Dizz
6.3K posts
Dizz
@hellomofo123
Post some bets and talk a lot about sports
Katılım Eylül 2022
119 Takip Edilen77 Takipçiler
A new way to eat sandwiches: Easy viral sandwich recipe everyone wants
English
@jrwrites_ @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Also, you’ve just made 2 conflicting statements. Said it didn’t fall at free fall and then said it did for the same reason.
English
@hellomofo123 @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Yes a hollowed out shell that has had its internal structure already partially collapse will tend to do that. As the NIST report explained in great detail.
English
So you mean to tell me, an airplane can go right through the World Trade Center that had steel structure beams of 4 inch plate every 40” using 12 different grades of steel with a yield strength of 100,000 psi but if the same plane were to run into a firetruck on a runway the plane is completely destroyed.
Got it!
English
@jrwrites_ @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Yeah like I said before there’s other study’s that disprove what that report said. Why do you wholeheartedly trust the people who have lied to the public before?
English
@jrwrites_ @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Except it did for 2.25 seconds or 8 stories. They literally admitted that.
English
@hellomofo123 @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Except it didn't collapse at free fall. The interior structure and core collapsed first (which most of the footage conveniently clips) and some seconds later the external structure, now just a shell, collapses at near fall, because it has almost nothing holding it up.
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 The fact that it’s a YouTube video. Cmon man. Give me a credible study or something.
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Respond with what you disagree with.
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 A YouTube video! What a great credible form of evidence 😂
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Sure bro link me that study.
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 WTC actually had a really weak design compared to other buildings with a steel parameter design. It's what allowed the trusses to fail and the floors to cave in. This is all like kinda basic info.
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 That building does not have the same structural integrity as the world trade centres did 😂 actually search what happened to that building before just posting the first thing you found.
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 sure here:
youtube.com/watch?v=-f5Fmm…
YouTube
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Ok, link me where a steel sky scraper of the same structural integrity of the world trade centres has totally collapsed from fire in on itself?
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 There's been steel building collapse purely from fire since that study so the whole premise is kinda debunked. It is rare because we typically do not allow buildings to burn uncontrolled.
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Multiple parts. Search up the University of Alaska Firebanks study. Other things are not accounted for like free fall acceleration (that doesn’t make sense if it was a slow fire induced buckling) for example
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 What part doesn't make sense?
English
@jrwrites_ @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 Yeah and parts of that do not make sense. Other experts have proven certain claims are just false, such as weakening columns for example. I really don’t understand how people just take their word for it when the government hires the people to do these ‘investigations.’
English
@hellomofo123 @jee_vacation @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 The collapse of WTC7 was covered in detail by NIST.
Happy reading.
nist.gov/publications/f…
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 I don’t know why? The facts don’t add up. The building wasn’t hit apart from debris and it shouldn’t have fallen. How about the pentagon? Coincidentally hits the financial section of the pentagon after the government said they had no idea were 2 trillion dollars has gone?
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 WTC7 burned for like 7 hours uncontrolled on multiple floors, weakened a key column. It's not insane. Why would the gov fly two jets into the buildings to blow them up with explosives, then just blow up a third building lmao.
To give you the clues?
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 So the engineers who say that’s impossible to bring a building down are lying? Being hit with debris and being on fire (with temps not high enough to melt the beams) is enough to bring a building down that coincidentally held millions of insider trading files and secret info?
English
@AlperLdeBroglie @RealAssPig @jrwrites_ It’s just really convenient that the only passports found were of the hijackers. Lots of other stuff like credit cards, papers etc no other passports.
English
@RealAssPig @hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ Simply because there was not enough fire to destroy all these.
There is not enough fuel/oxygen mix to burn everything down (I don’t mean only jet fuel but everything that can catch on fire).
People treat WTC as if it is a wooden building.
English
@jee_vacation @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 I’m not saying planes didn’t hit the world trade centres I’m saying they’re not telling the truth. How do you explain WT7 or the pentagon? Cameras everywhere at the pentagon and they confiscated all video and released some frame skippy video.
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @buperac @JonnyRG1 The government planting things to seal the deal does not mean physics are not real.
The WTC had a specifically weak design and it’s not a case replicated very much. A few steel buildings have collapsed from fires.
English
@RealAssPig @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie Yeah I know but no other passports with (coincidentally) the face and name the bit of the passport not burnt? No other passports in all the other photo collections? A few credit cards but no passports out of all the people it’s the hijackers?
English
@hellomofo123 @jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie There were more than the hijackers. There is a photo collection of what was found. It includes so many luggage bags, hands, feet, and papers.
English
@jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie Why did a hijacker’s passport survive all that energy and obliteration, fall down to street level to be conveniently picked up and be reported? No other reports of other passports or bits of luggage etc. Just be conveniently the hijacker’s.
English
@AlperLdeBroglie Indeed. And on 9/11 a Boeing 767 was travelling fast enough to pierce the WTC exterior, as well as obliterating the internal core fireproofing which doomed the structure.
As the energy calculations already shown to you have demonstrated.
English
@jrwrites_ @AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @jee_vacation @buperac @JonnyRG1 It’s strange that one of the hijacker’s passports survived the impact intact and fell down to the street for someone to pick up and report….isn’t it.
English
@AlperLdeBroglie @DaRamblingMan @grok @jee_vacation @buperac @JonnyRG1 On the contrary, energy is everything. Even a fleck of paint can break a space shuttle window if the velocities are high enough.
asisonline.org/security-manag…
English
@hellomofo123 @EBL2017 Wouldn't change anything. The Point wasn't to press the CBs. it was to let the have the ball and block passes into midfield. Dropping a fb makes it easier to press them if they wanted to (They didn't), precisely why arsenal prefers the FBs high in build up.
English
Lijnders flipped the script.
EBL@EBL2017
Pep threw a spanner into the works. He changed tactics both in AND out of possession. No doubt Lijnders had a big say in the defensive approach which stifled Arsenal's build-up. Arsenal failed to adapt in both moments. It's a masterclass from Guardiola and his staff. No doubt.
English
@CalArsenal I don’t think all this was kepas fault but a little dunk over Semenyos head to Hincapie here would open everything up have the midfielders running into open space etc. Honestly no idea what Arsenals thoughts were today 😂
English
Still can’t believe Arteta didn’t find an answer to this or at least attempt something. Drop Havertz onto Bernardo and dink it into midfield. It was smart but it shouldn’t have won them the game as easily as it did
Vince™@Blue_Footy
City are pressing Arsenal high with a four-man narrow line. That's very rare but it's working big time. Arsenal can't build, they are only going long.
English