
Abu Moosa
315 posts







“I didnt claim the view wasnt weak” after debating it for hours 😂 then you talk about attribution to scholars, we asked u which scholars? Answer the 3 questions. Also lets not forget that conversation about Nasir al Fahd, youre an embarrassment quit talking about topics you dont understand. Why are you constantly talking when the opposite party asks you 3 simple questions and you outright refuse to answer?

Shaykh Salih al-Luhaydan said in 2012: “They presented to me the books of Shaykh Sulayman al-’Alwan, and I did not find in them a single remark where he contradicted the scholars who came before him.”


@wannabemuhadith akhi may Allah forgive you but this is propaganda about takfir because the kibar ulema like Sh al Barrak said Sulaiman Al Alwan is from scholars of Aqeedah and Sh al Ghunaiman said Al Alwan is a Mujtahid , so the big scholars are aware of his sound aqidah and manhaj



• The author of the book states that ruling by other than what Allah has revealed is: — Kufr Akbar — Apostasy — A nullifier of Islam • Shaykh ’Abd al-’Aziz al-Rajihi recommends that all Muslims read this book and calls for it to be spread and translated into other languages

@Tarrasbulba123 @ameeniooo doesnt matter, Imam Ibn ‘Abd al Barr said those who take 5:44 upon its dhahir are the khawarij lol








I’m not in fact a Jahmi, but we all know who the tweet is actually referring to, so to anyone sincerely looking for clarification: 1. Air in fact does have an image, denying this is similar to denying the existence of anything one cannot see. 2. Nothingness is not a ‘thing’, such that you can remove spatial properties from ‘it’ — whereas Allah is of true existence, so spatial properties, which only befit physical and limited entities, can be rejected for Him, without denial of His perfect existence. 3. Performing actions is done in other than Allah, such as His creating the universe and all its particulars. However, He does not perform actions in Himself. And this is simply because if He caused an action within Himself, a temporal property would exist within Him, which intrinsically would necessitate Him a created being, thus creating a contradiction with His unique oneness and eternality. So, here lies no problem. 4. Speech is internal, and only becomes external due to deficiency in the listener. Your inability to hear Allah’s Speech does not nexessitate He does not have the quality of Speech. Thus, for your own sake, so that your incapable and dependent self can understand His speech, He created what indicates to His Speech, and revealed it to us. Yes, the expressions are created. The expressed is uncreated. The indicator is created. The indicated is uncreated. So does Allah speak? Yes. In the way that anthropomorphist believe? No. The problem is when someone untrained attempts to delve into higher sciences, he/she concludes rationally absurd ideas, and in doing so, throws many Muslims under the bus by labeling them as other names that aren’t appropriate, such as ‘jahmi’ for an Ash’ari or Maturidi scholar. It is best to stay silent if one is not aware, and stay away from these confusing matters if one is not dedicated to this field of study. To all average Muslims, continue your prayers to the only Creator of the universe, and don’t be set back or held back by individuals or confusing posts like these. May Allah aid us all

If you lock in for 10+ years straight, will you reach the knowledge of Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله?



















