gitcreek

Dear Andrew, In my opinion, Erika Kirk had foreknowledge of Charlie’s assassination and has been actively involved in the cover-up that followed. Based on the evidence and patterns I’ve seen, I believe Erika, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer knew each other well before she was ever introduced to Charlie. Their connections appear to go back to Romania. I also believe Tyler Bowyer attempted to set Erika up with Charlie on at least three separate occasions before the timing finally worked in their favor. I believe all three of them were foreign agents of israel and were placed around Charlie as handlers. Their job, in my view, was to keep him in line and steer him in the direction they wanted. Toward the end of his life, I believe Charlie became aware of this arrangement and realized he was essentially living in a real-life Truman Show. This is one of the reasons, in my opinion, that he decided to leave the pro-Israel cause. He also made moves to distance himself from certain people, including removing Tyler Bowyer as COO and replacing him with Justin Streif. Additionally, Charlie had an appointment scheduled for September 15th to update his end-of-life documents, which sadly he did;t make. I interpret that as him planning to remove Erika as his beneficiary. Additionally, Charlie knew he was in danger. He told multiple people, including Dan Flood, that he believed “they were going to kill him.” We both know he wasnlt referring to radical trans liberals. He also allowed his life insurance policy to lapse, which I find significant. If someone genuinely believed their life was in danger, it would make little sense to let that policy expire unless it was intentional. Since Charlie’s death, Erika has directed and supported coordinated attacks against those asking questions, particularly Candace Owens. She has also been caught colluding with the Trump Administration in efforts to stage and amplify certain narratives, including the staged White House Correspondents Dinner clip where she was pushed in a leaked email from the Pentagon and White House as an “emotional asset.” Her behavior since the assassination has not resembled that of a typical grieving widow. She has remained highly visible, continued traveling extensively, and has shown little apparent concern about leaving her children without either parent present if God forbid if something happend to her as well. She has also been caught in multiple contradictions and lies. She even admitted to researching how other widows behave so she could mimic their actions. In my opinion, this suggests she was performing grief rather than experiencing it naturally. I do not believe she ever truly loved Charlie. Instead, I see a consistent pattern throughout her life of using romantic relationships as a means of social climbing for power, status, and fame. Every relationship she has been in publicly has involved high-profile men in sports, music, or politics. She has already moved on and, according to multiple sources, has been seeing Blake Wynn since at least December 2025 — only three months after Charlie was killed. This fits the pattern of her always seeking to “level up” in terms of wealth and status. Charlie was a millionaire, Blake is a billionaire. (again leveling up) When you also consider her family connections — including genealogical ties to the Rothstein family in Israel and the Rothschilds, who literally founded Israel — the picture becomes even more concerning to me. Additionally, there is an eyewitness account placing her at Fort Huachuca omn September 8th, with some suggesting this may have been connected to planning or testing for Charlie's assassination. While I cannot independently verify every detail, the cumulative pattern is difficult to ignore. Again, this is my opinion based on the facts and evidence I have reviewed. I believe any reasonable person presented with the same information would find these connections deeply troubling and worthy of serious investigation. Remember in almost every homicide case, the victim's spouse is usully the number one suspect especially when there is a very obvious motive such as a multi million dollar life insurance policy, where she stands to take over a multiple hundred million dollar organization. Where the US Director of National Counterterrorism says there was evidence of a foreign nexus. So why has the FBI nor Utah state law enforcement looked at her as suspect?

NEW: Image from today's ICE-involved shooting in Maine shows bullet holes in the vehicle's window. This image was sent to me by someone on the ground before police covered up the scene.

Just got out of shoulder surgery after shooting an AR-15 only one time. The surgeon said the brute force of the recoil nearly blew my shoulder clean out of my body. Curse this terrifying weapon of war!

This is what being shot with a 30-06 actually looks like. You know....For those of you still believing the official story.

Forensic analysis concluded that the major bullet fragment retrieved from Charlie Kirk's body could NOT be conclusively matched to the rifle allegedly used in the shooting of Charlie Kirk. This is a bombshell.

The conspiracy requires dozens, likely hundreds, of people across multiple agencies to plant evidence, fake or ignore forensics, coordinate stories, and stay silent forever. The evidence we actually have requires only one person who left his DNA on the rifle and towel, sent messages about leaving it wrapped up, and used a gun he had access to. Occam's razor doesn't favor the version that needs a flawless, leak-proof machine. It favors the version that needs one guy who fucked up.