t

10.5K posts

t

t

@glomde

Motvalls Kritiskt tänkande Älskar att se saker från olika håll

Katılım Şubat 2011
495 Takip Edilen106 Takipçiler
t
t@glomde·
@BioPicker @Aktiepappa Är det lön, arbetsgivare inte tillåter det eller något annat? Om det är lön så kan du tänka till och fråga dig om du har råd att vi sänker arbetstiden
Svenska
1
0
1
10
Taha Bengali
Taha Bengali@BioPicker·
@glomde @Aktiepappa Om du funderar lite så klarar du säkert att räkna ut det själv. Jag har förtroende för dig.
Svenska
1
0
0
15
t
t@glomde·
@StevenViddal @Kjusern1 So then what was your point if you agree that US/Israel can not stop bombing and declare victory without securing Hormuz?
English
1
0
0
19
Torbjørn Kjus
Torbjørn Kjus@Kjusern1·
US-Israel strikes have destroyed Iran’s ability to enrich uranium, Benjamin Netanyahu says. But what if Iran does not want to open the Strait even if U.S./Israel stops the bombing? It takes both sides to end a war… ft.com/content/096fe3…
English
1
0
9
1K
t
t@glomde·
@StevenViddal @Kjusern1 So it takes more than stop bombing for US/Israel to win the war? Iran clearly has been completely bombed out and their capability for war has been diminished already.
English
1
0
0
46
t
t@glomde·
@StevenViddal @Kjusern1 If Iran looses the war and Hormuz ends up being controlled by Iran. Maybe it would be better not to win the war
English
1
0
0
43
Steven Viddal
Steven Viddal@StevenViddal·
@Kjusern1 No, it really does not. It takes one side to win the war. It takes one side to degrade the other side's ability to wage war and inflict damages. Which quite likely is what is happening.
English
2
0
1
117
Taha Bengali
Taha Bengali@BioPicker·
@Aktiepappa Jag frågar inte dig för du klarar uppenbarligen inte av att tänka komplexa tankar utanför 40-timmarsboxen med många variabler.
Svenska
3
0
1
220
t retweetledi
Alan Eyre
Alan Eyre@AlanEyre1·
“Although President Donald Trump says he has ‘destroyed 100% of Iran’s Military Capability’, the 0% that remains is playing havoc with the global economy.” -The Economist
English
176
7.4K
40.6K
984.3K
TH
TH@18Wiltonrow·
No one will pay a toll to Iran to navigate international waters. The Strait of Hormuz is considered international waters by law. Maybe you should do some research before replying with intellectually lazy posts. Also, Iran’s navy is at the bottom of the ocean, so unless they plan on swimming those mines out into the strait, there is nothing to worry about.
English
1
0
0
36
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Brilliant move by Iran. They are planning to levy a 10% toll on all ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This will generate $73 billion a year, completely offsetting US sanctions and paying for war damages. Checkmate.
English
5.6K
12.6K
50.7K
2.2M
t
t@glomde·
@HayekAndKeynes @vol_is_our_edge I guess US did the same. I would not be surprised it would end by making Iran controlling the Hormuz and take a toll
English
0
0
0
29
The Long View
The Long View@HayekAndKeynes·
NATO allies who didn’t offer military support to help close Hormuz may soon see how much that decision will cost them…. Defense would have been cheaper than the energy bills that are coming. Fools learn from experience.
English
122
33
339
40.1K
Stefan Schubert
Stefan Schubert@StefanFSchubert·
Chess is a really atypical profession. When we watch chess, we don't just care about the objective quality of the moves: we care about them having been decided by a human. By contrast, when we hire a doctor or an accountant we typically just care about the output.
Dr. Dominic Ng@DrDominicNg

Chess is 30 years ahead of every other profession in dealing with AI. The best case study we have for what's coming. 4 lessons: 1. Human-AI collaboration had a 15-year shelf life in chess. "Human in the loop" is a phase.

English
46
33
955
68.4K
t
t@glomde·
@John_Hempton @wolfejosh Why do you loathe him? From my understanding you believe Israel has been to soft since 7 october
English
0
0
0
22
John_Hempton
John_Hempton@John_Hempton·
@wolfejosh I loathe Bibi. And if you look at my twitter stream I am clearly not anti-Israel.
English
4
0
9
1.5K
Josh Wolfe
Josh Wolfe@wolfejosh·
none of the bigot antizionists are saying anti bibi by all means protest bibi. half of Israel does NO they're saying israel, the historic jewish homeland should be erased from the map. that a jew who wants to go home has no right even the Quran says ISRAEL was home of jews
Josh Wolfe tweet media
Lone Skum@LeveredLong_

@wolfejosh Antisemitism and Anti Bibi aren’t the same… just the same way anti Trump and anti American aren’t the same.

English
4
6
52
10.7K
t
t@glomde·
@phl43 @bolsademiedo They could but did not before. Now they do, if US lets it keep controlling Hormuz they are more powerful. So it alla it depends on where we end.
English
0
0
0
12
Philippe Lemoine
Honestly I think it's more than far-fetched, it's completely absurd. Listening to those people, you'd almost think that the Iranians wanted the US and Israel to bomb the shit out of them.
English
6
0
18
2.3K
Philippe Lemoine
This doesn't make any sense. Iran always had the ability to close Hormuz, thus indirectly controlling the price of oil, but it wasn't doing it because that's a very risky move. The reason why it's now using that power is that it doesn't have a choice, because it's getting pummeled by far superior military forces, which is obviously not something that makes you more powerful. There is a plausible case that Iran will be able to force the US to end the war by keeping the strait closed, you can say that, but the idea that it's more powerful now than before the war is idiotic.
Robert A. Pape@ProfessorPape

Iran is more powerful now than before the war — it controls the price of world oil and more likely to fracture the US coalition than US is to grow it. Stunning gains in 17 days

English
75
78
1K
100.1K
t
t@glomde·
@GrimmVeronika @jakluge Would you expect US to come and help if EU country stsrted war against Russia without consulting US?
English
0
0
3
169
Veronika Grimm
Veronika Grimm@GrimmVeronika·
No nuclear armament, less aggressive/possibly cooperative regime, end of/weakening of proxy support - it‘s not that difficult to guess. There Are more positive but less likely further developments - and there are worse outcomes. The hybris of Europeans to claim that US/ISL have no goals is worrying. Of course it is not in their interest to reaveal them to the public in a situation of war.
English
34
4
49
5.6K
Veronika Grimm
Veronika Grimm@GrimmVeronika·
I fear that Europeans don‘t get what is at stake. Failure of US/Israel in the middle east is of MUCH higher cost to us in Europe than to almost anyone else. (This holds independently of what one thinks about the escalation - it is already there)
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Just spoke to @POTUS about our European allies’ unwillingness to provide assets to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning, which benefits Europe far more than America. I have never heard him so angry in my life. I share that anger given what’s at stake. The arrogance of our allies to suggest that Iran with a nuclear weapon is of little concern and that military action to stop the ayatollah from acquiring a nuclear bomb is our problem not theirs is beyond offensive. The European approach to containing the ayatollah’s nuclear ambitions have proven to be a miserable failure. The repercussions of providing little assistance to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning are going to be wide and deep for Europe and America. I consider myself very forward-leaning on supporting alliances, however at a time of real testing like this, it makes me second guess the value of these alliances. I am certain I am not the only senator who feels this way.

English
577
292
1.9K
233.4K
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
We’ve reached the point where serious, smart people I’ve known for 10+ years think Iran can sink a U.S. aircraft carrier. Thank you MSM. Not saying it’s impossible but I’ll put $100K on the other side of that bet right now.
English
272
337
3.9K
83.3K
Sage Vizsla
Sage Vizsla@kcismek37·
@retserofer @johnkonrad @ostopezdo Do you want us to dock it and let them plant bombs on it? Ffs no one said it’s unsinkable it’s just nearly impossible to do when it’s in wartime status.
English
1
0
3
100
t retweetledi
Darth Putin
Darth Putin@DarthPutinKGB·
Europe has told Donald that it won't donate weapons to him but they will let him set up a fund where he can buy the equipment he needs. They're also going to lift some sanctions on Iran.
English
89
1.2K
7.1K
210.9K
t
t@glomde·
@robertgraham @MarnerJoshua So are you saying we shoulf not have done IP6 and just said it will sort it out it self? No you believe the same with bandwidth or any other resource and how do you now which will run out which will not?
English
0
0
0
8
Robert Graham
Robert Graham@robertgraham·
Back in the 1990s, early Internet nerds were convinced we were running out of IPv4 addresses and that we needed to create a new standard, IPv6, to prevent this. They used the same arguments as Paul Ehrlich, exponential growth meeting a fixed supply, leading to devastating collapse. They did this even after Ehrlich was proven completely wrong in 1990. This argument is a higher level Truth that can never be disproven, no matter how many times its predictions fail to come about. Over 30 billion devices are connected to the IPv4 Internet and we sill haven't run out of IPv4 addresses. Of those are 8.5 billion mobile phones on the IPv4 Internet. Yet, when people explain IPv6 to you, the first thing they'll tell you is that it's needed to prevent the Internet from running out of addresses.
Jeff Blehar is *BOX OFFICE POISON*@EsotericCD

Fun Paul Ehrlich fact: He didn't want to personally sign the check to Julian Simon to pay off his infamous lost bet about resource prices. So he made *his wife* stroke the check.

English
69
33
452
114K
t
t@glomde·
@Richard_Brase Då blir man lite nyfiken. Vad använder du?
Svenska
1
0
0
257
t
t@glomde·
@michaelh992 And Iran has been 6 months to develop Nuclear weapons the last 15 years according to BN
English
2
0
5
1.2K
Michael A. Horowitz
Michael A. Horowitz@michaelh992·
The IDF says a strike dismantled a space-related compound belonging to the Iranian terror regime that "was used to develop attack capabilities against satellites, posing a threat to Israel’s satellites and to space assets of other countries around the world."d [I don't think it was known that Iran was developing anti-satellite capacities.]
Michael A. Horowitz tweet media
English
5
24
100
74.4K
t
t@glomde·
@that_stocks_guy @alansritchie Where did you get that the margin is 10% before paying salary? Thats just numer you somehow found from nowhere
English
0
0
2
350
Charles Archer
Charles Archer@that_stocks_guy·
Hiring a minimum wage worker for a 10-hour pub shift costs £150. At 10% profit (and that's charitable) on a £6 pint, you make 60p profit per pint. You need to sell 250 pints (or 25/hr) just for the pub's profit to match what the worker earns. Lamb at Leadenhall? No issue. Rural pub in Devon? Zero chance of employment.
John Stepek@John_Stepek

"We're going to refund employer NI if you hire the people you currently can't afford to hire because we raised employer NI"

English
93
60
831
238.1K