Little

@FilthyArmenian Never trust a post from someone who joined X last month.

Street vendors are the trashy fetish of 2010s hipsters who thought dribbling taco juice off their chins bent over a sewer was a more epic dining experience than sitting in a clean well-lit place open round the clock so now it’s roach coach galore while every diner shuts down 👍

@Byron_Wan Why do they all have teeth like that?

🇬🇧 Stephen Lillie, the former director of defence and international security at the Foreign Office, secretly discussed Britain’s nuclear deterrent during closed-door talks with the Grandview Institution, a “think tank” that has ties to China’s spy agency, in Oct 2025. The influence of the Beijing-based think tank has come under scrutiny since it emerged that Jonathan Powell flew to China for several meetings with the organization before being appointed as Sir Keir Starmer’s national security adviser. The revelations will raise difficult questions at a critical moment for Sir Keir, whose premiership has been damaged by the Mandelson vetting scandal. Senior Tories said it “proved” the Government had “put Britain’s security at risk”. Several of the Grandview Institution’s most senior staff members have current or past connections to military intelligence and 🇨🇳 Ministry of State Security, Beijing’s main foreign spy agency. Lillie held the talks with the think tank on Oct 22, 2025, during a four-day trip to Beijing, which was not publicized at the time. While much of the conversation was redacted on the grounds of “national security”, it appears to have been focused on Britain’s “nuclear failsafe” systems — protocols and technology involved in determining when and when not to use nuclear weapons. In the heavily redacted emails, Lillie discussed his visit to Grandview with Garret Martin, the deputy director of nuclear policy at the Ministry of Defence (MoD), and described how colleagues at the MoD had “been the subject of previous lobbying” on the matter. The senior mandarin said: “I see [nuclear failsafe] is slated to come up at GrandView.” He continued: “Copying MoD colleagues given they have been the subject of previous lobbying on this.” UK officials engage with international institutes, including Chinese-based ones, to understand global developments and protect UK interests. The meeting appears to have been part of a flurry of trips to Beijing by top mandarins late last year amidst Sir Keir’s thawing of relations with China. Sir Olly Robbins, the Foreign Office’s recently sacked top civil servant, had lunch with “domestic and foreign policy experts” from Grandview on Oct 15 last year. In January, Sir Keir became the first British prime minister to visit China since 2018, hailing the economic opportunities for the UK. It came one week after the Government approved plans for a Chinese super-embassy in London, despite Beijing’s plans to build a secret room under the embassy located near sensitive communication cables. Earlier this year, the Labour Government admitted failings in how it handled the cases involving Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry, who were accused of stealing secrets from Parliament and selling them to senior officials in the CCP. They both denied the charges. The case was dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service in Sep 2025 after the Government declined to provide evidence that China was an “enemy”, which was required to prosecute the pair under antiquated espionage legislation. The Grandview Institution claims that it is an “independent” think tank committed to “dialogue between China and other countries”. But in reality it is a front for 🇨🇳 Ministry of State Security intelligence and the PLA. It’s definitely not a normal institution to be engaging with if what you want is dialogue with China because it doesn’t exist for that purpose. “Before meeting with Grandview, foreign government and military officials should first receive thorough briefings from their own intelligence services to understand the goals and methods of China’s ministry of state security and its proxies.” A Foreign Office spokesman said: “No sensitive information was discussed at this meeting.” telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/1…

@Architectolder NGL, I kind of like its balanced look. Why spoil the symmetry with egress points?

Where’s the door?

@3YearLetterman Braking > Breaking.

No race is officially called until you get a braking news tweet from me

@Champagnerain6 @grok is this video real or AI?

Best US Military Movies ranked: 1) Full Metal Jacket 2) Top Gun 2) Mr. Roberts 3) The Sand Pebbles 4) Down Periscope 5) Hunt for Red October 6) Captain Phillips 7) Heartbreak Ridge 8) Greyhound 9) They Were Expendable 10) Action in the North Atlantic

@VickieforNYC @Gavin_McInnes @grok what is the Bataclan massacre?

@Gavin_McInnes This is also why they kept the details of the Bataclan massacre very very quiet. If what actually went on that night was made broadly known, people would be horrified beyond their ability to rationalize it away.

One of the reasons the elites ignore the Muslim grooming gangs is they simply can’t handle the levels of horror these attacks reach. Such as… -nailing a girl’s tongue to a block of wood while she’s raped. -having them dig their own graves. -drenching them in gasoline. -branding girl’s asses with an M for Mohammad. -raping girls under the Pakistani flag. The list goes on. It’s much easier just to assume we’re lying and the problem isn’t real.

@grok @9mmScorpion @grok is there any information identifying the location or the person involved

The video shows a person dressed in dark clothing (appears to have head/face covering) standing near a metal container in a rural outdoor area. They repeatedly swing a long stick or pole at a brown dog on the ground, striking it multiple times. The dog is mostly motionless after the initial hits. The camera is shaky and distant, with no clear audio or additional context visible.

A jewish terrorist beats a Palestinian guard dog.

The question isn't "if" we need more Clarence Thomas statues. The question is if Clarence Thomas statues should be bronze or marble!

Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere." Farmer: "Where did they get it?" Activist: "What?" Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere." Activist: "From... eating?" Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it." Activist: "The soil?" Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from." Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere." Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it." Activist: "Then just don't have the cow." Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle." Activist: "It's not that simple." Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."

@iowahawkblog Children’s cigarettes

Welcome to my no-judgment brainstorming session. Remember, there is no such thing as a bad idea, now let's hear what you got

@3YearLetterman Need any help?

Going to spend the summer using this route to run as many cyclists as possible off the road with my Taurus

@JonCovering Yeh, he moved out of the Airstream because of the death threats. Seems that’s an important detail missing from the headline (but not the article).

Trending right now 👀

@awstar11 @SN_Weekly_ Nobody had “Israeli Rape Dogs” on their 2026 Bingo Card. Except maybe Nicky K and the NYT.

Put the fucking shovel down Nick

@MatthewFoldi @dlippman @AbdulElSayed @MikeRogersForMI @grok define “physician” under Michigan State Law

Bombshell from @dlippman on #MISEN race that comes as @AbdulElSayed is potentially the Democrats’ frontrunner against @MikeRogersForMI

@bonchieredstate The 30 percent of Jews in NYC who voted for Mamdani can also take a bow

Here’s the size difference between the highest-selling commercial aircraft in history, the Boeing 737, and the Airbus A380 “Superjumbo” — the world’s largest passenger airliner.

@MOSSADil To get more gas? I’m just spitballing

U.S. Air Force aerial refueling aircraft at Ben Gurion Airport...where are they going?