Guix

L'Académie française ayant proposé de traduire "follower" par "acolyte des illustres", un ami a proposé de remplacer "troll" par "farfadet de la dialectique". Je propose un concours de pastiche, dans lequel chacun traduirait un mot du langage web/jeune de cette manière.

Anthropic accidentally leaked their entire source code yesterday. What happened next is one of the most insane stories in tech history. > Anthropic pushed a software update for Claude Code at 4AM. > A debugging file was accidentally bundled inside it. > That file contained 512,000 lines of their proprietary source code. > A researcher named Chaofan Shou spotted it within minutes and posted the download link on X. > 21 million people have seen the thread. > The entire codebase was downloaded, copied and mirrored across GitHub before Anthropic's team had even woken up. > Anthropic pulled the package and started firing DMCA takedowns at every repo hosting it. > That's when a Korean developer named Sigrid Jin woke up at 4AM to his phone blowing up. > He is the most active Claude Code user in the world with the Wall Street Journal reporting he personally used 25 billion tokens last year. > His girlfriend was worried he'd get sued just for having the code on his machine. > So he did what any engineer would do. > He rewrote the entire thing in Python from scratch before sunrise. > Called it claw-code and Pushed it to GitHub. > A Python rewrite is a new creative work. DMCA can't touch it. > The repo hit 30,000 stars faster than any repository in GitHub history. > He wasn't satisfied. He started rewriting it again in Rust. > It now has 49,000 stars and 56,000 forks. > Someone mirrored the original to a decentralised platform with one message, "will never be taken down." > The code is now permanent. Anthropic cannot get it back. Anthropic built a system called Undercover Mode specifically to stop Claude from leaking internal secrets. Then they leaked their own source code themselves. You cannot make this up.

Si tu en viens à boycotter une salle de sport car tu ne peux plus y voir de femmes, c’est que tu n’allais pas à la salle de sport pour les bonnes raisons François… Reste donc chez toi oui.

Headphones that are so much more than just headphones! The new AirPods Max 2 have even better audio, even better ANC, and even better features like Adaptive Audio and Live Translation.

Attendez qu’il découvre iJustine et ses « j’ai déballé les 4 couleurs des MacBook ». Les youtubeurs US mainstream, j’ai l’impression qu’ils ont arrêté de faire des efforts.

So many people defending MKBHD lol You people understand that he doesn't even know you guys exist? In all seriousness, 10min for a monitor review is nothing, but: This is not a monitor review. At all. He reads a spec sheet and that's literally it. Everything else is just an opinion of him about this monitor. The fact alone that he just claims that the Studio Display just uses an 11 year old panel says it all. No measurements about color accuracy, latency nothing. He just reads 27", 5K, 60Hz. And that means it's identical to the old iMac one. For an actual review of such a display it would be super important to see how Apples claims hold up, does it reach 2000 nits brightness, what is the sustained full screen brightness, contrast, how well calibrated is the panel and all of Apples reference modes. THOSE are important facts worth knowing if you're in the market for this display that you want to use for your work. Some dude talking about how nice 120Hz is, that the bezels are thicker or how generous Apple is for including the stand are hilariously irrelevant. At 1:45 he says "there is not much to say about the panel itself" which is nothing but is ridiculous. It is literally THE most important part of a monitor review. He LITERALLY just reads of a spec sheet. That is a hands-on at best. Not a review.