Kenny

LMFAOOOOOO new generational gif just dropped holy fuck this is definitely going triple platinum

@normdonald881 @DanJBarnsley @ManceWarner @JustinWhang @MrTimStrange @beastmanhusk

@DanJBarnsley @ManceWarner @JustinWhang @MrTimStrange @beastmanhusk Keep ur side show away from my fucking food you stupid fucking imbecile.

What the fuck is up Popeyes

"How do we show everyone we're HaRdCoRe?" "I know, let's expose everyone in this chicken restaurant to hepatitis!"

@davemeltzerWON Yes Dave, NFL fans actually DO say that. In fact, there's literally an ages-old derogatory term for it: "Monday morning quarterback."

Do nfl fans say that football is ruined because too many fans cosplay as coaches? Never criticize the coach. Just enjoy the game. I only say this because if you are thinking of doing a tweet on wrestling. First do the same tweet word for word about sports movies or food. If it them sounds stupid well that saves you looking stupid publicly

@SeanRossSapp I dunno, 2021 was the year of the BOX LIKE STRUCTURE.

WWE's top title booking from summer 2019 to early 2020 was some of the worst cable TV wrestling I've ever covered

@DrewMcWeeny How did this even get claimed? If anything it's easier now. I can literally do cinema-quality greenscreen or blackout compositing on my 2020 iMac. And I have.

@nicklopiccolo Was Ari sucking your dick while you wrote this?

let’s start where this actually lives, not where you want it to live. with the math. the last three weeks of dynamite: 👉 765k 👉 730k 👉 654k that is not a ramp. that is not momentum. that is not “heating up” into a conversion window. that is a decline into it. you are looking at a -111k drop in two weeks, roughly 14–15% contraction from the high to the low, at the exact point where a traditional ppv cycle should be stabilizing or expanding. instead, you have compression. average those three weeks and you land at roughly ~716k linear viewers. that is your real, observable, measurable audience. not hypothetical reach not cumulative impressions not social engagement proxies actual people sitting down and watching the show in the time slot that matters for conversion. i’ve already laid out in detail what the max numbers actually represent and how simulcast behavior works, so i’m not going to re-litigate all of that here. but it matters enough to say again clearly: max is not a second audience at scale. it is a distribution extension that splits the same audience. it does not double your reach. it does not materially expand your funnel. it shifts a portion of existing behavior from one pipe to another. the short version is already established: 👉 max is not additive at scale 👉 max is a split of the same audience 👉 max realistically contributes ~50k–150k, ~75k center so your total reachable audience on a good night is: 👉 ~790k–800k all-in that’s the funnel. that’s the ceiling. that’s the number you are working from. that’s the universe that can possibly convert into a paid transaction. not hypothetical not inflated not “what if” that is the real audience number. now take the number dave is floating: 👉 ~143k ppv buys run the only equation that matters: 👉 143k ÷ 800k = ~17.9% conversion stop there for a second @davemeltzerWON is unironically asserting that nearly 1 out of every 5 viewers is converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026 in a market with: – no centralized ppv infrastructure – subscription-first behavior – widespread piracy – fragmented pricing (domestic, max discount, vpn international) – a declining weekly audience trend that is the claim. not “strong performance.” not “better than expected.” not “up year over year.” the claim is nearly 1 in 5 viewers converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026. this is where the conversation should end, because that number does not exist anywhere in modern media behavior. it doesn’t exist in boxing. it doesn’t exist in ufc. it doesn’t exist in any scaled transactional model operating in the current environment. and more importantly, it didn’t exist consistently even when the infrastructure supporting it was intact. again, this is the part people either don’t understand or choose to ignore: ppv is not just a pricing model. it is an infrastructure model. and that infrastructure is gone. for decades, the backbone of ppv was inDemand. that system wasn’t just pushing content out to cable homes. it was aggregating buys, standardizing reporting, and creating a reconciliation layer that allowed promoters, distributors, and networks to operate off the same dataset. if you were serious about this business, you could triangulate numbers. you could get within a narrow band of reality because the pipes were real and the accounting was shared. that system shut down in 2025. 👉 143k ppv buys is not an aggressive take 👉 it is not an optimistic take 👉 it is a structurally impossible take because we know what real conversion looks like. we do not need to guess. it has been modeled across combat sports, boxing, ufc, and multiple transactional platforms. the ranges are stable: 👉 1–3% → normal 👉 3–5% → strong 👉 5%+ → elite and rare, reserved for events with massive cultural heat and crossover appeal those ranges were established when the infrastructure was intact, pricing was more controlled, piracy was less frictionless, and distribution was more centralized. today, every one of those conditions is worse. pricing is fragmented. you have $49.99 standard, $39.99 through max, international pricing accessible through vpn, and a piracy environment where high-quality streams are available instantly. that is a high-friction, high-leakage system. so conversion should compress, not expand. now apply real-world conversion to your real audience: 👉 800k × 2% = 16k buys 👉 800k × 3% = 24k buys 👉 800k × 5% = 40k buys that’s your range. 👉 ~15k–35k realistic 👉 ~20k–30k as the most defensible center 👉 ~40k reasonable given the strength of the headliners now invert the math, because this is where the claim completely collapses. if you want to justify 143k buys at even a healthy 3% conversion rate, you need roughly 4.7 million engaged viewers. so the question becomes extremely simple: where are the other four million people? 👉they are not on linear television. 👉they are not on max. 👉they are not showing up in any digital engagement metrics that correlate with that level of demand. 👉they are not visible anywhere in the ecosystem that would need to exist to support that level of conversion. 👉👉👉👉👉 they do not exist. and this is before you even account for the trend line moving the wrong way. you are not converting off a growing base. you are converting off a shrinking one. you are not building urgency. you are losing reach. that matters, because conversion does not happen in a vacuum. it happens on top of momentum, visibility, and audience expansion. when those inputs are declining, conversion does not spike to historic highs. it compresses further. the biggest fights in the world are no longer relying on ppv as their primary distribution model. they are moving to platforms that guarantee reach and revenue up front. the most recent example should end this conversation for anyone actually paying attention: netflix just locked tyson fury vs anthony joshua for a major global fight this august. that is one of the biggest possible matchups in boxing. in any previous era, that is a premium ppv event with massive buy expectations, heavy marketing, and a full transactional rollout. instead, it is going to a subscription platform. why? because the economics are better. the reach is global. the friction is lower. the platform values engagement at scale over one-off purchases. that is where the industry is. so when you are being asked to believe that a weekly wrestling property with a ~700k linear audience, declining into its ppv window, is somehow generating six-figure transactional buys inside a subscription platform in 2026, you are not just being asked to accept a number. dave is asking you to ignore the direction of the entire market. and that’s before you even bring in platform behavior. max is not a live sports-first platform. it does not behave like one. when max has something it cares about, it promotes it aggressively. homepage rails. push notifications. press releases. talent integration. cross-platform amplification. you do not see that here. and that absence is not accidental. platforms surface what they want you to see. they amplify what drives engagement and revenue. if ppv at scale were happening inside that ecosystem, it would be visible. it would be part of the narrative. it would be monetized loudly. it isn’t. and that’s before you even factor in the other variables i’ve broken down in detail before: 👉 i’ve already debunked why the max numbers people are throwing around don’t make sense 👉 i’ve already explained what the linear number actually represents and what it doesn’t 👉 i’ve already mapped the media rights landscape in 2026, including how these properties are being evaluated ahead of the paramount–wbd merger the wsj reports could close as early as july so when you’re being told by dave that a property with a ~700k weekly audience trending downward into a ppv window is generating six-figure transactional buys at premium pricing inside a subscription platform in 2026, you’re not being given data. you’re being given a number that does not reconcile with anything else in the system. that’s math. stop it - 45

@JobberNationTV You don't have any "sources," dipshit.

BREAKING: Sources are telling me that Toni Storm hasnt been happy with the direction of her career the past year Shes at odds with Tony Con!!! If true, WOWWWWW HUGEER NEWSSS!!

@iamjondraper Imagine making a company your glazing target when they take money from a regime that dismembered a journalist alive and stones women for showing their ankles.

Imagine making this company your identity on social media when it produces stuff like this?

@WONF4W People in WWE? The sister promotion of the one she's been burying somewhere in the Earth's mantle for the past several weeks?

People in WWE ‘shocked’ to see Ronda Rousey at AEW Revolution ift.tt/9weUlWQ

@ansonmount He's an awful person who fired people who worked for him because they reported a sexual predator.

This man is a genius and a gift to the American wrestling ring. If I could nominate him for a McCarthy Fellowship, I absolutely would do so. For the time being, all I can do is admire the artistry. 🧑‍🍳 💋

@PapaJohns Is this the care I should expect going forward when you outsource one of my orders to @DoorDash?

If I ever learn what this tweet means, you have my consent to compassionately euthanize me

@TheRealDisco WCW was giving tickets away for free in the 90s and still couldn't fill 7,000-seat houses.

Ticket prices for these shows are $10-$40 USD.

@thecomputerclan And here is the… Site? Product? Program? …it’s advertising: weareshredtactics.com/confirm-age/ (If you go to the root URL it’s a blank site, which is VERY sus.)

@thecomputerclan Another AI slop YouTube ad, except this time it’s stunningly offensive content. Seriously, not even REMOTELY safe for work. But somehow running as a YouTube ad. youtube.com/watch?v=KBKmEf…

@VerizonSupport I am a delivery driver. This outage is quite literally costing me money. I hope I can get a bill credit or something for this.

😂

@ThirstRoundPick @davemeltzerWON I didn't say profitable, I said salvageable. And they might have become the number 1 company, but they didn't stay that way, did they? Profitability is meaningless if it isn't consistent and lasting.

@fusionaddict @davemeltzerWON Your argument would be stupid then because they never made a profit before hogan and became the number 1 company with hogan.

That happened in late 1988.

@jondelarroz Uh, no? Moron.

Now that the dust has settled, can we admit that James Gunn Superman was a terrible--and woke--movie?