Entropy☃️Chase

45.8K posts

Entropy☃️Chase banner
Entropy☃️Chase

Entropy☃️Chase

@EntropyChase

markets, kindness, & tunes 😎. 🎵 music: https://t.co/wDleUUtf6Q RAD: https://t.co/N7eAo6OtEn

Anytown, USA Katılım Ekim 2021
5K Takip Edilen3.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
Finished an article summarizing some tips I learned to write faster pandas code! Notebook included! [buymeacoffee.com/entropychase/f…] For me, this led to big speed improvements, esp for tasks that require row by row iteration!
English
7
12
68
11K
Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel
The pattern is one thing, the chance of that being natural is somewhere between 1 and 0.1%. The key finding is that these sites contain way more mutations than the rest of the genome (odds of this being natural somewhere below 1:10k and 1:1 mio.). @gadboit2 re-analysis confirmed that this is extremely unusual.
Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel tweet media
English
2
0
3
39
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
Since the COVID origins debate picked up steam recently, I decided to write a shorter summary of the basic facts we have available. I noticed that not everyone has been caught up to date with these details. Hopefully this improves the discourse! @entropychase/6-facts-for-a-more-informed-debate-on-covids-origins-1c8c1b01ca6a" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@entropychase/…
English
15
11
52
9.2K
Meցan
Meցan@MeganSuspended·
@EntropyChase Excellent article. I’ve had to speed read thru the end as I’m sitting in the car in between jobs as taxi mum - but just wanted to say thank you, for what seems like a measured and logical summary of the ‘unknown’ origin. Great job.
English
1
0
0
34
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
The book of Genesis, 84% created by AI! 🤣🤣🤣 Happy Easter/Happy Passover!
Gary Marcus tweet media
English
31
42
272
22.9K
Gilles Demaneuf
Gilles Demaneuf@gdemaneuf·
Rasmussen, the usual attack dog of the Morens/Daszak little cabal, doing her best to bail out the sinking zoonotic certitudes. She surely deserves a reward for her dedication.
Gilles Demaneuf tweet media
English
4
8
75
8.3K
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@JeromeAdamsMD I feel differently. Even if folks believe COVID is nbd now (a point I personally disagree with), it still killed millions of people even early on. That's a big tragedy, and understanding the origin of a tragedy is not pointless or a "small fish." Important for prevention.
English
1
0
2
43
Jerome Adams
Jerome Adams@JeromeAdamsMD·
I can't square the cognitive dissonance of those who insist we wildly overreacted to COVID... yet also obsess over “lab leak” + “gain-of-function.” If a lab accidentally released a virus no worse than a bad cold, then don’t we have much bigger fish to fry? 🤷🏽‍♂️
English
87
54
495
34.4K
rohit
rohit@krishnanrohit·
Question: what's a list of capabilities that AI has not meaningfully progressed on from 2023 till today? Writing well is my example, esp fiction, where it's gotten subject cohesion but the slope of the line is much flatter than eg coding. What else?
English
30
6
86
13.1K
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@hexane360 @gdemaneuf "virology of the virus" is an odd phrase, never seen that in the literature... regardless, the problem is that the evidence we have today isn't supportive of a natural spillover. we still lack direct evidence for either theory. @entropychase/6-facts-for-a-more-informed-debate-on-covids-origins-1c8c1b01ca6a" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@entropychase/…
Entropy☃️Chase tweet mediaEntropy☃️Chase tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
Colin
Colin@hexane360·
@gdemaneuf Believing the lab leak theory requires systematically throwing out all the data we have on the virology of the virus and where we found it. Then lab leak wins by default, hooray!
English
1
0
0
13
Gilles Demaneuf
Gilles Demaneuf@gdemaneuf·
I am afraid Miller's argument shows that he has no real idea of what he is talking about. He makes a word salad out of 10% at most of the documentary material, and displays a profound misunderstanding of the ways the cases we sought for or reported across times, how they were classified, filtered, accepted or rejected. Sometime a bit of knowledge is the worst thing. In the case of Peter Miller, it resulted in him building up an argument on sand.
Colin@hexane360

@mattwridley I find the arguments here very persuasive re: ascertainment bias. astralcodexten.com/p/highlights-f…

English
3
4
34
3.8K
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@GregHBurnham @krishnanrohit @j_dekoninck Big fan of Epoch's work with FrontierMath btw! I find it interesting scores on FrontierMath are so much lower than on 2026 MO problems. Do you think it's due to contamination, less novelty, or something else?
English
2
0
1
28
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@GregHBurnham @krishnanrohit @j_dekoninck do you think those other tests do a good job at mitigating contamination risk? I've noticed that it's an under discussed risk and results tend to get inflated, so it's just something i've learned to be cautious about.
English
1
0
0
27
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@VBruttel understandable. I considered discussing restriction site pattern you mentioned, but @gadboit2 noted that the chance that could arise via luck was higher than I initially thought. I might be way off there tho. I was unsure & tried avoiding anything potentially gray area
English
1
0
1
68
Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel
@EntropyChase Good article. I just found this sentence misleading👇 It is fine to focus on the non-molecular evidence, but one should then not conclude that there is only a low amount of evidence supporting a lab origin. IMO, that evidence is overwhelming.
Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel tweet media
English
1
0
5
156
Entropy☃️Chase
Entropy☃️Chase@EntropyChase·
@GregHBurnham @krishnanrohit @j_dekoninck yeah, this does seem like a solid improvement. I wonder if there is any reason to be concerned about data contamination (and how that risk compares to last year). hopefully unlikely if test was 6hrs after problems came out
English
1
0
1
31
Greg Burnham
Greg Burnham@GregHBurnham·
@EntropyChase @krishnanrohit Yeah, not sure. @j_dekoninck could maybe shed some light re: odds something snuck through. These geometry solutions are just awful. But tbc even if you threw them out entirely there’s still a clear jump vs. last year.
English
1
0
1
30