Robbo

2.5K posts

Robbo banner
Robbo

Robbo

@electricbuffoon

$BTC $TAO

Katılım Kasım 2011
1.5K Takip Edilen153 Takipçiler
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@DreadBong0 @simioape You are 100% the most legit guy on CT. Made some epic early calls and own all your losers when they don’t work out. In addition to this, you repeatedly tell people not to blindly follow you and DYOR. King amongst men and should be respected as such. You owe people nothing 👑
English
1
0
1
86
𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗢
I rode $TAO from single digits to triple digits From sub $20m valuations to multi billions I fully intend to do the same with $TIG I will then watch $TAO 100x That's the plan
English
28
39
429
18K
M0N3T0SH1
M0N3T0SH1@monetoshi·
I know there is a trifecta that will retire your blood line over the next few years. $TAO $TIG and what's number 3?
English
18
0
38
1.4K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@0x_Asuka How will TIG enforce the patent on algorithms? If they are open sourced (+ privately licenceable) what will stop companies just using them under the hood & not disclosing? How would you know they were using a particular algorithm? It seems much harder to enforce than chip design
English
0
0
4
67
Sparta (𝔦, 𝔦)
Sparta (𝔦, 𝔦)@0x_Asuka·
Given that this upcoming TIG CC is an AMA, I thought it would be appropriate to preface it with a FAQ. These are the questions that’re asked of us most frequently and preempting the space with them will allow us to get to the most interesting topics much quicker than we otherwise would. If your question isn’t covered below, it’s fair game! Please reply to the thread with it and I’ll be sure to ask John today. Brief TIG FAQ Wen licensing? TIG accrues revenue by licensing state-of-the-art algorithms to individuals and organizations that find them useful. As far as we know, TIG has yet to do this. Building a startup, especially one with goals as lofty and far-reaching as TIG’s takes an extraordinary amount of time and effort. Despite having produced SotA algos twice now, the project is still early on in its life cycle. As such, there are not yet any publicly known instances of TIG licensing an algorithm. Outreach is actively being conducted by TIG Labs and its partners. Given the amount of time and effort involved, it would be irresponsible to provide a definitive timeline. We have avoided doing so for this reason. TIG could close its first licensing deal tomorrow, a week from now, or six months from now- only the team knows how far off we truly are. Documentation detailing TIG’s revenue model is being written by Phil David and will be released soon. Will you increase liquidity any time soon? TIG’s staking rewards are still quite generous at ~8.5% APY. For this reason, it would be extraordinarily expensive for the team to subsidize liquidity provision by artificially increasing the rewards for doing so. Focusing on generating more breakthroughs and onboarding innovators is a much higher ROI use of funds and so there are no immediate plans from the team to add or incentivize liquidity themselves. Exchange listings? As above, exchange listings are simply not the highest ROI usage of Foundation funds. TIG’s listing strategy has been and will most likely continue to be analogous to TAO’s- a ‘build it and they will come’ approach. Many exchanges have already listed us for free/without contacting the team and we expect that trend to continue as awareness and volume increases over time. Wen Marketing? The team consistently spends a significant amount of time speaking to and partnering with some of the world’s brightest scientists, academics, and AI engineers. These are the people who will make TIG a success and help us generate more algorithmic breakthroughs. These are the people who will produce intellectual property that will send billions of dollars flowing into the token. The entirety of crypto could explode tomorrow and TIG will likely still be a success purely because it is hardly dependent on the excitement (or lack thereof) that exists around digital currencies. TL;DR we spend a lot of time marketing: just not toward mercenary capital. We’re confident our existing strategy reaches the most valuable ecosystem participants and will continue to double down on it.
The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦)@tigfoundation

By popular demand, our upcoming Community Call will be an AMA- our first in quite some time! This Monday at 4PM UTC, join @Dr_JohnFletcher and @0xAsuka as they answer all your burning questions about TIG. We hope to see you there!

English
24
20
86
4.3K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@ChentoTrades I love watching shorters get liquidated
English
2
0
2
12
Chento
Chento@ChentoTrades·
Not great but unbothered. Plan remains the same, yes we might go slightly higher, still dca’s at: ✅80k ✅81k ✅82k And even higher if needed. Also don’t make the mistake assuming this is my whole port, this is just the 500k-5m challenge and don’t worry I will manage risk. May is notorious for being RED, we seen irrational behaviour from every market last month, with global tensions rising, biggest energy crisis ever pending and hawkish FED stance. Yes, markets can stay irrational longer than we can normally stay liquid but fundamentally, no reason for me to close as of yet. $btc
Chento tweet media
Chento@ChentoTrades

Today’s probability 74.2% down $btc

English
51
4
174
34.9K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@2xnmore Links please if you’re going to make sensational claims. So the Nvidia claim was made up completely? What’s the deal with $200M investment from polychain? The only way they can ‘invest’ is by buying tokens same as the rest of us right? Or did they do some otc deals?
English
0
0
0
12
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@Pop_Collapse Why are you calling it bittensor:native? What’s wrong with $TAO?
English
0
0
0
53
Barbie True Blue
Barbie True Blue@Pop_Collapse·
How long until we see something like this on Kalshi or Polymarket? "Bittensor bittensor:native is now projected to soar past $1,000 this year." Many actually predict bittensor:native will hit $3,000 this year and decouple from $BTC Bitcoin 📈
Barbie True Blue tweet media
English
7
12
120
6.8K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@cryptooosiris To be fair, the licensing guy does have a little bit of experience…
English
1
0
0
49
Scarface
Scarface@scarfacecrypto0·
One thing remains unproven for $TIG. The licensing model. Everything else is real: World class team ✅ Algorithm beats peer-reviewed 2025 paper ✅ Prometheus — millions of potential contributors ✅ One enterprise signs. The flywheel starts. $TIG
English
4
5
63
2.9K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@taablla Tell me you don’t understand $TAO without telling me you don’t understand $TAO
English
0
0
2
101
Tabla
Tabla@taablla·
$TIG is not next TAO. I say it’s greater than Tao . $TIG is industry agnostic, can host any challenges not only train models $TIG is marketplace to build and rent next level algorithm.
English
7
10
83
3.2K
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
$TAO is down 6% today -- resulting in Goblintown on the USD subnet bubble chart .... However, if you switch from USD to TAO denomination ... quite a bit of green. Why? Because the main liquidity pairs are TAO : Subnet. So when TAO goes down in USD terms, subnet tokens tend to go up in TAO terms.
Mark Jeffrey tweet mediaMark Jeffrey tweet media
English
12
19
158
12.4K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@528vibes Catastrophic pictures
English
0
0
0
4
₿iτSurfer
₿iτSurfer@_Bitsurfer_·
@MikePantherCap @AlgodTrading Cause you are a lame fuck that cant count to 3. But i'm gonna tell you the whole thing it's called "incentive mechansim" now find the needle
English
1
0
0
36
Algod
Algod@AlgodTrading·
Most valuable companies are AI related, in crypto we dont have any ai projects in top 10 Dont overthink it, narrative alone will drive multiples in top 10
English
43
21
351
17.8K
Robbo retweetledi
The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦)
The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦)@tigfoundation·
@Dr_JohnFletcher @dwarkesh_sp please get @Dr_JohnFletcher on your podcast He is in SF this week with The Innovation Game (TIG) team TIG is an economic machine that keeps algorithms open x.com/Dr_JohnFletche…
John Fletcher (𝔦, 𝔦)@Dr_JohnFletcher

Andrej, I’m John Fletcher. I have a PhD in mathematics and theoretical physics from Cambridge, and since 2016 I have been working full-time on the problem of how to coordinate untrusted distributed compute for algorithmic innovation. I listened to your No Priors conversation and recognised the architecture you were describing: commits that build on each other, computational asymmetry (hard to find, cheap to verify), an untrusted pool of workers collaborating through a blockchain-like structure. The result is The Innovation Game (TIG), which has been in continuous operation since mid-2024. The correspondence is so close that I thought it worth writing. The short version: roughly 7,000 Benchmarkers test algorithms submitted by Innovators by solving instances of asymmetric computational challenges (SAT, Vehicle Routing, Quadratic Knapsack, Vector Search, among others). This testing is "proof of work" in the technical sense of Dwork and Naor (1992). Innovators earn rewards proportional to adoption by the Benchmarkers. The repository of algorithms is open source (github.com/tig-foundation…). The system is already producing state-of-the-art results. For the Quadratic Knapsack Problem, 476 iterative submissions by independent contributors brought solution quality to a level that now exceeds methods published by Hochbaum et al. in the European Journal of Operational Research (2025). We are working with Thibaut Vidal (Polytechnique Montréal), who has submitted a state-of-the-art vehicle routing algorithm directly to TIG, and with Yuji Nakatsukasa (Oxford) and Dario Paccagnan (Imperial College London), among many others. One of TIG’s active challenges is directly relevant to your autoresearch work: an optimiser for neural network training (play.tig.foundation/challenges?cha…), where Innovators compete to develop an improved optimiser (see screenshot). One way in which TIG extends the vision is on the economic side. In our view, a monetary incentive is required, otherwise the open strand simply cannot compete at scale. TIG’s open source dual licensing model (designed by my co-founder Philip David, who was General Counsel at Arm Holdings for over a decade, and was the artchitect of ARMs licensing strategy) is intended to solve that problem. I expect we have each thought about parts of this that the other hasn’t. Happy to talk whenever suits. John Fletcher tig.foundation

English
0
5
46
1.1K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@digijordan Tbf - as a CIA operative, Jim is probably much more capable than the weak general population to handle disturbing information about reality. A large percentage of the general pop get upset about unkind words on social media or incorrect pronouns being used…. 🤷🏻‍♂️
English
0
0
0
45
Jordan Crowder
Jordan Crowder@digijordan·
So Jim can digest it. He’s just a regular ass human…but somehow he’s able to process this information and continue living normally. But the rest of humanity is just too dumb or unstable to handle it… Hey…here’s a thought…maybe they’re ‘dumb’ because they’re being lied to… And maybe they’re ‘unstable’ because they know there’s more to existence than what’s presented and they’re called crazy for wanting to know more. Maybe all these folks who say they know more… Who claim to know answers to the most important fundamental questions a human could ever ask… Maybe those folks should say what they know… Or shut the fuck up.
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP

🚨 Jim Semivan of CIA "The UFO truth is INDIGESTIBLE... too TERRIBLE to tell humanity". 👽🛸 Jim Semivan's comments ring louder than ever after Congressman Rep. Tim Burchett said yesterday "The things I have seen would keep you up at night" What could be SO horrifying? Could it be the INTENT of UFO's & Aliens which is indigestible?

English
132
47
556
29.8K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@maniaUFO It looks fake as fuck. No way it cost a quarter of a million dollars ++
English
0
0
0
392
UFO mania
UFO mania@maniaUFO·
Believe it or not, this is real footage of an alien.🧐🤔👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 The people who say definitively "fake" or "real" probably need to research it more because the fact is, we just can't tell with certainty either way. Some insights: it was first known to surface on the net in 2011 no one has staked claim since, as to having anything to do with it's origins one of the rumors abound was that it came from a KGB leak experts weigh in on a daily star article and it is, as expected, inconclusively determined that "if it was faked it cost a lot and required incredible expertise" (with a ballpark guesstimate of 250k) the soviet story was that Bob was a pilot the soviets captured from zeta reticuli the premier argument made seems to be one of "should we really believe an alien looks so humanoid or stereotypical".... well, probably not back then IMO, but now "commonly hominid" seems to overlap with a lot of other theories so this argument doesn't hold water like it used to. That's all I can think of on skinny Bob. It is hands down, one of my favorite featuring a biologic. I just mean, it seems the most plausibly believable grey footage I've personally seen. Now let the roast begin
English
107
212
1.4K
116.9K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@tigfoundation If algorithms are open source, what stops everybody copying them - would you propose to license them out? And how would you stop people just copying them and not paying the license fee?
English
1
0
4
56
The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦)
The Claude Code leak just revealed how frontier labs are fighting back against open source AI. And it tells you exactly where this war is heading. What leaked was the Claude Code harness (not the actual model or weights). But buried in the source are active "anti-distillation" methods. We spoke about this before: x.com/tigfoundation/… Quick recap: a distillation attack is when a competitor sends a prompt to an LLM and copies its exact response. Do this enough times and study the chain of thought, you can improve your own model. The code in claude.ts (lines 301-313) shows that if the model suspects a distillation attack, it silently injects decoy material (literally called fake_tools) into the message so attackers can't cleanly copy it. A second mechanism in betas.ts (lines 279-298) buffers reasoning between tool calls and returns only cryptographically signed summaries instead of the full chain of thought. Here's the catch: these defenses rely on secrecy to work. Now that the source code is out, anyone scraping Claude Code traffic knows exactly what to look for and what to strip out. Both mechanisms became useless the second the code went public. Short term this is a win for open source. But it highlights something bigger: much of open source AI's recent competitiveness has been propped up by distillation from frontier labs. The labs will build better defenses. Once those methods mature, the distillation pipeline that has been quietly propping up open source dries up. The gap between close and open will widen. But it gets worse. Even when distillation works, you can only copy a model's answers, not the algorithm that produced them. When a lab makes a fundamental training breakthrough, distillation only captures the surface. The underlying method stays locked inside. Every major algorithmic advance widens the gap again, on top. It compounds. Decentralised training can't fix this. The only durable advantage an open ecosystem can build is keeping the underlying algorithms open. Without open algorithms, open source AI has an expiry date
The Innovation Game (𝔦, 𝔦) tweet media
Chaofan Shou@Fried_rice

Claude code source code has been leaked via a map file in their npm registry! Code: …a8527898604c1bbb12468b1581d95e.r2.dev/src.zip

English
7
9
59
2.6K
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
REMINDER 🚨: TOMORROW, APRIL 1, HUMANS WILL RETURN TO THE MOON FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 53 YEARS We’re living in history! The entire mission is being streamed live by NASA, don’t miss it.
Kekius Maximus tweet media
English
1.8K
895
6.1K
380K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@MerlijnTrader Raoul Pal was calling for a supercycle well into 2022! He was nowhere near the peak 🥴
English
1
0
0
28
Merlijn The Trader
Merlijn The Trader@MerlijnTrader·
MASSIVE: Raoul Pal: "Bitcoin peaks in 2026. Probably Q2." Raoul Pal has been right before. 2020 bottom. Called it. 2021 peak. Called it. Now he's saying the cycle extended. And early sellers may regret it. You already survived the dip. Don't give up the run.
English
307
206
1.7K
235.6K
Robbo
Robbo@electricbuffoon·
@AbbottEddi5270 It looks like AI. Not even a particularly good AI unfortunately
English
0
0
5
2.6K
Eddie Abbott
Eddie Abbott@AbbottEddi5270·
Well… I’m sitting on several videos that are just amazing…. This one is a complete masterpiece!!! Everyone run to the damn store right now and buy your house a ring type camera!! This is an insane one….. ANONYMOUSLY dropped in my inbox!! So I sat on it…… Then after speaking to several other analysts that kept talking about some crazy ring cam video that they got to analyze…. Well guess what!!! It passes all the tests!! So since the cat is out of the bag and it’s out in the public and has been analyzed by many……………. Here Y’all go………. This is what they captured….. @PatrickQJackson @JonStewartIL
English
77
140
778
92.8K