Fede Ratier

676 posts

Fede Ratier banner
Fede Ratier

Fede Ratier

@federatier

Lavaplatos en el extranjero

Katılım Eylül 2008
75 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Fede Ratier retweetledi
Zanfa 2
Zanfa 2@ZanfaVive·
Leve desconforto
Português
100
1.5K
21.5K
335.4K
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
@julianmedita Vamos a ver si aunque sea llego a tener entrevista, hubo un par de cosas que me gustaron y me ghostearon fuerte hahah
Español
1
0
0
19
julian
julian@julianmedita·
@federatier Quiero una comisión si entrás. 😂 o llevame.
Español
1
0
0
21
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
@amartino Recién re leo el comentario, pero no te dijo ignorante, dijo que porque tenés plata, te quitó lo ignorante 😂
Español
2
0
0
38
Mariano Amartino
Mariano Amartino@amartino·
En algún momento LinkedIn se convirtió en X y no me avisaron? Jajaja
Mariano Amartino tweet media
Español
13
0
21
2.9K
Fede Ratier retweetledi
Tino
Tino@TinoCLeclerc·
Es el mejor resumen de F1 que vi jajdjajwjwj Siempre hay un fragmento de los Simpsons para resumir cualquier momento de la vida
Español
36
693
4.8K
137.6K
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
@jespr @bif1964jc @SAS @Starlink ahh well they are not in the long hauls yet, so from US to EU you won't get it, but internally you might if you are flying a 320
English
0
1
1
87
El Pincel de Dios
El Pincel de Dios@yo_ruso·
@MNPicc @SamsungArg ¿30 meses te parece muy limitada vida útil en un celular? Lamentablemente la tecnología de hoy tiene una obsolencia programada cortisima. Personalmente creo que esta más que amortizado. Igualmente no confío en los fold/flips, sorprendido que te haya durado tanto.
Español
19
0
15
15.8K
Marcelo Piccardi (DrGenial en Reddit)
Compré un Samsung Fold 5 hace 30 meses. Un día el display interno explotó como sucede con TODOS los Folds y Flips eventualmente. Inicié un reclamo y @SamsungArg me dice que no es un defecto de diseño porque el teléfono tiene marcas de uso indebido. Las marcas:
Marcelo Piccardi (DrGenial en Reddit) tweet media
Español
216
35
1.2K
274.2K
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
Primera vez corriendo el Nascar Pickup Cup. 4to. Not bad. Not bad. Hubiera sido 2do si en la última vuelta no había un tipo frenado en el medio…
Fede Ratier tweet media
Español
0
0
0
45
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
And first flight with Starlink enabled happened, one of many to come
Fede Ratier tweet media
English
0
1
1
150
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
La manera más sencilla de mandar paquetes
Español
0
0
0
116
Fede Ratier retweetledi
Ryan
Ryan@ohryansbelt·
Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor
Ryan tweet media
erin griffith@eringriffith

A detailed and brutal look at the tactics of buzzy AI compliance startup Delve "Delve built a machine designed to make clients complicit without their knowledge, to manufacture plausible deniability while producing exactly the opposite." substack.com/home/post/p-19…

English
402
732
8.2K
5.6M
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
@SebaOnTwitt3r What is so hard to understand from this? I'm specifically talking about people who does not provide the structure and context needed for the AI to make correct decisions. People who does not have the fundamentals of programming x.com/federatier/sta…
Fede Ratier@federatier

@SebaOnTwitt3r No, humans that do not know the fundamentals of what they are coding are not going to catch it. That's why I'm specifically talking about vibe coding and not about coding with AI.

English
0
0
0
8
Juanito Nieve ⭐️🌟⭐️
Juanito Nieve ⭐️🌟⭐️@SebaOnTwitt3r·
@federatier Not at all, I'm always curious about how people think—especially those who claim universals and systematically fail to explain their points.
English
1
0
0
23
Fede Ratier
Fede Ratier@federatier·
How I know you vibe coded that: It has 35 fucking useEffect for no reason at all
English
1
0
3
95