Peter Jones

52.5K posts

Peter Jones banner
Peter Jones

Peter Jones

@h2cm

Community MH Nurse Hodges Model h2cm Non-Mathematician seeking help. Researching 'Care Fusion'? HUM - SCI; NHS & Global Health He/him https://t.co/2vkXidfN7k

What category object- is this? Katılım Ağustos 2007
10.9K Takip Edilen10K Takipçiler
Peter Jones retweetledi
🌈 George Corney
🌈 George Corney@Haxiomic·
This one was fun – back in 2015 I used NOAA data to visualize Earth's wind flow – at the macroscale it looks almost like an ocean, you can see wind 'waves' crashing against continents This was for the website of Attenboroughs Reef which is still online 11 years later attenboroughsreef.com
English
6
14
103
6.8K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Polemic Paine
Polemic Paine@PolemicTMM·
Wish I knew who to credit. Sent via a friend. Thank you anon whoever you are. Nailed it.
Polemic Paine tweet media
English
43
1K
3K
93.7K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
Former President of Ireland Mary Robinson says we can't have "double standards" with the international rule of law. She compares the criticism of Putin invading Ukraine with the U.S. and Israel's strike on Iran, which she says very few countries have spoken explicitly about it.
English
400
2.6K
9K
394.6K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A student asked an MIT professor to explain Game Theory without jargon. He drew two stick figures on the board. That was the entire lecture. "These two people are you and everyone you've ever negotiated with," he said. "Every decision one makes changes the best decision for the other. That's the whole thing. That's all of Game Theory." The student laughed. The professor didn't. "You think I'm simplifying. I'm not. Every war in history. Every corporate merger. Every raise you didn't get. Every co-founder relationship that exploded. All of it traces back to two stick figures making decisions that affect each other." Then he said the thing nobody writes down. "The reason most people lose negotiations isn't that they're less intelligent. It's that they're optimizing for the wrong outcome. They want to win the moment. The other person is playing for something else entirely." He paused. "Figure out what they're actually optimizing for and you will never lose a negotiation again." I've used that single framework in every business conversation since. The textbook version of Game Theory takes a semester. That professor taught the only part that matters in 4 minutes. Some MIT lectures should cost $100,000. That one was free.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
21
169
811
106.7K
Peter Jones retweetledi
J.P. Cooney
J.P. Cooney@cooneycongress·
I prosecuted the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, and then Donald Trump himself. One week after he took office again, he fired me. Now I’m running for Congress to defend our democracy and restore the rule of law.
English
6.3K
8.8K
30.4K
811.6K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Stonehenge U.K
Stonehenge U.K@ST0NEHENGE·
Stonehenge Spring Equinox Celebrations 🙏
English
115
1.1K
4.5K
226.9K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Cliff Pickover
Cliff Pickover@pickover·
Math. This mystery space-filling curve is a variant of Hilbert's curve, built from epicycles. Watch it evolve as more harmonics are added. Source: I created this animation using Hopperpop's Epicycle Drawer, an interactive tool: hopperpop.github.io/EpicDrawer/
English
10
69
373
24.4K
John Crickett
John Crickett@johncrickett·
Large language models don't think. They don't reason. And they can't produce endless new information. This is clearly explained by George D. Montañez in a recent talk at Baylor University, and it's worth understanding why. Three key points stood out to me: LLMs don't ponder, they process. They're next-token predictors, sophisticated ones, but they have no understanding of what they're producing. They know two vectors are similar; they don't know what either vector means. LLMs don't reason, they rationalise. Studies show their outputs shift based on irrelevant prompt wording, embedded hints, and statistical shortcuts. The "chain of thought" they show you often has nothing to do with how they actually arrived at the answer. They don't create endless information. Training AI on AI output causes rapid degradation and model collapse. Information theory tells us you can't get more out than you put in, regardless of the architecture. None of this means these tools aren't useful. But it does mean we should stop anthropomorphising them and start being honest about what they actually are. The hype is real. So are the limits. You can watch the talk on YouTube here: youtube.com/watch?v=ShusuV…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
53
86
393
31.5K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Kegham Balian
Kegham Balian@kbalian90·
Lebanese cellist Mahdi Saheli playing Armenian composer Aram Khachaturian's Andantino in the ruins of southern Beirut.
English
225
6.8K
19.1K
527.2K
Peter Jones
Peter Jones@h2cm·
Margaret is a GP and academic who has campaigned to expose hidden influences in medicine. She goes back to the powerful 2005 Health Select Committee; a parliamentary investigation called The Influence of the Pharma. Industry, to discover what they found: bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
English
0
0
0
22
Peter Jones retweetledi
Financial Times
Financial Times@FT·
NHS official pushed to add patient data to Palantir platform while also advising company ft.trib.al/jnT6fxC
English
42
658
802
184.3K
Peter Jones retweetledi
Dr Jill Belch
Dr Jill Belch@JillBelch·
Leading human rights groups, health organisations & trade unions will publish a major new briefing examining the threat US spy-tech company Palantir poses to NHS & data privacy in UK. It will give the report's key findings explore the growing campaign to remove #Palantir from NHS
Dr Jill Belch tweet media
English
5
67
86
1.1K