Umer

@NTDEV_ Lol, thank you, by the way if you are using Windows 11 PE, it will get stuck in EBS, you have to use a Windows 10 PE for now (until we figure out what is going on)

@halal_beef_ I actually tried it on my S9+, but for some reason it got stuck on the Project Silicium screen. Maybe I'm doing something wrong though. Huge fan of the project by the way!!! I find it really cool that you guys are bringing UEFI onto so many devices😁

Still working on it btw😆

@Kiezensoftt @NTDEV_ (also worth noting, any exynos platform that doesn't use H-ARX will not need the bootrom exploit to boot, such as 9810 and Exynos7, as for 9820 I am not sure if H-ARX was introduced then)

@Kiezensoftt @NTDEV_ hypervisor setup and rely on the SMC handler set up by EL3 MON to handle PSCI, which is what seems to be the intended way for the cores to start on windows.

Oh no my PC/Device needs to be repaired😢

@NTDEV_ Anyways, if anyone is truly skeptical, here's a video of bootup, from bootrom -> bootrom exploitation -> uefi -> windows youtu.be/8tnFi1ARMd8

@NTDEV_ woa booted on the Galaxy S20, Exynos990 ;)

@elitey15 @NTDEV_ We have mainline Linux as well, though yeah there is less of a community surrounding it compared to Qualcomm

@halal_beef_ @NTDEV_ i have just traded my s20 on exynos to oneplus 10 pro, atleast i have arch linux

@eugeniyoz @r0rt1z2 @Cidwel @ahachete @Cloudflare @LaLiga I'll correct it even, to show my honest gratitude. WTF boyyy calm down 😂 🫃

@eugeniyoz @r0rt1z2 @Cidwel @ahachete @Cloudflare @LaLiga no lad I'm telling you to calm down, my bad that I misgendered you

This is Spain today: I cannot docker pull postgres:18 because there's football games happening. Yes, you read it well. This image is being served from @Cloudflare , which is apparently blocked massively during football games by mafia-managed @LaLiga Ofc, VPN -> pull completed

@eugeniyoz @r0rt1z2 @Cidwel @ahachete @Cloudflare @LaLiga WTF girlll calm down 😂 💅

@r0rt1z2 @Cidwel @ahachete @Cloudflare @LaLiga You and the person I answered to could vote with your wallet and change the provider. Instead, that person is calling Spain "a joke" and you can't hide your nationalism. Yeah, there is an issue with La Liga - and yes, you could make your move by changing provider, not by whining.

@lizar72718 @r0rt1z2 Account made in March 2026, only to follow graphene, an alt of a certain individual to save grace? :)

@r0rt1z2 Correcting misinformation is not being toxic, you are the one who is by posting this kind of comment.

I’m usually not someone who likes getting involved in this kind of drama, but reading this thread and the replies just reminds me how toxic the GrapheneOS community can be sometimes.

@LeddaZ_ @r0rt1z2 @GrapheneOS do better.

@LeddaZ_ @r0rt1z2 Same here kinda, except I called them out for publicly sharing other profiles of the OP, they replied to my call out, defending their actions, then blocked me after (so I can't reply to them) then not long after deleted the tweet posting their profiles, they knew i was right

@GrapheneOS @MainePla lmao, turns out the dude running the graphene account blocked me after his reply, almost like he knew he was in the wrong

@GrapheneOS @MainePla sending his profiles to the public cause you can't hold your own in an argument, how mature

It's kind of funny how @GrapheneOS wants to let everybody know about the "dangers" of "closed source operating systems" yet they themselves ship precompiled, presigned applications that are included in their OS and are NOT reproducible, the most you can do is compile them out of tree and include them manually. And even then, this is still a MAJOR security risk as their precompiled apps have permissions that you really don't want apps to be granted implicitly. I've attached a photo of all the permissions available to the Messaging app, which is included in GrapheneOS at build-time as a prebuilt application. I should mention this, the aforementioned Messaging application has no form of reproducible builds, meaning the only way to update these apps is for some developer to manually build this application on their build PC, sign it and then push it to a git repo. Imagine the security implications of that. (You can unzip the app yourself to check the manifest too.) github.com/GrapheneOS/pla… This is the module included into GrapheneOS. Meanwhile the actual messaging app is at github.com/GrapheneOS/Mes…. For reasons beyond me, GrapheneOS devs thought it fit to remove the Android blueprints from it, therefore making this app unbuildable inside the Android source itself. #L378" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/GrapheneOS/pla… The inclusion of said prebuilt Messaging app. It's not just this app either. The included App Store, the Camera app, hell, even the Auditor. All of these apps are presigned and precompiled, and granted implicit permissions to do whatever. Why not compile them in-tree? WHY go out of your way to make them unbuildable by removing the blueprints? It's not about adding one yourself and doing it yourself, that's completely besides the point. The point is, why is some OS claiming to be security focused, yet has the ability to infect devices with a theoretical malware spread with these prebuilt apps? Why are these apps not built in-tree in the first place!? There is literally no excuse, every other app is compiled in-tree except these GrapheneOS inclusions. How does it feel to trust a random person with an app that can theoretically upload all your data to a remote server without your knowledge? Further more, besides doing such things, GrapheneOS devs have the _nerve_ to go forth and cement their beliefs on others? When they themselves don't commit to their standards? If this isn't an absolute form of hypocrisy, I really don't know what is. Maybe this post will instill some form of awareness in die-hard GOS fans. Maybe I'll get to deal with insane backlash. Who knows. At least I'm putting it out there. Maybe one day we'll get to know that this entire project was a honeypot.

@TrueAmPatriot86 @raphielscape @GrapheneOS @TheVancedGamer Do you have any proof of working at Google or do we have to just take your word for it?

@raphielscape @GrapheneOS @TheVancedGamer CI.android.com builds internally on Google servers owned by Google. They do not build on any third party cloud. I worked for Google. I would know.