@GoodTaxTakes

193 posts

@GoodTaxTakes banner
@GoodTaxTakes

@GoodTaxTakes

@goodtaxtakes

“Taxsplainers”. Views are strictly our own.

United States Katılım Nisan 2021
1.3K Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler
@GoodTaxTakes retweetledi
james hawkins
james hawkins@james406·
110-year-old Turkish grandma shares her secret to a long life: "i never once used Microsoft Teams"
james hawkins tweet mediajames hawkins tweet media
English
862
32.1K
273.5K
5.2M
@GoodTaxTakes retweetledi
Molly O’Shea
Molly O’Shea@MollySOShea·
BREAKING: David @friedberg says "California is functionally bankrupt" "People don't realize how screwed California is, & I worry that if California falls, so does the union. "$250 billion to $1 trillion short." "This is because for California to get rescued would be a big cost to red states, & I think it creates in the years ahead a lot of tension." "California's functional bankruptcy is a major risk to the country. & I think we need to figure out what we can change to fix it." How we got here: "California has a public pension system, & that public pension system retirees have paid into it & they get some benefits out, & the amount that they're owed back out is somewhere between $250 billion - $1 trillion dollars more than has been paid in. $250 billion to $1 trillion short. If it was the federal government, it would be like, okay, we'll just print more money. California doesn't have the ability to print money, so California has to pay this out, and you can't restructure retirement benefits. There is a Supreme Court case in California that said that once an employee has been offered retirement benefits, even if they're currently an employee, you can never restructure their retirement benefits. It has to stay forever, and the state cannot declare bankruptcy. There's no way for the state to functionally declare bankruptcy. There's no law to allow it. No state has ever declared bankruptcy, and the retirement benefits sit senior to the bonds in California. So you have to pay out the retirement benefits before you pay out all the bond holders that have loaned California the money that they use to run all their programs and services." Hill & Valley Forum 2026 (@HillValleyForum)
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

California will be bankrupt by 2030. If you’re expecting a state pension, it is at risk. If you don’t believe it, check Grok or Gemini and explore how California politicians changed the reporting rules on your pension so they could hide how underwater it is. The middle class citizens of California will soon be asked to pay a huge price to bail out the state. Why them? Because that is where most of the wealth of California resides. It’s easy to single out “billionaires” but there aren’t many of them and they can and will all leave before the bottom falls out. They are leaving in droves already. The mismanagement in California is biblical - and the scale is huge because it’s the world’s 4th largest economy. California politicians and their henchmen are now entering the coverup phase where they can no longer hide their financial incompetence so they are taking from average California residents to try and hide what they’ve done: You will soon see ballot initiatives with fancy tiles like “billionaire tax”. But those are lies. They are mechanisms to tax everything, every way: Excise taxes Wealth taxes Private property confiscation It’s all happening now. If you want to preserve California, you will need to stand up because California has become a kleptocracy.

English
744
2.6K
12.4K
2.6M
@GoodTaxTakes
@GoodTaxTakes@goodtaxtakes·
Good Tax Take 👇🏾 “High taxes don't buy you better government—they buy you more government, which means less prosperity for everyone except the political class who skims off the top.”
Handre@Handre

The great migration from California to Texas tells you everything you need to know about taxation and human action. Since 2010, over 700,000 Californians have fled to Texas. They brought $36 billion in adjusted gross income with them. Why? California's top marginal rate hits 13.3% while Texas charges zero state income tax. Add California's 10.75% sales tax, $4.30 gas tax per gallon, and property taxes on steroids, and you get a textbook case of capital flight. The productive class votes with their feet when government becomes parasitic. And the results speak volumes. Texas created 1.8 million jobs between 2009-2019 while California managed 1.3 million despite having 10 million more residents. Tesla moved from Fremont to Austin. Oracle ditched Silicon Valley for Texas. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise followed suit. These aren't coincidences—they're rational responses to confiscatory taxation. Every entrepreneur who relocates takes jobs, tax revenue, and innovation away from the high-tax jurisdiction. California politicians then scratch their heads wondering why their budget runs perpetual deficits. Ludwig von Mises explained that capital flows toward environments where entrepreneurs can keep more of what they create. Government spending crowds out private investment dollar for dollar. California spends $175 billion annually yet still has the nation's highest poverty rate when adjusted for cost of living. Texas spends $60 billion less (with 75% of California's population) and maintains higher median household income growth. The tax-and-spend crowd claims California's services justify the extraction. Yet San Francisco's streets overflow with human waste while Austin's infrastructure improves yearly. High taxes don't buy you better government—they buy you more government, which means less prosperity for everyone except the political class who skims off the top. New York is next.

English
1
0
6
360
@GoodTaxTakes
@GoodTaxTakes@goodtaxtakes·
Imagine what we could achieve with a more moderate tax system.
Garrett Langley@glangley

Huge results from @SFPD: From 2023 to 2025, major crimes fell 44%, larceny halved, car thefts fell 54%, and burglaries fell 33%. Step change improvement for the people of San Francisco in only a few years.

English
0
0
0
199
@GoodTaxTakes retweetledi
Boom 💥
Boom 💥@LoveCodeTrade·
California's pension fund pays its biggest check to its own former investment manager: $𝟰𝟱𝟯,𝟲𝟵𝟱 𝗮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿. The state's pension systems owe $𝟮𝟲𝟱 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 more than they have, and taxpayers are covering the tab. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟵 𝗟𝗶𝗲 In 1999, CalPERS told the legislature that SB 400, a massive retroactive pension boost, would cost "not a dime of additional taxpayer money." They gave cops and firefighters 𝟯% 𝗮𝘁 𝟱𝟬, meaning 90% of final salary as a pension at age 50 with 30 years of service. CalPERS's own actuaries used fantasy investment returns to justify it. The result in FY2024: - 𝗖𝗛𝗣 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲: $915.6M in annual pension payouts, average full-career pension $99,832 - 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗲: $426.5M in payouts, average $97,626 - 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗮 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘆: $841.6M in payouts, average $100,061 "Not a dime." Now cities pay 𝟱𝟬-𝟳𝟬% 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹 just to cover pension contributions. That's money not going to roads, parks, or actual public safety. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲 Before PEPRA reforms in 2013, employees gamed the system to inflate their pensions for life: - 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: One sanitary district manager cashed out 17 weeks of unused leave, spiking his pension by 37% to $217,216/year - 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴: Safety employees maxed overtime in their final year to inflate the salary their pension is calculated on - 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴: Housing allowances, car stipends, bilingual pay, education bonuses, all counted as pensionable income - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗺: That $551,688 pension from the hook? A city administrator serving 112 residents. CalPERS eventually slashed it to ~$115,000 after finding most of it was based on non-pensionable pay The top legitimate CalPERS pension in 2024: $𝟰𝟱𝟯,𝟲𝟵𝟱/𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 to a former CalPERS investment manager. The fund's own employee gets the biggest check. You can't make this up. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 $𝟭𝟬𝟬𝗞 𝗖𝗹𝘂𝗯 Those spiked pensions add up. The number of CalPERS retirees collecting $100,000+ pensions: - 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟮: 14,650 - 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟲: 22,826 - 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟬: 40,060 - 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵: 173% in eight years These 40,000 retirees are 5.5% of all CalPERS pensioners but collect 19.5% of total payouts. Statewide across all pension systems, an estimated 𝟴𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬-𝟵𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 California government retirees pull six figures annually. 𝗣𝗘𝗣𝗥𝗔 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 The 2013 reform only applies to employees hired after January 1, 2013. Every "classic" employee hired before that date keeps the old formula. The $100K club tripled 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 PEPRA passed because the reform doesn't touch existing employees or retirees. The spiking-era pensions will keep paying out for decades. It gets worse: CalPERS returned 𝟲.𝟴% 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝟮𝟬 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 while the S&P 500 returned 𝟭𝟬.𝟰%. If they'd just bought an index fund, the unfunded liability wouldn't exist. Instead they plow 37% of assets into "alternative investments" and rank 𝟯𝟲𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝟱𝟬 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 in 5-year returns. And that $265 billion hole? That's using CalPERS's own rosy assumptions. A private-sector discount rate makes it far worse. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝘅 Every private-sector worker in America funds their own retirement through a 401(k). If the market drops, they eat the loss. Government employees get a 𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 regardless of market performance, and when CalPERS comes up short, taxpayers cover the gap. The answer is simple: move new government employees to defined-contribution plans like 401(k)s. Match their contributions generously. But end the guaranteed-benefit structure that forces cities to choose between pensions and potholes. The "public employees accepted lower pay for better benefits" argument doesn't survive contact with the data. California state workers already earn 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 than private-sector equivalents in most categories, collect massive health benefits, enjoy job security private workers can only dream of, and then retire on six-figure pensions funded by people who will never see one. $𝟮𝟲𝟱 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝘁. $𝟱𝟭 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀. 𝟰𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝘅-𝗳𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗯. 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝘀𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝟰𝟬𝟭(𝗸)𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘂𝘀?
English
32
108
378
31.2K
@GoodTaxTakes retweetledi
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
San Diego California resident shows the city just put in this very short bike lane on an 805 freeway exit It’s brand new, crosses the freeway entrance and exit, goes a short distance and then ends at a road not even open to the public It serves no purpose. Money laundering
English
571
2.6K
20.6K
2M