HazelnutXin | 榛心
736 posts


@mxryboo 没人愿意说实话吗…东亚人是普遍没有狐臭的基因,但这反而让整个中国没有很强的气味管理意识。夏天不天天洗澡北方人扎堆的地方尤其如此,上大学都有。不过基因来说白人黑人原始味道确实更逆天,闻一次断魂
中文
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

@iScienceLuvr Putting “Ph.D.” in your social media name is a sure sign of a pompous retard
English
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

美股的女股神 @seriouslyaped 今年五个月狂赚38倍 😱
最牛的是她的持仓股全部都盈利了, 最高111倍
她就是用AI去选产业链, 然后去找这产业链上最卡脖子的地方,再出了20多只股票. 基本都是翻几十倍的. 真的牛


中文
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

几个值得重点关注的“实质性垄断”标的:
- MSSCORP (6830):在检测和 CPO 良率把控上构筑了极深的专利护城河。
- $SOI:主导绝缘体上硅 (SOI) 衬底市场。
- NGK (5333):稳拿薄膜铌酸锂 (TFLN) 晶圆核心技术。
- $AXTI:把控磷化铟 (InP) 衬底等上游关键材料。
像讯芯 (Shunsin) 这类公司其实很难被轻易颠覆,毕竟背靠富士康,而富士康本身就深深扎根于众多核心供应链的腹地 🏭
$SIVE 的逻辑也极其相似。他们已经成功打入 (design in) 了众多顶尖 CPO 架构的设计体系,抱紧了 Ayar、Lightelligence (壁仞的供应商)、Lightmatter 以及 Celestial 等 众行业领军者的大腿
相比之下,个人认为 $HIMX (奇景光电) 或 Foci (上诠) 未来面临被踢出局 (design out) 的风险最大,很有可能会被台积电的光学部门采钰 (Visera 6789) 这类巨头直接垂直整合。不过话说回来,在未来两三年内,借助 CPO 相关的光纤阵列 (FAU) 和无源器件,他们眼前依然有 波巨大的赚钱机遇
泥伏雷闯关记@Nicole_yang88
博主看得很透,直接穿透到了物理AI的底层供应链。 不过想请教一下 @aleabitoreddit ,随着各大厂资本支出(CapEx)的狂飙,这几个起步较小的光子和材料公司,目前谁的产能弹性和技术壁垒最不容易被后发者颠覆?尤其是在西方供应链本土化这个点上,谁的确定性最高? PS:我也在学习美股🙃
中文
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

I don't post dollar amounts because they don't matter.
What matters is return %. Speaking of that...
YTD: 3840.39%.
I'm probably the only one in the world. Who called out multiple names that 10x'd in a short timeframe.
Do you remember these thesis anon?
1. $AXTI
2. $SIVE
3. $AAOI
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK
24. $NBIS
25. $MU
They're all up 100-1000%+, because...
1. I post a thesis.
2. People can see how the stock performs months later.
3. They turn out right (thesis validation) because they're up hundreds of percent + hold their returns.
I really dislike the traditional X influencer who shows large dollar amounts or fancy watches/cars/private jets.
Then use that to get more by selling expensive subscriptions rather than through market returns.
So trying to set a new trend off pure information discovery/synthesis from free thesis posts and the results that follow in terms of return percentages.
TLDR: Market returns in terms of percentages matter the most to validate a thesis.
Not the dollar amount made.

krasko@krasko1199362
@aleabitoreddit Notice there's no dollar amount attributed
English

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions.
Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place.
The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin.
Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not.
Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese)
On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days.
One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads.
I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard.
Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general.
When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it.
I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this.
I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity.
I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc.
But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.
English
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

很多这波被裁的 Meta 员工,纷纷现身说法,表示在大规模裁员前一天,他们突然收到在家办公的通知,声称出于人文关怀。
然后等大家搬离工位,居家办公后,第二天所有人在凌晨 4 点,收到了被裁邮件。
然后他们再想去公司,就刷不进门卡了。
而没被公司裁员的,电脑上则被安装了一个名叫 Model Capability Initiative 的监控软件。它会偷偷记录员工的鼠标移动、点击、键盘输入,甚至偶尔截屏。
这些数据被专门用于训练 AI 模型,让 AI 学会像员工一样操作电脑、用各种 App,最终来随时取代这些人。
与此同时,Meta 这家公司,正在创下创纪录的利润,这太赛博朋克了。

AB Kuai.Dong@_FORAB
太魔幻了。近期 Meta 创始人扎克伯格,在大规模裁员前夕,内部的公开谈话,被员工录了下来。 他透露所有员工的设备,其实被公司日常追踪,用于训练 AI 模型。而理由是想把大家的工作方法,变成训练数据,这样就不用再需要那么多人力了。 这太诡异了。
Meguro-ku, Tokyo 🇯🇵 中文
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi
HazelnutXin | 榛心 retweetledi

彭博爆料,被中国政府要求撤销 Meta 对 Manus 20 亿美金收购案的,相关 Manus 三位创始人,计划新融资约 10 亿美元,以应对此前政府要求撤销 Meta 收购案的决定。
由于外部融资为 10 亿,还差 10 亿美金还 Meta 钱,所以除计划引入 10 亿外部融资外,创始人还可能自掏腰包补齐余款。
而这笔新融资代价是,Manus 将与这些投资方,在中国设立合资企业,并谋求在香港未来上市。
此前,政府向当事方发出通知,要求取消这笔 Meta 对 Manus 的 20 亿美金收购案,随后 Meta 火速响应中国政府号召,寻求让 Manus 原班团队还这 20 亿美金。


AB Kuai.Dong@_FORAB
果然,Meta 火速答应了撤销收购。 WSJ 援引消息人士,在昨天中国发改委,要求 Meta 公司撤销 20 亿美金收购 Manus 交易案后,Meta 公司正积极响应号召,取消对中国人工智能初创公司 Manus 的收购。 但棘手的点在于,包括 Benchmark 在内的 Manus 资方,已完成了退出回报。 扎克伯格,估计开心坏了。
Meguro-ku, Tokyo 🇯🇵 中文












