PLO

@tritonpoker they took your video down unfortunately

Stream link: youtube.com/watch?v=TwcyF9…

The titans are back. Event #8 – $125K NLH 7-Handed resumes with the biggest names still in the mix, with plenty left to play for. Streaming soon with @JupiterExchange.

I’m giving away an all-expenses-paid $30,000 @tritonpoker Super High Roller trip for Montenegro plus seats for all remaining stops this year through a giveaway on my YouTube channel. 🔱 All you need to do is play during the week on @CoinPoker_OFF and earn a qualifier ticket for Sunday. The next of 6 total qualifiers starts in 4 hours - if you wanna have a shot, I will link the promotion below. I´ll also raffle away 1.000$ in this X post: 1⃣Like (1pt) 2⃣Tag a friend/comment (2pts) 3⃣ Retweet (5pts)

@IgnitionCasino Your site is full of bots so its better to not play there to begin with.

Would you have continued with this hand pre-flop? #poker #money

@CoinPoker_OFF No, because there is a 3% fee which is insanely high.

Do you use EV Cashout to protect your mental game or do you let the cards fall as they may?

@CoinPoker_OFF Better captions would be: Top - Coin Poker announces a software upgrade with more games available. Bottom - Coin Poker announces new rake structures.

@cardplayerlife @IvanPotocki @PokerLifeMedia Vision is decent but PLO Mastermind has much better software for PLO. It's not really close. There is a long list of features that MM has that vision doesn't, but the reverse isn't true.

Poker solvers have become a critical part of studying the game, but with so many out there, which should you choose? Just published this excellent side-by-side comparison article by @IvanPotocki on @PokerLifeMedia that'll help you figure it all out. 😃 cardplayerlifestyle.com/poker-tips-str…

@CoinPoker_OFF @pokerorg Nobody is biased against you in the first place. You significantly increased the rake cap (doubled for some stakes) and now people are planning on moving to other sites after your March promo ends. It's not bias, it's a logical response to your greed.

Thanks to @pokerorg for the unbiased interview - our ambassador Mario Mosböck answers many questions players may have on rake and rewards, head on. "The goal is to build up enough liquidity to become the world’s biggest poker room".

CoinPoker has Leveled Up! Our upgraded software adds PLO6, AoF, a whole new UI/UX, Bomb Pots, PokerIntel, an iOS app and 100% rakeback! If you like the client, we're giving away 6 x $500 in this post: 1️⃣ Like (1 point) 2️⃣ Comment (2 pts) 3️⃣ Tag a friend (3 pts) 4️⃣ RT (4 pts)

@WPN_CEO no offense but it's honestly one of the only good things about ACR

Am I am moron for having a cap on rake at $3? I should reconsider my life choices.

@ClubWPTGold do you just have to be physically located in an allowed state in order to play or do you have to be a resident?

PLO

I just introduced the FAIR BET Act with @RepRoKhanna to rightfully restore the 100% tax deduction for gaming losses. I encourage other members to support this critical fix.

I agree with Derek that public housing projects shouldn’t cost $1.3 million per unit. I also agree that the government should be able to build public housing for the same (or, ideally, lower!) cost than private developers. Here’s the catch: The housing project Derek is talking about isn’t public, and the government didn’t build it. See, back in the 1990s, Wall Street acquired hundreds of billions of dollars worth of multifamily housing and commercial real estate for the first time, and they didn’t want the government building housing that competed against them for tenants and forced them to lower rents (which would—gasp—push down their asset values). So, Wall Street did what it does best: It got together with big builders to lobby Congress for a special favor — a law that banned the government from building or funding the development of ANY new public housing. And (surprise!) they got what they wanted: In 1998, Congress enacted the notorious “Faircloth Amendment.” Instead of letting government agencies simply build public housing like normal developers do, the Faircloth Amendment forced them to use a set of complex and inefficient financial tools—tax credits, loan guarantees, and tax-exempt bonds—to incentivize big banks and big corporations to give (free or nearly free) money to private nonprofits to pay a developer to (finally) build private “affordable housing” projects. Naturally, this convoluted system produces affordable housing at grossly inflated costs—because that’s what it was designed to do. It puts projects in the hands of inexperienced nonprofits who wouldn’t know how to control construction costs even if they tried. It routes funding to those nonprofits through layers of intermediaries—each of whom takes a cut. And, for a coup de grâce, it then drowns each of those intermediaries in paperwork, which they have to hire small armies of expensive lawyers and accountants to complete. All of this adds up to projects that drag out for years on end—racking up extra costs all along the way. The upshot: The most important thing we can do to make the government efficient at building public housing is to repeal the Faircloth Amendment — and let the government build public housing. Who do you think are the interests that would oppose that?

@changrd @OrleansPokerRo1 Ok, could you message me?

Winner @OrleansPokerRo1 TORSE!

“your 20s are for—“ enough my 20s are for rediscovering all of my interests from 6th grade and realizing that actually 12 year old me was kinda onto something