Jake

22.7K posts

Jake banner
Jake

Jake

@hulljacob

Future Retiree, Growth investor, Likes: Hockey, puppies, sweater weather, stocks. Dislikes: delayed trains, paper cuts, war.

Katılım Ağustos 2011
645 Takip Edilen441 Takipçiler
The Long Investor
The Long Investor@TheLongInvest·
So we are all agree It was a bad move for you to touch options and leverage
English
34
5
341
43.1K
Jake
Jake@hulljacob·
@derekquick1 It can go lower bear flag on the weekly, it is undervalued tho
English
0
0
0
211
Derek Quick
Derek Quick@derekquick1·
$UNH UnitedHealth Group is on sale. Added more options at last year’s lows. Multiple catalysts ahead,Massive MA % earnings upside, Higher 2027 % vote for MA with coding tailwinds,buybacks,fraud reduction,AI,easing MCR%,Buffett adding? Either way Free cash flow over everything.
English
10
1
85
9.4K
Jake
Jake@hulljacob·
@marketswithmay When I read that at first I almost spit out of my coffee I chuckled so hard
English
0
0
1
21
MarketswithMay
MarketswithMay@marketswithmay·
$FICO... listen, not for nothing, but the increase was $4.95 to $10 per $FNM $FRE loan. The article says "Straining home buyers." Am I the only one who thinks the $10 pass through charge on my FICO score is NOT the thing breaking the bank for homebuyers and making it difficult to buy a house?
Josh Hawley@HawleyMO

I’m launching an investigation into FICO The increasing cost of credit scores is straining homebuyers in an already unaffordable market I’ve also asked the FTC to investigate FICO’s anticompetitive practices politico.com/live-updates/2…

English
3
0
9
1.6K
Stock Market Nerd
Stock Market Nerd@StockMarketNerd·
OpenAI offering PE firms 17.5% (!) guaranteed returns while they remain a cash incinerator years away from making any money. Feels highly aggressive at the very least. Feels ponzi-esque & like an inevitable disaster at the very most. 🤷‍♂️
English
10
3
90
11.6K
Jake
Jake@hulljacob·
@derekquick1 Bear flag, but this price action is awful, long term it’s fine but can go lower imo
English
0
0
0
155
Derek Quick
Derek Quick@derekquick1·
$UNH I have been wanting the $260s potentially $250s again to load up a bunch of shares so blame me lol.
English
2
0
6
2.7K
Derek Quick
Derek Quick@derekquick1·
$UNH UnitedHealth Group is at 2020 prices management says buybacks are attractive $12B authorized = 5% of the company, currently 83% locked by institutions. If smart money buys more 90% of the 904M shares will be locked up, this is how float gets squeezed before a rerate.
Derek Quick tweet media
English
9
10
124
20.5K
Stock Market Nerd
Stock Market Nerd@StockMarketNerd·
Was going to stare at Sunday night futures but then remembered that doing pretty much anything else would be a better use of my time
English
15
3
152
14.4K
Jake
Jake@hulljacob·
@QualityInvest5 Now look at $JD and then look at their chart too
English
0
0
0
191
Aria Radnia 🇮🇷
Aria Radnia 🇮🇷@QualityInvest5·
$WIX market cap: $5B $WIX cash on hand: $1.2B $WIX free cash flow: $600M 1/3rd of the market cap is just cash + FCF Do what you want with that information...
Aria Radnia 🇮🇷 tweet media
English
15
1
56
9.2K
maha
maha@mahaaaay·
never flying @AmericanAir ever again what a fucking joke
English
6
1
81
8.3K
Siyu Li
Siyu Li@siyul·
Compared to a typical @muddywatersre short report, this $SoFi piece is relatively weak and insubstantial. (can elaborate more on this, but hold that thought) However, aside from chest-pumping BUY screenshots and belittling short-seller standard disclaimer (short covering), there is a lack of merit-based rebuttals on X or from SoFi. Why? (more interesting to me)
Siyu Li@siyul

MW on $SoFi, two controversial subjects (with my past spicy takes) in one event. 😂 Shall I give it a read and give my unbiased view (no position whatsoever), or shall I shut up?

English
5
1
11
6K
maha
maha@mahaaaay·
my hot take is i love the keg. affordable, consistent, great service. i love the keg
English
17
3
126
6.6K
Rose Celine Investments 🌹
Rose Celine Investments 🌹@realroseceline·
I read the Muddy Waters report on $SOFI, and the more I went through it, the less I cared about whether every single accusation is right or wrong. What stood out to me is something much simpler, and something I’ve have known and said all along. This business is difficult to understand. It’s not a normal company where you can follow a product or service and see cash come in. $SOFI is complex because it’s a balance sheet business. They make loans, sell some, keep some, and then use models to decide what everything is worth today. The profit is booked today,but the cash shows up later in the future, and that’s confusing. That’s really what the report is saying. When a business depends on assumptions like default rates, prepayments, and discount rates, small changes can move the numbers a lot in both directions. And you don’t really know if those assumptions were right until later. But usually by then it’s too late. I personally have a rule where I don’t invest in banks at all, no matter what. Which is funny because I once owned a very successful bank, $AX, and I still follow it. Maybe I’ll write about it one day because it’s actually a great story. At the end of the day, you don’t control your own costs in banking. The Federal Reserve does. Rates go up or down and your whole business changes overnight. It’s the same way oil controls energy companies. You can be doing everything right and still get hit. So when I look at $SOFI, I’m not trying to figure out if it’s fake. I’m asking a much simpler question. Do I actually understand this business? If the answer is not clearly yes, then it’s probably riskier than it looks. I don’t think $SOFI is fake. I just think it’s a lot harder to understand than people realize. 🌹
English
34
8
245
31.4K
Jake
Jake@hulljacob·
@WestMacro5 Lmao absolutely not, it’s total and complete fabricated garbage, do you think noto is stupid enough to have committed such simpleton fraud and while do so put a massive amount of his net worth at risk?
English
0
0
0
26
Timothy Sweeney
Timothy Sweeney@Tim_Sweeney_TAR·
$sofi New short report My initial reactions is this is another guy trying to support his short thesiswith what is at best disingenuous attempt again at fair value calculations and is a rehash of prior arguments. It's a similar argument to what if..... if they sell pre default loans they have to take those losses into extent in the year of the sale... to take those losses and then apply it across the board to all loans in a fair value calculation would be a miss matching of defaults. And not accurate The fair value calculations determine default rates on the loans left between a borrower and a seller for the entire term of the loans so saying that losses on the loans sold (which are effectively termed out at a sale) should directly effect the fair value calculation of the remaining loans is simply not accurateand isn't relevant. Remember sofi still estinated default rates over the term of the loans of about 7% as I recall. Your intent to sell loans before they default does not change the default percentages used in a fair value calculation. This is because fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific one. This report is simply disingenuous
English
18
30
257
25.2K
TJTheWheelDeal
TJTheWheelDeal@TJTheWheelDeal·
I'm seeing a lot of whiny ass $sofi investors on my timeline, but not a lot of folks actually scooping up shares or leaps. If your investment thesis is still in tact, why are you mad about the opportunity to load the boat? I will die on this hill. I don't understand why investors get mad about better prices!
English
49
4
167
14.6K