Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ik ben ook maar eens begonnen met Parler. parler.com/profile/Frankv…
Zijn er onder mijn volgers meer mensen die daar al een account hebben?
Nederlands
Frank van Dorp
8.9K posts
Frank van Dorp
@frankvd8
Populist. Schrijft stukjes voor Saltmines en heeft meningen op Twitter. Alles op persoonlijke titel, uiteraard.
Katılım Mart 2020
218 Takip Edilen573 Takipçiler
@maxberger I must have missed the part of the constitution where citizenship/right to vote is limited to one race only. Can you please quote that part for me?
English
Frank van Dorp retweetledi
Het Biden regime ontspoort steeds verder.
Echt onvoorstelbaar dat er mensen zo dom konden zijn dat ze stonden te juichen toen deze man president werd.
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec
BREAKING: Ukrainian president had to correct Biden multiple times on their call today when he insisted Kyiv was about to be ‘sacked’ by Russian forces. At one point he even asked Biden to calm down.
Nederlands
@GemmaF101 @clown_shoes_ @ElloSteph @MattWalshBlog How about respecting other people's spaces, like female bathrooms and women's sports? How about showing that basic respect and humanity to other people, before demanding others show it to you?
English
The external anatomy of a female, but have the internal anatomy of a male? What if a woman was assigned female at birth, presents as masculine, and doesn’t have children. If that isn’t a woman doesn’t that contradict your theory regarding transgender identities? @MattWalshBlog
Steph Frosch@ElloSteph
The term has evolved. Women used to be defined as property or second class citizens. Some people say they are people who can carry kids, but what about women who are infertile? Are they suddenly men? What about the fact that people can be born with (pt. 2) @MattWalshBlog
English
@judge_pirro @StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews One of the leading journalists at CNN is not exactly a random irrelevant liberal I would think.
English
@judge_pirro @StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews Sure, here's an example by Brian Stelter.
crooksandliars.com/2018/08/cnns-b…
English
Some Establishment Media outlets are celebrating Biden's attack on Fox News' Peter Doocy this week, calling for more "trash talk" to "save" his presidency. trib.al/MCmurt5
English
@judge_pirro @StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews I mean, that's exactly when conservative media DO accuse the Biden admin of "attacking the free press": when he uses the FBI to raid a journalist's home and steal his private communications because he once possessed a document that was very embarrassing to the Biden family.
English
@judge_pirro @StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews That's just not true, people were saying he threatened the freedom of the press every time he called them fake news during a press conference.
English
@StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews No, we didn't. Trump always makes movements and hand gestures like that when he's mocking someone, regardless of whether they're disabled or not. He mocked Ted Cruz in exactly the same way.
More examples: bizpacreview.com/2016/09/01/100…
English
@frankvd8 @BreitbartNews I saw it, you saw it, we all saw it.
English
@StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews So what? If it's harmless when Biden does it, is harmless when Trump does it. And 1000 harmless actions together are still completely harmless.
And please, stop being so low information. The "mocking a disabled reporter" fantasy was debunked 5 years ago already. Catch up.
English
@frankvd8 @BreitbartNews Biden in one hot mic moment, 4 years of Trump name calling, revoking press passes, mocking a disabled reporter, etc.
Let's talk again when President Biden catches up.
English
@KBrickmaur @TimJGraham You're right, there's nothing "reverse" about this racism. It's just as racist as it would have been if he announced he would only consider white male candidates.
English
@TimJGraham Says UOU from the “class of” right-wing, radical Republican bias. Everyone knows what Reagan said and did. There’s NO bias, no “reverse” anything. There’s only conservative LYING and gaslighting.
English
Jen Psaki is asked about some conservatives seeing "reverse racism" in picking a black woman for SCOTUS, leading Psaki to pull out a quote from President Reagan's words about nominating Sandra Day O'Connor. Is she borrowing from Brian Stelter, or vice versa?
English
@Jdice17 @MrAndyNgo @MultCoDA Themselves, now they can go to cocktail parties of their fellow limousine liberals and brag how they made society more equitable, and be regarded as a Good Person by their peers.
That's ultimately what is all about for these people, that warm, cozy feeling of being virtuous.
English
In a new report shared by DA Mike Schmidt’s office, almost all of the @MultCoDA prosecutors say they believe it is their duty to prioritize race in order to reduce the number of people of color in the criminal justice system. They believe this is equity. thepostmillennial.com/portland-deput…
English
@StormyWeatherKY @BreitbartNews It was silly when Trump did it and it was silly when Biden did it.
The only real issue here is the monumental hypocrisy of the liberal media, who called it an "attack on press freedom" when Trump did it, but cheer for it now Biden does it.
English
@hugebigtime @MattWalshBlog And while you're at it, can you please provide a definition for the word "human"?
Because I'm kind of curious how that one stands up, if we start using the same logic you use to argue against the definition of "woman"
English
@MattWalshBlog How about you share a definition since you all seem so obsessed with this obviously fraudulent tactic
English
When you started listing random college courses you took, I assumed you were trying to impress unless it’s some weird cringy form of Tourette’s.
One last attempt: when you say the word “woman,” what do you mean? What are you trying to convey?
Steph Frosch@ElloSteph
Honey, I’m sorry you’re so unfamiliar with women paying attention to you that you view me replying to a tweet while making lunch as an attempt to impress you There has never been an objective, long-standing, consensus for term for woman. Do you even have one?
English
@hugebigtime @MattWalshBlog XX chromosomes, female reproductive organs. The last one either functional or dysfunctional.
Unless infertile, the ability to produce egg cells and not sperm cells.
You don't even have to meet all of these conditions, one is enough.
What is your definition?
English
@DeniseH86678202 @breathfart @MattWalshBlog Yeah, exactly. That doesn't answer the question at all. "Woman just means not a man" is essentially the argument here.
English
@mags_aguilar @politicalmoder6 @ElloSteph But gender had always been defined on the basis of sex. All dictionaries used to define it as "the state of belonging to either of the 2 sexes".
If trans activists use the word in a different way, they mean something entirely different and shouldn't be calling it "gender".
English
@frankvd8 @politicalmoder6 @ElloSteph Again, that is sex, and I agree it is useful medically, not so much socially. I personally don't care about the genitals of the people I interact with on the daily.
English
Language as a whole is arbitrary. That’s contemporary sociology 101, though I will not be surprised if you’re unfamiliar with the subject, considering classical theory fails to grasp the concept of “change” (But who knows? Maybe you’re lacking knowledge in that field as well)
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog
Leaving aside the total incoherence of this attempt at a definition, can we agree based on your statement that the claim “transwomen are women” is arbitrary?
English
@mags_aguilar @politicalmoder6 @ElloSteph I think my definition is ways more useful and meaningful.
For starters, it's the one used by veterinarians to figure out which dogs to neuter and which dogs to spay.
How could a veterinarian use your definition to make that decision?
English
@frankvd8 @politicalmoder6 @ElloSteph You know what, someone I've been tweeting to defined it better. Womanhood is a social construct. There are no correct ways to be one, you defined a female as in sex. Sex and gender are not the same. A woman is a person who feels more comfortable being what they think a woman is.
English
@politicalmoder6 @mags_aguilar @ElloSteph With the same logic transgenderism uses, you can just as easily argue that "Human" is just a subjective identity an individual from any species can adopt.
After all, the scientific definition of Homo sapiens includes all kinds of characteristics that aren't true for every human.
English