Eric Hammes

1.1K posts

Eric Hammes banner
Eric Hammes

Eric Hammes

@eric_hammes

Christ Follower | Committed Husband | Engaged Father | Web Tech Nerd | Personal Budget Fanatic

Collegeville, PA USA Katılım Nisan 2008
106 Takip Edilen89 Takipçiler
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@mikesalguero I get it now. I wonder if this loophole is being considered in the country-by-country renegotiations happening during the 90 day pause. Wild times.
English
0
0
0
28
Mike Salguero
Mike Salguero@mikesalguero·
Hearing from a few companies that the tariff on raw materials is causing them to move manufacturing OUT of the US. Easier to bring from china to other country, assemble, and then pay smaller tariff. Sounds disastrous. Gut small biz and manufacturing!
English
6
0
13
3.4K
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@mikesalguero Oh, I see, this is for US exports to bypass/minimize the tariffs that China levied on the US. I was thinking the other way around.
English
1
0
0
58
Mike Salguero
Mike Salguero@mikesalguero·
@eric_hammes Or they have less tariffs. So sell into Mexico or country B, assemble there (or do whatever was done in US) and then pay the smaller tariff. If the component parts are a big enough piece of the price, that would make sense.
English
1
0
0
68
MAZE
MAZE@mazemoore·
OMG this is not AI, it's real. It's a must watch. 2011. Obama announces a DOGE department and puts Joe Biden in charge of it! 😂 "Nobody messes with Joe." 🤣
English
4.8K
23.5K
74.2K
68.6M
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@NeilShenvi True, if we strive and fall to the idol of politics (or religion). But don’t we participate by a higher way?
English
0
0
0
42
Neil Shenvi
Neil Shenvi@NeilShenvi·
I've said this before and Alinsky's book reminded me: Christians should never be as "good" at politics as non-Christians because we are constrained by commands like "thou shalt not bear false witness" and "do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
Neil Shenvi@NeilShenvi

Alinsky's 13th "Rule For Radicals" explains so much about contemporary politics and even Twitter discourse. It reads: “The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Here's a thread explaining what he means. Warning: it's bad. 1/

English
79
19
198
115K
Mike Salguero
Mike Salguero@mikesalguero·
Why has no one invented ski boots and bindings that don’t crush your toes. Worth billions!
English
3
0
8
3.2K
Mike Salguero
Mike Salguero@mikesalguero·
I'm thrilled to see this change. Feels like we are healing as a country, his point about US censorship emboldening other countries was interesting; we need to again be a beacon of free speech in the world.
tobi lutke@tobi

Huge and important change.

English
2
1
17
1.9K
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@johnrushx New to all this. Right now I’m doing a lot of copy pasting out and into various AI tools with VS Code. Do any of these integrate with VS Code? I’m not really looking to abandon it yet.
English
0
0
1
50
John Rush
John Rush@johnrushx·
Absolutely nobody predicted this: AI Code is the new NoCode. Honestly, I like talking to AI more than to human developers when building small apps. It understands me better, even with half-baked specs. I've literally tested all AI builders I could find 😑 1/20 🧵 :
English
247
829
7.7K
1.4M
Mike Salguero
Mike Salguero@mikesalguero·
Or you could put them on grass where available, let them regenerate the soil, and build a negative net carbon cycle. This is why we talk about “back to nature”, meat is not the villain, it’s the answer!
English
2
3
21
2.3K
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@bensmithlive Would have been better to flip the axes. Money goes up and duration goes right. Amazing to see in visual form.
English
0
0
0
41
Ben Smith
Ben Smith@bensmithlive·
America has the highest health expenditure, but the lowest life expectancy in the entire world. Meanwhile, Big Pharma is a $1.5 TRILLION business. And is booming every year. Let that sink in.
Ben Smith tweet media
English
59
721
2.9K
241.5K
Ben Smith
Ben Smith@bensmithlive·
The world’s richest man built the entire healthcare system to keep you sick. He transformed healing into a profit-driven machine—and buried natural medicine in the process. This man is John D. Rockefeller. And here is the dark story of how he did it: 🧵
Ben Smith tweet media
English
1.4K
18.8K
59.4K
10.3M
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@Tobydeaux91 @darwintojesus In the sperm analogy, there are literally millions of other sperm and only 1 won. For that analogy to apply, there would need to be trillions (more) or other failed universes. My understanding is that there is little to no scientific evidence for this.
English
1
0
3
44
Tobydeaux
Tobydeaux@Tobydeaux91·
@darwintojesus If a different sperm had fertilized my mom’s egg, then I wouldn’t be here. That’s what these fine-tuning arguments always sound like to me. It’s like, so what? Then something else would be here.
English
9
0
9
1.8K
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
Christopher Hitchens was once asked for the best argument for God. His answer? Fine-tuning. Our universe is balanced on a razor’s edge; even a tiny change in constants would make life impossible. Let’s examine 𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐍 and see just how absurd atheism really is🧵
Darwin to Jesus tweet media
English
152
721
2.9K
239.8K
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Robert F. Kennedy Jr@RobertKennedyJr·
One of the first things I will do once we get @realDonaldTrump back in the White House and me to D.C. is to get ultra-processed foods out of school lunches.
English
2.7K
15.5K
95.2K
1.5M
Nancy Pearcey
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey·
A few years ago, CNN published an article titled “Why I Raise My Children without God.” Instantly it went viral. The author, a young mother named Deborah Mitchell, listed several reasons why she shielded her children from learning about God—most of them variations on the problem of evil. Mitchell argued that a loving God would not allow “murders, child abuse, wars, brutal beatings, torture and millions of heinous acts to be committed throughout the history of mankind.” But this argument fails logically. If my argument against God is that the world has too much injustice and cruelty, that presumes a moral standard by which we can identify injustice. But a purely material universe does not generate moral standards. It tells us only what is, not what ought to be. Therefore materialism does not give a basis for saying the world is unjust. Of course, if humans are nothing but complex biochemical machines, then to call their actions evil makes no sense. Machines do not have the capacity to choose good or evil, nor do we hold them accountable for their actions. (From Finding Truth)
English
13
51
252
21.7K
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@chrisjcolby @NancyRPearcey She’s saying that a standard isn’t much of a standard if it can change from one society to the next. A “standard” that evolved as a utility to help a civilization advance can simply be discarded in favor of a new, more useful, “standard”.
English
3
0
5
2.7K
Christopher J. Colby
Christopher J. Colby@chrisjcolby·
@eric_hammes @NancyRPearcey Agreed. So, what's your point? The person I replied to didn't specify objective or subjective. She just tried to claim that "moral standards" can't form in a material world. I demonstrated the opposite.
English
1
0
0
325
Christopher J. Colby
Christopher J. Colby@chrisjcolby·
@NancyRPearcey A purely material world where societies that cooperate have an evolutionary advantage actually do generate moral standards.
English
5
0
0
1.3K
Nancy Pearcey
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey·
The New Testament was written w/i 100 yrs. of the events it describes--some books 40 yrs. People were still alive who could point out the fraud, if there was one. Plato & Aristotle--earliest copies are 1400 yrs. later. Caesar--1000 yrs. But no one denies that they are authentic
UseYourBrain@PlsUseYourBrain

@NancyRPearcey Who wrote the gospels?

English
2
10
66
4.5K
Eric Hammes
Eric Hammes@eric_hammes·
@Chrbarkley @NancyRPearcey @EpektasisJohn But couldn’t evolution have created a different set of values? In fact, doesn’t each societal group create different sets of values? And if every society can have different values, Dawkins cannot condemn another set of values, except that he doesn’t like it personally.
English
2
0
1
43
Maurice
Maurice@In_the_sun4·
@NancyRPearcey @EpektasisJohn His protest makes sense from his worldview because he still cares about those values. He just thinks the reason he cares is due to evolution It is also valid for him to point out the contradiction in the Biblical worldview: that God is loving but also vindictive
English
2
0
0
388
Nancy Pearcey
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey·
Richard Dawkins's self contradiction: "On the one hand, his naturalism dictates that morality is just a relativistic trick of evolution to get our selfish genes into the next generation. On the other hand, he rails against the God of the Old Testament as a vindictive, bloodthirsty, homophobic, racist, genocidal, sadomasochistic, malevolent bully." Do you see the problem? That’s his commonsense moral realism talking, but his protest makes no sense in his worldview." str.org/w/naturalism-b…
English
12
14
71
6.5K
Nancy Pearcey
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey·
America has the highest rate of single parent homes in the world. And it's partly the consequence of the way fatherhood is mocked and ridiculed. One study analyzed 24 episodes of the Disney Channel’s two most popular tween shows featuring families and found that every 3.24 minutes, the TV dad acted like a buffoon. About half the time, the child characters reacted to him with expressions of contempt: rolling their eyes, making fun of him, criticizing him, or turning and walking away. (From Toxic War on Masculinity)
Nancy Pearcey tweet media
English
30
286
669
127.2K