Eric Wheeler

4.6K posts

Eric Wheeler banner
Eric Wheeler

Eric Wheeler

@ericswheeler

C# dev, hobbyist gamedev, enjoyer of games/trivia/puzzles/chess/movies

Downers Grove, IL Katılım Nisan 2013
131 Takip Edilen136 Takipçiler
Alec MacGillis
Alec MacGillis@AlecMacGillis·
This is pretty bleak.
Alec MacGillis tweet media
English
417
818
20.7K
4.1M
Eric Wheeler
Eric Wheeler@ericswheeler·
@ikirigin @jessegenet The problem here is there’s no evidence he bettered his career. It just said he was the “top user of AI” at his company. That doesn’t mean anything useful on its own.
English
1
0
0
16
Ivan Kirigin
Ivan Kirigin@ikirigin·
@jessegenet The people complaining about this post should be asked a question: If sacrificing time with your family to better your career is so bad, what do you think of two parents who work and get a nanny?
English
1
0
1
296
Jesse Genet
Jesse Genet@jessegenet·
Scene: for first time in history of mankind computer intelligence begins to eclipse human intelligence Man: communicates up front about what he needs to do to excel at work Man: does exactly what he says he needed to do Man: excels at his workplace Man: thanks wife for her efforts at home Wife: “it was surreal” Journalist: “this is bleak”
Alec MacGillis@AlecMacGillis

This is pretty bleak.

English
43
26
687
88.5K
Eric Wheeler
Eric Wheeler@ericswheeler·
@pham_alam @Sthormyy @ClaireMPLS I didn’t want to spoil it for the original poster who still hasn’t guessed it, it’s easier to not click a link than it is to not read a reply.
English
1
0
3
762
Eric Wheeler
Eric Wheeler@ericswheeler·
@Sthormyy @ClaireMPLS This is one of the funniest posts I’ve seen on tipofmytongue once you hear the answer, want to take a guess?
Eric Wheeler tweet media
English
4
0
16
7.6K
Stella
Stella@Sthormyy·
@ClaireMPLS this is literally the only thing i’m good at, figuring out which songs people have in their head that they don’t know who sings it and don’t know the words just the melody. and i’m cracking up because clearly this is mr jones
English
16
0
317
119.1K
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
It's literally the law of causality, literally the reason we have science! Change is the very reason we have science at all. Changes seen round about us are the effects that made the founders of science and philosophy seek causes of. It is because of change that science began, when men wanted to explain how and why those changes/effects occur. It is the purpose of science. And not just natural science, but all of science - theology, or the queen of the sciences, included. When we perform experiments using the scientific method, when we see changes, we don't issume the change came from nothing. No, of course not! Because fundamental to all of science is "ex nihilo nihil fit". Because of that, when we see change, we don't assume the change was its own cause. No! We assume something else caused it. That's because of the laws of contradiction and causality. We know that effects do not cause themselves! And we know that the universe is an effect! Thus, the universe is empirical proof that something exists outside of, apart from, separate from, or transcendent of the universe! What is to be said of the ideas of cause and substantial change given the principles of induction, uniformity, and the conservation of energy which Lucretius points out? The principles of uniformity and conservation (among others) are properties of Being. Another property of Being is causality or the notion of cause among things that change. The notion of cause or the principle of causality, has both philosophic and scientific implications. As demonstrated, Lucretius is interested in exploring the nature of causation in physical reality.
English
2
0
0
27
Night Sky Now
Night Sky Now@NightSkyNow·
🚨: Quantum cosmology suggests the universe can create itself from nothing
Night Sky Now tweet media
English
291
207
1.4K
715.8K
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
So you don't believe that, as a whole, it is expanding? You don't know that, as a whole, it is growing colder? You don't that each moment is not the same as the moment before? etc. Just one change means it is contingent upon something else for its existence, and I just gave you several, and there are more. So yeah, you deny it and I get why, but you do undeniably know it's been caused.
English
1
0
0
13
Doot 🪲🪷 Wishlist Milki Delivery 🐮🚲
Did you notice how our world building and parallax effect works? Every time you enter a new path, it teleports you and completely rebuild the path to your next destination. At any point in time, the only things that exists are actually where you are from and where you are going!
English
7
6
137
3.4K
Eric Wheeler
Eric Wheeler@ericswheeler·
@orb_3d The trend started before the AI boom and yeah it’s very lame and uninspired.
English
1
0
0
295
Orb
Orb@orb_3d·
I’ve noticed this weird trend in indie games where everything is called something-“bound” or something-“born.” There are so many of them that I’m starting to wonder if chatGPT has been naming half the indie games coming out lol.
English
22
0
68
8.2K
Eracu
Eracu@EracuStudios·
@ericswheeler I didn't even know about it. You've introduced me to a new platform!
English
1
0
1
16
Eracu
Eracu@EracuStudios·
Hey devs! Do any of you make devlogs? If so, where do you share them? Social media, YouTube, a blog, or somewhere else? #indiedev #gamedev
English
22
0
21
2.3K
Eric Wheeler
Eric Wheeler@ericswheeler·
@KenneyNL Yup. I’m working on a game with what I believe is a fairly novel concept, but it would be very easy to steal.
English
0
0
0
11
Kenney
Kenney@KenneyNL·
I've noticed that I've become a bit hesitant to show the games & tools I'm working on. I'm often afraid that they will be stolen (especially because of AI), or that a cheap copy will appear before I've been able to finish them. Does anyone else share this feeling?
English
162
34
1.6K
89.9K
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
Yet, atheists claim there is no reason to believe anything exists other than this natural, physical universe—i.e., the cosmos or Nature. But we know empirically that, as a whole, it's been caused, which means it hasn't always existed. By definition, that necessarily means, if Nature is all there is, as atheists insist, and we know empirically that it hasn't always existed, then we know by deduction that because it came into existence, there could not have been anything! Now, of course, we know that's impossible. But that's not our problem; it's the atheists'!
English
2
0
0
27