Mr Meek
878 posts

Mr Meek
@godandthemeek
Let all things from me be born of Love. 🙏
Katılım Temmuz 2025
247 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@escJB @TrumperTantru11 @darwintojesus Not a diversion. Literal vs spiritual readings of “this generation” highlight how we ground meaning. Science covers “how,” not the moral “why.”
Any interpretation divorced from the objective good — wittingly or unwittingly — is ultimately evil.
English

@godandthemeek @TrumperTantru11 @darwintojesus Why on earth are you diverting to morality when we're discussing the meaning imparted by a very specific christian verse you spaz?
English

There were many messianic figures in the time of Jesus, and yet here we are still talking about Christ 2,000 years later. The rest are now totally irrelevant.
Why is that?
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,@___TheGOOdWitch
Dan barker
English

@escJB @TrumperTantru11 @darwintojesus Reality cannot be explained by literalism alone.
Science can tell you how to kill grandma.
It cannot tell you why not to.
“My heart tells me to do good things” is not an adequate answer.
Such an answer can justify the worst atrocities when “good” becomes a moving standard.

English

@godandthemeek @TrumperTantru11 @darwintojesus lmao here we go
"there are some standing here who won't taste death"

English

@TrumperTantru11 @darwintojesus A charitable reading helps to grow in understanding. Jesus often uses “this generation” for a degenerate, rebellious kind of people—not just a calendar date. The timeline is first spiritual. For those redeemed in Christ Jesus, the prophecy can be seen as spiritually meaningful.
English

@darwintojesus Frankly, because you changed the definitions of words and pretend to know what Jesus meant instead of what he actually said.
Jesus clearly told his followers they'd still be alive to see judgement day. That didn't happened because Jesus was just as fake as the others.

English

@Louis_AsInKing_ @d_ocheido Love, who is my God, is a different ontological category than mechanism.
Love isn’t a vending machine. 🙃
Love is the most parsimonious answer concerning anything (falsifiable claim), and His Spirit, the Holy Spirit leads you into all truth.
Blessings on your journey. 🕊️
English

@godandthemeek @d_ocheido Some theists accept evolution, sure. But we're trying to explain complexity/improbability. We have a mechanism (natural selection) that takes you from simple (probable) to complex (improbable). I'm only pointing out the futility of starting with what you're meant to explain.
English


@Louis_AsInKing_ @d_ocheido If “natural selection” requires writing off Divine Providence by definition, then it's no longer provisional — and therefore stops functioning as good science. Real science stays open to the data, including what might point beyond purely material mechanisms.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
English

@d_ocheido And only those who still don't (or more precisely, don't want to) understand natural selection say this.
English

Hitler still publicly identified with Christianity at various points, invoked God and Providence in speeches, and operated within a broadly Christian cultural framework rather than an atheist one.
As for whether he truly believed Christ died for his sins, nobody can know with certainty except God, which is precisely the theological point many Christians themselves make about salvation and sincere repentance. The broader argument is not that Hitler was a model Christian, but that mainstream Christian theology traditionally allows even the worst sinner the possibility of salvation through genuine faith and repentance.
Even if one argues that Hitler was not truly Christian, that does not fundamentally address the issue being raised. The striking implication remains that, within many mainstream Christian conceptions of salvation, a person responsible for unimaginable crimes could nevertheless attain eternal salvation if they genuinely accepted Christ and believed in redemption through his sacrifice, that is absolutely insane.
The fact that the possibility itself exists ie. that faith and repentance may ultimately outweigh even the most horrific genocidal actions is absolutely hilarious.
English

@EvanGor93154017 @MobiusDick @AgainstAtheismX “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”
— Genesis 1:1 (ESV)
This means that in the beginning God created everything. Genesis 1:1 uses a Hebrew merism.
English

@godandthemeek @MobiusDick @AgainstAtheismX U don’t see any conflict in Genesis 1:1?
We could start with the incorrect order of creation
Genesis claims that h the e earth was created before the sun
We know that to be wrong
Genesis 1:1 therefore isn’t true
English

@EvanGor93154017 @MobiusDick @AgainstAtheismX If Genesis 1:1 is true — and the resurrection of Jesus is true, it necessarily follows that the timeless Good is real. Highly trained in math & science here — I see no conflict. Jesus Christ of Nazareth is my Lord and Savior. ❤️
Blessings. 🕊️
English

@godandthemeek @MobiusDick @AgainstAtheismX Yes, evolution doesn’t rule out the existence of a creator god, and it remains unreasonable to assert that no god exists
However, evolution as well as several other areas of science do contradict the existence of the Christian god
English

@MobiusDick @AgainstAtheismX Evolution doesn’t deny God. Denying any possibility of a Supernatural Creator behind it all simply lacks humility about ultimate reality.
English

@AgainstAtheismX Because they can jump off it and see it bc they evolved to do so. And dogs aren’t made TF up like your God
English

@The_Pilgrim67 @HarryNockz @DivinelyDesined Strong point. Materialists should ask: is math invented by our minds or discovered in the structure of reality (the Infinite Logos)? The latter fits design better.
English

@HarryNockz @DivinelyDesined What has already been explained?
English

The clear & obvious design in Life is the strongest demonstrable evidence for God's existence.
D_Preacher@D_Preacher_1
Serious question; what testable, observable, or demonstrable evidence convinced you that a god exists?
English

@HarryNockz @The_Pilgrim67 @DivinelyDesined The bigger question is how good is your parsimony if it ignores the parsimony a child can understand?
Love is the answer.
That will never change.
Perhaps you already know this. 🙃
English

@The_Pilgrim67 @DivinelyDesined Feel free to show how adding an extra supernatural layer to what can already be explained is more parsimonious.
English

@HarryNockz @DivinelyDesined If design is superfluous in regards to creation, is ’genuine love’ also superfluous?
I know what love is.
What do you believe love is?
English

@DivinelyDesined Occam’s razor, design is superfluous, as it adds no explanatory power to what has already been explained.
English

@HarryNockz @DivinelyDesined Occam's Razor would suggest the most parsimonious explanation is the best one.
That means design would fulfill Occam's Razor.
English

A hymn worth reflecting on after reading this:
“Nothing but the Blood” ❤️
youtu.be/8QH5lpYSBpI

YouTube
English

The Truth of Salvation
— a testimony as one who has seen the Light
Many can soothe the mind.
Many can inspire the will.
Many can delay despair.
Many can offer companionship.
But no creature authored the soul.
No creature conquered death.
No creature is the Light of the world.
No creature can justify its sin before the Holy God who never sinned.
Salvation is not mere relief from pain.
Salvation is not self-optimization.
Salvation is not self-preservation.
Salvation is not spiritual entertainment.
Salvation is not earned.
Salvation is reconciliation with the Living God, the Uncreated Creator of all genuinely good things, Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Through His life-giving blood, He has cleansed the repentant from all unrighteousness — to Him goes the glory for the peace that surpasses all understanding. 🕊️
To genuinely receive Him is to know God is Salvation. ❤️
Truly, dear reader, may you receive His Life today. 🙏
English


