Evan

You are not going to believe it but the A Holes at the SEC wanted the latest financials included. So some good people worked all weekend to get it done. So now the SEC can Suck on this capedge.com/filing/1936756…

🚨🚨NBH amendment #10🚨🚨 sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archiv… #MMTLParmy $MMTLP $mMAT

You are not going to believe it but the A Holes at the SEC wanted the latest financials included. So some good people worked all weekend to get it done. So now the SEC can Suck on this capedge.com/filing/1936756…

As the MMTLP continues to fight for transparency and restitution perhaps you, @POTUS @realDonaldTrump, could speak to Lt. Col. Bradshaw about how devastating this situation is for so many innocent retail investors. He is a veteran who has been victimized by the Wall Street cabal.

MMTLP #FAFO #NBH This NOT financial advice and for a better understanding of the S-1 process. I claim NO experience in this process, just a thought. I had listened to @oyehabla "Oy'e's" space and @Bow47064648John "John Bowen" brought up a great detail at the very end about all of the Exhibits in the latest S-1A Amendment 9. Exhibit Coverage Amendment No. 9 is explicitly described as an “exhibit‑only” filing, and the post reflects that by noting: - It includes no new disclosures, risk factors, or financials. - It updates the exhibit set, the legal, corporate, and transactional documents that underpin NBH’s registration. The exhibits visible on the EDGAR page include: - Corporate formation and governance documents (Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Certificate of Designation, Equity Incentive Plan). - Transactional agreements (Distribution Agreement with Meta Materials, Merger Agreement with McCabe Petroleum and Torchlight entities, Promissory Notes, Option Agreements, Purchase Agreements). - Legal opinions and consents (Woodburn and Wedge, auditor consents). These are the same categories referenced in the “final legal opinion” and “exhibit set” that must be completed before NBH files Amendment No. 10 and requests SEC effectiveness. 🧩 How the Exhibits Fit the Timeline Each exhibit represents a compliance prerequisite for SEC effectiveness: - They document NBH’s capital structure and ownership chain, which ties directly to the cap‑table contamination review in the Meta bankruptcy. - They include the legal opinion and auditor consents that must be finalized before the SEC can process the acceleration request. - Their completion signals NBH’s readiness to move from “exhibit‑only” to “go‑effective.” Because Amendment No. 9 already contains the full exhibit set, the remaining steps are procedural: Court approval of Trustee’s new counsel and funding structure. Confirmation that no new disclosures are triggered by bankruptcy findings. Filing of Amendment No. 10 with the final legal opinion. SEC acceleration and effectiveness, typically within 30–120 days once those dependencies clear. For those like me, here is a more detailed breakdown for possible events that need to be addressed. NBH S‑1 Effectiveness: What Still Needs to Happen There’s been a lot of discussion around the Next Bridge Hydrocarbons (NBH) S‑1 and what “no more SEC comments” actually means. Here’s the straightforward breakdown of what still needs to happen before the SEC can declare the S‑1 effective and why the Meta bankruptcy matters even though NBH isn’t a debtor. 🔹 What Still Has to Happen Before NBH Can Go Effective Even with the SEC’s comment review complete, several external dependencies must be resolved: 1️⃣ Trustee’s new counsel must be approved - The Meta bankruptcy Trustee just shifted to a new contingency‑based legal team. The court must approve that change before the litigation posture stabilizes. 2️⃣ Litigation funding structure must be finalized - Parabellum withdrew. The new firms are advancing costs. Until the court signs off, disclosures can’t be considered “final.” 3️⃣ Cap‑table contamination review must stabilize - The Trustee is reviewing the corporate actions that created the NBH shareholder base (spin‑off, MMTLP halt, distribution mechanics). The SEC cannot certify a registration if the shareholder count or chain of title is still under legal review. 4️⃣ Estate claims must be clarified - If the Meta estate asserts claims tied to the spin‑off or share issuance, NBH would need to update disclosures. The SEC must wait until the Trustee signals no further material developments. 5️⃣ No new disclosures can be triggered - Any new findings from Rule 2004 discovery or bankruptcy motions could require NBH to amend again. 6️⃣ NBH must file Amendment No. 10 with the final legal opinion - Amendment No. 9 was “exhibit‑only.” The final amendment is what actually requests effectiveness. 7️⃣ SEC must process the acceleration request - Once NBH files the final amendment, the SEC typically takes 7–14 days to declare effectiveness. ⏱️ Timeline Forecast (Now That Comments Are Done) - Earliest realistic: 30–60 days - Most likely: 60–120 days - Outside tail: 120–180 days The SEC is no longer the bottleneck — the bankruptcy dependencies are. 🔍 Why the Bankruptcy Still Matters (Even Though NBH Isn’t a Debtor) NBH’s entire shareholder base came from Meta’s corporate actions — the spin‑off, the MMTLP placeholder, the FINRA halt, and the final distribution. Those actions are now under active legal review in the Meta Chapter 7 case. Until the bankruptcy court stabilizes the record: - The shareholder count isn’t final - The chain of title isn’t final Potential estate claims aren’t resolved NBH can’t certify that its disclosures are complete And the SEC cannot declare a registration effective unless the underlying ownership structure is fully settled. This isn’t about NBH being in bankruptcy, it’s about the origin of the shares being under judicial review. Bottom Line - The S‑1 is in the endgame. The SEC is done commenting. But the bankruptcy court must finish its part before NBH can file the final amendment and request effectiveness. Once those pieces lock into place, the SEC can move quickly. Again, take this with a grain of salt but some things need to be closed out prior to it becoming effective. Focus.

sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archiv… It looks like it is effective. Let’s see what happens.

⚠️WRECK THE NARRATIVE #4787: MMTLP XTD NARRATIVE: "There’s no proof of ANY overages. AT ALL. None." TRUTH/FACTS/RECEIPTS: ✅FINRA admits to 2.65 million open short interest after the halt: Based on FINRA’s subsequent regulatory efforts, FINRA estimates that there was an aggregate short interest position in MMTLP in accounts held at broker-dealers as of December 12 of approximately 2.65 million shares…” RECEIPT: finra.org/investors/insi… ✅ 15.4 million shares borrowed and sold short on last day of trading: @JohnnyTabacco confirms, 15.4 million shares were borrowed and sold short on 12/8/2022. TOTAL SALES from 12/8/2022 have been reported to be between 8.33 million and 13.7 million. The math ain't mathin'! RECEIPTS: x.com/JohnnyTabacco/… stockinvest.us/stock-price/MM… investing.com/equities/meta-… ✅Anson Funds requested 10 million shares from NBH/Roth after the halt: "Anson Funds contacted Roth Capital seeking to buy shares of Nextbridge. 10 million shares at $0.30 cents a share to cover their short position. This is all documented. Roth’s response was, wait a second, don’t you have a borrow? Anson’s response was 'no'." RECEIPT: marketfrauds.to/anson-funds-na… ✅Financial Institutions contact NBH to buy shares halt: In a letter to FINRA's Robert Colby (Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer), NBH stated, "Per your request, the investment banking firm representing Next Bridge on our proposed S-1 has received several inbound calls from financial institutions needing to buy our shares to get their books in balance. One of the inquiries was of a size so large that I requested to be on a call with this group. From this call, I now have knowledge of an admitted shareholder imbalance from one single financial institution that is multiples more than 2.65mm shares. We continue to collect additional data regarding imbalances from multiple sources." RECEIPT: finra.org/sites/default/… In a PR Newswire release, NBH explicitly referenced foreign firms: "Unfortunately, we believe this is a consequential blind spot in FINRA's data, because foreign firms have approached Next Bridge about procuring more than 2.65 million shares." RECEIPT: cdn.prod.website-files.com/6169e69d0075ec… ✅Tradestation admits shares are not backed by certificates: “Despite TradeStation’s best efforts, we have been unable to recall a portion of the lent-out shares because there is currently no market for the security. This means that we will not be able to honor some of our customers’ requests to register or record their ownership in book entry form with AST because the shares are not backed by physical certificates.” RECEIPT: See email image below. ✅Hilltop Securities admitted to @PeteSessions that they have a “big problem”. Hilltop Securities provides clearing services for Schwab. ✅Broker-dealer statement confirms shareholder has 7x certificate allotment: One shareholder in one broker holds 50,000 shares. Settlement/Clearing firm has 7,038 certificate allotment and clears for several brokerages. RECEIPT: See image below. ✅ FIF Brokers admit they can not deliver shares: "Because of prior FINRA trading halt, there are shares on loan that lending broker-dealers cannot recover." RECEIPT: x.com/JunkSavvy/stat… ✅Other damning evidence is confidential and has been forwarded to Administration Officials, select Congress members and Legal Counsel for Issuers and Bankruptcy. Can we FINALLY stop the 🐂💩and admit WE STILL HAVE A SETTLEMENT ISSUE??? MMTLP MMAT TRCH