GifCo

5.7K posts

GifCo banner
GifCo

GifCo

@giffboake

I love procedural and generative CGI, tinkering with AI's and enjoying the outdoors. https://t.co/upk2SiwDYX

Whistler, BC Katılım Ocak 2013
675 Takip Edilen705 Takipçiler
pash
pash@pashmerepat·
Things are about to get wild ❄️
English
72
50
870
198.2K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@c_valenzuelab Man video gen is so dead it's not even funny anymore.
English
0
0
0
30
Cristóbal Valenzuela
Cristóbal Valenzuela@c_valenzuelab·
Every single one of these ads was made by one person. That’s insane, see the thread. Six months ago, that would have been impossible to say. The level of craft, story, and quality is quite impressive. What great talent can do with the right tools is what excites me most. Imagine not paying attention to what is unfolding right before your eyes.
Runway@runwayml

Congratulations to our inaugural cohort of creatives whose work won big in Runway's Big Ad Contest for Products That Don't Exist. Of the thousands of ads we received across genres, briefs and formats, just 25 winners have been selected. Watch the top 5 ads below.

English
7
8
73
7.1K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@plainionist How is that a serious question? It's not even a question FFS. It's litterally just a statement of fact.
English
0
0
0
0
Seb
Seb@plainionist·
Serious question: If vibe-coded projects produce code humans can't read but AI can, do we end up depending on AI just to maintain our own systems? 🤔
English
111
2
62
7.4K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@thdxr I'd rather things slow to a crawl then ever move to random quants with reduced intelligence. What other computer system do we allow that to happen!!! We always make things slower when resources are limited never worse but the same speed!!
English
0
0
1
23
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@romainhuet No one has been asking to pay $100 a month for a shitty chatbot
English
0
0
0
6
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@artee_49 @Hesamation Yes this must be a joke. %11 savings for a 2.7% perf increase over sonnet is actually terrible!! I guess the joke is Anthropic actually thinks this is good?mm
English
0
0
0
11
ARTEE
ARTEE@artee_49·
@Hesamation is opus only 2.7% better than sonnet? if not your sentence makes no sense.
English
1
0
0
56
ℏεsam
ℏεsam@Hesamation·
Anthropic just dropped the coolest feature: ADVISOR. it uses Opus for complex planning but leaves the dirty work to Sonnet. the result: 11.9% less cost and 2.7% better than Sonnet alone on SWE-bench multilingual. it's ~Opus-level intelligence at a fraction of the cost.
ℏεsam tweet media
Claude@claudeai

We're bringing the advisor strategy to the Claude Platform. Pair Opus as an advisor with Sonnet or Haiku as an executor, and get near Opus-level intelligence in your agents at a fraction of the cost.

English
50
90
1.3K
156K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@Hesamation Wait is this a joke? Or did you miss type? It's only 11% cost savings?
English
1
0
1
51
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
How the hell did we get stuck with dick head Dario and Scam Altman owning some of the best AI models and talent. Thank God for xAI and funny enough the Chinese for OSing so man good models! When China is more moral, and honest then the top American companies in the field you know there is a huge problem!
Elon Musk@elonmusk

Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI

English
0
0
1
14
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@scaling01 And Google will run it. So it'll really be theirs. So Naw your bad predictions failed again
English
0
0
0
34
Lisan al Gaib
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01·
called it
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01

Who builds AGI first? It's essentially a combination of who currently has frontier models, who has the resources to keep building out compute and power, who has the necessary research engine and who is bold enough to go for moonshot ideas. S++ instead of just S because they already have positive feedback loops. They might just run away with their lead. Google ahead of OpenAI and Anthropic, because they have the advantage everywhere (scale, compute, data, resources, multimodal, research) except for current text model capabilities. So in short timelines Google would likely lose to OpenAI or Anthropic, but in longer timelines, which I think are more likely, they can still outscale them. xAI and Meta in A tier because of resources (capital, compute, data), research and current capabilities. ByteDance, Alibaba and DeepSeek in B tier, because they have the resources (less than xAI, Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft) and the research and are bold enough to execute (Nvidia and Microsoft lack this). Microsoft and Nvidia in C tier, mostly for the bad short term timelines (market crashes, Microsoft could absorb OpenAI) and because of their compute and capital in long timelines. Baidu and Tencent in D tier also simply because of their capital in long timelines. I put all the smaller chinese labs in E tier (although i love my kimi, z-ai, minimax and stepfun bros), because they are too small and lack the research. It would take a miracle research breakthrough that can compensate a 10-100x compute disadvantage. In F tier all the other labs that lack the willingness, research, resources, or that don't even train models anymore (not a serious tier). You could fight about Mistral or Cohere having a shot, but they lack ambition. They are going for the safe business route.

English
12
0
123
16.5K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@nrehiew_ This is nothing but benchmaxing and even if it wasn't the small increase over last gen models only cements the fact we have hit the top of the exponential
English
0
0
0
85
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@NinaDSchick Is it hard to make up such large amounts of bullshit
English
0
0
0
102
Nina Schick
Nina Schick@NinaDSchick·
Claude Mythos. Ten trillion parameters: the first model in this weight class. Estimated training cost: ten billion dollars. On the hardest coding test in the industry (SWE bench) it scores 94%. It found a security flaw in a system that had been running for 27 years, one that every human engineer and every automated check had missed. It found another bug that had survived five million test runs over 16 years. (It did so overnight.) It is so capable in cybersecurity that Anthropic will not release it to the public, instead it is launching Project Glasswing along with 100m in compute credits to help secure software. Only twelve partners currently have access: Amazon, Cisco, Apple, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, JPMorgan Chase, Crowdstrike, Palo Alto, AWS, The Linux Foundation, Broadcom. (I'm sure the Pentagon is on the line?) This is not a product launch: it is a controlled deployment of a system too powerful to distribute freely. Tell me this isn't (very expensive) AGI?
Anthropic@AnthropicAI

Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing

English
585
903
11.3K
1.9M
Relaxbud
Relaxbud@ba_Aqla·
@Hesamation honestly, them releasing them the one they're internally would be scary, the world hasn't even caught up with AI let alone dealing with an AGI.
English
1
0
0
101
ℏεsam
ℏεsam@Hesamation·
is it just me or did they really nerf Claude Mythos this week?
English
7
0
48
4.6K
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@alexalbert__ Wow you guys spend a lot of time benchmaxing. Maybe try doing some real work for a bit
English
1
0
0
240
Alex Albert
Alex Albert@alexalbert__·
We released Claude Opus 4.6 just two months ago. Today we're sharing some info on our new model, Claude Mythos Preview.
Alex Albert tweet mediaAlex Albert tweet media
English
860
1.2K
17.7K
2.9M
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@beffjezos Yea keep believing the biggest shills on the planet
English
0
0
0
6
GifCo
GifCo@giffboake·
@DaveShapi @EMostaque Or it's because the models arnt improving. So giving it to a corporation with an NDA is an easy way to hide that fact
English
0
0
0
53