forcedsm

3.1K posts

forcedsm

forcedsm

@forcedsm

Katılım Ağustos 2019
109 Takip Edilen28 Takipçiler
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@PeterWrangel It doesn't matter since America is not and never will be an empire.
English
0
0
0
17
Peter Wrangel
Peter Wrangel@PeterWrangel·
This is going to be rather unpopular but more GWOT veterans need to realize and internalize that the US Military was defeated in Afghanistan, at all levels tactical, operational and strategic.
Gua@TheThinLine123

@PeterWrangel I think if more Vets could openly admit, we could help make a change for the next generations

English
190
42
812
142.9K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@AscendedYield If taxes where reduced so real wage growth was allowed to occur, it would reduce public demands for redistribution via taxes. If your ideological objective is to expand the state, wage growth becomes a threat
English
0
0
0
169
Bear
Bear@BearJFK·
Something about HS2 that never made sense to me. Who wants a high speed line to Birmingham?
English
34
0
70
6.8K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@rafcolantonio What of the spirit of source physics as an intrinsic element to the reactivity of the sim, or is this a piece of dna belonging to an extinct ancestor?
English
1
0
2
413
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@PeterMcCormack The left understand economics, but economic prosperity doesn't increase the relative size of the state, if anything it undermines past progress in expanding the state, undermining the entire objective of leftist ideology
English
0
0
0
337
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
I see the comments, the whys… So listen, we have a country where people are taking past each other. I’ve had plenty from the right on the show, though getting people from the left is hard. They either don’t return emails or they agree and then cancel (cough cough @ZoeJardiniere). While people talk past each other, they keep voting to get poorer. Every damn election. So good on Narinder, whatever you think, she agreed, turned up, we talked, found out what we agreed on and what we didn’t. I just want the left to understand economics. That’s all, because else we’re all doomed. Platform is still open - @ZoeJardiniere is still welcome, @graceblakeley I’d love to talk to, @lewis_goodall still waiting, @ZackPolanski lots we can discuss, @garyseconomics I’m ready. Let’s talk :)
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

So I finally got someone from the left to sit down and talk. Tea, cake and economics with @narindertweets. Full interview 👇🏼

English
131
26
591
46.2K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@Dominic2306 Either Link pensions to project outcomes or start a lottery to pick people from failed projects for public hangings. Btw doing a big Noticing a project is shit isn't running the country, you were at the table, you are all playing pretend
English
0
0
0
655
Dominic Cummings
Dominic Cummings@Dominic2306·
My 2023 blog on why I tried so hard to cancel HS2 in Jan 2020. It was a clear disaster and the 'evidence' presented by Cabinet Office/DfT was clearly fraudulent. If you tried to do this in business you'd be jailed. You can see the original chart below with Ben Warner's 'this is bullshit' scribbled on it in the Cabinet room when they presented. You can see the smooth exponential which predicts the need for HS3 then HS4 - everyone in yookay either riding on them or building them! This is how CON-LAB burn your money - and when the Trolley went ahead with it, Labour and Whitehall and FT etc all cheered. Trebles all round for 'the serious grownups'
Dominic Cummings tweet mediaDominic Cummings tweet media
English
53
276
1.4K
152.9K
W.Brenton
W.Brenton@WBrenton14236·
@Lordmiles It doesnt help either that money made through criminal acrivity is counted TOWARDS GDP. If it wasnt, youd see a much harder clamp down as thats money which is effectively being lost to potential GDP growth
English
1
0
1
139
Lord Miles
Lord Miles@Lordmiles·
The British must realise that the reason money laundering drug dealing Turkish barbers / vape shops / American sweet shops etc aren’t being shut down is because the police are corrupt and taking bribes, actively protecting them. Same for most crime. The institutions are compromised
English
55
140
1.9K
44K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@FuturistPartyGB At this point, given the sums involved. The public need to form some sort of legal challenge, for prejudiced harm to the public because fish or w/e preferred group is exploiting the system. go for the jugular: sue for pensions. If not, the UK doesn't get to be a 1st world country
English
0
0
1
123
AnglofuturistParty
AnglofuturistParty@FuturistPartyGB·
The practice of the state is to shake companies (or even itself) down for random stuff : * No building homes without building 20% “affordable homes”. * No nuclear power without fish discos and donations to LGBTQ+ charities * No building a train station without building a community centre. * No listing a company without creating DEI board positions. * No hiring without hiring disadvantaged people. Essentially all investment and construction is defacto banned unless you can bribe politicians and regulators with some “social goods” and we wonder why there is a housing, electricity, and water shortage and why the economy is down the toilet. Everything is forbidden. Basically there is
The Log Lady@gamecounsel

Only 50 out of 867 homes were planned at social rent, 27 at intermediate rent & 790 for market sale. Of course it was rejected. It's ridiculous.

English
13
43
318
7.4K
RedWave Press
RedWave Press@RedWavePress·
Bill Maher: “Let’s get r*tarded—let’s get started.” will-i-am: *Laughs* Bill Maher: “I’m not trying to say the word r*tarded. I’m not like reveling in that we can say it again. It’s not that big of a deal. If you don’t want to hear it I’m sorry.” “It’s just shows what a different place we were in 20 years ago.” will-i-am: “If you’re in the studio… and the producer or conductor says ‘okay, on bar 24 we’re going to retard on bar 24.’ That’s a musical term.” Bill Maher: “Good luck explaining that to Greta Thunberg because she’s going to f*cking kill your a$$.”
English
205
193
8.5K
2.9M
Active Patriot
Active Patriot@ActivePatriotUK·
🚨 NEW: 𝕏 Exclusive, Lincolnshire housing partnership (LHP Homes) a social housing provider have purchased £23 million pounds worth of brand new houses that are being built in Grimsby exclusively for immigrants Ferribby fields is a housing estate located on "Mathew Telford Park in scartho. It was named after Sargent Matthew Telford who died with 4 other soldiers building security in Afghanistan. They was training Afghan national police. The attacker was a member of the Afghan National Police who caught the soldiers unaware while they were relaxing inside the compound with their helmets and flack jackets removed. May they rest in peace 🙏🏻
English
206
1.2K
2.5K
112.6K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@PolemicTMM That £180M comes from people not just working but creating something of value, and that labour took home less pay and businesses harmed to pay out the tax, which the govt herald the result in gdp go up
English
1
0
1
73
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@escapefrommelos @michgold1 Boeing is dependent on the state and a state monopoly, whereas Amazon and tesla stock is dependent remaining something the consumer wants and chooses
English
0
0
2
234
Melian Refugee
Melian Refugee@escapefrommelos·
its actually stunning that we live in an era where men with nearly unlimited money and power don’t routinely “exert politics by other means” Bezos doesn’t have his wife’s ex-husband “die in a car wreck”; elon doesn’t arrange an overdose for whichever discord groomer trans’d his son, etc
MeI Gibson fan 83@MelGibsonFan083

Alec Baldwin hits back at Elon Musk for criticizing The Odyssey casting, saying, "If you have a problem with someone, you should just murder them"

English
92
97
3.2K
234.5K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@TimOnPoint Another aspect on skill curve, is you can get insanely effective pilots, but by being on more sorties, or flying the final impact without increasing thier risk. You can't fire a javelin better than the clu
English
0
0
0
184
TimOnPoint
TimOnPoint@TimOnPoint·
Yes, yes, yes, combined arms and all that... I read these opinion pieces being published by West Point and I wonder if these well-credentialed authors have really been paying attention. *The article was written by Canadian tankers btw. Drones are NOT just the "next TOW." Why? 1. Remote UAS controller not at risk: A TOW or Javelin team is right there in the line of fire (or at least line-of-sight vulnerable). An FPV pilot can be kilometers back, often in a dugout or even further with fiber-optic relays. This removes the “suicide mission” calculus that limited massed ATGM use. Ukrainian operators routinely cycle through dozens of sorties per day from relative safety. 2. Cost differential & scalability: A heavy FPV runs ~$500–1,200. A T-90M is ~$3.8–4.5 million. Russian analysts themselves ran the numbers in early 2026: one T-90M = ~3,200 heavy FPVs; one BMP-3 = ~870. Ukrainian FPVs have accounted for an estimated 50–65% of Russian tank losses as of early 2025 (Forbes/OSINT tracking), with some T-90M batches showing ~50% of kills as final FPV strikes. Even at a pessimistic 20–43% hit rate per sortie (per Ukrainian veteran accounts), you’re still talking single-digit thousands of dollars to mission-kill a multimillion-dollar vehicle. TOWs/Javelins never offered that exchange ratio at scale. 3. Drones can (in fact) hold ground: We’re just entering the nightmare phase now. Right now drones excel at denial (exactly what the article says—they restrict mobility without controlling terrain). But with fiber-optic, AI/autonomous navigation, and loitering munitions, we’re already seeing the shift to persistent presence. Autonomous “last-mile” navigation has pushed success rates from ~10–30% to 70–80% by cutting out constant radio links and operator skill ceilings. Swarms + AI target recognition + reusable platforms (some Ukrainian systems now resupply themselves) start looking like cheap, attritable area-denial forces that don’t need 24/7 human babysitting. We’re not there for true “holding” yet, but the trajectory is clear and the article underplays it. 4. Automation - human-in-the-loop obsolescence: Already happening faster than most Western armies admit. Fiber-optic drones are unjammable; AI-enabled ones handle navigation and terminal guidance independently. Ukrainian sources in 2025–2026 report this is slashing both drone losses and required operator skill. The article’s “evolutionary” framing treats this as just better guidance systems. It’s not—it’s the removal of the vulnerable link that made past guided weapons (TOW, Hellfire, etc.) manpower-intensive and detectable. 5. Area denial is insanely economical in manpower & cost: One well-trained FPV section (a handful of operators + production teams) can paralyze a mechanized battalion’s movement. Compare that to the crew, logistics, and fuel for equivalent ATGM teams or attack helicopters. Russian analysts themselves are now questioning whether tanks remain cost-effective precisely because of this. 6. Skill curve: Training a competent FPV pilot takes weeks. A tank crew or even a Javelin gunner takes months/years plus expensive platforms for live-fire practice. Ukraine has flooded the battlespace with operators from a civilian gamer/drone-racing pool. The article notes that poorly trained crews suffer more, but the flip side is that anyone can become a lethal drone operator extremely quickly. That’s not true for traditional mechanized warfare. 7. Dev cycle speed: Attritable = sprint. Bespoke = crawl. FPV airframes, warheads, EW countermeasures, and AI modules are iterating in weeks/months because losing a $700 drone is trivial. Tank armor packages, APS, or new IFV designs take years and billions. Ukraine’s drone ecosystem (modular 7–10 inch FPVs that can swap ISR/strike/relay roles on the fly) proves this. The article acknowledges rapid advance but treats it as historically normal. It isn’t—not at this price point and iteration speed. *The authors correctly note that drones have helped create a static, attritional battlefield reminiscent of 1916. Where they err is in presenting this as a failure of drone warfare or proof that "combined arms" simply needs better integration. For the defender—Ukraine, outgunned in traditional metrics—this stasis is the win. Drones didn't just deny maneuver to the attacker; they made large-scale Russian armored advances prohibitively expensive in blood and treasure, freezing the front and preserving Ukrainian sovereignty. A static line where your country still exists is not "limited strategic effect." It is survival against long odds. History's tank-killers (Saggers, TOWs, Javelins) never achieved this scale of denial at this cost ratio. Drones did. The Cold War and GWOT are gone people. Adjust your thinking.
TimOnPoint tweet media
English
45
119
623
58.3K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@Ye_Olde_Holborn Echr makes pains to express that violation of the rights it provides is acceptable if done for the purposes of taxation.
English
0
0
0
26
Ye Olde Holborn☣️
Ye Olde Holborn☣️@Ye_Olde_Holborn·
ECHR Article 1, Protocol 1⬇️ EU loving dipshit Burnham needs to explain where he’s going to get £100+ billion to renationalise water
Ye Olde Holborn☣️ tweet media
English
5
9
46
1.9K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@mikecosgrove The government feared that given the anticipated numbers there was a low % that if the crowd decided on physicslly removing starmer a coup could've taken place and would've been successful. Had that been the case reform and torys wouldn't have any role in govt.
English
0
0
0
33
Mike Cosgrove
Mike Cosgrove@mikecosgrove·
In life I’ve learned silence has the ability to answer questions. Why are Reform and Tory completely silent on today’s march? Why the total blackout? Why are they all schtum? Who gave the orders to all stay quiet on it?
English
3
4
23
1.4K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@victorpridwen @FuturistPartyGB No because you would reduce the nations investment pool for no reason, the problem is the pool is allocated to housing, destroying the capital doesn't fix a perceived misallocation of existing capital. You could remove stamp, have annual tax on property for non UK tax residents.
English
1
0
0
12
victor
victor@victorpridwen·
A large proportion of credit flows into the housing market. Either introduce a land tax to capture the economic rent to disincentivise credit allocation (remove business rates and stamp duty in the process) - double win. Or mandate credit rules on the banks to make houses a higher credit penalty (but exempt new builds) The former is a more natural market lever but harder, the latter more technocratic but faster to implement
English
1
0
1
71
AnglofuturistParty
AnglofuturistParty@FuturistPartyGB·
If we are not to lose the next crop of innovative companies to America we need to fix our series C funding gap. Ideas: * Change pension fund allocation (look into why US & Canadian funds allocate far more to VC investments that UK ones likely regulatory/structural/cultural reasons) * EIS like tax efficient scaleup Investment Scheme (SIS) for Series B/C * Relax accredited/sophisticated investment rules to let more people invest in funds. * Government/sovereign fund to take strategic shares in early stage technologies and companies of national importance.
Maxi@AllForProgress_

In a workshop on the outskirts of Bletchley (it had to be there, didn't it), on the 26th of March this year, a small British company called Pulsar Fusion did something that has not been done by any other company or government on Earth. It ignited a controlled plasma inside the test chamber of a working nuclear fusion rocket engine. The plasma held, along with the chamber. The fusion reaction was the kind of reaction that, contained inside a sufficiently engineered magnetic bottle, will one day take a crewed British vehicle to Mars in 30 days rather than 8 months, and that will, within the working lifetime of the engineers presently building it, make the outer planets of the solar system accessible to anyone with a British passport. The geography of the achievement deserves a longer moment of pause. Bletchley, in 1942, was where Alan Turing and his colleagues broke the Enigma cipher and almost certainly shortened the war in Europe by two years. Pulsar Fusion's headquarters sits roughly 600 yards from the Hut where they did it. The country that did the maths inside that hut has just, less than a mile down the road, ignited the plasma that could power the next century of human space travel. There is a continuity of British scientific lineage here that is, on the face of it, almost embarrassingly providential, and it is almost completely unreported in the British press. It's not quite Kitty-Hawk-to-the-moon in 61 years, but it's close. Like so many great companies of profound importance, Pulsar Fusion is pretty small. It was founded in 2013, and employs around 50 staff. Its chief executive, Richard Dinan, is a working British physicist who has spent the last decade quietly assembling the team and the capital to do what the world's national space agencies have been promising for 60 years and consistently failing to deliver. The competing American programmes, principally at NASA's Glenn Research Center and at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, are years behind on the propulsion side. The competing Chinese programmes are obscure but, on what is known publicly, also behind. The European Space Agency is, as ever, organising a workshop. Pulsar fired its plasma in March and has been preparing the next-stage tests in the months since. What this kind of capability means, when commercialised, is genuinely vast. The economic argument for getting a payload to Mars in 30 days rather than 8 months is not principally about the human passengers, though there is one. It is about cargo. Given a 30-day transit, Mars becomes a logistically tractable destination for the kind of infrastructure-build that turns it from a flag-planting science mission into a working industrial site. The argument for the outer planets is even larger. The asteroid belt alone, on conservative mineralogical estimates, contains more economically viable platinum-group metals than the entire crust of the Earth has been mined for in industrial history. The first country with reliable fusion propulsion is the first country with reliable access to that supply. The country that holds that capacity, fifty years from now, will be holding the most consequential industrial advantage of the 21st century, and there is no obvious second prize. The standard British response to this kind of thing is to either ignore it entirely, sell the company to an American buyer at series B (the DeepMind path) for fire-sale prices, or fund it at the level of a Whitehall departmental tea and coffee budget (the Skycutter and Orbex paths). The standard British response will not be sufficient. Pulsar Fusion needs the kind of patient capital that turns a working demonstration into an operational engine, and that, in turn, into a manufacturing capability. The British state, on present form, is structurally incapable of providing it, British pension funds are structurally incapable of investing in it, and the British political class will, on present form, only notice if it somehow manages to swing a leadership election. I wantt= Pulsar Fusion treated as a national-strategic asset, and beyond that as a potential subject of national destiny. The Sovereign AI Fund that backed Ineffable Intelligence has a clear template. The Prosperity Zone programme we designed at Progress that anchors heavy industry at SaxaVord and Teesside has the geographic flexibility to include a fusion-propulsion cluster in Buckinghamshire, six miles from the most evocative site in modern British scientific history. The procurement architecture of every major British defence and space agency should, from this autumn, be writing offtake contracts contingent on Pulsar's milestones. There's nothing extreme about these ideas. We could have been doing it decades ago. I always conceived of Britain as being as much among the stars as it is on Earth. To buy into the idea of Britain as a culture and polity is necessarily to buy into the concept of the human being as an illimitable force. Our history is littered with happy instances of people of great fortitude hitting upon obstacles and, with a cry of "This will not stop us", clearing the way for our brothers and sisters to follow through. A small British company in Bletchley has, while nobody was looking, extended that arm of our tradition, by accomplishing one of the most important pieces of scientific engineering of the decade. The country that produced them is, in a measurable sense, the same country that produced the Bombe, the Colossus, the jet engine, the structure of DNA, and the World Wide Web. The capacity is intact. The political class capable of recognising it must catch up, and will.

English
5
3
26
2.2K
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@FuturistPartyGB Either delete nic or ring fence for investment. A fund from which a maximum of 5% pa can be drawn down for paying pensions.
English
0
0
0
25
forcedsm
forcedsm@forcedsm·
@LabourSJ "Eww look at them on the screens, the public masses of them, wanting something"
English
0
0
0
9
Sarah Jones MP
Sarah Jones MP@LabourSJ·
Challenging day for the Metropolitan Police who briefed me on their operational response from their command centre. Thank you to every officer on the streets of London today for their professionalism and bravery.
Sarah Jones MP tweet media
English
894
78
487
212.8K
Loading . . .
Loading . . .@gingercrust·
@owenjonesjourno I’ve sort’ve thought for a while that whoever controls the white working class far right has all the power. They unfortunately are the ones willing to fight physically. ATM it feels like they are are being prepared. It feels a bit unsafe in the UK now
English
2
0
0
394