B Wilson

There might not be anyone left working in federal government with real knowledge and experience in forest management. They’ve probably been “Guilbealt’d” leaving only climate change zealots. In Ontario, the provincial ranks have also been thinned and operating budgets slashed to the bone.

🇺🇸 Ambassador to 🇨🇦 Pete Hoekstra on the wildfire situation. 1⃣ The FIFA World Cup final may have to be postponed. Businesses are closing due to the smoke. There's an impact on the 🇺🇸 economy. 2⃣ There is a high level of frustration as this could have been addressed. 4 years in a row is too much. 3⃣ The 🇺🇸 wants to work on a plan to avoid a repeat. They are asking for 🇨🇦 officials to explain the complexity of the problem to state & federal legislatures. 🪓The tariff threat is being used to spark action. It remains to be seen if Carney will take this seriously.

Det krävdes alltså att den europeiska industrin hamnade i respirator och uppvisade klinisk hjärndöd innan EU-byråkraterna lyckades lokalisera sitt eget förnuft. EU-kommissionen har drabbats av en akut attack av verklighetsförankring och inser nu att Europa håller på att förvandlas till ett ekonomiskt u-land. Så de föreslår att mildra kraven i utsläppshandeln, en efterlängtad livlina för att stoppa det ekonomiska förfallet. Men i SVT-studion utbryter direkt landssorg. Reportern förklarar med darrande röst att detta minsann kommer att missgynna "svenska gröna satsningar". Det blottar ju hela bluffen: våra skattefinansierade fantasiprojekt är alltså så usla att de blir helt värdelösa så fort EU drabbas av minsta lilla uns av sunt förnuft. Vi har skapat en religiös sekt där framgång mäts i hur effektiva vi är på att avindustrialisera oss själva medan resten av planeten gasar på som vanligt. Sen toppar de eländet med att ta in Centerpartiets Emma Wiesner som gråter ut över att EU sänker ambitionerna och går "extremhögern" till mötes. Att vilja undvika ekonomisk härdsmälta är alltså en högerextrem konspiration nu. Man måste ju bara älska den totala opartiskheten. Tänk att ingen i den där studion har intelligensen att förklara att när en fabrik stänger i Europa och öppnar i Kina, så försvinner ju inte utsläppen från atmosfären. De byter bara postnummer. Koldioxiden bryr sig liksom inte om ifall den släpps ut i Ludvika eller i Shanghai, men den lilla detaljen är tydligen överkurs för Public Service. Det enda vi uppnår är att vi flyttar utsläppen till andra sidan jordklotet, utraderar de jobb som finansierar vår egen välfärd, och rullar ut röda mattan för Kinas totala ekonomiska dominans. Hur kan man sitta i en tv-studio med ett rakt ansikte och försvara en politik som gör oss fattiga utan att rädda ett enda gram koldioxid, samtidigt som Kina tar emot vår industri och bygger nya kolkraftverk för att fira?

Liberals have spent more than a decade making farming, specifically cattle ranching, impossibly expensive. Carbon taxes, regulations, and endless paperwork have pushed Canadian beef to be among the most expensive in the world. Now the liberal party solution is to import meat from countries that don’t have the same standards regarding food safety, animal welfare, or quality control. They’re tying the Canadian beef industry’s hands behind our backs and bringing in someone to beat us senseless.

Most people have no conception of the size of the wildfire disaster in northern Ontario - especially so in north western Ontario along the Manitoba border. Congratulations to our federal and provincial governments for their dedication to cost cutting! Let’s hope the brave firefighters who are battling these wildfires will stay safe. 🚨 Ontario's Largest Wildfire Surpasses 350,000 Hectares and Keeps Spreading youtu.be/E7ncJlSaVCU?si… via @YouTube

@cbcwatcher Climate change? Governments once again directing Canadian media to coverup mismanagement of our forests. Heard yesterday that families were packing up their belongings and planning to evacuate Thunder Bay today. EVACUATING the largest city in Northern Ontario!

CBC’s coverage of the Canadian wildfire smoke choking US cities this week has been a textbook case of omission The network ran multiple interviews with climate activists framing the fires as unquestionable proof of climate change. Yet in the only segment even touching forest management — this piece highlighting complaints from Michigan Republican lawmakers — CBC quickly pivots to Carney government talking points about “global cooperation” and “climate change being a global problem,” while giving almost no airtime to practical forestry solutions Where is the discussion of: * Proactive clearing of pine beetle-killed timber? * Scaled-up controlled burns (including Indigenous-led practices)? * Regular removal of deadwood and underbrush? Where is the historical context on Canada’s steady decline in active forestry labour and management intensity since the late 1980s? Those are measurable policy and resource choices, not weather An average Canadian cannot let their roof rot for years, then blame “climate change” when it collapses in a storm. Yet when it comes to our publicly managed forests, CBC treats neglect of basic maintenance as off-limits for debate. Instead, the network allows activist guests to declare the cause “unquestionably climate change” with zero pushback or counter-analysis. Forest management is not a partisan issue — it is land stewardship Canadians cannot lecture Americans about transboundary pollution while neglecting basic land stewardship. In the 1970s and 1980s, Canadian politicians repeatedly scolded the US over acid rain drifting from Midwest coal plants, demanding action and treaties because it was damaging Canadian lakes and forests. They didn’t simply blame “global climate patterns” and move on — they insisted on accountability for preventable emissions and management failures on the American side and Americans followed through Responsible coverage would examine both long-term climate trends ANDthe on-the-ground failures in prevention and maintenance. CBC has chosen the former while burying the latter. That’s not journalism; it’s advocacy. Canadians and our American neighbours deserve better This all merits an Ombudman complaint @brodiefenlon @CBCOmbud

@sarobertson_ Climate change? The feds cut a hundred million or so from its budget for forest fire preventative measures and the government of Ontario does the same thing. How is mismanagement of our forests a climate change problem?

Q: What do you say to elected officials in the US who are asking Canada to do more to avoid that the north of the US every year sees the smoke from the wildfires? Carney: We need a contribution from the Americans in the fight against climate change ... climate change is everyone's responsibility, including the US.

Maia Johnson is an American political operative whose appointment by Prime Minister Mark Carney as the first chief operating officer in the Prime Minister’s Office represents a troubling elevation of foreign influence into the heart of Canadian government operations. This newly created corporate-style position gives her direct oversight of day-to-day machinery in the PMO while she simultaneously retains her role as senior adviser on Canada-United States relations, a dual responsibility that raises serious questions about divided loyalties at a time of heightened trade tensions with the Trump administration. Johnson surfaced in Canadian politics only last year, arriving from New York City to volunteer on Carney’s Liberal leadership campaign before quickly embedding herself inside the PMO earlier in 2026, where her rapid ascent has left even Ottawa insiders unable to fully explain her path or qualifications for such sensitive power. Her background is steeped in failed Democratic Party ventures in the United States, including work on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign in areas of strategy, logistics, and scheduling that contributed to one of the most disappointing losses in modern political history marked by email scandals, misjudged voter outreach, and alienating rhetoric that divided the electorate. Johnson maintained a presence in the orbit of Michael Bloomberg’s political machine through the now-defunct Hawkfish LLC, a data and technology firm Bloomberg bankrolled to push his own short-lived 2020 presidential ambitions that collapsed after burning through hundreds of millions of dollars with little to show beyond early primary flops. Hawkfish itself drew sharp criticism for misleading potential recruits by falsely claiming it would serve as the Democratic National Committee’s primary tech platform, a deception that highlighted the firm’s questionable ethics and aggressive pursuit of control over party infrastructure, all while operating with heavy subsidies from Bloomberg’s vast wealth that allowed it to undercut competitors and centralize voter data in ways that progressives themselves rejected as billionaire overreach. The firm ultimately shut down in 2021 after the Biden campaign wisely distanced itself amid backlash, leaving behind a trail of unfulfilled promises and perceptions of secretive, top-down maneuvering that prioritized elite access over transparent democratic processes. Compounding these associations is Johnson’s documented involvement with the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, or GFANZ, the controversial climate finance initiative that Carney himself launched during his United Nations tenure and co-chaired with Bloomberg. Carney publicly credited Johnson for research assistance on his 2022 lectures tied to GFANZ, which promoted expansive ideas around global environmental governance that critics have long viewed as undermining national sovereignty in favor of unaccountable international alliances and financial mandates pushed by billionaires. This connection funneled her directly into Carney’s inner circle, bypassing more traditional Canadian political routes and illustrating a pattern of importing external networks steeped in climate activism and Democratic operative tactics that prioritize globalist agendas over domestic priorities. Her low public profile only deepens the unease, as searches yield virtually no clear photographs, social media presence, or detailed biographical information, making it difficult for Canadians to assess her background or potential conflicts in a role that demands utmost transparency and accountability. The ethical red flags surrounding Johnson are equally concerning and cannot be overlooked. In June 2026, Canada’s Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner hit her with a 200 dollar administrative monetary penalty for violating the Conflict of Interest Act by failing to provide all required information for her confidential report within the mandatory 60 days of appointment as a public office holder. That filing remains listed as in progress even after the fine was paid, signaling ongoing compliance shortcomings that are especially alarming for someone now tasked with running the operational core of the Prime Minister’s Office. Such a lapse, however minor in dollar terms, points to carelessness or resistance to basic oversight rules that elected officials and their staff are expected to follow without exception, particularly when handling Canada-United States files during a period of economic vulnerability and national unity strains. Taken together, Carney’s decision to hand Johnson this unprecedented level of day-to-day control, amid a broader PMO shuffle that also elevated other insiders while sidelining others, exposes a troubling reliance on American Democratic networks, Bloomberg-linked climate finance circles, and unvetted rapid promotions that prioritize personal connections over proven loyalty to Canadian interests. This move risks embedding foreign-influenced operatives deeper into government functions at the worst possible moment, when trade deals, economic stability, and sovereignty are under pressure, and it underscores a pattern of elite insulation that leaves ordinary Canadians questioning whose agenda is truly being advanced inside the Prime Minister’s Office. The full web of her associations, from Clinton’s losing campaign to Hawkfish’s deceptions and GFANZ’s globalist push, paints a picture of someone whose behaviors and choices have consistently aligned with circles known for opacity, high-profile failures, and top-down control rather than open, accountable public service.

@HWLinvest Canada used to have a test but given the number admitted to the country since 2015 who now claim citizenship but don’t speak either official language it’s difficult to say if were ever tested

Sverige har officiellt tröttnat på att spela rollen som den lim-ätande kusinen i den nordiska familjen. Efter decennier av total och fullkomlig naivitet har Sverige äntligen valt att kopiera resten av Norden och införa ett faktiskt medborgarskapsprov. Norge och Danmark har kört detta i evigheter, Finland hänger på nästa år, och nu har vi också fattat galoppen. Det fantastiska? Succén är redan ett faktum. Så fort vi höjde ribban till absolut minimum och började kräva grundläggande kunskaper i svenska och samhället, så blev provet fullbokat direkt. Det är nästan så man måste nypa sig i armen för att förstå hur absurt det var tidigare: Du kunde sätta dig på ett flyg från Kabul, kliva av på Arlanda med exakt noll koll på om Sverige ligger i Europa eller på månen, inte kunna producera ett enda svenskt ord, för att några år senare belönas med ett av planetens mest värdefulla pass. Det gamla systemet var så löjligt att det nästan krävdes en aktiv insats för att lyckas undvika att bli svensk medborgare. Att våra politiker lyckades sälja in idén att det var "främlingsfientligt" att be folk lära sig språket och förstå hur vårt samhälle fungerar är en gåta som inte ens modern psykiatri kan lösa. De klappade sig själva på axeln för sin "godhet", helt blinda för att deras heliga skräck för att ställa grundläggande krav på lagar och värderingar i själva verket dömde människor till livslång isolering. Jag förstår fortfarande inte hur det blev mer ”främlingsfientligt” att kräva att folk faktiskt förstår hur vårt samhälle och våra lagar fungerar, än att bara ge dem ett pass, klappa dem på huvudet och säga: "Vi förväntar oss absolut noll av er". Hur lyckades våra politiker sälja in den här typen av intellektuell lobotomi som den ultimata formen av ”antirasism”?

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

@TrendPolCa @MarkJCarney How many people in the PMO either work from NYC and commute or worked in New York previously with Brookfield, EuroAsia Group or the DNC?

PM @MarkJCarney just handed day-to-day control of his office to an American political operative who worked for Hillary Clinton and Michael Bloomberg. Her title didn't exist until this week, and even the Globe and Mail can't fully explain how she got here. 🧵👇 (1/6)

@linadreaamy 222

bunu çözersen zekâ seviyen ortalamanın üstündedir. çözebilir misin?

Canada’s economy is not healthy. It is being propped up by population growth, government spending and political spin. The number that matters is not total GDP. It is GDP per person, real income per person and how much your paycheque actually buys. Between 2015 and the end of 2025, real disposable income per person grew by less than 4 per cent in total. That is a lost decade. Productivity is the bigger disaster. Trevor Tombe estimates that if Canada had simply kept pace with the United States over the past ten years, our economy would now be roughly $600 billion larger every year. That missing wealth shows up everywhere: Lower wages. Weaker investment. Higher taxes. Larger deficits. Fewer businesses. Less purchasing power. Canada did this to itself. We blocked pipelines, slowed mines, delayed infrastructure, raised taxes, buried projects in regulation and relied on mass immigration to make total GDP look better than the lived reality. I also believe Canada entered a technical recession. Real GDP contracted in the fourth quarter of 2025 and again in the first quarter of 2026 on an annualized basis. Economists can debate definitions. Canadians are living the result. Unemployment has risen. Purchasing power has weakened. Housing is unaffordable. Business investment is poor. GDP per person has fallen. Millions of Canadians feel poorer because they are poorer. Canada now produces only about 70 per cent as much per person as the United States. Even with strong reforms, it could take decades to recover the ground lost since 2014. At the same time, we must pay for an aging population, rising healthcare costs and much higher defence spending. That means hard choices. We need lower taxes on investment, faster project approvals, more resource development, serious spending restraint, healthcare reform and a realistic trade strategy centred on the United States. We also need an honest debate about benefits paid to wealthy seniors while younger Canadians face impossible housing costs, higher taxes and mounting public debt. I say that as a senior. Canada’s problem is not a lack of resources, talent or opportunity. It is bad policy. That should make us angry, but it should also give us hope. What politicians broke through bad decisions can be repaired through better ones. The first step is to stop pretending aggregate GDP growth means Canadians are getting ahead. They are not.

51st state was Trudeaus idea? 💡

KPMG's report on 🇨🇦 companies moving to the 🇺🇸 to avoid tariffs is worse than the headlines. 1⃣ 42% have already moved or are planning to. 2⃣ 57% have paused or cancelled investment in their business. 3⃣ 61% can't survive without 🇺🇸 access. 4⃣ 11% of manufacturers already planning to move their HQ to the 🇺🇸. 🇲🇽 Mexico starts a third round of detailed USMCA negotiations next week. 🇨🇦 has announced none. 📉 A massive Carney failure that gets worse with each passing week. We are being slowly crushed.

NEW STUDY: Top 20% of Canadians NOW pay 65% of all Personal Income Taxes and the bottom 20% pay just 0.7% of taxes!! Together, the top 40% of income earners pay 85% of ALL income taxes......insane levels of wealth redistribution!

Nearly half of Canadian businesses -- and 60% of manufacturers -- are planning to move to the US 🤯 Elbows up, pants down.

@linadreaamy 98

bunu çözersen, IQ seviyen ortalamanın üstündedir. Peki sen zekana güveniyor musun? çözebilir misin?

Norway is a great case study for immigration because they track everything on race, background etc. Using 2024 data; Norway has a foreign population of 1,152,000~ people or (20.8% of their population). The majority of these people are from Europe, but around 400,000~ are from the Middle East and Africa. Social welfare: 72% of all state social welfare/assistance goes towards immigrants, 86% of which was paid to immigrants from Asia (Middle East, pakistan, india) and Africa, 6% to european immigrants. Health: Immigrants represented 90% of the annual cases of tuberculosis, 60% of the annual HIV cases and 96% of the annual Hepatitis B cases. Crime Immigrants make up 30% of all annual imprisonments. Immigrants make up 47% of all cases of perpetrators have murdered their partner. Immigrants made up 47% of cases involving domestic violence to children. Fiscal effects The cost of each immigrant to the Norwegian economy by what they take vs what they contribute; Somalian: $-927,351 USD each (43,200 Somalis in Norway) Indian: $-164,862 USD each (19,200 indians in Norway) Pakistani: $-525,555 USD each (38,600 pakistanis in Norway) Im really not seeing the strength here, maybe it really is all just about the food? #auspol

Canadian politicians, businesses and citizens should give a listen to this interview very carefully x.com/mdisruptors/st…

We’re launching a campus organization, inspired by Charlie Kirk! A few months before Charlie Kirk was shot dead on a university campus, I had a long conversation with him — almost an hour. He was worried about Canadian universities. The cancel culture. The silencing of conservative students. The indoctrination factories he had spent his entire career fighting south of the border. He had seen it up close, and he asked me: were we going to fight back? I told him yes. Then, on September 10, 2025, a politically motivated sniper climbed onto a rooftop at Utah Valley University and put a bullet in Charlie Kirk’s neck while he was doing exactly what he always did — standing up for free speech on a university campus. I’ve thought about that conversation a lot since then. Because Charlie understood something that too many people on our side still refuse to face: the university campus isn’t just where young people go to get degrees. It’s where the woke mob is manufactured. It’s where the cancel culture foot soldiers are recruited, trained, and radicalised — before being sent out into the world to tear down everything we hold dear. We’ve made real gains. Independent media is getting stronger. We win (sometimes) in the courts. And the battle for free speech has new allies, like Elon Musk and his social media platform, X. But the woke machine at our universities is still running at full capacity. You know the stories: Lindsay Shepherd was a 22-year-old teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University. She showed a short video clip of Jordan Peterson in class — as part of a lecture on a controversial topic. Her professors hauled her into an interrogation and compared her to a Nazi showing propaganda films. This past January, Conservative MP Garnett Genuis was refused permission to hold an event at York University. A sitting Member of Parliament — barred from speaking to students. Those are just the stories that got coverage. Every day, thousands of our students sit down, stay quiet, and self-censor — terrified of being destroyed by the mob before their careers have even started. And nobody is fighting for them. If we don’t fight at the source — inside the lecture halls and student unions where the actual indoctrination happens — we’re only ever chopping heads off a hydra. It will keep growing new ones. And right now, on Canadian campuses, our side has nobody. The Conservative Party’s campus clubs are too nervous to stick their necks out for anyone — they don’t want to risk their political careers. No think tank is focused on campuses. The faith communities, the advocacy organizations — all doing important work, but few of them are walking through the doors of our universities. That is why The Democracy Fund (@TDF_Can) is launching Canadian Students for Free Speech — a TDF-led national network that will establish student-led, officially recognized free speech clubs on every post-secondary campus in Canada. If you care about free speech, if you want to support conservative and freedom-oriented students on Canada’s university campuses, learn more about Canadian Students for Free Speech and donate to help build it. Here is the plan. The Democracy Fund is recruiting students with backbone, and we will train them in campus organising and free speech philosophy. We will coach them step by step through the process of getting their clubs officially recognised by their universities — and trust me, that battle alone will be worth documenting and publishing. We will equip them with professionally printed posters, pamphlets, and proven messaging to promote free speech. Canadian Students for Free Speech will bring speakers directly to those campuses: Tamara Lich, and other freedom fighters who’ve been through the fire. Debates, town halls, and meet-and-greets that give conservative and freedom-loving students a reason to come together and realise they are not alone. Canadian Students for Free Speech will train every club member to document every act of censorship — and we will publish every story. And when the administration comes after them — and they will come after them — Canadian Students for Free Speech will show up with cameras, journalists, and The Democracy Fund’s lawyers. Our students will not face the mob alone. To do this properly, The Democracy Fund is hiring a full-time National Campus Coordinator. This is a real, demanding job. This person will travel coast to coast — from UBC to Dalhousie — recruiting student leaders, running training weekends, coordinating speaker tours, managing club applications, and fielding that call at midnight when a dean suddenly decides to cancel a student event. They will be the spine of the entire operation. Beyond the salary, there are real costs to account for: printed materials for clubs at dozens of campuses, travel expenses for our speakers, legal fees when universities try to block or deregister our clubs, and the infrastructure to run a national student network. This is not a small project. But then again, losing an entire generation to indoctrination is no small matter. REPORT by @EzraLevant: