Candace Owens
Ian Carroll
Collin Campbell
Will all be getting cease and desist letters from Erika Kirk
I helped with Collin Campbell
Fun is over losers.
@fibsone@VanessaBel69801@ATL_Buckeye@RealCandaceO@kimKBaltimore Her following speaks for itself - there are still many free-thinkers in the world who are not prisoners of whatever cult they chose to belong to and not afraid to change their minds and admit they were wrong about something.
I realize people are not taking me seriously enough when I say that I am not the same person after Charlie’s death. I will not suffer fools, I will not suffer liars, and I will not suffer dishonorable strippers. Attached please find the once-confidential agreement between me and Kim Klacik, before she violated that agreement by lying about our court case.
I would like to draw your attention specifically to contract term 3— clause which prevented me from ordering a transcript of the deposition which was interrupted when Kim Klacik began hysterically crying and folded.
The subsequent exhibits will demonstrate why. We were in contact with fellow strippers as well as conversations with drug dealers discussing Kim Klacik’s alleged usage.
Kim Klacik’s stage name was September. In the coming days her colleagues, (who are infinitely more honest than her), will be speaking out with more undeniable information about who @kimKBaltimore actually is. You will note that Kim Klacik was allegedly ordering a “pick me up” during the time that she was campaigning to clean up the streets of Baltimore.
Kim folded in her deposition because we asked her about her dealer. This is exactly what happened. I do not lie because I do not need to lie.
Enjoy your evening reading.
🧵 Part 1
@fibsone@VanessaBel69801@ATL_Buckeye@RealCandaceO@kimKBaltimore So she used to believe some common lies but she changed her mind when she learned the truth behind the lies? How is that bad? In fact, it's the people who never change their mind about anything that are concerning because it indicates that they are close minded.
@PreppenWolf@MichaelAArouet That's good to hear. I left Poland over 15 years ago so all I know is from what my friends & family tell me. Good to know they keep catechesis in schools even when it's not required.🤍❤️
@evvalot@MichaelAArouet The program is still there, though optional not mandatory. 60% of kids opt in. There is a secular ethics class as well as another option.
There is a popular myth that Poland enjoys its economic miracle because it didn’t accept immigrants.
In reality, it did let them in, but unlike Western Europe, Poland offers no lavish welfare. Most immigrants work, integrate, and contribute to society. That’s the difference.
@WeightandBias@MichaelAArouet You mean illegal immigration. It is no myth, Poland does not accept illegals. At all. They shoot them at the border if they try to break in. 💁♀️
@PreppenWolf@MichaelAArouet Unfortunately this is outdated information, religion was taken out of schools years ago sadly by their equivalent of the democratic party rule.
Poland is a Catholic country that teaches Catechism in every school. So, the country has low 3rd world immigrants and a cohesive moral, conservative framework. Every country can be like this. Deport immigrants, denaturalize people who don't conform to traditional conservative values. Return Christianity to public schools. Shoot at people who try to enter your country illegally.
@benfromsuffolk@MichaelAArouet From all over Europe and Asia and even the Americas. But they are all LEGAL immigrants. This post is super misleading. No such myth. Poland is strong on only accepting legal immigrants. That's the truth, no myth here.
@MichaelAArouet Hmmm you got it wrong from the first sentence. Not a myth, just forgot that really important word: "illegal". Poland didn't and still does not accept illegal immigrants.
@ConceptualJames@Holden_Culotta My goodness you are slow. If Charlie didn't spend those 2 days at the WH convincing Trump not to go to war with Iran, what is happening NOW would have happened back THEN. He was practically the one who stopped it. And that's when the Israelis got pissed at him.
Listen you human piece of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight.
Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025.
So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie.
Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success.
Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it.
Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year.
1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy;
2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict;
3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time;
4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change;
5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently.
To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so.
To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said.
You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.
Wow.
Joe Kent just revealed the last thing Charlie Kirk said to him:
“The last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this Earth was in June, in the West Wing.”
“He looked me in the eye and he said … Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.”
“One of President Trump’s closest advisors was vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis.”
“And then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that?”
“The investigation that I was a part of [with] the National Counterterrorism Center, we were stopped from continuing to investigate.”
“But there was still a lot for us to look into that I can’t really get into.”
“There’s unanswered questions.”
“We know, because of the text messages that have been made public, that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from a lot of pro-Israel donors.”
@joekent16jan19@TuckerCarlson
@ErikaC47@GenFlynn Honey the protestants are mostly being infiltrated not attacked. Catholics and Orthodox are under attack because they have rules to follow and won't easily bent on their doctrines.
@GenFlynn The Christian faith is being attacked. Not Catholics. Invoking a denomination to fit a narrative is divisive. Also, biblically, this event doesn’t align with the teachings of Jesus.
Breaking: Yes, I’m a Catholic, and I’m concerned about the attacks against my faith and few seem to know it’s happening and even fewer seem to care.
I have spent a lifetime studying how nations maintain stability and how they unravel when the pillars that sustain them begin to erode. Contrary to popular imagination, societies rarely collapse in dramatic fashion, decline usually unfolds quietly. Institutions that once anchored moral order are gradually weakened while political leaders, media elites, and sometimes even the institutions themselves hesitate to acknowledge what is plainly occurring. I have watched this pattern emerge in fragile states abroad. Today, troubling indicators suggest that similar dynamics are beginning to emerge in the United States. genflynn.substack.com/p/catholic-chu…
@ArticulateTHGHT@nosoup4knowles Yea Im surprised Candace is supporting her, she must have not seen the full interview with Tucker. I wasnt sure what to think of her until she started fake-sobbing, that was it for me. This woman is fake & gay and Candace should notice sooner or later