
fishtrousers
175 posts






I Exposed Ireland's Immigrant Invasion...


@RupertLowe10 @Harry_pitt In the very same interview:











White men in America are more outraged about little girls being raped by foreign subhumans in the UK than all the women's rights groups combined. Makes you think doesn't it



found this in a comments section 😭






Islamic call to prayer tested in downtown Regina ctvnews.ca/regina/article…


Giorgia Meloni only talks, Trump walks the walk. In Italy, we need a Trump, not a chatterbox.


@___Sean______ Yes. He advocates for his own people. We should be surprised by that? Or are you somehow saying that is bad in and of itself?







The parliamentary constituency of Makerfield is an overwhelmingly English area. In 2021, it had a population of 98,833. Of these, 68.3 were Christian, 30% were atheist, and less than 1% were Muslim. Of this electorate, 58.75% voted yesterday in the bi-election. This was a considerable 6.35% increase from the 2024 General Election. 54.8% of votes were cast for Labour and Andy Burham, one of the key figures in the cover-up of the Muslim rape gangs. 34.5% of votes were for Reform UK; and just 6.8% were for Restore Britain. The votes for both Labour and Reform were up, respectively, by 9.6% and 2.7%. This suggests that the electorate were aware of the significance of this vote, which was triggered by the incumbent Labour MP resigning to allow Burnham to win the seat and thereby challenge Keir Starmer for the leadership of the Labour Party. What this Labour Government has done to the country since July 2024, including its historical and ongoing complicity in the gang rape and trafficking of upwards of a quarter of a million English girls, not only didn’t stop 24,927 English people from voting Labour, but actually increased those who did by nearly 10%, a huge electoral swing. What was pitched as an expected upset turned out to be a resounding win for the Labour Party. How do we account for this? Makerfield is in Greater Manchester, where Burnham has been Mayor since 2017, and is one of the safest Labour seats in the country, with the predecessor seat (before the current constituency was created in 1983), held by Labour since 1903. This is, of course, why it was chosen for Burnham. The Labour Party rightly identified the voters of Makerfield as the electorate that would vote their candidate into the House of Commons. These are, in other words, died-in-the-wool Labourites who place their Party above the country, the British people, even their own children. They believe, or perhaps hope, that we’re back in 1992 and Neil Kinnock is about to lead them to victory over Margaret Thatcher. There’s an additional indication that, between the Census of 2011 and that of 2021, a mere decade, the Christian population of Makerfield dropped by 16% from 80,953 to 67,544. Presumably, it’s even lower today. Part of that, undoubtedly, would be because of the older generation dying out; but over the same decade the atheist population increased by an almost equivalent 15.4% from 13,977 to 29,614. That’s 15,637 atheists replacing 13,409 Christians. I don’t know whether Christians would have voted or did vote for a Party that has sold hundreds of thousands of English girls into sex slavery for Muslim rape gangs in return for votes, but I think it’s an indication that Woke, rather than Methodism, is now the religious foundation of the Labour Party, and even when not aligned with Islam it will place its own parliamentary success and access to power above the interests and even the safety of the British people. The other indication of how this happened is that 41.25% of the electorate of Makerfield, 31,853 people, didn’t vote, not for Labour, not for Reform UK, and not for Restore Britain. They didn’t not vote because they were presented with a choice between indistinguishable Labour and Conservative candidates. They didn’t vote, I would guess, because they never have voted. Even if, under the blanket media ban, they have never heard of Restore Britain, they undoubtedly would have heard of Farage and Reform UK, yet they didn’t vote for him either. The split in the so-called Right-wing vote between Reform and Restore never happened. 3,111 voters who may have voted for Reform voted Restore, but even combined these two parties were over 6,000 votes short of beating Labour. What lessons can we draw from this? This week I went to my first Restore Britain meeting. I came back from a cushy life in Hong Kong to fight for my country, and yet I walked out of this meeting in disgust. I have sat in many political meetings and am more than familiar with the rhetoric of political parties, which is almost indistinguishable between the Left and the Right. We mustn’t be divisive. We must be inclusive. Everyone’s welcome. We condemn violence. And for Christ’s sake don’t mention Islam. I expected, or at least hoped, that this meeting would be different. It wasn’t. The presenter, a woman who said she worked ‘in the City’ and spent an hour taking us through pie-charts, said several times that ‘we’ (meaning, presumably, the official position of Restore Britain) don’t condone what happened in Belfast (meaning the response by the people of Northern Ireland, not the beheading of one of them by a Muslim, which she didn’t mention). That ‘we’ don’t want to outrage people. That ‘we’ must be inclusive and appeal to everyone. That ‘we’ musn’t be divisive. She had swallowed and was regurgitating every cliche of the woke handbook. It was like listening to Sadiq Khan. The last straw for me was when, displaying the racial demographic of my constituency, which is 43% Black and Asian, she said, for the second time, that she doesn’t like such data being divided by race and that she was didn’t like the category of ‘White’. This meeting was held two days after The Rape Gang Inquiry Report was published, documenting the grooming, drugging, gang-rape, torture and trafficking of at least 250,000 British girls who were targeted by Muslim men specifically because they were White. For decades now, since at least the New Labour Government of Tony Blair, the existence of the British as a White race has been denied as racist, and British citizenship has been handed to every race that arrives in our country, legally or illegally. Over the same period, the culture and unparalleled achievements of White people, not only in Britain but across Europe and the Western world, has been under relentless and increasing attack by the ideology of Woke. And as a result of immigration policies enforced on the White British people against our will on the basis of virulently anti-White Woke and Islamist ideology, the White British are set to become a minority in our own country by 2063 at the latest. Yet in a meeting of Restore Britain, a party formed to oppose all this and much more, the lead speaker and organiser didn’t want to use the word White. Moreover, like every parliamentary party in history, it was already according itself the right to tell the White working class how it should respond to the attacks on us, what is permitted and what isn’t, what violence we are meant to tolerate and what violence we are permitted to use in return. This branch of Restore Britain, in other words, was indistinguishable from the Labour Party, the Green Party, even the Conservative Party. Now, partly this is because this meeting was held in London, which is the UK’s centre of White guilt and self hatred, into which this speaker and the room of largely (but not exclusively) White Britons that sat listening to her had clearly been indoctrinated. But if Restore Britain repeats the DEI rhetoric and ineffectual tactics of the other parliamentary parties, it will repeat the results of the Makerfield bi-election in 2029, always supposing a General Election is held. Let me say this very clearly. The voters which Restore Britain has to target are not the 25,000 Labourites or 15,000 Reformers who voted against their country and people in the Makerfield bi-election, but the 31,000 White English people who didn’t vote and the White British share of the 20 million people who didn’t vote in the 2024 General Election. And we don’t get them to vote for Restore Britain by the kind of DEI crap I heard at the meeting I attended this week. What we say to them, quite clearly and without fear, is that Restore Britain is a political party for the British people. That the British people are a White race. That no-one who is not White British can hold office in Restore Britain, as no-one who is not White British will be an MP in a Restore Britain Government or in a Restore Britain council. That the British people are in a religious war with Islam and a racial war with the millions of immigrants from South Asia, the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa brought here to rape, murder and replace us. That unless we restore Britain to the British people we will become a subject people in our own homeland under Sharia law. That the British people are right to be enraged by what has been done and is being done to them. That every Muslim is an enemy of the British people and should be treated as such. And that only a political revolution by the British people that is not limited to a Restore Britain Government but which will de-Islamise and de-woke British society from top to bottom will ensure the success of such a government. This is what the 20 million Britons who didn’t vote, and the millions more who did but for a party they chose as the least worse option, want to hear from Restore Britain. We won’t get the British people to vote for us by talking to them in the language that has reduced the British people to our current servile state as dhimmis in what is already a country under Sharia law. We do that by increasing their anger, by increasing the sense of outrage they have kept locked in their chests their whole lives, by validating, celebrating and rewarding their patriotism, and by making them understand, loudly and clearly and by every means possible, just how close we are to the ethnicide of the British people. We are at war. Pretty women mouthing platitudes about inclusivity and diversity and British values are not what the British people want to hear. They are looking for leaders of men in the Battle for Britain we still haven’t started fighting. If you want to know how we, the British people, can start to bring this about now, rather than sitting at home watching the football and posting on social media about how many followers we have; or if you still don’t understand fully the extent of the existential threat we face as a people, a culture, a nation and a race; you may want to read my recently banned but now republished book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. The link is below. architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2026/02/26/the…














