Drowsy Morning

@DennisTheProf @flavioAd You can just press continue when you have your rates back and it picks up where it was.

@flavioAd It should off board. Leave you a doc of exactly where it left off and what it was working on.

Getting rate limited is fine Killing the task halfway through is not claude code should just let the task finish like codex does

@kai_benetti @kimmonismus Retail switches back and forth between every narrative. It's dishonest to think retails opinion of the week is a stable assessment.

@kimmonismus wild that people think these companies don't care about their retail face when it matters for brand equity

sorry, i call bs. In my opinion, Anthropic isn't worried about losing customers. And the reason is quite simple: They barely make any money in the B2C sector. Subscriptions are heavily subsidized; their compute and Fable 5 are primarily intended for businesses and enterprises, and these customers are willing to pay immensely high costs for them. This is also Anthropic's main source of revenue; it's the area where they are far ahead of OpenAI. Dario certainly isn't losing sleep over this and isn't running around hysterically because he's afraid consumers will cancel their subsidized Max plans due to the lack of Fable 5. At best, this will free up more compute for the relevant areas.

@iuditg @rafintheloop If you have so much time to switch back and forth every other week maybe you don't matter

@rafintheloop Everything can change fast in the AI world. No one rated OpenAI models for coding, but look where we are

Thanks Codex team, after using GPT 5.6 Sol, I don't miss Fable anymore. So even if Fable leaves Claude Code tomorrow from subscription, it will not matter much. I'm planning to move two of my other Claude Code Subscription to Codex once I am close to ending my subscription. Will keep just one Claude Code sub for UI and UX, that's it. Anthropic, you have ruined it for yourself.

@kartikeyk545 @yacineMTB No offense but I don't think not releasing models was part of their agenda ever.

@yacineMTB Even if they don't remove it they still won't be able to compete. Fable is too expensive. I think their only option is to release Opus 5. If not, they can still keep users by providing Fable, but most people will be using GPT-5.6 for most of their tasks.

There is no way they are pulling fable. They will get slaughtered by OpenAI. 😹

@technologytard @rezoundous Every code chat actively uses memory. You have like 7GB to work with so if you are a swarm master it's going to bottleneck. 8 million different solutions like just don't do that, use cloud or don't buy a Mac if you're going to do that.

@rezoundous I don’t get it. You’re not running the models locally.

After running multiple parallel Fable + GPT-5.6 sessions, I can conclude that Macbook Air M4 16GB has officially become the bottleneck

@davetakes @FastbreakHoops5 Hey good mid range for a big then at least

@FastbreakHoops5 Ayton had me fooled for a bit there. Almost thought he was good

This was such a fumble, man.

@illBetOnThat @KalshiHoops True. I think he's going to be 20+ still and effective but as a guy who makes use of every inch losing that half a step is going to limit his ceiling. In my heads math that version of Kyrie is greater than harden but it's speculation.

Without the injury and just talking individual player I agree kyrie is better and is a playoff riser not dropper like Harden. Acl injuries to guys his age who rely on their athleticism isn’t a good combo. Luka is an amazing facilitator. He’d be playing with a bunch of dudes who need the ball. Wouldn’t improve the team much if any

According to Bleacher Report NBA writer Greg Swartz, Cleveland could pursue a three-team deal involving Kyrie Irving in an attempt of making their pitch to sign James the most favorable. In the proposed trade, Cleveland would acquire Irving, Gafford and Naji Marshall from Dallas. Miami would receive James Harden, while Dallas would get Jarrett Allen and Schroder from Cleveland, as well as Davion Mitchell and Nikola Jovic from Miami. (Via @YahooSports)

@illBetOnThat @KalshiHoops Kyrie > harden. Regular season player versus top 5 clutch player in the NBA. Also is effective without the ball as was seen with the Luka stint. He is just good at basketball.

@KalshiHoops That does nothing. Harden = Kyrie maybe a bit better coming off an injury. Plus both ball dominant. Harden is a better passer. Allen > Gafford. Marshall would be good rotation player

@btc_charlie Crypto nerds finally found out about the s and p

Think I've just cracked a ponzi for infinite money. Saylor on steroids... But 0 systematic risk.

@KillaXBT @saylor This is bs because we've seen those random buy spikes over the year and they've almost always correlated to his average entry for the week.

People who actually believe @saylor is dumping on the open market are proving they have zero understanding of how institutional transactions work. If he’s selling, it’s almost certainly OTC, the same way he buys. The “Saylor is selling” narrative is just another fear campaign to shake weak hands out of their $BTC.

@William91713663 @TheDJ_King So what makes more sense, that there is information that we lack or that we really hit jackpot? I think there is obvious tuning of our world it's too specific. The explanation of missing information with a creation system does not require a statistical improbability.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King And the reason I say that is the same reason you say there’s a creator, because I believe the probability of ur explanation to be near zero and mine to be less near zero.

Provide evidence.

@William91713663 @TheDJ_King It's very simple logic. Either it was created, or complete randomness had a near impossible sequence of events to produce what we have today. No matter with your logic or mine it requires an illogical inference. In my opinion, the former is more logical than an absurd probability

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King Again you’re making an assumption that someone put it in, I would highly suggest you do some research on the universe, origin of this planet and the vastness of the cosmos. I am willing to put my entire life on the fact that life on earth was nothing to do with a higher power.

@William91713663 @TheDJ_King It does when the other option is probability so low we don't have a comparable. So you have to say if you believe we live in a surviving outcome or that there is a "creator". Progress in an oven happens when it's on but someone put it in first. There's patterns everywhere.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King You’re still assuming too much without sufficient evidence. Just because it’s the easier thing to think doesn’t mean it’s true, there is 0 evidence of a creator and significant evidence to suggest scientific processes over a macroscopic time frame. LOGIC doesn’t infer a creator

@goodalexander @Evan_ss6 None he's fucking lying

@Evan_ss6 What asset?

The hard road to $4.2069. The easy road to $100.

@William91713663 @TheDJ_King It's common sense. There's already enough "miracles" for life itself. Combine that with all the interesting things that exist in this world the probability of that is too small. It's more logical at that point to assume intention. If you want to believe that it's random sure.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King You can’t assume that, you don’t have sufficient evidence to make that claim. With the information we currently have, it makes more mathematical and logical sense to assume we have no higher significance compared to any other floating rock.

@cryptic_nc @TheDJ_King So you can believe in astronomical probability or a god. Doesn't matter to me.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King So the chances of something happening being astronomical means it didnt happen? Thats how logistics work bro you dont just say "well since it not impossible, but not likely, it must be impossible."

@cryptic_nc @TheDJ_King By probability if we have near infinite sandboxes we have two outcomes. We are the one in a trillion billion... result of randomness or were a result created with intention. I don't buy lottery tickets so I believe in the more likely explanation of an entity beyond understanding.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King How does that prove god exists?

@cryptic_nc @TheDJ_King Incredibly stupid is missing the point that was made and jumping past the point that materials have to exist in a sandbox for people to make things with them

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King Something designed by humans isnt evidence god exists. Thats incredibly stupid.

@Angora_Felis @TheDJ_King so why so we have devices and resources that allow magical devices and why couldn't we have just not had that.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King We know why everything happened. We've literally done the math.

@laat650 @TheDJ_King Alright so you believe we're the 1 in a billion trillion Ill keep believing in logic.

@forgetscode @TheDJ_King Unlikely, but not impossible, and idk if you know this but the universe is really huge,a big enough scale can make even the unlikeliest of odds a near certainty.