Engkantu

@GobHenMLDL they should get landbank pronto, and ask whose account the money came from?

There are around 30-40 members in the House of Crocs Justiis committee, but it took only one Manong Ted Failon who asked and brought up this question.🤣 Tama naman ang sagot ni Chua-riwap.😜 ctto: 105.9 TrueFM

@MatchPoint60 summon the Landbank, then show whose account the money came from.

ANAK ka ng DEMONYO! yung DATE ng CHECKE is APRIL, 2023 e HINDOT ka pala. si MARCOS na PRESIDENTE nyan! BWAKANANANGINAKA!!!! facebook.com/reel/186739515…

@terryridon htere is a really good chance the SC will disagree with your opinions, just bec if you are in the same class as the justices, youd be at the very bottom of that class, HAHAHAHAH

Hinggil sa Petisyong Isinumite ni Vice President Sara Duterte sa Korte Suprema 7 Abril 2026 Sa araw na ito, nagsumite si Vice President Sara Duterte ng petisyon sa Korte Suprema upang pigilan ang nagpapatuloy na impeachment proceedings laban sa kanya sa House Committee on Justice. Ang petisyong ito ay nakabatay sa maling paglalahad ng mga aktwal na pangyayari at maling interpretasyon ng Konstitusyon at umiiral na jurisprudence. Ito ay malinaw na panlilinlang ng Pangalawang Pangulo at ng kanyang mga abogado sa Korte Suprema at sa publiko. Una. Hindi totoo na hindi ang plenaryo ng Kongreso ang nag-refer ng mga impeachment complaints. Makikita sa mismong video footage ng plenaryo noong 23 Pebrero 2026, sa oras na 3:48 PM, na ang referral ng apat na impeachment complaints ay isinagawa ng buong Kapulungan, alinsunod sa Section 3(2), Article XI ng Konstitusyon. Hindi ito aksyon lamang ng Speaker o ng Committee on Rules. Ito ay aksyon ng plenaryo ng House of Representatives bilang isang kolektibong katawan. Ikalawa. Walang rekisito sa batas na kailangang magkaroon ng deliberasyon bago ang referral. Walang probisyon sa 1987 Constitution, House Rules on Impeachment, o sa Gutierrez vs. House na nag-uutos na kinakailangang magkaroon ng deliberasyon bago ang referral. Ang sinasabi lamang sa Gutierrez ay maaaring magkaroon ng deliberasyon—hindi ito isang mandatoryong rekisito. Higit pa rito, sa araw ng plenaryong iyon, walang sinumang Miyembro ng Kapulungan ang naghain ng mosyon o objection upang tutulan ang referral at magsimula ng deliberasyon—kahit mula sa kapatid, kamag-anak, o kaalyado ng Pangalawang Pangulo. Ikatlo. Walang paglabag sa One-Year Bar. Ang One-Year Bar ay umiiral lamang matapos ang isang valid referral ng impeachment complaint. Malinaw sa public record na iisa lamang ang naganap na referral ng mga impeachment complaints sa House Committee on Justice, kahit itinabi ang Castro complaint at nag-withdraw ang Dee complaint. Mismong ang kaso ng Duterte vs. House ang nagsasaad na ang proseso ng House Committee on Justice ang magtatakda kung alin sa mga impeachment complaints ang dapat magpatuloy at alin ang dapat mabasura. Samakatuwid, walang paglabag sa One-Year Bar, at ang kabaligtarang pahayag sa petisyon ay isang maling aplikasyon ng Konstitusyon at jurisprudence. Ikaapat. Walang paglabag sa due process sa mga hakbang ng Committee on Justice. Ang kapangyarihan ng Committee on Justice na magsagawa ng pagdinig, mag-isyu ng subpoena, at mangalap ng ebidensya ay malinaw na nakapaloob sa Konstitusyon, sa House Rules on Impeachment, at sa nagdaang kaso ng Duterte vs. House. Hindi kinakailangan na kalakip ang lahat ng ebidensya sa oras ng paghahain ng impeachment complaint. Ang proseso ng pagdinig ay mismong mekanismo upang tuklasin ang katotohanan. Sa harap ng panlilinlang na ito sa Korte Suprema at sa publiko, magpapatuloy ang Kongreso at ang House Committee on Justice sa proseso ng pagpapanagot sa Pangalawang Pangulo sa usapin ng confidential funds, di-maipaliwanag na yaman, at pagbabanta sa Pangulo ng Pilipinas. Lalapag sa mga susunod na araw ang mga dokumento mula sa Ombudsman, BIR, at SEC. Mailalantad ang mga ito sa buong bayan sa susunod na linggo, sa ika-14 ng Abril. Ihaharap din si Ramil Madriaga upang magbigay ng kanyang patotoo. Nasa gitna na tayo ng proseso ng pagpapanagot sa Pangalawang Pangulo. Tuloy-tuloy ito hanggang sa pinakadulo. Tama na ang panlilinlang. Tama na ang pagsisinungaling. Panahon na para harapin ang katotohanan.

@buruguduyskuy @smninews You should do the same

@engkantu @smninews Know your info stupid! 😄

WALA NANG TIWALA KAY BBM Inamin ni Cong. Toby Tiangco na dati ay kampante siya sa liderato ni Pangulong Ferdinand Marcos Jr. matapos niyang makita na pinagalitan nito si dating Speaker Martin Romualdez kaugnay ng nadiskubreng anomalya sa badyet. (1/2)

@rodel_sol retarded alert! ill accuse you of stealing from me, go to court and prove otherwise.!

Kung wala kang ninakaw pupunta ka ng Committee on Justice at sabihin mo sa kanila na hindi ka magnanakaw ,ipakita mo mga ebidensya para mapahiya sila hindi yung pupunta ka sa SC para ipatigil yung hearing.

@buruguduyskuy @smninews its possible dna nya kayang magkunyaring pinkshit?

@smninews Toby Tiangco now a full blown DDShit wala ng pagkukunwari

@MissLigaya2074 You would have been right if the impeachment was for a legit reason. Dumb fucks believe the crocs in congress.

Kung pinili mong TUMAKBO dapat you have to be READY TO BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE ANYTIME, ANY DAY. Kaso ang mga DUTERTE gusto lang ng POSISYON, PERO AYAW NILANG MANAGOT SA TAONG BAYAN. GALING NI ATTY. Ybanez❤️

@dlsuy @mariannenriquez Same could be said to you lot

@engkantu @mariannenriquez Talaga mga paid ccp dds trolls sabay sabay at iisa ang script

“IF WE WON’T HOLD HEARINGS, HOW WILL WE DETERMINE PROBABLE CAUSE? MANGHUHULA BA TAYO?” — LUISTRO House Justice Committee Chairperson Gerville Luistro stressed that the proceedings against VP Sara Duterte are hearings to determine probable cause, not a trial.
 “If we will not conduct a hearing proper, if we will not conduct a clarificatory hearing, if we will not ask questions… ano ang magiging basis natin ng determination ng probable cause? If we will not do that, manghuhula ba tayo?”
 Luistro underscored that every step taken by the committee is guided by due process, the Constitution, House impeachment rules, and Supreme Court rulings, ensuring a fair and lawful proceeding. @News5PH

@mariannenriquez Na technical sa kanilang mini trial.. magaling mangurajot, mahina sa detalye

CHUA TO VP SARA: “LAHAT NA LANG UNCONSTITUTIONAL. ANO BA TALAGA?”
 House Committee on Good Government Chairperson Joel Chua questioned VP #Sara Duterte’s camp over repeated claims that House #impeachment proceedings are unconstitutional.
 “Lahat na lang, sinabi niya, unconstitutional. Yung unang mga desisyon ng Korte Suprema, sinasabi, unconstitutional… Ngayon, lahat ng nakalagay sa ating Saligang Batas, ito po ay sinusunod namin, pati sa rules. Ngayon, unconstitutional pa rin. So, ano ba talaga?”
 He added: “Dati sinasabi nila na handa sila… Pero ngayon, eto, binibigay na yung pagkakataon sa kanila. And yet, lahat naman kinu-question nila at sasabihin nila na unconstitutional. Kaya hindi ko po maintindihan kung ano po talaga ang gusto nila.”
 @News5PH

@newswatchplusph Haha, first to self distruct isbnowba goodbthing.. right. Waht a retard.

FIRST IN ASIA? PALACE CITES QUICK GOVERNMENT RESPONSE WATCH: Palace press officer Claire Castro says the Philippines is the first in Asia to declare an energy emergency, proof of the Marcos administration’s quick and proactive response to the Middle East crisis. “Iyan lamang ay nagpapatunay na ang pamahalaang ito ay hindi nagbabagal sa kanilang pagkilos,” she said. | @TristanNodalo

@tenchi_MNL It only means do your job properly, in accordance with the laws. SC will not tro you if you dont actvlike an idiot

If the Supreme Court issues a TRO and rules on the impeachment hearings in favor of Sara Duterte once again, it will send a clear message to both the Executive and the Legislative that the Judiciary is more powerful than the two branches. Beware.

@BicolanoP Hahahaha, ying isa palanging nakatambay sa kanto... ang tawag ay?

A Tale of Two Women. Yung isa po ay DUwag.

@dejezach @mariannenriquez Symepre, sara is just playing their game, kung igrant ang tro, at ma technical sila ulit, ibigbsabihin mgatanga silang lahat. Obvious naan ang motive nila, kaya pagsikapan tlaga nila yan, at our expense. Hindinnaman cguro tanaga ang supreme court.

@engkantu @mariannenriquez A proper trial via impeach court (senate) hasn’t started yet. Pero, phone a friend agad sa SC for TRO? Ano un?

@dejezach @mariannenriquez Dont worry, hundi sila ma tro kung hindi illegal ang kanilang mini trial.. dapat, naghearing sila ng maigi bago nila inepach si sara, masyado kasing atay.. kaya tuloy ma technical

@engkantu @mariannenriquez Isn’t Lustay camp and SC asking for due process, hence, last yrs case was deemed unconstitutional due to lack of it? Now that they are doing what they were whining about. They don’t want to face them? Why? Unconstitutional again? Fyi, they’re running to SC for help again!

@mariannenriquez Hindi sila ma tro kung hindi sila tanga

SC TRO BID VS VP IMPEACHMENT ‘EXPECTED NA’ — CENDAÑA Akbayan Rep. Perci Cendaña says the move by lawyers allied with Vice President Sara Duterte to seek a temporary restraining order from the Supreme Court against the impeachment hearings comes as no surprise. He questioned the petition's intent, stressing that efforts to block the proceedings only raise more concerns. “Hindi nakakapagtaka. Expected na yan. Korap lang ang ayaw humarap.” @News5PH

@newswatchplusph so no relief for petitioners for abuse of congress powers? maybe D5 should argue before the SC, if she's that smart maybe SC will deny the prayer of the petitioners.

'HINDI DAPAT PUMAYAG ANG KORTE NA PALAGI NA LANG SILANG GINAGAWANG TAKBUHAN NI SARA' READ: Mamamayang Liberal Rep. Leila de Lima slams the petition for a temporary restraining order filed before the Supreme Court on the House proceedings of the impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, calling it a "sign of desperation" to evade accountability. "May pa-bloodbath, bloodbath pang sinasabi noon. Sa simpleng committee hearing nga ay takot na takot ngayon," she said. Lawyers allied with Duterte filed the petition with the court on Friday, March 27. They clarified they do not officially represent the vice president. | @bylancemejico

@Talon_Haribon we are going to be the next Normandy!

PH is gonna see some French troops in the near future.

@PorLaPatria1896 @mariannenriquez ignorance of the law excuses no one... mahirap maging tanga dahil sa atat mag impeach ng kalaban.

@mariannenriquez The House should IGNORE any Supreme Court ruling against the impeachment proceedings. There will be HELL TO PAY if the SC attempts to rescue Inday.

HOUSE WILL CONTINUE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS AMID SC PETITION The House Committee on Justice, chaired by Rep. Gerville Luistro, reaffirmed its full respect for the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of constitutional and legal questions and said it will abide by any lawful order. At the same time, the committee stressed that the Constitution vests in the House the sole power to initiate impeachment cases, a responsibility it is duty-bound to carry out faithfully. The statement emphasized that the filing of a Supreme Court petition does not suspend the House’s constitutional functions, and unless directed otherwise, it will continue its proceedings to determine probable cause. This comes after a petition was filed before the Supreme Court by Atty. Israelito Torreon and other allies of VP Sara Duterte are questioning the House Committee on Justice’s actions and seeking to restrain it from proceeding with the impeachment case. @News5PH

@AnnaMalindogUy Friends dont kick their buddies in the teeth

Friendship is NOT weakness— IT IS WISDOM! At a time when narratives are being shaped by fear, suspicion, and geopolitical pressure, it takes courage to speak a different truth: that the relationship between China and the Philippines is NOT defined solely by disputes or conflict of interests over the contested South China Sea (SCS), but also by decades, even centuries, of exchange, cooperation, and shared progress. Filipinos should never feel timid or afraid to express a more nuanced or positive view on China. Gratitude is NOT surrender. Dialogue is NOT betrayal. And recognizing the tangible benefits of engagement—trade, infrastructure, investments, and opportunities—is simply being honest about reality. Yes, challenges exist. Sovereignty and sovereign rights issues over the disputed SCS are real and must be addressed with clarity, firmness, peaceful, constructive, sincere, and open-minded negotiations. But reducing an entire relationship to hostility blinds the Philippines and us as a people to the bigger picture and limits our strategic options as a nation. We must ask ourselves: Do we want a future built on perpetual confrontation, or one grounded in pragmatic cooperation and peaceful co-existence flourishing in prosperity and development? The Philippines does not have to choose between the United States and China. We can stand firm on our national interests while also acknowledging that constructive relations with China have brought, and can continue to bring, real benefits to the Filipino people. In the end, wisdom lies NOT in shouting the loudest, but in seeing the fullest picture. The Philippines, a nation FRIEND TO ALL. ENEMY TO NONE! THAT WILL BE OUR STRENGTH AS A COUNTRY AND AS A PEOPLE!