Dave Hamilton

🚨🇺🇸 Florida just passed a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote. DeSantis will sign it, obviously. The left will call this voter suppression. Normal people call it "making sure voters are actually citizens." Wild concept, apparently. Watch how fast this gets challenged in court. Because in 2026 America, verifying you're a citizen before voting in citizen elections is somehow controversial. Fox News

The only loser bigger than the Jihadist is the American protesting for him.

Trump: "Mike Johnson is a very religious person. He does not hide it. He'll say to me sometimes at lunch, 'Sir, may we pray.' I'll say, 'Excuse me? We're having lunch.'"

I was going to jokingly say that this guy was probably either a child molester or aware his room-mates were, but decided not to because that would be stupid and cruel. Unbelievably, exactly that TURNED OUT TO BE TRUE - per not ICE but all of DHS (below) and a records search. The eagerness of liberals and leftists to ride for the very worst people alive really does merit more study.

JD Vance: "Democrats have to stop rallying the mob against legitimate law enforcement operations. That means we are gonna get tougher."

There aren’t, in fact, two interpretations. There is what happened that day. Then there are lies.

What are the odds… Minnesota has been conquered

🚨🇺🇸 THE MOST UNCOMFORTABLE FACT IN CRIME DATA: VIOLENT CRIME IS NOT RANDOM Violent crime in U.S. cities is not evenly spread. Not culturally. Not geographically. Not mathematically. It’s concentrated - absurdly concentrated - in fractions of fractions of the population. This isn’t ideology. It’s decades of DOJ, PD, and academic data all pointing at the same tiny cluster: • ~0.5% of residents linked to 50–70% of shootings • Most homicide suspects have 8–12+ prior arrests • Victims usually know their attackers • Violence clusters block-to-block, not citywide It blows apart the comforting narrative that crime is this vague atmospheric force that “just happens.” It strips out the comforting “society failed them” story and forces a harsher question: If 1% is driving the carnage, why is the entire system designed around treating it like a 100% problem? Why? Because it’s easier to redesign a city than to confront the handful of people actually pulling triggers. It’s easier to blame “society” in general than acknowledge that a tiny network of repeat offenders is blowing holes in entire neighborhoods. Crime is driven by a hyper-small group of chronic, high-risk individuals interacting with each other in micro-geographies the rest of the city rarely sees. At some point, every major city will be forced to admit the truth: You don’t need to fix everyone. You need to fix (or isolate) the 1% doing the damage. Source: DOJ, NIJ, Harvard, UCSB, Rutgers Media: The New Yorker

One day before Charlie was shot and killed, he was featured in the SPLC's "Hatewatch" newsletter

Nancy Mace says she will start carrying a gun after Charlie Kirk’s assassination: “This is a terrifying time, and I’m not going to be terrorized. I will be locked and loaded with one in the chamber.”

Someone posted a mega-thread of Blizzard devs trashing Charlie Kirk... WoW...