hampelman.algo

⠙⠕ ⠝⠕⠞ ⠙⠊⠎⠞⠥⠗⠃ ⠓⠁⠍⠏⠑⠇⠍⠁⠝ ⠊⠎ ⠺⠕⠗⠅⠊⠝⠛

A big thanks to all the xGovs who supported the grant for Lute to become an open-source project! There is a link to the repo in the nav bar on lute.app We look forward to your suggestions and contributions!

@LuteWallet @AlgoFoundation @Algorand @algodevs congrats!!

I have an algorand

🧵 2/ The majority of blockchain naming systems gives you a name that only works inside their ecosystem. NFDs give you a name that works everywhere DNS works... which is everywhere. Resolves automatically to your profile, use simple HTTP redirects if you want, or add custom RRs. All exposed immediately.

Your blockchain name just became a real domain. V3+ NFDs now have native DNS. Your yourname.algo resolves as yourname.algo.xyz, from any browser, any email client, any DNS-aware app on the planet. No plugins. No gateways. Just DNS. 🧵👇

Almost 1 year ago from @prob_fishing

@vaxryy just make a claude archlua skill to ship with and all critics will silence

say less, claude implement pls

Did I get any wrong?

just want to point out that this happened in less than one galactic year our solar system is only 16 years old

vibes while claude is working

@vaxryy @_trapexit is the guy on the left you in 30 years visitning from the future?

@_trapexit dats me!! :D hope you liked it

And now @vaxryy

working on a taxonomy for the game assets. instead of a tree, it will utilize tags, so assets can share properties across db tables. each tag will have a weigth, manually curated or rarity based or a combination. big implications, since here, one can abandon moral intuitions civalgo 💀 30K assets and climbing

@AlgoFamily I wonder how art history books would look if impressionism originated in west Texas instead of Paris, France

Share something you saw that was beautiful today.

why do they always put Radiohead as soundtrack to surveillance, whistleblowers and privacy videos?

no regrets are watching

What wallet… • will work if WalletConnect is down? • lets you connect to your own node in case public node services are not reachable? • uses on-chain storage (instead of a proprietary backend service) to facilitate multi-sig distribution? Lute. Please support Lute in xGov!

@usgraphics the map is not the territory

My contrarian view is that the symbolic version of a map is better than 3D version for navigation. Not everything needs to be a literal and accurate representation of the thing. At some point, the details become irrelevant for the task at hand (navigation). An arrow is IMO indisputably more effective that a literal 3D model of the car for fast cognition. For exploration of a city and looking at landmarks, may be cool to fly over a 3D map on your couch; but for navigational purposes (the usage as shown in the quoted tweet), so much of this is nuissance when you have a second to glance at the navigation screen. Literal representation is appealing on the first order. But if you think about what the vision system has to do to distill relevant information, it's a red herring. Even things like exits and ramps, we can symbolically show them and it'd be superior than having to cognate 3D renderings of it from a totally different perspective than what you're seeing out the window. I am not saying it is impossible, I am saying that it takes longer for the vision system to process. I also think 3D version and a symbolic UI are not different in degree, but in type. One cannot replace the other, at best they're useful for different goals. For 3D maps, navigation isn't one of them. Navigation is a task that demands high performance UI.

Mass surveillance and censorship are escalating in many countries right now. There is a global attack on secure encrypted communication. Often, authorities, politicians, and tech companies work together to push for new laws. One example: when Ashton Kutcher (yes, the actor), through his tech company Thorn, tried to introduce total surveillance of all EU citizens through undemocratic and corrupt methods. First, Ashton Kutcher convinced the EU Commission that they could scan everything on an EU citizen’s phone or computer (messages, photos, emails, phone calls, all of it) for child sexual abuse material without, at the same time, looking at the content of other types of communication. And then? And then EU Commissioner Ylva Johansson presented the legislative proposal called Chat Control, which aimed to scan everything on all EU citizens' phones and computers (including conversations in end-to-end-encrypted messaging services). The message from the Commission was: we will only search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM). And then? And then experts from all over the world explained to her that the kind of scanning she was talking about (as Ylva described it: a drug-sniffing dog that can detect illegal content in a message without reading the message) simply cannot be done safely, and that Chat Control would mean the end of privacy and pose a security threat to all Europeans. Ylva responded with: “what about the children?” And then? And then it was revealed that Thorn, the organization founded by Ashton Kutcher and which had been lobbying for Chat Control from the beginning, was selling the kind of scanning technology that could be used for Chat Control – despite being registered as a charity organization in the EU’s lobbying registry. And then? And then it was revealed that Thorn, together with the EU Commission, had also started and funded “children’s rights organizations” that had supported the proposal. What appeared publicly to be charitable organizations were in fact lobby groups. And then? And then it was revealed that Europol wanted unlimited access and wanted to use the scanning for more than just child abuse crimes, saying that all data – also unfiltered and innocent material – should be stored because it “could at some point be useful to law enforcement”. And then? And then it was revealed that employees at Europol had joined Thorn, to lobby their old colleagues. And then? And then politicians in Brussels wanted to exempt themselves from the scanning. And then? And then the European Parliament, in an almost historic consensus, voted against the proposal and called Chat Control nothing but mass surveillance. As one of the members of the parliament said: “The Commission wasn’t focusing on protecting children but wanted mass surveillance.” And then? And then The Council of the EU (law proposals must go through both the Parliament and the Council), after three years of negotiation, finally reached a common position on Chat Control. The requirement for mandatory scanning (including end-to-end encrypted messaging services) was removed, which is a major victory, but several problematic elements remain in the Council's position. For instance, the Council wants to demand ID Control to use messaging services (including end-to-end encrypted). And then? And then, in 2026 the final negotiations began, between the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU. At the same time, the European Commission is working on a Plan B, through the initiative Going Dark/ProtectEU, where they once again try to force total surveillance (this time organized crime is the excuse) on the citizens of the EU. And then? youtube.com/watch?v=fPzvUW…

@FlintDibble you can't generalize to simply "AI", what model, what harness did you use? what are we comparing? otoh, there's few if any archaeology models on hugging face. it is a matter of training a model for archaeological needs, and only "you" can do it. you meaning archaeologists

But it's not true. In my field (archaeology), even with the latest models I see rampant hallucinations. AI gets the general picture decent, but when you ask it on specifics, it invents references, randomly combines unrelated details, and just plain gets stuff wrong 1/4

@trq212 ok, how about /ngl /iykyk /wtf /brb /ccp /otoh /ftw?

We just added /btw to Claude Code! Use it to have side chain conversations while Claude is working.