Nicholas Higgs

@AlboMP How about calling out @AustralianLabor apparatchiks & stalwarts who repeat Soviet Zionology?

@Kon__K @PaulJKeating has form, his role in the 1990s scandal involving the Mufti of Australia, Sheik Hilaly, prevented his deportation & set the tone of tolerance of Islamic supremacism in Australia.

@Kon__K Ignore the UK, France, Belgium, Dearborn Michigan. Don’t believe your lying eyes, Paul knows electoral advantage when he sees it, Country be damned:

Paul Keating does not hold back in response to Angus Taylor new immigration policy and I’m so here for it. Reminds me of better times when we had PMs with the backbone to tell it like it is. Truly statesmen like & excellent & I encourage everyone to take a moment to read it 👇🏼

British MP Sarah Pochin has triggered massive outrage from the Muslim community after calling to shut down all Islamic Sharia courts in the UK. She stated clearly: “Sharia law has no place in Britain.” Do you agree with her? Yes or No?

I am posting from inside Iran, bypassing several layers of blockage to post this. The Iranian people want this regime gone and are willing to pay the price, because the price of the regime staying in power is higher. That is all. That's the tweet.

Muslims become more devout, more visibly Islamic, more committed to the cause, not in Mecca, but in Michigan, not in the Islamic countries, but in the West. Why? Because Islam in the Muslim world is a system of hollow rituals weighed down by guilt. You’re expected to follow endless rules, pray, fast, wash, repeat, and when you fail (and you will), Allah offers nothing but shame and punishment. No grace. No relationship. Just fear. Eventually, many Muslims give up. They go through the motions, because it’s all meaningless repetition in a society where everyone else is pretending too. But when a Muslim steps into the West, into enemy territory, everything changes. Now, the same rituals become weapons of loyalty. Now, obedience has strategic value. Now, every act of devotion is proof to Allah that you're on His side, surrounded by the infidels. Suddenly, praying in public is a badge. Wearing the hijab is a flag. Going to the mosque, spreading Islam, organizing protests, infiltrating institutions, all of it becomes a way to declare loyalty to Allah behind enemy lines. Because here, in the West, allah is not just demanding ritual, He’s demanding allegiance. And that allegiance feels powerful. Purposeful. Redemptive. It fills the void that guilt and hopelessness left behind in the Muslim world. Back home, they failed allah constantly and felt nothing but shame. But here, allah gives them a mission: Defend Me. Represent Me. Expand Me. And I will reward you. That’s why Muslims who were secular or indifferent in their own countries suddenly become zealous in the West. They start praying. They start veiling. They start preaching. They start targeting every non-Muslim for conversion. They organize. They march. They infiltrate. Because now, it all means something. They’re not lost in empty rituals anymore. They’re loyal soldiers in a foreign land. And every step they take toward Islam is, in their mind, a strike against the enemy and a point earned with allah. This is why Western freedom doesn’t soften Islam, it activates it. It gives Islamic obedience a battlefield. And loyalty, not guilt, becomes the engine.

The person who posted this claims to be an academic in favour of free speech. Oh, and a supporter of The Palestinian Cause™️, (the rump of Nazism), and Francesca Albanese. Enough said.

@Julie_Linsley @MiddleEastEye Why would you claim this? Everything I’ve stated is demonstrably the truth.

@HiggsDoig @MiddleEastEye I'm sorry you're insane. An awful time in the world.

"Like a river to the sea." A flash mob in Australia’s Brisbane city drew a large crowd as protesters gathered to oppose new Queensland laws restricting pro-Palestinian expression. Set to John Farnham’s 1988 hit “Two Strong Hearts”, the performance used the lyric “like a river to the sea” as a deliberate workaround to echo a now-banned phrase. The phrase "from the river to the sea" had been widely used by protesters over the past two years in demonstrations against Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It is now criminalised under Queensland state law, carrying potential prison penalties of up to two years, in what critics say is legislation brought under foreign influence via pro-Israeli lobby groups. The song choice turned a familiar Australian anthem into a pointed protest against political censorship. The demonstration came a day before police arrested around 20 people at a larger rally on 18 April, where protesters openly chanted and displayed phrases such as “from the river to the sea”. Those arrested were taking part in what was a peaceful protest, intentionally challenging the legislation. Australians argue the law is targeting pro-Palestinian voices and suppressing solidarity, and critics say the ban is part of an orchestrated campaign by foreign entities against the interests of Australians.

@Jukehorse50 Michael, you have been conned. There is no such thing as a genocide in Gaza.

I'm 76 years old and for most of my life I have been on the side of Israel because of Hitler and the Holocaust. I can't do it anymore. I can't tolerate genocide and crimes against humanity. Fuck Netanyahu.

Julie, there was no genocide in Gaza, you’ve been lied to by Hamas & now you are lying to yourself & us. Israel went so far out of its way to protect Palestinian lives that the civilian/militant fatality ratio was the lowest in urban combat history. I could cite another ten or twenty examples but that alone disproves your lie. Stop lying.

@HiggsDoig @MiddleEastEye If you can look at the genocide in Gaza by Israel and yet complain about opposition to such death and horror, as "the madness of crowds", you're cooked.

@LesserMegadeath @angel_nowar Lesser, the first comment corrects your lie. Why do you bother?

@HiggsDoig @angel_nowar so the israeli govt is lying when they brag about a holocaust?

"Ho ricevuto minacce di stupro contro mia figlia, hanno licenziato mio marito dal lavoro e confiscato il mio appartamento, perché ho detto che Israele sta commettendo un genocidio"

@McdowallRose @angel_nowar You are a fuckwit. Like her, totally at home in 1930s Germany.

@HiggsDoig @angel_nowar Oh contraire she tells the truth, this is why she is persecuted by those committing and supporting crimes against humanity. She will prevail

@FeserEdward @smod4real Stop gaslighting us.

Liberating the Iranian people has been among the constantly shifting rationalizations for the war, but they remain unliberated. Meanwhile, around 1700 Iranian civilians have so far been killed. For perspective, that’s a larger number than the 1200 killed by Hamas in its Oct 7 attack on Israel. Defenders of the war are rightly horrified by the second number, but they give the first number a shrug. Yet in both cases we’re talking about the deaths of innocent people. It is true that Hamas deliberately targeted their victims whereas the U.S. and Israel did not deliberately kill the 1700 Iranian civilians. It is true that that is a morally important difference. But defenders of the war pretend that that is the end of the story, and it is not. As just war doctrine teaches, a risk of bringing about unintended civilian casualties can in some cases be morally permissible, but not if the harm thereby inflicted is out of proportion to the good that the military action in question aims to achieve. Otherwise the risk to civilians is gravely immoral (just as reckless endangerment is gravely immoral and just as involuntary manslaughter is a serious crime). The U.S. and Israel have in past wars clearly violated this principle. For example, the Iraq war brought about 150,000-200,000 civilian casualties, and on some estimates as high as 600,000. By comparison, Saddam was responsible for the deaths of between 250,000 and 290,000 Iraqis. Israel’s war in Gaza brought about over 57,000 civilian deaths, including the deaths of over 21,000 children (in retaliation for Oct 7, on which, again, 1200 Israeli civilians were killed). The principle of double effect obviously cannot justify the civilian deaths in Iraq and Gaza, which are massively out of proportion to the good these military actions were claimed to bring about. Thankfully, the number of civilian deaths in Iran has so far been much smaller than these numbers (though it would climb rapidly if the president were to make good on his threat to destroy Iranian civilian infrastructure). But it is still significant. Defenders of the Iran war are rightly outraged at the crimes of the Iranian regime and routinely cite the numbers of civilians it has killed. But they are disturbingly unmoved by the Iranian civilian deaths the war has caused, just as they seem unmoved by civilian deaths in Iraq and Gaza (which critics of the Iran war have pointed to as concrete historical evidence of how reckless the U.S. and Israel can be with civilian lives). You can’t have it both ways. If you sincerely care about the innocent – as opposed to just using them as a political prop – then you cannot give their deaths a shrug when it is “our side” causing them.

@DrJillStein Jill supports Islamic conquest. Don’t be like Jill.

It's insane to obsess over nukes Iran *might* build in 15 years, instead of eliminating nukes Israel may well use next week.

@BladeoftheS The UN is unfit for purpose as it is consumed by Jew-hatred. When run by a literal Nazi it subsequently had to withdraw a similar judgment. Stop citing a discredited authority.

@BladeoftheS To wit:

South Africa was banned from the Olympics from 1964 to 1988 because it was an apartheid state. The ICJ declared Israel to be an apartheid state, so when does its ban start?

@HussainShafiei Bullshit. Hate speech like this, straight out of The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, is unwelcome in Australia.

Tell me Australia is not occupied by Jewish Supremacy and undue interference from Israel

@NickRiemer1 @Sydney_Uni Yeah, Wendy Bacon. That paragon of decency & understanding. The Islam/Left alliance is lunacy & Wendy has forgotten her roots in her insane Jew-hatred.

Sydney Uni's recently appointed antisemitism expert is funded by the pro-Israel lobby, a major sponsor of his academic department, Hebrew, Biblical & Jewish Studies. Important investigation by Wendy Bacon of dangerous conflicts of interest at @Sydney_Uni. michaelwest.com.au/antisemitism-o…

@RitaPanahi @MLoParis Stalinist vibe.

Nothing says inclusive and tolerant more than a desire to eliminate your political opponents.