Reply Cat

106K posts

Reply Cat banner
Reply Cat

Reply Cat

@fractality

Freedom, Rationality, AI, Maths, Coding

Germany Katılım Şubat 2008
4.5K Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
23% of people still get this wrong, even when the correct answer is explicitly stated. They are called "hopeless". There are also the "careless" who get it right when given a hint.
Reply Cat tweet media
English
2
1
8
2K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@neythomas Wenn sie länger geklebt hätte, wäre ich vielleicht sogar mal zum Sightseeing dran vorbeigefahren.
Deutsch
0
0
0
6
Reply Cat retweetledi
VolkerKetzer
VolkerKetzer@VolkerPetzer·
Das ganze Leben eine einzige faule Ausrede für die eigene Unfähigkeit.
VolkerKetzer tweet media
Deutsch
188
90
2.3K
67.1K
Reply Cat retweetledi
Richard Cooper
Richard Cooper@Rich_Cooper·
Again, marriage is a humiliation ritual for most men.
Richard Cooper tweet media
English
64
38
588
21.9K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@neythomas Bei Einhaltung von EU-Regularien? Vielleicht 1,50m?
Deutsch
0
0
0
67
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann@SebTillmann·
In der Hochschule hat sich viel bewegt, zugunsten der Frauen. In sechs von acht Fächergruppen stellen sie die Mehrheit, auch in Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften. "MINT ist männlich" ist auf Ebene der Studierenden nicht mehr haltbar.
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann tweet media
Deutsch
3
2
52
5K
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann@SebTillmann·
Zum ersten Mal studieren in Baden-Württemberg mehr Frauen als Männer, 50,2 %. Fast alle lasen das als Erfolg der Gleichstellung. Die Rohdaten des Statistischen Landesamts erzählen etwas Komplizierteres. Ein Thread.
Dr. Sebastian Tillmann tweet media
Deutsch
12
38
288
47.4K
Reply Cat retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Should any of the women's organisations targeted by @AmnestyUK's recent 'anti-rights' blacklist wish to take legal action, applications can be made to the JK Rowling Women's Fund. jkrwf.org
Trans Widows’ Voices.@transwidows

Whilst I understand the detriment to Beira’s Place is real, and focussing on @jk_rowling get clicks it’s a shame that mainstream press coverage of the Amnesty debacle is not also focussing on us smaller groups listed who do not have the same power or influence to defend ourselves

English
406
4.1K
22.7K
1M
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@DemzDeliver You don't even know how much 100 books are, do you? You don't need a library for 100 books, that is a single book shelf. Also, no books are banned in the USA, it's all bullshit.
English
0
0
0
3
Democrats Deliver
Democrats Deliver@DemzDeliver·
🚨 Dua Lipa opens banned book library after global right-wing book censorship.
Democrats Deliver tweet mediaDemocrats Deliver tweet media
English
2.9K
2.6K
25.5K
18.7M
Reply Cat retweetledi
Climate Warrior🐬 #ClimateJustice🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈
“Civilisation is a bloated pus-filled corpse, feeding off the purulent AIDS-riddled vomitus of obscenely-flatulent billionaires who daily waddle from their climate-destroying cars to their air-conditoned planet-killing offices to perform unspeakable misogynies.” From my book FRANKENPATRIARCHY
Climate Warrior🐬 #ClimateJustice🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
English
25
4
63
1.3K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@WolfgangRichtEU He fought for the freedom of migrants to piss on his grave. It's hard to do better than that, honestly.
English
0
0
0
12
Wolfgang Richter
Wolfgang Richter@WolfgangRichtEU·
I was at the cemetery putting flowers on my grandfather’s grave yesterday. He died a war hero fighting the Nazis. A group of immigrants then came up and started pissing on his tombstone. “You’re right,” I said. “While he died fighting Nazism, he was still white and perpetuated gender stereotypes. I understand your anger.” I can recognize the suffering of queers and immigrants and that’s what makes me morally superior to my grandfather. He fought the Nazis, but I fought for migrants’ right not to be deported after committing violent crimes, for 14-year-olds' right to cut their dicks off without parental consent, for crippling energy prices in the name of the climate, for Chat Control, and for a bloated public bureaucracy full of overpaid incompetents with gender studies degrees. My grandfather would be proud. Have a wonderful day, Wolfgang
English
28
37
440
7.6K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@markrudolph2701 @grok Es muss Schwachsinn sein, so viel Energie kann man doch gar nicht verbraten. Sonst könnten wir ja die Städte einfach kühlen, indem wir alle die Kühlschranktüren offen lassen.
Deutsch
0
0
0
5
LaurieWired
LaurieWired@lauriewired·
I’m convinced that a large % of programmers don’t actually like computers. As a side effect, are also perfectly happy to throw away their reasoning to a model as soon as they can. I don’t get it, at ALL. Don’t you *LIKE* understanding the magic of the machine? You do realize hand-programming (I hate that I even have to specify hand now) is fun…right?
English
989
664
8.4K
853.6K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@nikitheblogger Jammerst Du jetzt echt rum wegen 90 Millionen €? Die evtl. dazu beitragen, daß Deutsche nicht im Krieg sterben müssen, weil Ukrainer das für uns tun?
Deutsch
0
0
0
6
Neverforgetniki
Neverforgetniki@nikitheblogger·
Wahnsinn: Deutschland sagt gerade zu, 50.000 Kampfdrohnen im Wert von 90 Millionen Euro für die Ukraine zu finanzieren! Verstehe ich das richtig? Uns Deutschen muss man um zu sparen Kürzungen beim Zahnersatz und beim Wohngeld reinwürgen, aber Hauptsache die Ukraine hat Drohnen?
Deutsch
182
605
3.5K
80.4K
Reply Cat
Reply Cat@fractality·
@Corvus_corone2 90m Millionen sind jetzt echt nicht das Problem, für eine sinnvolle Sache.
Deutsch
0
0
1
3
Reply Cat retweetledi
Manfred Rosenbauer
Manfred Rosenbauer@ingeniarius08·
FYI: Die meisten Leute wählen nicht die "AfD" weil sie sie so toll finden, sondern weil sie die anderen Parteien so Scheisse finden.
Deutsch
9
10
118
1.2K
Reply Cat retweetledi
Dr. H📯
Dr. H📯@1900HO·
Verstehe die Aufregung nicht. Wer nichts zu verbergen hat - also die Anständigen und Gerechtdenkenden - hat doch nichts zu befürchten.
Paul Walsh@Paul__Walsh

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites. 🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements. Today von der Leyen said: "This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children". 💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984. 🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online". 💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different. 🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done". 💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof". 🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source". 💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant. 🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents". 💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust. 🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence" 💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do. 💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive. 💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child. 💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive. 🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed" 💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price. 🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof" 💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution". 💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity. 🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it". 💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely. 💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor. 💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law. 💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection. 🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content. 🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals. 💡Where this ends 🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever". George Orwell, 1984.

Deutsch
257
12
148
15.5K