unQueered

966 posts

unQueered banner
unQueered

unQueered

@fullmagdump

It’s time we all knew our queers just a little bit better. Streaming begins pride Month 6/7/2026.

Katılım Ocak 2026
55 Takip Edilen104 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
Of all the films about queerness, this is the only one you’ll ever need to see. This is “unQueered”, the most comprehensive and concise concordance ever created on the human garbage know as queers, their ideology, and the skeevy groping pedophiles at the center of it all. So come join me, Mr. Janis, along with almost every major queer scholar known to man, as we dive into this festering queer cesspool and get to know these degenerate, handsy little queers just a little bit better.
English
12
15
38
4.6K
Luke Rudkowski
Luke Rudkowski@Lukewearechange·
Transgenderism is a trojan horse for Transhumanism
English
31
10
130
7.6K
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Excluding trans people from society won’t make women safer, it will just make trans people less safe.
English
95
26
192
5.1K
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
@Alecaticus With tranny marxists, it's always the victimhood olympics.
English
0
0
4
28
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
@jk_rowling "becoming trans is a unique and spiritual journey"... This and other tranny marxist queer religious nonsense can be found here. youtu.be/qWSONMMdDBk
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
3
2.2K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Bizarre. I thought the condition of being trans was innate and present from birth? So why are you talking about these women's husbands 'becoming trans'?
J.K. Rowling tweet media
English
207
562
6.5K
205K
Melissa Wong
Melissa Wong@Melissa_WongMT·
@RT_com trannies are just like degenerate monkeys. Got it.
English
1
0
8
63
RT
RT@RT_com·
'Did you know that... bonobos... have same-sex sex every day?!' Elliot Page drops a nature doc to teach kids that animals can be 'gender fluid' and LGBTQI+...
English
537
31
271
129.3K
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
@DrFrankTurek Move away from pacifism and “niceness” and bring light to the war we are in.
English
0
0
1
58
Frank Turek
Frank Turek@DrFrankTurek·
What can churches do to appeal more to men and avoid hyper feminization?
English
717
14
374
55.4K
Luke LRPS
Luke LRPS@LukeLRPS·
If you are a trans person and have been harmed by the actions of the anti-trans hate group @GoodLawProject please don’t hesitate to take your complaints to the @metpoliceuk or the @EHRC. Transphobia is never okay,
Luke LRPS tweet media
English
49
57
471
28.9K
Sam (he/him)
Sam (he/him)@mushycrouton·
A “gender critical organisation” is a predator organisation. They want to divide the LGBTQIA+ community. They want to groom gay people into the gender critical cult. They want gay people isolated and vulnerable so we are easier to prey on. Gender criticals are predators.
English
21
26
188
2.5K
Ann ♀️ 💜🤍💚💛
If a woman is just a "social construct", then a "trans woman" is doubly so.
Ann ♀️ 💜🤍💚💛 tweet media
English
9
17
182
2.5K
RigoStaRR
RigoStaRR@RigoIrizarry·
As a gay man, I have a question. Why is the trans community so fucking insufferable?
English
718
274
9.8K
309.1K
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
If you say that God’s Word is subjective, then you are placing reality above God. And it’s not a matter of proper English, either. The usage and objective nature of the Word of God is very clear in every translation back to its earliest form. Christ called Himself “I am”. Which is either highly grammatically incorrect and He’s crazy, or He is God.
English
0
0
0
4
ᴬᵍᵉᵒᶠᵈᵒᵍᵉ
Who was talking about limitations? I wasn't. I didn't place anything above God. You seem to have missed the part where I explicitly told you I was making an argument about the usage of the word, not about God. Gods word is *literally* subjective. This is NOT a statement about God or his place, or power, or in any way a commentary on religion at all. It's simply the factual meaning of the word in English. I said NOTHING at all about the primacy of the Word of God. You have completely missed the point, despite having it spelled out for you.
English
1
0
0
9
unQueered
unQueered@fullmagdump·
If one says “if there is a god, but he has limitations” then that person is not speaking about the God. It’d be like trying to have a discussion about cats while some idiot drones on about harp seals. Additionally, if you say a god’s word is subjective, you are not speaking about the God for the simple reason that you’ve placed reality above God. God IS the objective Truth. And, from a biblical perspective, there really is no debate on the primacy of the Word of God. So its not “using the words wrong” Hebrews 11:3 — “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” • Psalm 33:6, 9 — “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made… For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood firm.” • John 1:1-3 — “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him…” Now you may disagree with the assertion of the existence of God. But you don’t get to redefine what He is in order to justify your own denial.
English
2
0
0
10
ᴬᵍᵉᵒᶠᵈᵒᵍᵉ
It seems to me that people just use the words wrong. If it depends on something in your mind it's subjective. I see zero reason why that meaning would change specifically in regard to God. If reality is God's word, then reality is subjective, because it depends on what God, thinks, feels, believes, wants, or whatever. If that is true and there is no reality above God or that contains God, then the whole of reality is subjective. That isn't an argument about what God is. It's an argument about what the word subjective means. I get that calling the word of God objective makes it sound more impressive, but it's not the proper use of the word. Also. “if there is a God” Is the opposite of a presumption, saying it not only doesn't presume anything. It specifically avoids presuming anything. If you said "there is a God" or "there is not a God". Those are presumptions.
English
1
0
0
10