exegesis

651 posts

exegesis banner
exegesis

exegesis

@exegesis

Katılım Aralık 2008
150 Takip Edilen85 Takipçiler
exegesis
exegesis@exegesis·
@ArriojaJoseE @BrazilBrian Hooking up more intermittent power sources to your grid makes you less robust, as seen in Spain a few years ago.
English
0
0
0
21
Jose Enrique Arrioja
Jose Enrique Arrioja@ArriojaJoseE·
How Uruguay is Navigating Rising Energy Prices As the ongoing war in Iran has pushed energy prices worldwide to near-historic highs, Uruguay is offering a model for managing the current crisis that most countries may want to emulate. Over a decade of policies to encourage investment in renewable energy has weaned the power grid off its reliance on fossil fuels; gross oil consumption has decreased substantially, while EV sales have surged. A comprehensive and clear analysis by Nicolás Saldías for Americas Quarterly. Join the regional dialogue at @AmerQuarterly @NicSaldias #LatinAmerica #EnergyPolicy #Inflation #Economics #GasolinePrices americasquarterly.org/article/a-lati…
English
1
13
23
1.6K
exegesis
exegesis@exegesis·
@ToKTeacher You should talk to Doomberg, genuinely interested in the exchange. I follow you both. Full disclosure.
English
0
0
0
10
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
Ultimately we’ll solve all this. If we figure out fusion, as I say, all this will be moot. Solar, fossil fuels, wind, basically everything else will fall to zero cost because there’ll be ~zero demand for it. But that’s a prophecy. As is any claim that “solar is the future”.
English
1
0
1
437
exegesis
exegesis@exegesis·
@wewantpicks Hey, I pay 10 bucks a month to support you all. You don't charge enough. Are you telling me I can pay $300 and get a lifetime membership that includes other sports soon?
English
0
0
0
7
Kunath
Kunath@KunathMMA·
Actual conversation with my fiance how were the fights? - solid did you win a lot? - not much but decent enough. up for the card as a whole nice! what about the picks? - 11-2 😎 Damn that’s gooddd … but how did you only make a little profit with 11/13 picks? - I kept taking methods rather than MLs and got burned a few times Why not just take MLs?
GIF
English
26
4
149
12K
Le Shrub🌳
Le Shrub🌳@agnostoxxx·
In the Golden Age of Grift, Wars only take place when the Market is closed. Etiquette 🤭
English
36
106
1.5K
217.7K
exegesis
exegesis@exegesis·
@grey4626 Almost every Western Hemisphere country is more important to th US than the UK. Has a country fallen faster from relevance than the UK?
English
0
0
0
112
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.” Until now. Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions. Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.” It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years. And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this. This isn’t “turning his back.” This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies. You want the special relationship? Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons. Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have. The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year. Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure. Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian. You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy. Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes. We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something. In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion. Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact. You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power. Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer. He sees what you refuse to admit: the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945. It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated. We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves. Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing. The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality. And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other. Look into it. 💀⚖️🗡️
The Economist@TheEconomist

No British government has ever imagined that an American president might turn his back on the special relationship between both nations. Until now econ.st/3OZceLM Illustration: Mona Eing & Michael Meissner

English
1.3K
5K
16.2K
1.3M
Stock Talk
Stock Talk@stocktalkweekly·
*U.K. PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER: WE DO NOT SUPPORT THE U.S. BLOCKADE OF THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ... WE WILL NOT BE DRAGGED INTO WAR DESPITE PRESSURE, NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES...
English
16
8
130
20.4K
Borg
Borg@Borg_Cryptos·
Honestly ? I don't believe it. Bull Trap.
English
49
16
378
22.2K
Borg
Borg@Borg_Cryptos·
Today is probably your last chance to sell your bag. What's coming will be terrible for markets.
English
32
16
121
6.7K
exegesis
exegesis@exegesis·
@DanTalks1 Fair. I'm confused by US not securing nuclear material and Iran charging a fee for Hormuz crossing is bullish.
English
0
0
0
44
Dandalf
Dandalf@DanTalks1·
I got a 2 hour drive, ask me anything thread
English
11
0
8
1.5K
Borg
Borg@Borg_Cryptos·
What are you buying today ?
English
133
26
153
5K
Borg
Borg@Borg_Cryptos·
🚨 CRYPTOS AND STOCKS ARE ABOUT TO COLLAPSE
English
24
6
94
4.3K