Sweeny G

@SoloSportFutbol @LugarCinema Si.. Nicholson repitió muchas veces ese rol Tuvo sus chispasos con Ironweed, The Last Tycoon, Prizzi Honor, About Schimd y otras Pero si se quedó muy pegado a su rol que lo hizo ganar su primer Oscar que para mí debió haber ganado Maximilian Scheell o Al Pacino ese año

@LugarCinema Con mucha diferencia, Marlon Brandon. Simplemente, en "Un tranvía llamado deseo", demuestra su excelsa calidad actoral. En la foto me falta el otro grande, Paul Newman. Y me sobra el histriónico y sobrevalorado Jack Nicholson. Nunca salió del "...Nido del Cuco".

¿Quién es el mejor actor de la foto?👀

@LugarCinema 1-Robert De Niro 2- Daniel Day Lewis 3- Anthony Hopkins 4-Marlon Brandon 5- Jack Nicholson 6- Al Pacino

@mrbrianrowe 1- Joe Pesci 2- Gene Hackman 3- Martin Landau 4- Robin Williams 5- James Courbun 6- Kevin Spacey 7- Michael Caine 8- Cuba Gooding Jr 9- Tommy Lee Jones 10- Jack Palance

Best Supporting Actor Oscar wins of the 1990s RANKED. Tomorrow morning!

@oscaruriel @disneyplusla La Actuación de John Leguizamo en Bob Treviño Like It es muy entrañable y que ganotas de llorar con ese final

Mi entrevista con John Leguizamo. Interpreta a Pablo Escobar en #DearKillerNannies @disneyplusla

@mrbrianrowe Mark Whalberg si merecía la nominacion A Nicholson le he visto ese personaje otras veces

Mark Wahlberg was a fun Oscar nomination in Best Supporting Actor for The Departed, but his slot really should have gone to Jack Nicholson for the same film!

@shadowknightdk Nee Mark Whalberg tiene muy merecida la Nominacion y hasta la fecha Una de sus pocas buenas actuaciónes Nicholson y Damon estaban correctos.. déjen de sobrevalorar alos grandes

they nominated mark wahlberg when the film had dicaprio, matt damon and jack fucking nicholson acting their asses off

@cinematictalk JAJAJA JAJAJA el era pero para Freddie Mercury

No lo digo yo, lo dice el pueblo.

@TheCinesthetic Mayormente Suelo decir que un actor debe de ser todo terreno Hasta interpretar a un árbol pero hay unos que se quedaron en proyectos que ni explorar más su capacidad a pesar de mostrar chispasos Uno fue Kevin Kline.. Alfonso Cuarón lo Rescato con Disclaimer

What actors feel trapped in mediocre projects despite clearly having far more range?

@_AmbaRdz_ Pero ese es un vídeo de MJ No la película

@ElPrincipeDicee Pos al niño te la compro Está Morro Pero a los demás si está cabron jajaja

Somos un país naco y no es queja en absoluto

@FrankTracy Lo de Finch era una actuación de reparto Holden por tiempo y impacto está sobre el Sus escenas hablando de su vejez son tremendas Pero quién debió haber ganado era Robert De Niro o Giancarlo Gianini

Rewatched Network last night (kind of dumb; I'm going to see it again in a week at #TCMFF because Faye Dunaway will be there). Peter Finch won the Oscar (posthumously), as did Dunaway and Beatrice Straight. But in retrospect, I think Holden should have won. He's achingly real.

@mrbrianrowe La Alineación y Mi Top de ese año 1- Edward Norton(Win) 2- William H Macy 3- Armin Mueller Stal 4- Cuba Gooding Jr 5- James Woods Debieron está por encima de Woods y Gooding 1- Nathan Lane 2- Noah Taylor 3- Hank Hazaria 4- Paul Scofield

James Woods got the Oscar nomination in Best Supporting Actor for Ghosts of Mississippi, but his spot that year should’ve gone to Nathan Lane for The Birdcage!

@TodoTuCine0 Se supone que Las polémicas con Jackson vienen después de los años 80's Está película termina en BAD

#Michael Hace buena a “Bohemian Rhapsody”. La nada más absoluta a nivel narrativo y de puesta en escena. Un popurrí de vídeos sacados de YouTube y un vergonzoso blanqueamiento (nunca mejor dicho) a la mayor estrella de pop omitiendo cualquier tema polémico de su vida. Terrible.

@oscaruriel Exacto.. También hay que tener en cuenta que se sabia en qué rumbo iba la película cuando el productor la anunció y busco un director de encargo como lo es Antoine Faqua.. no es un trabajo Autoral ni Pasional

Vi #Michael de Fuqua. No es una buena película. No es un trabajo autoral. Nunca se vendió así. Es versión oficial. Me pareció entretenida y como fan service funciona. La prefiero por sobre otros biopics musicales infames como ese de Amy Winehouse. Mi opinión.

@howatdk Y Colman Domingo??

Jaafar Jackson is tremendous in MICHAEL, truly making you forget he isn’t the real thing. An off-the-charts performance. The rest of the movie is about as generic as you can get. Fans will love the musical performances, but there’s sadly no humanity behind them.

@CinemaTweets1 No recordaba que había ganado jajaja

Michael B. Jordan’s #Oscar win is not even one month old but the moment he won already feels iconic. I can’t run from the fact that I thought Leonardo DiCaprio was the most deserving, but MBJ was also deserving & I’m happy for him personally. So excited to see where he goes next.

@CinemaTweets1 La del 53 tiene un error de cast con Bogart y Holden que actúan sosos.. mala dirección de casting Aquí por el contrario hay una gran elección de cast con Ford y Kinnear que están correctos en sus roles.. superando a Julia ormond Sin olvidar la gran canción de Sting y john Willia

Harrison Ford’s performance in the remake of Sabrina is vintage ‘90s Ford & another rare example of a remake done right. This film, directed by Sydney Pollack, is a remake from Billy Wilder’s 1954 film, but remade with a little style & a little taste. Having Ford definitely helps

@CinemaTweets1 Ay pensé que era David Cross

Outcome (🌟), directed by Jonah Hill, is atrocious. This film is a disaster on at least three different levels, all of which I intend to dive into during this review. It’s not my style nor is it my preference to really go in on a film like I’m about to, but Hill’s second film as a director is so painfully out of touch, so disgustingly unfunny, and so incredibly unfair to Martin Scorsese, that I have no choice but throw this review down a flight of stairs. Get my guy Marty the hell away from this film & Jonah Hill’s direction as fast as humanly possible. And Keanu Reeves? If you thought you could run from this, you’re not safe either. Outcome is the story about a fictitious actor by the name of Reef Hawk (Reeves), who’s been famous since he was a kid, owns two Oscars & is recovering from a secret heroin addiction. The plot here is so mindlessly stupid I barely have the energy to give it room in this review. The idea here is Reef’s attorney Ira (Jonah Hill) informs Reef that an unknown person is extorting Reef with a viral video of Reef that will tank Reef’s career. This forces Reef, at the behest of Ira, to meet with people from Reef’s past, apologize, atone, and hope he can find the person trying to extort him in the process. His friends Kyle (Cameron Diaz) and Xander (Matt Boomer) stick with him through thick & thin yada yada yada- the story is so fucking stupid. I told you at the top of my review that this movie is a disaster on three levels & I’m going to tell you all three right now. The first is issue is the writing could not be worse. The dialogue between characters sucks, the plot itself is ridiculous, and every attempt at humor falls flat on its face. But what’s most offensive about this film is the plight Reef takes to atone for his past. It’s clearly a cosplay for Hill’s own personal life & image, which has taken a few major hits in the last 6 years. Hill is effectively communicating his own personal feelings through Reef’s journey, and all of it just feels so totally out of touch. Nothing in this script is funny and the way the characters talk amongst each other is just obnoxious. Screenplay = F. The second issue here is Jonah Hill the actor, who tries to upstage Keanu Reeves at every turn & is quite literally “doing the most”. How is this the same Jonah Hill who starred in Superbad? How is this the same Jonah Hill who had me dying when I first saw 21 Jump Street? Hill’s character is supposed to serve as the comic relief throughout the film as Reef goes on a “emotional” journey through his past. But this is some of the worst overacting I’ve seen in awhile. Hill just isn’t funny whatsoever & his performance gave me second-hand embarrassment. Also, his fake teeth & entire wardrobe are just an annoying distraction. The third issue is the filmmaking. Everything about this movie looks utterly awful. This movie takes place in Los Angeles but looks like it was shot completely in front a green screen. For the life of me, I don’t get why Jonah Hill, the director, made such an ugly looking film. But before I go, I have to speak on Keanu Reeves. I am a massive Keanu Reeves fan. Am I going to sit here and suggest I’m the biggest Reeves fan in the world? Definitely not. But I respect him as an artist. That said, what the hell is he thinking picking films like Good Fortune & Outcome, especially in such close proximity to one another? Never mind the fact Reeves is essentially trying to help two quasi-cancelled guys who belong in 2015 get back on their feet, what bothers me more is that neither film is a good use of Reeves’ talents as an actor. His line delivery is so redundant in both Good Fortune & Outcome, his performances in both films feels so similar when his characters are totally different, and I mean that in a bad way. Reeves has comedic chops- see Always Be My Maybe or Something’s Gotta Give or Bill & Ted- this guy can achieve “funny”. But not in these situations. Not with these trash scripts. Reeves needs to do a better job vetting projects & picking films. I would suggest he start by avoiding comedies for the near future & get back to John Wick or The Matrix. Skip this movie at all costs.

@CinemaTweets1 Se sabe que Jonah Hill es Muy desigual como Guiónista.. tiene ¿Porque El ? Con Bryan Cranston y la película es mala en cuanto todo..las situaciones y el humor muy forzado y ni hablar de las actuaciónes tan fuera de forma También tiene esa que hizo con Eddie Murphy.. los mismos

@CinemaTweets1 Un buen consejo sería que tampoco vuelva a esas sagas..serie estancarse aún mas