sentimentai

@esjesjesj Define racism

Right wing humor is like “racism! 🤣😂🤣😂 “

@BondJohnBond If you were better at English you wouldnt be in the position youre in right now

@realJaredGilman Why is he dead and not nick fuentes?

it sucks that apparently it’s still controversial to say that charlie kirk was a hateful person, cuz he so very obviously was. if u don’t think he was a hateful person, you probably are one too

@shruwdshru True a free world where people can do what they want and are rewarded forheir strengths does suit me, just like a world without arranged marriage suits hot people and not indians

Is this rage bait? Did he just say politics is unimportant in a dynamic? I’ll just attach this for u

@hecubian_devil In almost any case you can find i am in favor of putting the low impulse control repeat offender in jail

This is a million times more common than subway/bus murders, but because it was murder-by-car & the offender was white, there will be no Right-wing hysterics. No grandiose “look what you force me to do” threats and crocodile tears, no calls to abolish roads. They shrug

@nosoupforgeorge A president is real when hes cool because he goes to the barber. You should have the right to vote

He's so fucking cool. I miss having a real President.

@giawluna You understand that this statement implies other generations didnt bodyshame right

@suchnerve explain how this proves what you want it to

@whstancil Huh

yes let's compare the african foods available here in minnesota to the "traditional" european foods you absolute racist dolt

@caitiedelaney I dont think searching for music makes me human actaully i do more important things

we’re just gonna keep loading off the very things that make us human, those beautiful traditions we share with each other that give us joy and bond us together straight to the computer. Cool

@esjesjesj Yes we already knew that

@micah_erfan Thats literally what happened

this girl is 14 years old

@LTMF24 @hecubian_devil How did you determine that if the tests dont work?

@iSentimentaI @hecubian_devil Here, I’ll put it in terms you believe in: this conversation requires an IQ of 100 and you’re about 30 points short

“IQ is the most well-supported construct in psychology” is a nonsense phrase IQ is a measurement system. It’s like saying “Fahrenheit is well-supported.” Does he mean reliability? IQ is certainly reliable—the same person will get very similar scores across time & different tests. But that’s not a very flashy claim, so I assume he means something more substantial than that. Maybe Hunter means IQ tests have a high construct validity? But this is actually quite contested and always has been; IQ is very well-correlated with performance on other standardized tests (like the SAT or GRE), which makes sense because they’re…also time-pressured standardized tests. So, performance on IQ tests can predict performance on other, similar tests. That’s not nothing! But it’s not very grand, either. IQ is less well-correlated, but decently correlated, with educational achievement (grades, matriculation, etc). Also makes sense, because school is full of tests. Beyond that, IQ tends to correlate very weakly with other forms of achievement, like income. It also has very weak (negative) correlations to things like crime—so weak that they often can vanish entirely depending on which controlling variables are used. In other words, IQ tests tend to predict extremely well how you do on tests; it predicts reasonably well how you’ll do in school, which is a part of life that’s full of tests. And, beyond that, it doesn’t predict all that much. So, is that really a high-validity construct? If you purport to be measuring a general test-taking ability, then sure, IQ is highly valid. If you think IQ measures something called ‘intelligence’, which is an all-purpose trait that expresses raw human potential and is incredibly important in every area of endeavor, then, no, it doesn’t seem to be a very valid construct. Anyway, when people use imprecise, grandiose language like this about IQ, I get the unavoidable sense that this is a big performative display. You’re supposed to think they’re smart, because they’re defending Smartness, as a concept, with great vehemence. And they use this kind of allusive, vague, but strident rhetoric, suggesting a deep familiarity with numbers and scientific findings. Idk, it’s all very…grasping. Striver energy.

@olyonps @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji to provide a good answer they do!

@iSentimentaI @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji They don't need that information

It is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of your own private fortune

@BpdLion does the rihgt own ozempic now lmfao

I've lost 7kg recently through calorie control and exercise. Feels quite retro. If I was right wing, I would of spent thousands being juiced up on ozempic to look like a barely human skeleton. Being woke is healthy ☺️🥬

@lisamarieiswear @usermooseontwt i dont choose who is good at basketball!

So you watching the NBA for cute dudes?

@olyonps @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji so that the other person has the information to answer the question!

@iSentimentaI @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji Why does it matter if it's not possible

@HaunterPrigg @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji you are a retard who doenst think?

@iSentimentaI @opticnurv @KyleTrainEmoji because

@TerryWatkinsJr1 this isnt china buddy

Check his phone. Check his computer. Check his house. Check his credit card purchases. You might be saving a child.