VVikas Kumaarr

24.1K posts

VVikas Kumaarr banner
VVikas Kumaarr

VVikas Kumaarr

@flyingvikas129

Founder @VRSuccessful |💹 Mastering the Art of Explosive Trading |Trend-spotter 📊|Timing Big Moves🎩| Living the Dream 💭 |Charts are My Canvas 🎨|NO PAID TIP|

India Katılım Ekim 2013
166 Takip Edilen18K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
Read it slowly.
VVikas Kumaarr tweet media
English
31
10
289
0
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
Thanks! Though it seems you’ve assumed I’m on the bulls’ side based on what I post on social media, but those who follow me and seen me live ( a few must be here on this platform as well) , know I’ve taken clear bearish positions as well when the market demanded it. 😃
Mahendra Kumar Sahu@Mahendr09523141

@flyingvikas129 Welcome back....Apka kbse wait tha..kaise hai sir...Bulls r back..🙏

English
2
0
9
761
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
I almost got scammed by @hm. But, But, But 😁 I always make it a habit to record a video whenever I return something, because I don’t trust how logistics companies handle packages. This time too, I recorded a clear video showing that I handed over the return parcel. If I didn’t have that proof, H&M was ready to deny my refund by saying, “the returned item was not the original product.” Just imagine how many people might have faced this because of mistakes from them or their delivery partners. So here’s a simple tip: whenever you return anything bought online, always record a short video showing you handing over the parcel to the courier. Create your own shield because everyone here is ready to punish you and pass the blame for their own Mistake. Since, I had Video which was enough to put them a place where they can't deny my refund. Finally they decided to refund.
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129

❌❌FRAUD BY @hm &M ❌❌ Hey @hm Can you justify On what grounds are you attempting to deny the refund to the customer when the lapse has evidently occurred either with your logistics partner @delhivery or within your internal handling process? Does this justify penalising the customer for your operational failure, or will you take ownership and resolve this matter directly with your logistics partner instead of passing the burden unfairly onto me? @GabbbarSingh @jagograhakjago

English
0
1
7
579
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
❌❌FRAUD BY @hm &M ❌❌ Hey @hm Can you justify On what grounds are you attempting to deny the refund to the customer when the lapse has evidently occurred either with your logistics partner @delhivery or within your internal handling process? Does this justify penalising the customer for your operational failure, or will you take ownership and resolve this matter directly with your logistics partner instead of passing the burden unfairly onto me? @GabbbarSingh @jagograhakjago
VVikas Kumaarr tweet media
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129

⚠️ Consumer Alert: H&M & Delhivery Refund Scam? Subject: FORMAL GRIEVANCE: Alleged Fraud and Request for Immediate Refund – Order #47722252842 Dear H&M Support and Delhivery Management, I am writing this formal email to express my absolute outrage regarding the handling of my return for Order #47722252842 (Value: INR 9,396). The current situation, where H&M denies a refund despite clear evidence of a valid return, is nothing short of consumer fraud. The Facts of the Case: Return Date: 17/03/2026 under Tracking ID: 16602364672452 (Delhivery). H&M’s Claim: Your team claims that the parcel contained a "non-H&M product" and refused the refund. The Evidence: I have already provided a video recording of the return pickup. In this video, the Delhivery agent is seen verifying each article. He explicitly confirms the contents are correct (stating "Theek hai") before taking possession of the parcel. The Dispute: Despite providing photographic and video proof that the correct items were handed over to your authorized courier partner, H&M continues to send automated, dismissive responses stating that the "claimed article was not received." This leads to only two logical conclusions: The article was lost or swapped while in the custody of Delhivery. The article was misplaced or mishandled at the H&M Warehouse. In either scenario, the customer is not at fault. I have fulfilled my responsibility by returning the items and documenting the process. It is the legal and ethical responsibility of H&M to manage its logistics partners. If there is a discrepancy between what the courier picked up and what the warehouse received, that is a matter for H&M and Delhivery to investigate internally. Demand for Action: I will not accept "gross negligence" as an excuse for denying a legitimate refund of INR 9,396. By holding the consumer financially liable for your internal logistics failures, you are engaging in a scam. I hereby demand: 1. An immediate reversal of the decision and the processing of my full refund. 2. A detailed explanation of how a verified pickup by your courier resulted in a "missing" or "incorrect" item at your warehouse. At this point, it strongly appears to be a case of either gross negligence or a deliberate attempt to deny a legitimate refund. If the article has been misplaced, it is solely the responsibility of H&M or your courier partner—not mine. Holding the customer accountable for your internal failure is unacceptable. This behavior reflects extremely poorly on your service standards and raises serious concerns about unfair trade practices. I will not tolerate being denied my rightful refund after complying fully with your return process and providing valid proof. If my refund is not processed immediately, I will escalate this matter through formal legal channels under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, including filing a complaint with the consumer forum and other relevant authorities. I expect this issue to be resolved without any further excuses @hm @delhivery @jagograhakjago @TimesNow @htTweets @aajtak @inshorts

English
1
2
4
1.6K
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
❌❌FRAUD BY @hm and @delhivery ❌❌ Hey @GabbbarSingh can you please amplify @JagranNews @jagograhakjago
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129

⚠️ Consumer Alert: H&M & Delhivery Refund Scam? Subject: FORMAL GRIEVANCE: Alleged Fraud and Request for Immediate Refund – Order #47722252842 Dear H&M Support and Delhivery Management, I am writing this formal email to express my absolute outrage regarding the handling of my return for Order #47722252842 (Value: INR 9,396). The current situation, where H&M denies a refund despite clear evidence of a valid return, is nothing short of consumer fraud. The Facts of the Case: Return Date: 17/03/2026 under Tracking ID: 16602364672452 (Delhivery). H&M’s Claim: Your team claims that the parcel contained a "non-H&M product" and refused the refund. The Evidence: I have already provided a video recording of the return pickup. In this video, the Delhivery agent is seen verifying each article. He explicitly confirms the contents are correct (stating "Theek hai") before taking possession of the parcel. The Dispute: Despite providing photographic and video proof that the correct items were handed over to your authorized courier partner, H&M continues to send automated, dismissive responses stating that the "claimed article was not received." This leads to only two logical conclusions: The article was lost or swapped while in the custody of Delhivery. The article was misplaced or mishandled at the H&M Warehouse. In either scenario, the customer is not at fault. I have fulfilled my responsibility by returning the items and documenting the process. It is the legal and ethical responsibility of H&M to manage its logistics partners. If there is a discrepancy between what the courier picked up and what the warehouse received, that is a matter for H&M and Delhivery to investigate internally. Demand for Action: I will not accept "gross negligence" as an excuse for denying a legitimate refund of INR 9,396. By holding the consumer financially liable for your internal logistics failures, you are engaging in a scam. I hereby demand: 1. An immediate reversal of the decision and the processing of my full refund. 2. A detailed explanation of how a verified pickup by your courier resulted in a "missing" or "incorrect" item at your warehouse. At this point, it strongly appears to be a case of either gross negligence or a deliberate attempt to deny a legitimate refund. If the article has been misplaced, it is solely the responsibility of H&M or your courier partner—not mine. Holding the customer accountable for your internal failure is unacceptable. This behavior reflects extremely poorly on your service standards and raises serious concerns about unfair trade practices. I will not tolerate being denied my rightful refund after complying fully with your return process and providing valid proof. If my refund is not processed immediately, I will escalate this matter through formal legal channels under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, including filing a complaint with the consumer forum and other relevant authorities. I expect this issue to be resolved without any further excuses @hm @delhivery @jagograhakjago @TimesNow @htTweets @aajtak @inshorts

English
1
1
2
482
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
Any one who can help me to file a consumer case to @hm for the FRAUD THEY ARE DOING ? PLEASE DM ME OR REPLY
English
0
0
1
407
VVikas Kumaarr
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129·
⚠️ Consumer Alert: H&M & Delhivery Refund Scam? Subject: FORMAL GRIEVANCE: Alleged Fraud and Request for Immediate Refund – Order #47722252842 Dear H&M Support and Delhivery Management, I am writing this formal email to express my absolute outrage regarding the handling of my return for Order #47722252842 (Value: INR 9,396). The current situation, where H&M denies a refund despite clear evidence of a valid return, is nothing short of consumer fraud. The Facts of the Case: Return Date: 17/03/2026 under Tracking ID: 16602364672452 (Delhivery). H&M’s Claim: Your team claims that the parcel contained a "non-H&M product" and refused the refund. The Evidence: I have already provided a video recording of the return pickup. In this video, the Delhivery agent is seen verifying each article. He explicitly confirms the contents are correct (stating "Theek hai") before taking possession of the parcel. The Dispute: Despite providing photographic and video proof that the correct items were handed over to your authorized courier partner, H&M continues to send automated, dismissive responses stating that the "claimed article was not received." This leads to only two logical conclusions: The article was lost or swapped while in the custody of Delhivery. The article was misplaced or mishandled at the H&M Warehouse. In either scenario, the customer is not at fault. I have fulfilled my responsibility by returning the items and documenting the process. It is the legal and ethical responsibility of H&M to manage its logistics partners. If there is a discrepancy between what the courier picked up and what the warehouse received, that is a matter for H&M and Delhivery to investigate internally. Demand for Action: I will not accept "gross negligence" as an excuse for denying a legitimate refund of INR 9,396. By holding the consumer financially liable for your internal logistics failures, you are engaging in a scam. I hereby demand: 1. An immediate reversal of the decision and the processing of my full refund. 2. A detailed explanation of how a verified pickup by your courier resulted in a "missing" or "incorrect" item at your warehouse. At this point, it strongly appears to be a case of either gross negligence or a deliberate attempt to deny a legitimate refund. If the article has been misplaced, it is solely the responsibility of H&M or your courier partner—not mine. Holding the customer accountable for your internal failure is unacceptable. This behavior reflects extremely poorly on your service standards and raises serious concerns about unfair trade practices. I will not tolerate being denied my rightful refund after complying fully with your return process and providing valid proof. If my refund is not processed immediately, I will escalate this matter through formal legal channels under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, including filing a complaint with the consumer forum and other relevant authorities. I expect this issue to be resolved without any further excuses @hm @delhivery @jagograhakjago @TimesNow @htTweets @aajtak @inshorts
VVikas Kumaarr tweet media
English
4
48
20
4.2K
VVikas Kumaarr retweetledi
Shivank
Shivank@shivankbaiswar·
@flyingvikas129 Just sayin, what if you haven’t recorded a video? Most people don’t, as they trust delivery partners and brand. It becomes easy to accuse customer & put the blame on them for sending the wrong product. @delhivery @hm you got caught this time. You can’t fool/scam every customer.
English
1
3
0
800
VVikas Kumaarr retweetledi
InvesTrader
InvesTrader@EInvestrading·
This is atrocious and day light robbery off customers by H&M. Need a swift, immediate and favourable action @hm @delhivery @jagograhakjago @TimesNow @htTweets @aajtak @inshorts @flyingvikas129
VVikas Kumaarr@flyingvikas129

⚠️ Consumer Alert: H&M & Delhivery Refund Scam? Subject: FORMAL GRIEVANCE: Alleged Fraud and Request for Immediate Refund – Order #47722252842 Dear H&M Support and Delhivery Management, I am writing this formal email to express my absolute outrage regarding the handling of my return for Order #47722252842 (Value: INR 9,396). The current situation, where H&M denies a refund despite clear evidence of a valid return, is nothing short of consumer fraud. The Facts of the Case: Return Date: 17/03/2026 under Tracking ID: 16602364672452 (Delhivery). H&M’s Claim: Your team claims that the parcel contained a "non-H&M product" and refused the refund. The Evidence: I have already provided a video recording of the return pickup. In this video, the Delhivery agent is seen verifying each article. He explicitly confirms the contents are correct (stating "Theek hai") before taking possession of the parcel. The Dispute: Despite providing photographic and video proof that the correct items were handed over to your authorized courier partner, H&M continues to send automated, dismissive responses stating that the "claimed article was not received." This leads to only two logical conclusions: The article was lost or swapped while in the custody of Delhivery. The article was misplaced or mishandled at the H&M Warehouse. In either scenario, the customer is not at fault. I have fulfilled my responsibility by returning the items and documenting the process. It is the legal and ethical responsibility of H&M to manage its logistics partners. If there is a discrepancy between what the courier picked up and what the warehouse received, that is a matter for H&M and Delhivery to investigate internally. Demand for Action: I will not accept "gross negligence" as an excuse for denying a legitimate refund of INR 9,396. By holding the consumer financially liable for your internal logistics failures, you are engaging in a scam. I hereby demand: 1. An immediate reversal of the decision and the processing of my full refund. 2. A detailed explanation of how a verified pickup by your courier resulted in a "missing" or "incorrect" item at your warehouse. At this point, it strongly appears to be a case of either gross negligence or a deliberate attempt to deny a legitimate refund. If the article has been misplaced, it is solely the responsibility of H&M or your courier partner—not mine. Holding the customer accountable for your internal failure is unacceptable. This behavior reflects extremely poorly on your service standards and raises serious concerns about unfair trade practices. I will not tolerate being denied my rightful refund after complying fully with your return process and providing valid proof. If my refund is not processed immediately, I will escalate this matter through formal legal channels under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, including filing a complaint with the consumer forum and other relevant authorities. I expect this issue to be resolved without any further excuses @hm @delhivery @jagograhakjago @TimesNow @htTweets @aajtak @inshorts

English
0
2
1
644
Somnath Bharti सोमनाथ भारती
मोदी जी ने क्या कभी ऐसा किया???
TANVEER@sktanveer87

नेपाल की राजनीति में इस समय एक नई लहर देखने को मिल रही है! प्रधानमंत्री बालेंद्र शाह और गृह मंत्री सूदन गुरुंग की जोड़ी ने भ्रष्टाचार के खिलाफ जो मोर्चा खोला है, बातों' में नहीं, सीधा 'एक्शन' में विश्वास रखते हैं। ​हाल ही में गृह मंत्री सूदन गुरुंग स्विट्जरलैंड के राजदूत के ऑफिस पहुँचे और एक ऐसी माँग रख दी जिससे भ्रष्ट नेताओं की नींद उड़ गई है। उन्होंने साफ कहा स्विस बैंक में नेपाल के जितने भी भ्रष्ट नेताओं और बिजनेसमैन का काला धन (Black Money) जमा है, उसका पूरा डेटा सरकार को चाहिए। ​ गुरुंग ने राजदूत को सख्त लहजे में अल्टीमेटम दिया है। 1 महीने के भीतर सभी संदिग्ध खातों की पूरी डिटेल। 5 दिन के भीतर उस पैसे को नेपाल वापस लाने की पूरी कानूनी प्रक्रिया (Procedure) की जानकारी। यह पैसा देश के विकास कार्यों में इस्तेमाल करने का संकल्प है। ​ ​अब सवाल यह उठता है कि क्या भारत और अन्य पड़ोसी देशों में भी ऐसी राजनीतिक इच्छाशक्ति दिखाई जाएगी? अगर स्विस बैंक से सारा काला धन वापस आ जाए, तो हमारे देशों की अर्थव्यवस्था कहाँ से कहाँ पहुँच जाएगी!

हिन्दी
12
66
210
4K
Dr Nishikant Dubey
Dr Nishikant Dubey@nishikant_dubey·
Community note पर हो हल्ला क्यों भाई ।@XCorpIndia नोट छापते रहे और भारत सरकार को कोई टैक्स नहीं दे, यह कहाँ का न्याय है । ऑस्ट्रेलियाई क़ानून की तरह वह भारत में Publishers का लाइसेंस लें तथा हमें प्रत्येक साल भारत सरकार को 25 हज़ार करोड़ का टैक्स देते रहें,अन्यथा कम्यूनिटी नोट बंद करे। X प्रत्येक वर्ष ऑस्ट्रेलिया सरकार को 7 हज़ार करोड़ रुपये टैक्स देता है
हिन्दी
2.2K
433
2K
522.3K