Mickey Williams

12.3K posts

Mickey Williams banner
Mickey Williams

Mickey Williams

@fusenUK

Mostly retweeting stuff I find interesting.

Canterbury, UK Katılım Mayıs 2008
10 Takip Edilen168 Takipçiler
Mickey Williams
Mickey Williams@fusenUK·
@marcode I guess a made up story doesn't really add or subtract from the actual level of how shit Amazon is to work at
English
0
0
0
18
Mickey Williams
Mickey Williams@fusenUK·
@marcode This is a 'post stories' account btw, it's not a real scenario of someone at Amazon. However shit Amazon may actually be in the real world.
English
1
0
0
34
Mickey Williams retweetledi
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
The Strait of Hormuz is not closed. It is sorted. Iran has built a three-tier access system for the most important waterway on earth. Tier one: allies transit free. Malaysia cleared seven vessels through diplomacy at zero cost. India negotiated zero-fee passage. Pakistan secured clearance for 20 ships. Iraq transits without charge. These countries proved geopolitical alignment and the IRGC waved them through the Larak corridor without collecting a rial. Tier two: compliant neutrals pay. At least two tankers, likely Chinese-linked, paid up to two million dollars each in yuan through Kunlun Bank intermediaries. COSCO container ships attempted the corridor, were turned back on first approach when documentation was incomplete, then succeeded days later with revised paperwork. These are the vessels that prove the system works. They submit IMO numbers, ownership chains, cargo manifests, and crew lists to the IRGC’s Hormozgan Command. They receive clearance codes. They are escorted by pilot boats through the five-nautical-mile channel between Qeshm and Larak. They pay in a currency that does not route through SWIFT. Every successful yuan transit is a live proof-of-concept for non-dollar energy settlement. Tier three: adversaries are denied entirely. The committee plan bans American vessels, Israeli vessels, and vessels from any country participating in sanctions against Iran. These ships do not get vetting. They do not get codes. They do not get escorts. They get the AL SALMI, burning off Dubai, as illustration of what the corridor looks like without permission. But the toll is not the real cost. War-risk insurance is. Premiums have surged from $40,000 per VLCC transit before the war to $600,000 to $1.2 million today, a 30-fold increase, now running five to ten percent of hull value. A VLCC carrying $50 million in crude oil can absorb a combined $3 million in toll and insurance as a fraction of cargo value. A container ship carrying $5 million in manufactured goods cannot. The insurance premium alone exceeds the profit margin on non-oil cargo. The strait has become an oil-only VIP lane. Crude flows selectively for those who can pay the combined cost. Everything else waits, reroutes around the Cape of Good Hope, or does not move at all. And the US Navy is not inside the strait. The Abraham Lincoln strike group operates from standoff in the Arabian Sea. Three Littoral Combat Ships sit in the Persian Gulf. Marine expeditionary units are positioned for contingency. But zero American warships have transited the strait or escorted commercial traffic since the war began. The Navy told the shipping industry it has “no availability” for Hormuz escorts. The world’s most powerful fleet keeps respectful distance from a waterway controlled by a country whose navy is 92 percent destroyed because the mines, drones, and shore missiles that remain make close-in presence prohibitively risky. The result is a geopolitical sorting algorithm operating at the molecular level. One hundred and eighty-one vessels transited in all of March. Pre-war traffic was 138 per day. Of those 181, roughly 70 percent were Iranian-affiliated. The remaining 30 percent were vetted allies or yuan-paying neutrals. The 20 percent of global oil that once flowed freely through this strait now flows selectively, conditionally, and in currencies chosen by Tehran. Iran lost its air force. It lost its navy. It lost two thirds of its production capacity. It retained the only thing that matters: 39 kilometres of coastline on both sides of the narrowest point. The US Navy will not enter. Chinese tankers will. And the sorting algorithm processes another vessel, collects another yuan payment, and demonstrates once more that geography is the one military asset that cannot be degraded by precision strikes. The strait is not closed. It is under new management. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
202
2K
5.1K
873.1K
Mickey Williams retweetledi
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
Look at this image carefully. You are looking at a Chinese commercial satellite photograph of Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. Every red box is an artificial intelligence model identifying a US military aircraft by type. Every label is in Mandarin. And the base you are looking at is the one Iran fired ballistic missiles at on Saturday night. A company called MizarVision, founded five years ago in Hangzhou, published this. Not the Pentagon. Not the CIA. Not a classified intelligence briefing delivered to the Situation Room. A Chinese startup with access to sub-meter resolution Earth observation satellites and an AI object detection model that can distinguish a KC-135 Stratotanker from a KC-46 Pegasus from orbit. Aviation Week confirmed what the image shows. Fifteen KC-135 aerial refueling tankers. Six KC-46 Pegasus tankers. Six E-3 Sentry airborne early warning aircraft, which is significant because only thirty one E-3s remain in the entire US Air Force inventory worldwide, meaning roughly a fifth of America’s operational AWACS fleet is parked on a single ramp in the Saudi desert. Two E-11A Battlefield Airborne Communications Nodes. C-130 Hercules transports. C-5 Galaxy heavy lifters. The backbone of Operation Epic Fury, catalogued from space and published on Weibo. This is the base that Iran targeted. AFP journalists in Riyadh reported explosions in the eastern part of the capital with thick smoke rising. The Saudi Foreign Ministry condemned Iranian attacks targeting Riyadh and the Eastern Province. Saudi air defenses intercepted the projectiles. But the image you are looking at was published days before the strike. Which means Iran had exactly the same intelligence picture that MizarVision gave the entire world for free. This is what the democratization of intelligence looks like. In 1991, only the United States could see individual aircraft on a ramp from space. In 2003, a handful of nations had that capability. In 2026, a Chinese startup publishes annotated satellite imagery of American force dispositions on social media, and Aviation Week runs the analysis before the first missile is fired. Defence Security Asia captured what this means: sub-meter resolution imagery distinguishing individual aircraft types fundamentally alters the secrecy calculus of pre-strike deployments. You cannot mass two hundred aircraft across half a dozen bases and keep it secret when commercial satellites photograph every ramp twice a day and AI models label every airframe before an analyst finishes their coffee. The age of hidden buildups is over. Every deployment is now observable, catalogued, and published in near real time by companies with no security clearance and no allegiance to anyone. The next war will not be planned in secret. It will be watched from orbit by everyone, in every language, simultaneously. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
818
6.6K
23.9K
4.7M
Mickey Williams
Mickey Williams@fusenUK·
@goldbossed @FPLSam_ @FPL_Harry Any rebuttal mentioning the proximity of the ball to be blunt simply doesn't understand what it is like to have that sort of speed of shot come at you when standing in goal. There are probably fewer than 3-5 goalkeepers in the PL who can make that save
English
1
0
1
59
Mickey Williams
Mickey Williams@fusenUK·
@goldbossed @FPLSam_ @FPL_Harry The slowmo repeats completely destroy why it's such a good save. As said above, ignore how close the ball is to him, that is irrelevant to why it's such a good save, Pickford has almost no time to react and then also needs an incredibly strong wrist to be able to deflect the ball
English
2
0
2
73
Mickey Williams retweetledi
Documenting Saylor
Documenting Saylor@saylordocs·
“If I put $100 in Bitcoin in 2010 I’d have $2.8B now.” No. If you bought $100 of Bitcoin in 2010 and watched it go to: $1k → $100k → $1.7M and did nothing Then watched $1.7M go to $170k and still did nothing Then watched $170k go to $110M and still did nothing Then watched $110M wither to $18M and still did nothing Then watched $18M surge to $390M and still did nothing Then watched $390M deteriorate to $85M Then watched $85M climb to $1.6B and still did nothing Then watched $1.6B shrink to $390M and still did nothing Then watched $390M surge to $2.8B and then for some reason finally decided to do something… Then yes, $100 in 2010 would be worth $2.8B today.
English
589
1.6K
28.9K
2M
Mickey Williams retweetledi
el.cine
el.cine@EHuanglu·
‘AI is slop’ they say
English
1.5K
2K
21.7K
5.2M
Mickey Williams retweetledi
Tom Harwood
Tom Harwood@tomhfh·
"We have not built a reservoir since 1992, or a runway since 2001, or high speed rail since 2007."
David Lawrence@dc_lawrence

I'm in the @NewStatesman today arguing why rejoining the EU Customs Union won't fix Labour's growth woes. The basic reason: UK and European stagnation predate Brexit, and the real challenge is competing with US and Chinese dynamism. Brexit didn’t cause our economic problems, but it did create an excuse for them. The EU debate sucked the air out of our idea space, particularly on the left, which means we haven't properly interrogated the root causes of our economic malaise. Europe as a whole suffers from a lack of dynamism. Our largest companies are much older than those in the US, and weighted towards legacy sectors (finance, luxury goods, oil, pharma, automobiles), many of which have seen poor productivity growth compared to America's digital services and AI, or China's advanced manufacturing. Crucially, dynamism is not the same as innovation. Britain, like many European countries, has no shortage of entrepreneurs and inventors, scientists and creators. The challenge is continually re-allocating talent and capital towards evermore productive uses, in effect turning ideas into profitable companies that can take on incumbents and scale. For this, market structure, regulation and underlying infrastructure are more important than ingenuity and skills. We do not build enough housing, particularly in productive cities, and especially in London. This means workers can’t afford to move to good jobs, and wages are inflated to cover high rents, increasing cost and reducing business investment. Britain has some of the highest electricity costs in the world, in part due to our failure to build transmission infrastructure and nuclear power. We have not built a reservoir since 1992, or a runway since 2001, or high speed rail since 2007. Physical infrastructure is important for dynamism because it effectively levels the playing field. Productive firms cannot take on established incumbents if they face prohibitive costs to expansion. The net effect is dampened investment and firms that would rather scale in the US–or not at all.

English
22
61
584
147.6K
Mickey Williams retweetledi
Sam Freedman
Sam Freedman@Samfr·
New post: "The Overshoot" Net migration is collapsing, and will fall further over the coming years. We could even have net emigration. What does that mean for the country + the political narrative as we head towards the next election? (£/free trial) open.substack.com/pub/samf/p/the…
English
4
11
28
20.7K
Michael Cox
Michael Cox@Zonal_Marking·
This old penalty conversion % map from @PenaltyKickStat (from taker's perspective) is a good guide. Put it high and the keeper has no chance. Put it low and he's struggling. Put it about one-third up and it's getting close to 50:50. It's a stock phrase for a reason: it's bang on.
Michael Cox tweet media
English
11
1
104
15.8K
Michael Cox
Michael Cox@Zonal_Marking·
(a) about one-third up IS a nice height for a goalkeeper, which is obvious from both watching football and proven by data, & (b) well no, they'd say something like "great cross", as someone has put it at the right height (rather than the wrong height) x.com/prodnose/statu…
Danny Baker@prodnose

Never understood why commentators have always agreed on the bullshit phrase "nice height for the goalkeeper". Ball coming at you at 70mph! They never denigrate a great headed goal as "a nice height for the forward".

English
5
1
183
75K
Mickey Williams
Mickey Williams@fusenUK·
While Cloudflare blocks almost all AI crawlers, there’s one particular bot it cannot block without affecting its customers’ online presence — Google." I bet an anti-monopoly charge appears eventually due to this tomshardware.com/tech-industry/…
English
0
0
0
53
Andy
Andy@LetsTalk_FPL·
Hopefully Fulham consider defending soon.
English
18
7
382
63.3K