the streets and seize the cities.
Farshid tweet media
English
31
9
49
4.4K
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
PRESIDENT TRUMP: There won’t be any nuclear weapons. Iran has agreed to that. We’re in a good bargaining position. We’re way ahead of schedule and they have no navy, air force, or missile protection. Most of their launches we’ve killed.
English
1.2K
1.7K
9.3K
387K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@AULaw24 @Mahesh10816 @talk_2_ankit The relevance of these or something similar will actually be restored with drone swarms as floating islands capable of docking and launching huge amounts of drones, and can have cheap effective drone interceptor nets at different layers of distance around the ship
English
0
0
0
39
Antonio Falconieri
Antonio Falconieri@AULaw24·
No, it hasn’t …that’s ridiculous but it has kept them at a distance and you have to remember that the aircraft carrier became the centerpiece of the United States Navy in World War II but it’s primary job was to win naval battles. Did it provide support during the island hopping campaign …of course it did. It was floating airbase and when the target was an island it was effective. In addition during the Korean and Vietnam wars they were convenient weapon platforms as floating airbases as well - because neither of those conflicts involved countries that had the weapons or will to try to attack American aircraft carriers at sea. But the times have changed. Even little pipsqueak countries can strike aircraft carriers at a distance where their strike faighter squadron are effective and then comes the cost effectiveness issue. At the end of it all the “pointy end“ of the entire carrier strike group is 3 to 4 squadrons of strike fighters. At least one of those squadrons is going to be partly down for repairs or assigned as a reserve squadron and/or up on combat air patrol or ready alert. That leaves you at the maximum with three squad in a strike fighters to bring the war home to the enemy. That’s just not what the carrier was originally designed to do and if you look at the contribution of carriers to the war on Japan at the end of 1945 they were helpful but not necessary when it came to attacking the Japanese Home Islands. So now essentially, we view them still as these massive pieces of power projection went quite frankly three squad ends of F/A 18s just isn’t a war winning tool. And of course, in the meantime, their escorts can be run out of defensive weaponry very very quickly by countries the 15 years ago didn’t even have the weapons to consider doing that at the range of which of the carrier would operated an optimal level(being able to strike targets without air to air refueling) So when you look at the cost of building these things - the relatively small punch that they carry (and the fact that a very good portion of the rest of your surface warfare units are there to protect aircraft carriers to deliver that relatively small punch) they just make a very poor investment for a huge naval budget. Until we develop directed energy air and missile defense weapons that actually works all the time against every level of threat, I don’t see a real place for surface warfare units of any kind as instruments of major force projection against enemy nations. Do we still need them for war at sea? Yes, but probably not a carrier based Navy anymore. New under sea warfare technology is where naval war will be won or lost and quite frankly a large enough submarine can carry a hell of a lot of striking power. When you start looking at the problems, the US had off of Yemen you can really understand how things have changed.
English
3
0
12
1.9K
Mahesh 🇮🇳
Mahesh 🇮🇳@Mahesh10816·
Aircraft carriers are obsolete ideas, in this age of hypersonic missiles, they are sitting ducks used for target practice. Move ahead of the time, don't waste tax payers money on obsolete platforms
English
402
135
1.5K
103.1K
Link651 PackersGo
Link651 PackersGo@Link6513·
@elderbeef @ent_socal @FoodPleaser What dumbass stupid shit is this? You must have an IQ of 10. I'm losing IQ points talking with you. You don't even have your picture as your profile picture. You must be ugly as a shit too.
GIF
English
1
0
0
12
Food Pleaser
Food Pleaser@FoodPleaser·
Boiled Chicken, White Rice, Plain Greek Yogurt. What’s missing here? 🍗 🍚
Food Pleaser tweet media
English
557
12
199
50.6K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@Richard90Ti Realistically we are dumbing trillions into things that explode into pieces that damage trillions of dollars of assets and cost trillions to clean up and restore. How can anything win. Aside from robot apocalyptic elites from handing out future tickets to life. Too many mouths.
English
1
0
1
8
Richard
Richard@Richard90Ti·
@elderbeef So basically we are funding a high stakes fireworks show while the rest of us skip lunch. Is there any sector that actually benefits from this logic besides Lockheed?
English
1
0
1
9
Iran Observer
Iran Observer@IranObserver0·
⚡️BREAKING Iran could rake in $80 billion a year if transit fees were charged in the Strait of Hormuz Ships already pay Iran up to $2 million to ensure safe passage
Iran Observer tweet media
English
371
2.1K
11.8K
439.4K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@bindass_ladki @narendramodi Most important thing is we all Have to end all war. Before technology destroys us all and we destroy what resources are left
English
0
0
0
6
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@bindass_ladki @narendramodi The fear of politically weaponizing the death of children is that incapable militaries out of touch with the everyday citizen will aggravate superior military’s and leverage child deaths for global support. Incentivizing child death, everyone donates more money… condemns, etc.
English
1
0
0
109
Narendra Modi
Narendra Modi@narendramodi·
Received a call from President Trump and had a useful exchange of views on the situation in West Asia. India supports de-escalation and restoration of peace at the earliest. Ensuring that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, secure and accessible is essential for the whole world. We agreed to stay in touch regarding efforts towards peace and stability. @realDonaldTrump @POTUS
English
7K
14.5K
124.3K
32.8M
Chef 👩🏻‍🍳
Chef 👩🏻‍🍳@chefsevenn·
What’s the first word that comes to mind when you see this?
Chef 👩🏻‍🍳 tweet media
English
8.5K
274
3K
541.5K
2x Old Beef
2x Old Beef@elderbeef·
@Link6513 @ent_socal @FoodPleaser Say you can’t cook without saying you can’t cook. I hope your flavourless beanless life brings you much joy and comfort. I will continue to produce methane at an alarming rate.
English
2
0
0
14
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵@learning_yohei·
I’m Japanese and studying English. Which god should I believe in: American English or British English?🇺🇸🇬🇧😵‍💫
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵 tweet media
English
511
29
420
21.9K