Edison

but isnt 3.1k a bit above industry avg? based on the small data i’ve seen from the likes of rise trackers like, i barely see any prop above 3k, i even remember @virasana_ni used to say that an avg payout of 2k per payout or below is healthy for a prop. Could you share a bit more about industry avg numbers?(for biweekly)

Not chiming in on anything but 1 thing. The numbers at the end. If you know what I know, and you can do some quick math. Either FTMO traders are amongst the lowest paid per split on the 2 phase set up, or something doesn't add up. Perhaps it would be better to just hook up to @PropFirmMatch and let them API in your payouts for clarity.

@TylerG_Capital did u have the same restrictions on darwinex? is that why u stopped trading it?

The CFD space is officially over. There I said it. The shit I see is actually disgusting. You don’t get any of that nonsense trading futures. - one sided betting rule…. (Yea no kidding or else I would be hedging) - margin rules….(pal we r trading demo accounts what are we even talking about about here) - max risk per trade rule. (Then what is daily drawdown for) Sad to see honestly. Just complete hypocrisy. If I burned my account to any of those rules the firms wouldn’t come save me right. Absolute shame really.

@clericusvagans1 check your dms

@AutismCapital Why aren’t you mentioning your owner Elon?

Ghislaine was a Reddit supermod. Epstein was a 4chan troll who likely started /pol/. You can’t even make this up. Apologize to your local schizo.

@salmanmunir96 @Market_Emotions @Stephb022 @EquityEdgeUK @BeefDayPepe @MTradingX condition is you send back 4939

@Market_Emotions @Stephb022 @EquityEdgeUK @BeefDayPepe @MTradingX Probably a condition before payout is disbursed.

@jeeniuz 500$ demo stop losses

Banks, funds and market makers are not coordinating to steal $500 stop losses. - towards ICT traders.

if there's no coming back probably call it a day, apologize, explain how u think it went wrong, -pay employees what is owed first if any -leave 25-35% of the remaining funds for proportional refunds based on where they were(p1, p2, funded in dd) -split the remaining funds based on how much people have profits on their funded accounts, basically in a shares like system or do like the avg very good ceo and pocket everything

If a firm has serious financial troubles what should they do in your opinion? *Disclaimer: Nothing to do with ATFunded or ATFX

@ScamsScram they're gonna cook...the traders

@Markos_mom feels good knowing you cant do such thing with me

My favourite time of year Over the past year I've carefully collected files of every payout posted on X They're carefully filed, categorised by name, and then sorted by transaction date Over the next two weeks I help traders by reporting all of those transactions to the IRS

@stoploss_ @fundingpips if he was caught group cheating on FP, why wasnt he banned on ticks?

Benny here is already banned from fundingticks because he got caught group cheating on @fundingpips awhile back

@jeeniuz been there done that, stricter than EU but i wish Kosova and Albania learned a thing or two from MNE

@fxEdisonn Paahh haha Honestly, Its not as funny as it sounds when you have to deal with them haha

SICA Capital Trading Floor Location: Ulqin, Montenegro - i have a problem with permits because of EU path for the country, they act too strict and on top of it , they work so slow. Going to take a while… Balkan shenanigans.

@jeeniuz @LoboWolfy27 wtf, sa thash qr sa mire qe "randomly" eshte dashuru me pjesen shqiptare t'malit zi 😂 + postimet kosove e shqiperi good pr, and you were one of us the whole time 😭😭

@LoboWolfy27 Yessir haha

idk how they stand cash wise, im sure very very well, but that isnt very important imo as much as the model is important, i've never had the chance to trade with MFF cause i had taken a break on FX but everyone i talked to about them used to say that slippage was noticeable but they always paid no questions asked, now i believe the prop firm traders nowadays have become weak, i think the new props launched in the last 2 years that launch with too good spreads too good slippages, they set a standard and then they have to increase spreads and slippages to stay alive, then these new conditions are seen as too predatory. I believe now MFF will be seen like that and i believe prop traders make too much drama too fast, i think the only chance for MFF to come back and be reliable like they used to is to come back FTMO style where they dont give a fuck about social media drama from the beginning, ban cheaters if they catch them etc, stuff that most props are afraid to do due to almost always be a loser in the public face cause its easier to side with the trader than the prop

A good moment for Murtuza and hopefully for prop.

@propwarz @RajaBanks wise words

We believed it was only fair to allow @RajaBanks to comment, given the recent posts on X linking his ‘As a multimillionaire’ status to his involvement in laundering money from Ted Safranko's hidden BTC wallets, following his associations with The Traders Domain $500m ponzi 💰

@Markos_mom im proud to say i knew u before that tweet

900k views and 11.5k bookmarks on something I bashed out while doing a poo

i think technical co-founder would be the best thing in your scenario, you'd waste too much time vibe coding when you could work on other stuff like planning marketing or something similar. Finding a trusted technical co-founder will be a bit hard though if you dont already know someone or someone that knows someone

Looking for advice I have an idea I'd like to build. It's been on the back burner for a while. It's trading adjacent. A saas idea. The TAM would be every retail trader. I don't believe anything like this exists on the market. Certainly not how I envisage. To build it would be complex. I have zero coding knowledge, but can vibe code as competently as anybody, which I believe could get me to a functional MVP - functional enough for a demo. To build it properly would need a proper developer, or technical co-founder. Distribution is also a challenge. I could go down the route of ads, but it feels inefficient when there are hundreds of existing potential partners with significant existing distribution channels in the trading world. Time is of the essence. I believe there would be a first mover advantage. I'm fiercely protective of the idea. I won't share what it is in DMs. What's the best way to go about it? Do I build an MVP and seek an investor? How do I identify the right backer? Do I bring a technical co-founder on board, or seek investment and hire a developer? I don't want to part with too much equity because I believe it would be a huge success, but I guess everyone believes that of their ideas, and I can certainly see the advantage of having the right partner with the right backing and team on board. Part of me thinks "you've never built anything, so perhaps worth going through the process of getting a backer, even if it means releasing some equity, and you'll build more shit in the future" But if I'm pitching to investors, how do I prevent them just taking the idea and running with it themselves? How do I even find investors? Any ideas appreciated ❤️

@NexoraSec but u dont understand that you’re 50x less relevant than ATF, imagine if someone is scared of getting their payout denied by ATF and goes to someone much smaller and riskier to seek help and security lol, what’s next, someone more irrelevant securing the security of nexora?

well there's vague rules like one sided betting, high risk etc, everyone with a few months in the prop space knows risking all the time above 2% will not be tolerated from the likes of 5ers, ftmo,... other props that deal that way. I know for a fact that FTMO warns you before they put you under 1% rules so tbh idk what to say, there's a reason you dont see people "gamifying" ftmo, 5ers,...

@fxEdisonn @flexxtrades Prop firms should adjust their rules accordingly upfront, not allow things then say to retake again with different rules

I had to redo phase 1 & 2, three times like this lmao

Would you really hand your money to this prop firm and trust them to pay you on time, every time after all you've seen now?

"Would you give this clown your money?" is basically what they want to say but afraid to say it. They are judging him on a tiny sample and are attacking a trader for doing what their own rules allowed. First of all, you're not giving anyone any money, you do not a-book a clint with 17 trades and then act all entitled here. Your whole funded accounts are just demo b-book accounts and you're using the a-book narrative to ban people. Deficit? What deficit when the both challenge and funded accounts are demo accounts? A bit of shame would be good guys! The trader is literally trading exactly inside your risk box that's why he's still not banned and you're asking people if they would fund him. If he was outside of your rules, you would have banned him outright long time ago without even asking anyone and you would have just gave him an NDA. Write it in your rules you low IQ imbeciles: "IF YOU CHANGE YOUR STYLE OF TRADING AFTER GETTING FUNDED, YOU'LL BE RESTRICTED TO 1% PER TRADE IDEA AFTER ONE WARNING" If you do not have that, then don't fund them, because anyone can increase risk if they stay within the margin and daily loss limit. Here they showed a handful of trades and tried to make a story out of it. No talk about: full equity curve total drawdown monthly returns end of year/month result Any serious firm knows you cannot judge a trader by two screenshot and 10-15 trades. If at the end of the year/month his equity curve is positive and his max DD/daily DD is inside their rules, then he did his job. Period. If you think those trades are too risky, fine. Then change the rules for new traders. Do not change the story after someone already passed. You cannot sell "funding" and then act shocked by risk. You sell leverage, challenges, high risk. You use flashy marketing about "big daily payouts" and "funded in 2 steps." You cannot then act surprised when a trader: - uses the higher risk on funded within the rules - sizes up when they see edge - has swings in balance That is literally what a high risk leveraged trader looks like. If you don't want it, limit him to 1% per trade idea or limit everyone to 1% per idea. But if you don't have 1% per trade idea and If the account is still: within your max loss within your daily loss closing the month green then he did his job better than most traders out here. You do not get to cash their challenge fees, call them "funded," use their results in your marketing, and then publicly roast them for the exact same risk profile you already approved and literally allowed for him to take. Now I will do a poll after this post, please vote.

@BabatundeOPaul no need baba 😂

@fxEdisonn @flexxtrades Dear Prime Minister, just command and we will execute.