Dammy!!!

I understand why many people are concerned when they hear “Sharia law,” especially when the examples that often come to mind are places like Afghanistan or Iran. However, I think it’s important to separate the actions of governments and individuals from the actual teachings of Islam. Many of the restrictions people point to, such as preventing women from pursuing education or careers, are not principles that Islam introduced. Islam did not forbid women from seeking knowledge or having a career. Seeking knowledge is encouraged for both men and women in Islam. One of the greatest examples is Aisha (RA), the wife of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), who was a renowned scholar and a source of knowledge for countless Muslims after the Prophet’s passing. That fact alone should challenge the claim that Islam seeks to keep women uneducated or uninvolved in society. Likewise, when people point to the failures of some Northern states and conclude that Sharia itself is the problem, they ignore the reality that selective justice and corruption are failures of human beings, not proof that the principles themselves are flawed. A system cannot be fairly judged by people who refuse to apply it consistently. By that same logic, no ideology, religion, or legal system would survive scrutiny because every one of them has been abused somewhere by those in power. It is perfectly reasonable to disagree with the implementation of Sharia or to have concerns about it. What is not reasonable is to reduce an entire legal and moral framework to the actions of extremists or governments that many Muslims themselves criticize. At the very least, we should be discussing what Sharia actually teaches, not what its loudest and most controversial examples have done.

Putting the Question of Sharīʿah in Yorùbá Land in Proper Perspective Much of the controversy surrounding Sharīʿah in Yorùbá land is driven more by fear, misinformation and politics than by a proper understanding of what is actually being requested by Muslims. The first point that must be clearly stated is that a full-fledged Sharīʿah legal system, in the sense of a comprehensive state-wide Islamic legal order governing criminal, civil and public affairs, is neither practical nor presently attainable in the multicultural and multi-religious context of Yorùbá land. The demographic realities, constitutional framework and religious diversity of the Southwest make such a project unrealistic. Indeed, the overwhelming majority of Muslims advocating for Sharīʿah are not calling for the establishment of an Islamic state, nor are they demanding the replacement of existing constitutional structures with a comprehensive Islamic legal system. What many Muslims have consistently requested is something far more limited, reasonable and constitutionally defensible: the opportunity to voluntarily access Islamic legal provisions in matters that directly concern their religious obligations and personal lives. These include areas such as: - Marriage and divorce. - Inheritance and estate administration. - Family disputes. - Endowments (waqf). - Contracts and certain aspects of personal transactions. - Religious mediation and arbitration. These are matters in which Muslims already believe they are religiously bound by Islamic teachings. The demand is therefore not for the imposition of Sharīʿah upon non-Muslims but for the accommodation of Muslims who voluntarily wish to regulate aspects of their personal affairs according to their faith. This is neither unusual nor unprecedented. Across the world, plural societies provide mechanisms through which religious communities can resolve personal and family matters according to their traditions, provided such arrangements operate within the framework of the law and with the consent of the parties involved. Viewed from this perspective, Sharīʿah Panels are not instruments of domination but mechanisms of religious accommodation. They are comparable to mediation and arbitration systems through which citizens voluntarily seek guidance and dispute resolution based on shared values and beliefs. The intense opposition to even these limited arrangements raises important questions. If Christians may organise their affairs according to Christian principles, and if practitioners of traditional religion may organise aspects of their communal and religious lives according to their convictions, on what basis should Muslims be denied the opportunity to seek guidance on inheritance, marriage, divorce and related matters from institutions grounded in Islamic law? To oppose a full Islamic legal state is one thing. To oppose Muslims having access to voluntary Sharīʿah-based mediation and personal law mechanisms is something entirely different. The latter begins to resemble a systematic denial of the legitimate religious rights of Muslims. Equally troubling is the recurring attempt to portray every discussion about Sharīʿah as a "Fulani agenda" or an externally inspired project. Such claims are historically inaccurate, intellectually weak and socially divisive. Islam did not arrive in Yorùbá land through Fulani people. Yorùbá Muslims are not recent converts. They are indigenous sons and daughters of the soil whose ancestors have practised Islam for centuries. The desire of a Yorùbá Muslim to distribute his estate according to Islamic inheritance law, contract his marriage according to Islamic principles or resolve family disputes according to Islamic teachings has nothing to do with Fulani nationalism, Fulani expansionism or any external ethnic agenda. It is simply the desire of a believer to practise his religion. 1/2

SAY NO TO SHARIAH PROPAGANDA! Shariah is justice. Shariah is fairness. Shariah is mercy. Shariah is compassion. Shariah is honesty. Shariah is trustworthiness. Shariah is accountability. Shariah is integrity. Shariah is financial responsibility. Shariah is ethical finance. Shariah is economic empowerment. Shariah is protection of wealth. Shariah is protection of life. Shariah is protection of family. Shariah is protection of human dignity. Shariah is protection of faith. Shariah is protection of knowledge. Shariah is social welfare. Shariah is charity and generosity. Shariah is caring for the poor. Shariah is respect for contracts. Shariah is fulfillment of promises. Shariah is peace and harmony. Shariah is moderation. Shariah is good character. Shariah is community development. Shariah is responsibility before Allah. Shariah is a path to human flourishing.

It’s shariah law they are practising in Afghanistan by the way. Afghanistan where there’s been complete erasure of women from public life. Taliban-led Afghanistan!!

If them adopt sharia law, none of the criminals would be safe. Because sharia law says anyone that takes another man’s life unjustly should also be unalived not rehabilitate them

BREAKING 🇳🇬🚨: Oyo Abduction: Bandits reportedly demand implementation of Sharia law in Oyo State as part of their ransom conditions.