Hugh Rabagliati

@edinhelp Thanks - I sent it via DM

@hugh_rab Hello, please can you confirm your full address and i will request this for you thanks, Sophie

Good Morning, Joanne here this morning to assist with enquiries. Have a good day 🙂 🙂

I don't use twitter these days but in case you do use twitter then we have a job at Edinburgh if you would like one here? elxw.fa.em3.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candidat… There's some areas we are particularly interested in, but also very open to apps from folks outside those areas. Bye!

So to sum up, CogSci reviewers are amazing. And the people submitting papers must be incredible too, because the programme looks fabulous. We - @AndyPerfors @drculbertson, Vero Ramenzoni and me - are so excited for Toronto this summer!

Maybe this is related to seniority? Either way, there's a good argument that reviewers should take stronger positions on the papers that they read, so that meta-reviewers spend less time reading the runes.

From the @cogsci_soc '22 committee, a HUGE thank you to our incredible reviewers this year! We had 762 paper submissions, assessed by 959 reviewers + 158 meta-reviewers, generating 3038 (!) reviews during February & March. That's amazing dedication from the field...

@glmurphy39 I thought you had retired?

I'm really excited that this paper is finally out (+ open access). This was the main project I worked on for three years as a postdoc: trying to figure out what concepts are and how polysemy works. Here's a thread 🧵... 1/20 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mi…

@glmurphy39 @barner_ucsd I think you were pretty clear about this even when I took your seminar back in 2005.

@barner_ucsd Do you think things were better in the 80s?

1/ Can toddlers monitor how they came to know a word? Short answer: yes! New paper accepted in Open Mind with Louise Goupil, @kennysmithed and @hugh_rab psyarxiv.com/ruwdk

And the original authors were Jennifer Crosby, Benoit Monin, & Dan Richardson. Here's their initial paper: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…

Running a large multi-site replication of an eye-tracking task was tough, but fortunately we had a crack team: @martincorley @ailsamillen @clevitan with great support from supremo @CharlieEbersole

Our ManyLabs 5 contribution is quite laden: A “non-significant” finding from the Reproducibility Project that we found to actually replicate (with a big n). My heart goes out to the original authors, for dealing with clouds over their work for 5 years journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…

@lkfazio Language switching in bilinguals might work. There's evidence that it is effortful in lab settings, but much easier in the wild sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

I'm looking for examples of psych research where effects are regularly found in tightly-controlled lab settings but disappear when the task is made more naturalistic - any good examples come to mind?