Levi 🛸

2.3K posts

Levi 🛸 banner
Levi 🛸

Levi 🛸

@gravityfaults

experiencer, UFO opinion haver

the sun came out last night Katılım Haziran 2024
290 Takip Edilen130 Takipçiler
Levi 🛸 retweetledi
cosmicfauxpas
cosmicfauxpas@cosmicfauxpas·
the method.
cosmicfauxpas tweet media
English
3
2
31
1K
Jake Angeli-Chansley
Jake Angeli-Chansley@AmericaShaman·
@gravityfaults If there were another way to view reality would you wanna see it? If you discovered that the lens thru which you percieve the world was distorted & inaccurate, would you want your lens of perception corrected? The ways our lens has become distorted 👇🚨👇 x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
1
0
0
22
Levi 🛸
Levi 🛸@gravityfaults·
Hey @DailyMail 👋 When you're reporting on the subject, could you at least *pretend* to be a serious organization? The circled bit here is a part of the targeting software system. It is not a UFO. You missed the actual UFO (shown in photo #2, my screenshot).
Levi 🛸 tweet mediaLevi 🛸 tweet media
Daily Mail@DailyMail

White House UFO insider: I'm finally exposing the government's high-definition satellite footage of 'alien tech'... you are only getting a fraction of the story trib.al/C4CqDh2

English
1
0
2
228
Levi 🛸
Levi 🛸@gravityfaults·
@TheUfoJoe @DrPhil Dr. Phil pushing UFOs does not inspire confidence. I see the word "grifter" baselessly thrown around a lot in this community, but it absolutely applies to him based on his TV career.
English
0
0
3
75
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
I see some are annoyed @DrPhil is talking about UFOs. Why? He seems to know his stuff & he seems to be interested. Is he doing it for ratings? Don't know & don't care. Just be accurate and educate the masses that this is a real mystery. And talk crash retrievals & bodies next.
NewsNation@NewsNation

. @DrPhil says newly released Pentagon UFO files raise new questions about government transparency. After reviewing the documents early, he told @thehill they support claims of a longstanding cover-up involving possible nonhuman technology. @BlakeBurman MORE: tinyurl.com/3h97redh

English
58
34
340
12K
Airam on hiatus until God grants him inspiration
@gravityfaults @pukicho In the QRT you mentioned, OP is specifically referring to when the integrated AI alters reality not only by using perspective/lighting, but by altering EVERYTHING that's displayed, without any editing. A regular camera is NOT capable of doing that without editing by a person.
English
1
0
3
63
Airam on hiatus until God grants him inspiration
@gravityfaults @pukicho You're confusing things. For example, there's lens distortion, which obviously makes the photo look distorted. However, “on its own”, it will NEVER turn a plane into a bird, or a cat into a rabbit. It doesn't alter what already exists in reality, only how it is displayed.
English
1
0
1
24
Levi 🛸
Levi 🛸@gravityfaults·
@r_vonhagn @pukicho I think you want to have a different conversation than this one, and that's fine.
English
0
0
0
70
Rick von Hagn 🗽
Rick von Hagn 🗽@r_vonhagn·
@gravityfaults @pukicho Olay but what I’m describing is the difference between recording information and interpreting it, and I don’t think its accurate to equivocate between the two
English
1
0
7
82
Airam on hiatus until God grants him inspiration
@gravityfaults @pukicho It's not the camera itself that deceives you but the photographer's intentions/the editing. A camera that captures reality without filters is not the same as a phone with AI that changes everything by itself bc it thinks it's a pigeon instead of a plane. I'm a photographer btw.
English
1
0
2
605
Rick von Hagn 🗽
Rick von Hagn 🗽@r_vonhagn·
@gravityfaults @pukicho A camera records exactly what it sees. The exception here is cameras which use computational processing, which sometimes hallucinates textures that do not exist and produces a non-faithful reconstruction.
English
1
0
12
573
sebby
sebby@sebby_of_x·
@gravityfaults @pukicho There’s post processing and AI post processing and they’re not the same lol
English
2
0
734
13.2K
faircompass
faircompass@faircompass·
@gravityfaults @pukicho We all know what he means but you're spinning his words out to who knows where, makes you seem less bright rather
English
1
0
10
297
Levi 🛸
Levi 🛸@gravityfaults·
@pukicho (My argument isn't pro-AI camera to be clear lmao) That is all true. But data is only as meaningful as how it's interpreted, and you can't divorce any photo from the perspective of who took it. This is sort of separate from bird-plane though.
English
17
0
54
17.5K
Pukicho
Pukicho@pukicho·
@gravityfaults I mean, I think a camera that hallucinates feathers on plane counts as a lie, as that is not the common use-case for a camera. There’s an objective physics involved in taking a real picture, which is then defined and compiled into data readily available to you. It’s objective.
English
3
0
1.5K
18.4K
Levi 🛸
Levi 🛸@gravityfaults·
@pukicho Less about the function of a sensor (which we agree on) & more about your definition of lying imo
English
9
0
61
20K
Pukicho
Pukicho@pukicho·
@gravityfaults A camera shot in Raw don’t really do much lying! Just sensors sensing things.
English
6
1
4.8K
64.8K
Robert Skvarla
Robert Skvarla@RobertSkvarla·
In case you were worried people weren't taking the UFO Files seriously, they gave Dr. Phil early access to look through the new batch
Dr. Phil@DrPhil

You're hearing this from me first. I was granted early access to newly released UAP documents, and one pattern jumps off the page: these objects have been showing up over our nuclear facilities for 77 years. Here's the record: • 1949, Los Alamos: After multiple "green fireball" sightings near nuclear facilities, the military convened a scientific conference to determine if they were meteors. Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, the foremost expert, said no. They flew horizontally, silently, at constant velocity. The conference's greatest concern: they appeared most frequently over nuclear sites nationwide. • 2015, Amarillo, Texas: A UAP violated the sealed airspace over Pantex, the heavily guarded plant where America assembles and disassembles nuclear weapons. Seen by multiple personnel. The release also includes: • Project SIGN's 1948 progress report, the Air Force's first formal UFO investigation, launched after Kenneth Arnold's famous 1947 sighting and Roswell eleven days later. Hundreds of cases studied. Rapid climbs, hovering, abrupt reversals, saucer-shaped craft. • A 1948 Air Intelligence Study acknowledging at least 210 unexplainable reports. • Hours of Apollo 17 crew debriefs on firework-like particles observed during their mission. • FBI and CIA witness interview reports focused on national security concerns. This isn't speculation. It's the government's own documentation, and you're seeing it here first. The nuclear pattern continues around the world today.

English
24
219
2.5K
93.8K