fastackl
8.7K posts







People go online to fulfill their unmet IRL needs. Men who can get their sexual needs met IRL dont watch porn. Women who can get their attention needs IRL don’t use social media. And there is very little you can get online that you wouldn’t be better off getting IRL instead. It’s worth asking yourself what unmet needs you are turning to the internet to meet and what you should change about your life to get them met offline instead.

Stop referring to them as 'Asian grooming gangs'. They're not Japanese. Call them what they are - they are Pakistani rape gangs.



@Stevephenni Hearing this all over - rabid Trump supporters are planning on staying home this fall if this continues. Blue tsunami inbound this fall if nothing changes. Polls I am seeing not reflecting this.

En El Salvador, el Presidente @nayibbukele derribó los monumentos de la izquierda construidos en la época de la falsa paz. Ese material se utilizó como tapaderas de alcantarilla para las calles. Y en ese lugar se construyó una plaza pública y un cine al aire libre gratis. 🇸🇻

Just a few years ago, the only tourists in El Salvador were surfers in beach towns. Going to downtown San Salvador at night? Unthinkable, even for locals.

The 'r-word' is seeing a resurgence. What happened? #onpoli trib.al/oVCCjuk


When I have children, I do not want them to be genetically mine. Instead, I will have someone better than me be the sperm donor. My reasoning here: nicholasdecker.substack.com/p/why-my-child…



(1/11) Some of you oldtroons calling themselves "frogs" seem to have forgotten your vidya roots and are oblivious to the humongous opportunity at hand with regards to age verification to use Discord or play online video games. If you're unaware, right now there is a push in the

The more time I spend in Latin America, the more I’m convinced this is the likely path for the US. Small, wealthy class of elites and then everyone else, crumbling infrastructure and economy dominated by an openly grifting state. Not quite socialism, not quite capitalism, an ugly middle ground where the social contract has completely eroded. @rhunterh was on this trend a while ago, took me a while to come around but there’s too much evidence to ignore.

THEY DID IT. The SEC and CFTC just dropped a landmark document that officially classifies crypto assets. They're actually telling us which crypto assets are securities and which ones aren't - by name! THIS IS SOMETHING GENSLER REFUSED TO DO (he focused on prosecuting crypto out of existence) This rule doc gives crypto many of the benefits of the clarity bill - it lifts us out of the gray market - it gives every asset a path. It's almost like the Clarity act just passed by way of regulator. (of course, the actual clarity act will harden all this into legislation and make it irreversible in the event we get another Gensler, we still want it) This rule says there's 5 categories for crypto assets: 1) Digital Commodities - assets tied to a functional, decentralized crypto system (e.g., BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, DOGE). Not securities. (yes, they name them on page 14) 2) Digital Collectibles - NFTs, meme coins, artwork tokens, in-game items. Not securities (fractionalized collectibles may be an exception). 3) Digital Tools - membership tokens, credentials, domain names (e.g., ENS). Not securities. 4) Stablecoins - payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not securities. Other stablecoins, it depends. 5) Digital Securities - tokenized versions of traditional securities. Like tokenized stocks. Always securities. Amazing! This makes so much sense I can't believe it's coming from a regulator. No more enforcement threats to Ethereum developers and crypto exchanges. How about the Howey test? More common sense! If an issuer makes specific promises of managerial efforts from which buyers expect profits, the offering is a security until those promises are fulfilled. Then it's a commodity. The asset itself was never the security, the deal around it was. (E.g. XRP was a security pre launch, became a commodity after). How about stuff like staking and mining? Mining? Not a securities transaction. Staking? Also not a securities transaction, that includes custodial and liquid staking even with LSTs! How about wrapping BTC? Not a securities transaction. Airdrops? NOT SECURITIES. NO MORE GEO BANS PROTECTING AMERICANS from free airdrops. Remember this is a joint doc from the SEC and CFTC, They're actually cooperating on this, no internal strife, this is binding to both. SEC regulates $80-100 trillion assets CFTC regulates $5-10 trillion assets Both of the world's largest capital markets are showing us that crypto assets are here to stay and they're welcome alongside traditional assets. Every country will follow. This is the biggest move toward legitimacy I've seen in all my time in crypto. Maybe bigger than the genius act since is covers all crypto assets. Well done @MichaelSelig and @SECPaulSAtkins. And especially well done to the indefatigable @HesterPeirce. Her fingerprints are all over this, couldn't have happened without her eight years of principles-based curiosity.



